Governmental management of social housing as an element of state social policy: Bibliometric analysis

  • 184 Views
  • 39 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Social housing for socially vulnerable segments of the population is a significant component of governmental social policy, as it is directly linked to demographic and migration processes, socially vulnerable groups and people with special needs, poverty alleviation, social integration, and community development. The study conducts a bibliometric analysis (using VOSviewer tools) of the scientific literature on social housing policy and management. The study filtered more than 6,000 research papers indexed in the Scopus database from 1983 to 2024. The purpose was to structure the global scientific knowledge on governmental management of social housing as an element of the state’s social policy, focusing on the following directions. The first is the evolution of scientific thought. The analysis revealed a rapid growth in scientific interest starting from 1991; the earliest articles were published in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and the United States, while scholars from Spain, Mexico, and Italy joined after 2020. The second is the complexity or conversely – concentration of research networks. The top five countries by the number of works are the United Kingdom, Australia, the Netherlands, Italy, and the United States; the most powerful research schools are in the Netherlands, Australia, and the United Kingdom; the most extensive scientific connections are held by the Netherlands, the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, and France. The third is the content-thematic orientation of the research. The paper identified the predominance of works from social sciences; social housing issues are most frequently studied in connection with public health and inequality issues.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Changes in studying management of state policy in the field of social housing
    • Figure 2. Authors-leaders of research in the field of governmental management in the field of social housing
    • Figure 3. Branch affiliation of scientific works on policy in the field of social housing
    • Figure 4. Geographic affiliation of scientific works on policy management in the field of social housing
    • Figure 5. Institutional affiliation of scientific works on governmental management in the field of social housing
    • Figure 6. Bibliometric network of co-authorship of scientific works on the management of state policy in the field of social housing: Cross-section of countries
    • Figure 7. Bibliometric network of co-authorship of scientific works on the management of state policy in the field of social housing: Cross-section of countries in time section
    • Figure 8. Bibliometric network of clusters of scientific works on the management of state policy in the field of social housing: Formed by keywords
    • Figure 9. Bibliometric network of clusters of scientific works on the management of state policy in the field of social housing: Bibliographic coupling
    • Table 1. Quantitative bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on the main categories of social housing management
    • Table 2. Description of the clusters formed by the co-author countries
    • Table 3. Combinations of keywords in research clusters
    • Conceptualization
      Fidan Mammadova, Nargiz Fatahova
    • Formal Analysis
      Fidan Mammadova, Nargiz Fatahova
    • Investigation
      Fidan Mammadova, Nargiz Fatahova, Shukur Aliyev
    • Methodology
      Fidan Mammadova, Nargiz Fatahova
    • Resources
      Fidan Mammadova, Shukur Aliyev
    • Supervision
      Fidan Mammadova, Nargiz Fatahova
    • Writing – original draft
      Fidan Mammadova
    • Project administration
      Nargiz Fatahova, Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov
    • Writing – review & editing
      Nargiz Fatahova, Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov, Shukur Aliyev
    • Data curation
      Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov, Shukur Aliyev
    • Funding acquisition
      Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov
    • Software
      Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov, Shukur Aliyev
    • Validation
      Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov, Shukur Aliyev
    • Visualization
      Shaban Mammadov, Ruslan Gasimov, Shukur Aliyev
Related Articles

  • Designing zero-based budgeting for public organizations

    Mukdad IbrahimORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.25
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #2         pp. 323-333 Views: 3653 Downloads: 1018 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Several systems of budgeting have been introduced into practice over the last fifty years. While more popular budgeting systems such as incrementalism and Planning Programming Budgeting Systems (PPBS) have seen continued popularity and resilience as budgeting systems, zero-based budgeting (ZBB) has experienced a resurgence in popularity, as governments and public organizations alike seek to control wasteful spending within their departments. The aim of this article is to provide users with a step-by-step guide to designing zero-based budgeting for public organizations. This article begins by describing the foundations of zero-based budgeting, as well as providing a brief comparative exploration of ZBB alongside other contemporary budgeting systems. To gain a deeper understanding of zero-base budgeting and the potential, as well as the drawbacks that this type of budgeting system holds, this paper examines the actual experience of several organizations that have implemented the zero-based budgeting method. This is accomplished by conducting a critical review of all the research and case studies that have been conducted on this topic. It is the hope of the author that both public sector and non-profit organizations will benefit from the findings of this paper when considering the implementation of their own zero-based budgeting, resulting in better planning and performance evaluation.

  • Ensuring transparency of key public finance authorities

    Alina BukhtiarovaORCID Researcher ID, Yuliia Dukhno , Ganna KulishORCID , Iryna KurochkinaORCID , Volodymyr LypchanskyiORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.11
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 16, 2019         Issue #2         pp. 128-139 Views: 1271 Downloads: 183 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Nowadays, there is a constant need for managing large amounts of information in public finances to identify existing and prevent future cases of illegal use of financial resources of citizens. The openness of information of key public finance authorities has a powerful anti-corruption effect and has a beneficial effect on economic development, while transparency of public finances is a factor in the successful implementation of the reform of all spheres of the economy.
    The purpose of the article is to develop a methodology for assessing the institutional and political transparency of the leading public finance authorities in Ukraine and its practical application on the example of the Ministry of Finance and the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine. The methodology includes six main stages, based on which the transparency index of public finance authorities was calculated. Constant calculations of the index will motivate the interaction of stakeholders and non-governmental organizations to increase the openness of public finance authorities in public finances, and the digital data settlements themselves can be used to develop recommendations to increase the level of transparency of the activities of key public finance authorities. Approbation of the developed transparency index of public finance authorities on the example of the Ministry of Finance and the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine made it possible to calculate the percentage of openness of data published by the indicated institutions. Based on quantitative calculations, practical recommendations were made for improving the completeness, reliability, availability and timeliness of published information.

  • Assessment of the social expenditure impact on the economic growth in OECD countries

    Mykhaylo MalyovanyiORCID Researcher ID, Nataliia IvanovaORCID Researcher ID, Kateryna MelnykORCID Researcher ID, Oleksandr NepochatenkoORCID Researcher ID, Oleksandr RolinskyiORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.31
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018         Issue #3         pp. 389-405 Views: 1026 Downloads: 131 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Economic growth is exposed to many socio-economic factors that impact both the formation and allocation of resources. The theoretical part of this article discusses studies by various authors on the social expenditure impact on economic growth, the dependence of this influence on selected funding principles and social policy models. In the empirical part, using the Pooled Mean Group (PMG) procedure and the Fixed Effect Model, the impact of social expenditure on the economic growth in OECD countries is determined. An increased focus is put on assessing the long-term impact of the main types of social expenditures (public and private), based on different financing principles (distribution and accumulation), on the economic growth rates both in OECD in general and in the context of countries (based on the Esping-Andersen’s typology) grouped according to social policy models. The following conclusions are drawn: 1) an increase in the share of total social expenditures in the country’s GDP negatively affects economic growth; 2) an increase in the share of private social expenditures in the country’s GDP contributes to economic growth; 3) the obtained indicators of impact assessment are different depending on a social policy model chosen. The analysis is based on OECD panel data for the period 1980–2013.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management