Digital transformation and ICT sector performance in EU countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(1).2023.05
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #1, pp. 48-58
- Cited by
- 874 Views
-
346 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Digital transformation is now one of the most important topics in all EU countries in creating and managing strategies and visions for states, businesses, organizations, and citizens. The ICT sector is currently one of the most important sectors with significant added value. The main purpose of the paper is to identify the efficiency of the digitalization of the economy and society concerning the performance of the ICT sector. This paper uses multi-criteria efficiency evaluation methods – Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA models). Inputs in the basic DEA model are the dimensions’ values of the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), which are also used to express the DESI summary indicator, such as human capital, connectivity, digital technology integration, and digital public services. Output in the DEA model indicates the ICT share of GDP. Finally, output-oriented DEA models are used to express the efficiency score. The analysis results show that Bulgaria, Romania, Greece, and Malta have a below-average level of DESI, but they can be classified as efficient. Italy, Lithuania, and Slovenia are the worst performers in the efficiency score. The next step was to express the efficiency scores in the DEA models in terms of different combinations of inputs and outputs. Malta was efficient in all fifteen DEA models. Based on these findings, Malta is considered significantly positive. Its approaches can serve as an example for other countries.
Acknowledgment
This paper was supported by the Slovak Ministry of Education’s Scientific Grant Agency VEGA: “Digital Economy and Changes in the Education System as a Reflection on Labor Market Requirements”. Project registration number: [Reg. No.: 1/0689/20].
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C67, O33
-
References33
-
Tables3
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. ICT share as % of GDP in EU countries
- Figure 2. DESI in EU countries in 2018
- Figure 3. DESI in EU countries in 2019
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of inputs and output
- Table A1. Efficiency scores in fifteen output-oriented VRS models in 2018
- Table A2. Efficiency scores in fifteen output-oriented VRS models in 2019
-
- Bakumenko, L. P., & Minina, E. A. (2020). International index of digital economy and society (I-DESI): Trends in the development of digital technologies. Statistics and Economics.
- Balcerzak, A., & Pietrzak, B. (2017). Digital economy in Visegrad countries. Multiple-criteria decision analysis at regional level in the years 2012 and 2015. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(2), 5-18.
- Baygi, M.R., Introna, L., & Hultin, L. (2021). Everything Flows: Studying Continuous Socio-Technological Transformation in a Fluid and Dynamic Digital World. MIS Quarterly, 45(1b), 423-452.
- Bencsik, A. (2020). Challenges of management in the digital economy. International Journal of Technology, 11(6) 1275-1285.
- Broz, T., Buturac, G., & Parežanin, M. (2020). Digital transformation and economic cooperation: The case of Western Balkan countries. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci / Proceedings of Rijeka School of Economics, 38(2), 697-722.
- Česnauské, J. (2019). Digital economy and society: Baltic States in the EU context. Economics and Culture, 16(1), 80-90.
- Cinca, S. C., A., & Molinero, M. C. (2004). Selecting DEA specifications and ranking units via PCA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(5), 521-528.
- Cooper, W. W. (2001). Data envelopment analysis. In S. I. Gass & C. M. Harris (Eds.), Encyclopedia of operations research and management science (pp. 183-191). Springer.
- Curtis, S. K., & Lehner, M. (2019). Defining the sharing economy for sustainability. Sustainability, 11(3), 567.
- Digital Agenda Data. (2021). DESI by components.
- Eurostat. (2022). Database. Percentage of the ICT sector on GDP [TIN00074].
- Gao, P., Wu, W., & Yang, Y. (2022). Discovering themes and trends in digital transformation and innovation research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(3), 1162-1184.
- Georgescu, M. R., Stoica, E. A., Bogoslav, I. A., & Lungu, A. E. (2022). Managing efficiency in digital transformation – EU member states performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Procedia Computer Science, 204, 432-439.
- Gorenšek, T., & Kohont, A. (2018). Conceptualization of digitalization: Opportunities and challenges for organizations in the Euro-Mediterranean area. International journal of Euro-Mediterranean studies, 12(2), 93-106.
- Grmanová, E. (2010). Hodnotenie efektívnosti komerčných poisťovní a bánk modelmi analýzy obalu dát. Trenčín: Trenčianska Univerzita Alexandra Dubčeka v Trenčíne. (In Slovak).
- Hawach, F., Zhang, Ch., Acharjee, S., & Sans, R. N. (2022). Internet capabilities and innovation in the Balkan countries: The role of foreign technology licensing. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries.
- Hund, A., Wagner, H. T., Beimborn, D., & Weitzel, T. (2020). Governing the competing concerns of digital innovation. DIGIT 2020 Proceedings.
- Jablonský, J., & Dlouhý, M. (2004). Modely hodnocení efektivnosti produkčních jednotek. Praha: Professional Publishing. (In Czech).
- Katz, R. L., & Koutroumpis, P. (2013). Measuring digitalization: A growth and welfare multiplier. Technovation, 33(10-11), 314-319.
- Koch, T., & Windsperger, J. (2017). Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy. Journal of Organization Design, 6.
- Kovács, T. Z., Bittner, B., Huzsvai, L., & Nábrádi, A. (2022). Convergence and the Matthew effect in the European Union based on the DESI index. Mathematics, 10(4), 613.
- Kraus, S., Jones, P., Kailer, N., Weinmann, A., Chaparro-Banegas, N., & Roig-Tierno, N. (2021). Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. SAGE Open, 11(3).
- Kulinich, T., Lisnievska, Y., Zimbalevska, Y., Trubnik, T., & Obikhod, S (2022). Digitalization of economies of low and middle income countries in the context of digital transformation. Amazonia Investiga, 11(51), 300-311.
- Laitsou, E., Kargas, A., & Varoutas, D. (2020). Digital competitiveness in the European Union era: Greek case. Economies, 8(4), 85.
- Małkowska, A., Urbaniec, M., & Kosała, M. (2021). The impact of digital transformation on European countries: Insights from a comparative analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 16(2), 325-355.
- Ministry of Investments, Regional Development and Informatization of the Slovak Republic. (2022). Index digitálnej ekonomiky a spoločnosti (DESI). (In Slovak).
- Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019).The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773.
- Olczyk, M., & Kuc-Czarnecka, M. (2022). Digital transformation and economic growth – DESI improvement and implementation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(3), 775-803.
- Pilková, A., Holienka, M., Mikus, J., Kovačičova, Z., Rehák, J., Greguš, M., Gavalcová, K., Chmelová, M., Belušák, L., Uhnák, M., Mobashar, M. M., & Sonsoles, J. (2021). Doing business in Slovakia in the era of digitalization through the lens of generations (MPRA Paper No. 113391).
- Pouri, M. J., & Hilty, L. M. (2021). The digital sharing economy: A confluence of technical and social sharing. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 38, 127-139.
- Vyshnevskyi, O., Stashkevych, I., Shubna, O., & Barkova, S. (2020). Economic growth in the conditions of digitalization in the EU countries. Studies of Applied Economics, 38(4).
- Yalcin, E. C. (2021). Efficiency measurement of digitalization on EU countries: A study based on data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 10, 323-333.
- Zhu, J. (1998). Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: an illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities. European Journal of Operational Research, 111(1), 50-61.