Relationship between sustainable development indicators and SMEs’ development indicators: Evidence from the EU countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.07
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #2, pp. 71-92
- Cited by
- 364 Views
-
109 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to identify whether achieving sustainable development goals influences SMEs’ development and assess its degree. The dataset on SMEs’ development indicators and SDGs 2, 8, 9, 12, and 13 for the panel of EU-27 countries in 2011–2020 was collected using Eurostat and OECD datasets. Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for pooled OLS/panel data random effects and Hausman test for fixed/random effects were utilized. The results were in favor of random effect GLS regression for SDG2 models, SDG9 models, and SDG12-13 (Model 1) and fixed effect GLS regression for SDG8 models and SDG12-13 (Model 2), respectively. Based on bibliometric analyses using VOSViewer 14 and a comprehensive literature review, 19 independent variables have been selected from the “Sustainable development indicators” catalog covering five sustainable development goals; SMEs’ turnover and SMEs’ employees employed are used as the dependent variables to reflect SMEs’ development. The empirical evidence suggests a significant relationship between individual sustainable development and SMEs’ development indicators. It was found that all seven sustainable development indicators of SDG 2 (Zero hunger) and SDG 12 (Responsible consumption and production) have a significant relationship with the indicators of SMEs’ development. Instead, only a part (8 out of 13) of the sustainable development indicators of SDG 8 (Decent work and economic growth), SDG 9 (Industry, innovation and infrastructure), and SDG 13 (Climate action) have a significant relationship with two or one of the SMEs’ development indicators. Therefore, achieving sustainability goals stimulates the development of SMEs itself.
Acknowledgment
This study is supported by the British Academy’s Researchers at Risk Fellowships Program (Award Reference: RaR\100673).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L25, Q01
-
References46
-
Tables30
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. The “Sustainable development – SMEs’ development” network visualization
- Figure 2. The “Sustainable development goals” keywords network visualization
-
- Table 1. The estimated results of GLS FE and RE for the SDG 2, SDG 12-13 indicators, and the SMEs’ development
- Table 2. The estimated results of GLS FE and RE for the SDG 8, SDG 9 indicators, and the SMEs’ development indicators
- Table A1. Pearson correlation matrix for SDG2 and SMEs indicators
- Table A2. Pearson correlation matrix for SDG12-13 and SMEs indicators
- Table A3. Pearson correlation matrix for SDG8 and SMEs indicators
- Table A4. VIF values for SDG8 indicators and SMEs’ persons employed as the dependent variable (EmpltmntRt included)
- Table A5. VIF values for SDG8 indicators and SMEs’ persons employed as the dependent variable (EmpltmntRt excluded)
- Table A6. VIF values for SDG8 indicators and SMEs’ turnover as the dependent variable (EmpltmntRt included)
- Table A7. VIF values for SDG8 indicators and SMEs’ turnover as the dependent variable (EmpltmntRt excluded)
- Table A8. Pearson correlation matrix for SDG9 and SMEs indicators
- Table A9. VIF values for SDG9 indicators and SMEs’ persons employed as the dependent variable (Patent_Inn included)
- Table A10. VIF values for SDG9 indicators and SMEs’ persons employed as the dependent variable (Patent_Inn excluded)
- Table A11. VIF values for SDG9 indicators and SMEs’ turnover as the dependent variable (Patent_Inn included)
- Table A12. VIF values for SDG9 indicators and SMEs’ turnover as the dependent variable (Patent_Inn excluded)
- Table B1. Estimated results of Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects for SDG2 and SMEs’ employment
- Table B2. Estimated results of Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects for SDG2 and SMEs’ turnover
- Table B3. Estimated results of Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects for SDG12-13 and SMEs’ employment
- Table B4. Results of Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects for SDG12-13 and SMEs’ turnover
- Table B5. Results of Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects for SDG8 and SMEs’ employment
- Table B6. Results of Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects for SDG8 and SMEs’ turnover
- Table B7. Results of Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects for SDG9 and SMEs’ employment
- Table B8. Results of Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects for SDG9 and SMEs’ turnover
- Table C1. Hausman test for SDG2 and SMEs’ employment
- Table C2. Hausman test for SDG2 and SMEs’ turnover
- Table C3. Hausman test for SDG12-13 and SMEs’ employment
- Table C4. Hausman test for SDG12-13 and SMEs’ turnover
- Table C5. Hausman test for SDG8 and SMEs’ employment
- Table C6. Hausman test for SDG8 and SMEs’ turnover
- Table C7. Hausman test for SDG9 and SMEs’ employment
- Table C8. Hausman test for SDG9 and SMEs’ turnover
-
- Abisuga-Oyekunle, O. A., Patra, S. K., & Muchie, M. (2020). SMEs in sustainable development: Their role in poverty reduction and employment generation in sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(4), 405-419.
