The impact of home office on employee productivity and work balance
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.21
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #1, pp. 244-254
- 828 Views
-
180 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The implementation of the home office has changed the organization of work not only during the pandemic but also permanently, so it is considered challenging to explore the effects on work processes and the value orientation of employees. This study aims to identify the employees’ subjective perceptions of work productivity, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of home office during each wave of the COVID-19 outbreak, by taking into account the views of each generational cohort. The paper analyzes the effects of the home office on employee productivity in Slovak firms and its impacts on private life. Descriptive statistical methods were used to process the data obtained by questionnaire survey, conducted in several phases from September 1, 2020, till August 20, 2022, on a sample of 1167 respondents reached by random selection. The questionnaire was distributed through social network sites and targeted at people who use information and communication technologies, which is a requirement of the home office. The hypothesis was verified using the chi-square test. Based on the survey results, workers who use home offices feel isolated and prefer a combined form of work; they lack social contact, which reflects negatively on their mental health. The combined form of work also significantly impacts the sustainability of work productivity. The study recommends that organizations ensure work-life balance, understanding the particular generations working within the home office.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)М50, J40, J59, J63
-
References33
-
Tables4
-
Figures6
-
- Figure 1. The way the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has affected the income of employees
- Figure 2. The use of home office (or remote) by employees in the observed period
- Figure 3. Home office work productivity during the pandemic outbreak
- Figure 4. Labor productivity perception
- Figure 5. Home office benefits from the perspective of generations
- Figure 6. Home office drawbacks from the perspective of generations
-
- Table 1. Questionnaire surveys on home office issues
- Table 2. How long have you had experience with home office work?
- Table 3. Labor productivity perception
- Table 4. Labor productivity perceptions during the particular waves
-
- AbuJarour, S., Ajjan, H., Fedorowicz, J., & Owens, D. (2021). How working from home during COVID-19 affects academic productivity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 48.
- Arefin, M. S., Alam, M. S., Islam, N., & Molasy, M. (2020). Organizational politics and work-family conflict: The hospitality industry in Bangladesh. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 9(3), 357-372.
- Bai, Q., Lin, W., & Wang, L. (2016). Family incivility and counterproductive work behavior: A moderated mediation model of self-esteem and emotional regulation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 11-19.
- Beňo, M. (2018). Working in the virtual world – An approach to the “home office” business model analysis. Ad Alta – Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 8(1), 25-36.
- Beňo, M., & Křížová, K. (2022). Face-to-display work: Czech managers’ experiences and expectations. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(5), 170-181.
- Blahová, M., Haghirian, P., Urbánek, T., & Pálka, P. (2023). Driving sustainable and competitive transition in enterprise performance management and measurement: The changing role of women in the Japanese labour market. Economics and Sociology, 16(2), 56-74.
- Birimoglu Okuyan, C., & Begen, M. A. (2022). Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, its effects on health, and recommendations: The pandemic and beyond. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 58(1), 173-179.
- Boes, A., Kämpf, T., Langes, B., & Lühr, T. (2014). Informatisierung und neue Entwicklungstendenzen von Arbeit [Informatization and new trends of work]. Arbeits-und Industriesoziologische Studien, 7(1), 5-23. (In German).
- Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work-home interface: The work-home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545-556.
- Dingel, J., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home? (Working Paper 26948). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Enache, R., & Puscas, A. (n.d.). Remote work in the new reality. KPMG.
- Eurofound. (2021). Living, working and COVID-19 (Update April 2021): Mental health and trust decline across EU as pandemic enters another year. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Eurofound-ETF. (2022). Living, working and COVID-19 in the European Union and 10 EU neighbouring countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Fadinger, H., & Schymik, J. (2020). The effects of working from home on Covid-19 infections and production – A macroeconomic analysis for Germany (CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_167). University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Fan Ng, C. (2010). Teleworker’s home office: an extension of corporate office? Facilities, 28(3/4), 137-155.
- GRAFTON. (2023). Prieskum benefitov 2023 [2023 Benefits Survey]. (In Slovak).
- Grmanová, E., & Ivanová, E. (2021). Working time flexibility in the EU countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 338-351.
- Hensher, D. A., Wei, E., & Beck, M. J. (2023). The impact of COVID-19 and working from home on the workspace retained at the main location office space and the future use of satellite offices. Transport Policy, 130, 184-195.
- Hoke, E., Peterek, K., Vichova, K., & Taraba, P. (2022). Effect of crises on human resources management in small and medium enterprises: Evidence from manufacturing industry in the Czech Republic. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 10-21.
- Holzgreve, F., Maurer-Grubinger, C. H., Fraeulin, L., Bausch, J., Groneberg, D. A., & Ohlendorf, D. (2022). Home office versus ergonomic workstation – Is the ergonomic risk increased when working at the dining table? An inertial motion capture based pilot study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23, 145.
- Hu, Y., Wu, X., Zong, Z., Xiao, Y., Maguire, P., Qu, F., Wei, J., & Wang, D. (2018). Authentic leadership and proactive behavior: The role of psychological capital and compassion at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
- Irlacher, M., & Koch, M. (2021). Working from home, wages, and regional inequality in the light of COVID-19. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 241(3), 373-404.
- Maloni, M., Hiatt, M. S., & Campbell, S. (2019). Understanding the work values of Gen Z business students. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 100320.
- Mishchuk, H., Bilan, Y., & Mishchuk, V. (2023). Employment risks under the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic and their impact on changes in economic behaviour. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 201-216.
- Oliveira, J. N. A., Orrillo, J., & Gamboa, F. (2020). The home office in times of COVID-19 pandemic and its impact in the labor supply. arXiv, 2007, 02935.
- PwC. (2021). Workforce study 2020. (In Slovak).
- Samoliuk, N., Bilan, Y., Mishchuk, H., & Mishchuk, V. (2022). Employer brand: Key values influencing the intention to join a company. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 17(1), 61-72.
- Silva, J., & Carvalho, A. (2021). The work values of Portuguese Generation Z in the higher education-to-work transition phase. Social Sciences, 10(8), 297.
- Skýpalová, R., Šikýř, M., & Urban, R. (2022). A study on employee experience with shift work. Economics and Sociology, 15(3), 143-158.
- Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Hildrum, J., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., & Mendez, D. (2023). Work-from-home is here to stay: Call for flexibility in post-pandemic work policies. Journal of Systems and Software, 195, 111552.
- Staniec, I., Kaczorowska-Spychalska, D., Kalinska-Kula, M., & Szczygiel, N. (2023). The need to work from home in higher education during the first phase of COVID-19: Employee productivity, autonomy, work relationships, job satisfaction and well-being. Journal of International Studies, 16(4), 257-280.
- Sulistiobudi, R. A., & Hutabarat, H. N. (2022). Adaptation of work values instrument in Indonesian final year university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 858688.
- Xu, N., Sun, Y. Q., Chen, J. W., Wang, Z. L., Chen, Z. F., Yang, B., Wang, P., & Zhou, J. X. (2022). Ergonomics evaluation of home office environment. In S. Long & B. S. Dhillon (Eds.), Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on MMESE. (pp. 466-473). Springer.