Defense industry business performance model in developing countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.20
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #2, pp. 172-186
- Cited by
- 869 Views
-
338 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The defense industry is vital to supporting a country’s defense, especially in the modern era. While many emerging and developing countries are capable of producing military goods and services domestically, they remain dependent on foreign inputs to varying degrees. Yet, several studies have examined factors that can affect the self-reliance of the defense industries in developing countries. Therefore, the present study aims to examine factors that can explain business performance variation of defense industries in developing countries. It investigates further the business model innovation mediation for the first two factors of business performance. Data have been collected from 70 defense industrial companies in Indonesia. The Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling method is used to analyze the impact of high-performance work systems, technological innovation, and business model innovation on the business performance of industrial companies. The results show a significant effect of implementing High-Performance Work Systems and Technological Innovation through Business Model Innovation on Business Performance (accounted for R2 = 0.67). The research findings are expected to encourage defense industries in developing countries to focus on implementing human resource practices and adopting new or improved technologies and research results at all levels of management following business model adjustments.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F52, L21, M54, O32
-
References54
-
Tables8
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
-
- Table 1. Demographic characteristics of participants
- Table 2. Measurement items of the questionnaire used in this study
- Table 3. Construct reliability analysis results (n = 70)
- Table 4. Discriminant validity results (n = 70)
- Table 5. Multicollinearity test results (n = 70)
- Table 6. Direct effects in the path analysis (n = 70)
- Table 7. Indirect effects in the path analysis (n = 70)
- Table A1. Questionnaire Items (Translated from Indonesian to English)
-
- Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrandiz, E., Marin, M. R., & Moreno, P. J. (2018). Patents and Dual-use Technology: An Empirical Study of the World’s Largest Defence Companies. Defence and Peace Economics, 29(7), 821-839.
- Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2012). Creating Value Through Business Model Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 41-49.
- Ananthram, S., Xerri, M. J., Teo, S. T. T., & Connell, J. (2018). High-performance work systems and employee outcomes in Indian call centres: a mediation approach. Personnel Review, 47(4), 931-950.
- Beamish, P., & Hubbard, G. (2011). Strategic Management (4th ed.). Pearson Education Au.
- Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High Performance Work Systems: A Synthesis of Research and Managerial Applications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53-101.
- Benoit, E. (1978). Growth and Defense in Developing Countries. Columbia University.
- Béraud-Sudreau, L., Liang, X., Wezeman, S. T., & Sun, M. (2022). Arms-production capabilities in the Indo-Pacific region. SIPRI.
- Best, R. J. (2013). Market-Based Management (6th ed.). Pearson International.
- Bjorkdahl, J., & Holmen, M. (2013). Editorial: Business model innovation-the challenges ahead. International Journal of Product Development, 18(3-4), 213-225.
- Cassel, C., Hackl, P., & Westlund, A. H. (1999). Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures. Journal of Applied Statistics, 26(4), 435-446.
- Chesbrough, H. (2007). Business model innovation: It’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy and Leadership, 35(6), 12-17.
- Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529-555.
- Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655-690). Springer.
- Chowhan, J. (2016). Unpacking the black box: Understanding the relationship between strategy, HRM practices, innovation and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(2), 112-133.
- Cohen, J. (2013). Chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables. In Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (pp. 228-284). Routledge.
- Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of Management, 31(5), 758-775.
- Ghozali, I. (2015). Partial Least Squares SmartPLS 3.0 (2nd ed.). Universitas Diponegoro.
- Giuliani, E., Martinelli, A., & Rabellotti, R. (2016). Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors. World Development, 77, 192-205.
- Gronum, S., Steen, J., & Verreynne, M. L. (2016). Business model design and innovation: Unlocking the performance benefits of innovation. Australian Journal of Management, 41(3), 585-605.
- Hair, F. J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Hamel, G. (1998). Opinion: Strategy innovation and the quest for value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 7.
- Haseeb, M., Hussain, H. I., Kot, S., Androniceanu, A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Role of social and technological challenges in achieving a sustainable competitive advantage and sustainable business performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(14).
- Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20.
- Holtström, J. (2022). Business model innovation under strategic transformation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(5), 550-562.