- Al-Mutawa, B., & Saeed Al Mubarak, M. M. (2024). Impact of cloud computing as a digital technology on SMEs sustainability. Competitiveness Review, 34(1), 72-91.
- Arion, F. H., Aleksanyan, V., Markosyan, D., & Arion, I. D. (2023). Circular pathways to sustainable development: Understanding the links between circular economy indicators, economic growth, social well-being, and environmental performance in EU-27. Sustainability, 15(24), Article 16883.
- Bal-Domańska, B. (2022). The impact of macroeconomic and structural factors on the unemployment of young women and men. Economic Change and Restructuring, 55(2), 1141-1172.
- Bilan, Y., Lyeonov, S., Vasylieva, T., & Samusevych, Y. (2018). Does tax competition for capital define entrepreneurship trends in Eastern Europe? Online Journal Modelling the New Europe, 27, 34-66.
- Bucci, G., Bentivoglio, D., & Finco, A. (2018). Precision agriculture as a driver for sustainable farming systems: State of art in literature and research. Quality – Access to Success, 19 (S1), 114-121.
- Buterin, V., Fajdetić, B., & Funarić, B. (2023). Understanding the macroeconomic effects of female participation in the labour market. Economies, 11(11), Article 280.
- da Silva, A.R., Cirani, C. B. S., Serra, F. A. R., Pigola, A., da Costa, P. R., Scafuto, I. C., Ruas, R. L., & Mazieri, M. R. (2023). Determining factors on green innovation adoption: An empirical study in Brazilian agribusiness firms. Sustainability, 15(7), Article 6266.
- Dechezleprêtre, A., Rivers, N., & Stadler, B. (2019). The economic cost of air pollution: Evidence from Europe (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1584). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Dėdelė, A., Miškinytė, A., Andrušaitytė, S., & Nemaniūtė-Gužienė, J. (2020). Dependence between travel distance, individual socioeconomic and health-related characteristics, and the choice of the travel mode: A cross-sectional study for Kaunas, Lithuania. Journal of Transport Geography, 86, Article 102762.
- Dey, P. K., Malesios, C., Chowdhury, S., Saha, K., Budhwar, P., & De, D. (2022). Adoption of circular economy practices in small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, Article 108496.
- Dobbs, L. (2005). Wedded to the car: Women, employment and the importance of private transport. Transport Policy, 12(3), 266-278.
- Dong, D., Xu, B., Shen, N., & He, Q. (2021). The adverse impact of air pollution on China’s economic growth. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 9056.
- European Commission. (2023a, June 27). Number of people employed by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the European Union from 2008 to 2023, by enterprise size [Graph]. Statista.
- European Commission. (2023b, June 27). Value added by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the European Union (EU27) from 2008 to 2023, by enterprise size (in million Euro) [Graph]. Statista.
- European Commission. (n.d.). EU Covenant of Mayors – Europe: Signatories.
- Eurostat. (n.d.a). Database.
- Eurostat. (n.d.b). Air emissions accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity.
- Farja, Y., Gimmon, E., & Greenberg, Z. (2017). The developing in the developed: Rural SME growth in Israel. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(1), 36-46.
- Gomes, S., & Pinho, M. (2023). Can we count on the commitment of European SMEs to achieve SGD12? An exploratory study of business sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425, Article 139016.
- Hao, Y., Peng, H., Temulun, T., Liu, L., Mao, J., Lu, Z., & Chen, H. (2018). How harmful is air pollution to economic development? New evidence from PM2.5 concentrations of Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 743-757.
- Horobchenko, D., & Voronenko, V. (2018). Approaches to the formation of a theoretical model for the analysis of environmental and economic development. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9(5), 1108-1119.
- Hrytsenko, P., Voronenko, V., Kovalenko, Y., Kurman, T., & Omelianenko, V. (2021). Assessment of the development of innovation activities in the regions: Case of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 77-88.
- Hutagaol, S. J. A., Erlina, & Tarmizi, H. B. (2020). The effect of youth’s role in improving micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Medan city. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(2), 332-343.
- Inegbedion, H. E., Thikan, P. R., David, J. O., Ajani, J. O., & Peter, F. O. (2024). Small and medium enterprise (SME) competitiveness and employment creation: The mediating role of SME growth. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 11.
- International Energy Agency. (2021). Ammonia Technology Roadmap.
- Jasińska-Biliczak, A. (2023). How to ensure the development of SMEs in post-pandemic economy? A start-ups case study. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 13(1), 201-225.
- Kafel, P., & Nowicki, P. (2023). Circular economy implementation based on ISO 14001 within SME organization: How to do it best? Sustainability, 15(1), Article 496.
- Koblianska, I., & Kalachevska, L. (2019). Problems of the institutional legal and organizational provision of systemic innovation policy: The case of Ukraine. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 22(1), 53-73.
- Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Ndubisi, N. O., & Roman Pais Seles, B. M. (2020). Sustainable development in Asian manufacturing SMEs: Progress and directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 225, Article 107567.
- Lunke, E. B. (2022). Modal accessibility disparities and transport poverty in the Oslo region. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 103, Article 103171.
- Melnyk, L., Matsenko, O., Kubatko, O., Korneyev, M., & Tulyakov, O. (2022). Additive economy and new horizons of innovative business development. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 175-185.
- Mishenin, E., Koblianska, I., & Mishenina, N. (2015). Strategy of implementation of ecologically-oriented logistical management of enterprise’s production system. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 64-67.
- Mota, J., Santos, J. N., & Alencar, R. (2023). Intertwining innovation and business networks for sustainable agricultural systems: A case study of carbon-neutral beef. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, Article 122429.
- OECD. (n.d.). SDBS Structural Business Statistics (ISIC Rev. 4): Number of SMEs and large firms.
- Pablo-Romero, M. d. P., Sánchez-Braza, A., & Manuel González-Limón, J. (2015). Covenant of mayors: Reasons for being an environmentally and energy friendly municipality. Review of Policy Research, 32(5), 576-599.
- Sabău-Popa, C. D., Bele, A. M., Dodescu, A. O., & Boloș, M. I. (2022). How does the circular economy applied in the European Union support sustainable economic development? Sustainability, 14(16), Article 9932.
- Sáez-Martínez, F. J., Díaz-García, C., & González-Moreno, Á. (2016). Factors promoting environmental responsibility in European SMEs: The effect on performance. Sustainability, 8(9), Article 898.
- Sau, P., Arru, B., Cisilino, F., Furesi, R., Pulina, P., & Madau, F. A. (2023). Economic and environmental sustainability trade-off analysis in sheep farming using the farm accountancy data network database. Sustainability, 15(24), Article 16621.
- Sidik, I. G. (2012). Conceptual framework of factors affecting SME development: Mediating factors on the relationship of entrepreneur traits and SME performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, 373-383.
- Song, M., & Ahn, Y. (2024). The determinants of SME success in the long run: An ecosystem perspective. Applied Economics.
- Sonntag, R., Lewis, G. J., & Raszkowski, A. (2022). The importance of implementing SDGs by small and medium size enterprises: Evidence from Germany and Poland. Sustainability, 14(24), Article 16950.
- Stoian, M., Ion, R. A., Turcea, V. C., Nica, I. C., & Zemeleaga, C. G. (2022). The influence of governmental agricultural R&D expenditure on farmers’ income – Disparities between EU Member States. Sustainability, 14(17), Article 10596.
- Tambunan, T. T. H. (2009). SME development pattern: A theoretical consideration. In SMEs in Asian Developing Countries (pp. 17-36). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Tsai, J.-F., Nguyen, P.-H., Lin, M.-H., Nguyen, D.-V., Lin, H.-H., & Ngo, A.-T. (2021). Impacts of environmental certificate and pollution abatement equipment on SMEs’ performance: An empirical case in Vietnam. Sustainability, 13(17), Article 9705.
- Wang, W., Melnyk, L., Kubatko, O., Kovalov, B., & Hens, L. (2023). Economic and technological efficiency of renewable energy technologies implementation. Sustainability, 15(11), Article 8802.