- Hunger, J. D., & Wheelen, T. L. (1993). Strategic Management (4th ed.). Addison-Wesley Pub.
- Iskandar, I. F. R., Wibisono, M., & Supandi, S. (2019). Indonesia’s Defense Diplomacy Towards Minimum Essential Force Policy in Ministry of Defense. Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan, 5(2), 51-86.
- Jemala, M. (2015). Systemic insights into nanotechnology patenting in EU countries. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 8(1), 1-22.
- Lee, J., Hwang, J., & Kim, H. (2022). Different government support effects on emerging and mature ICT sectors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121253.
- Lindgardt, Z., & Ayers, M. (2014). Driving growth with business model innovation. BCG Perspective, The Boston Consulting Group.
- Loon, M., & Quan, X. I. (2020). Theorising business model innovation: An integrated literature review. Australian Journal of Management, 46(3), 548-577.
- Lu, H., & You, H. (2018). Roadmap modeling and assessment approach for defense technology system of system. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 8(6), 908.
- Maharani, C., & Matthews, R. (2022). The Role of Offset in the Enduring Gestation of Indonesia’s Strategic Industries. Defence and Peace Economics, 1-22.
- Malik, A., Pereira, V., & Budhwar, P. (2018). Value creation and capture through human resource management practices: Gazing through the business model lens. Organizational Dynamics, 47(3), 180-188.
- McGrath, R. G. (2010). Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 247-261.
- Min, M., Zhu, Y., & Bambacas, M. (2018). Implementing HPWS among the indigenous companies in China: Analysing from both managers’ and employees’ perspectives. Journal of General Management, 43(4), 175-187.
- Montratama, I. (2018). Strategi Optimalisasi Pengadaan Sarana Pertahanan Bagi Industri Pertahanan Indonesia. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 4(3), 79-98.
- Nielsen, C., & Montemari, M. (2012). The role of human resources in business model performance: the case of network-based companies. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 16(2), 142-164.
- Obradovic, D., & Obradovic, D. (2016). The Role Innovation on Strategic Orientations and Competitiveness of Enterprises. Ecoforum Journal, 5(1), 90-95.
- OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th ed.). The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg: OECD Publishing.
- Porter, M. E. (1997). Competitive strategy. In Measuring Business Excellence, 1(2), 12-17.
- Rasheed, M. A., Shahzad, K., Conroy, C., Nadeem, S., & Siddique, M. U. (2017). Exploring the role of employee voice between high-performance work system and organizational innovation in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(4), 670-688.
- Reis, J. C. G. (2021). Politics, power, and influence: defense industries in the Post-Cold War. Social Sciences, 10(1), 10.
- Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2011). Business cases for sustainability and the role of business model innovation: developing a conceptual framework. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM).
- Sels, L., De Winne, S., Maes, J., Delmotte, J., Faems, D., & Forrier, A. (2006). Unravelling the HRM-performance link: Value-creating and cost-increasing effects of small business HRM. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), 319-342.
- Smajlović, S., Umihanic, B., & Turulja, L. (2019). The interplay of technological innovation and business model innovation toward company performance. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 24(2), 63-79.
- Song, W., Ming, X., & Wang, P. (2013). Collaborative product innovation network: Status review, framework, and technology solutions. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 21(1), 55-64.
- Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. (2010). Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: The naturhouse case. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 383-407.
- Souto, J. E. (2015). Business model innovation and business concept innovation as the context of incremental innovation and radical innovation. Tourism Management, 51, 142-155.
- Spies, P. H. (2014). The Democratization of Innovation. World Futures Review, 6(1), 15-28.
- Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49.
- Terjesen, S., & Patel, P. C. (2017). In Search of Process Innovations: The Role of Search Depth, Search Breadth, and the Industry Environment. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1421-1446.
- Tseng, S. M., & Lee, P. S. (2014). The effect of knowledge management capability and dynamic capability on organizational performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(2), 158-179.
- Wang, Z., Xing, L., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Do high-performance work systems harm employees’ health? An investigation of service-oriented HPWS in the Chinese healthcare sector. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(10), 2264-2297.
- Zheng, J., Liu, H., & Zhou, J. (2020). High-performance work systems and open innovation: moderating role of IT capability. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(8), 1441-1457.