Meta-analysis of organizational and supply chain dynamic capabilities: A theoretical-conceptual relationship
-
Received May 31, 2022;Accepted August 15, 2022;Published September 14, 2022
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6827-7637Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5078-278XLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-7680
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.27
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #3, pp. 335-349
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by6 articlesJournal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:Journal title: Social EconomicsArticle title: IMPLEMENTATION FEASIBILITY OF ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL CONTROLINGDOI: 10.26565/2524-2547-2023-66-06Volume: / Issue: 66 / First page: 49 / Year: 2023Contributors: Olena Golovko, Nataliya Tretiak, Kateryna OriekhovaJournal title: Revista Venezolana de GerenciaArticle title: Redes colaborativas horizontales en micro y pequeñas cadenas productivas de mercados emergentesDOI: 10.52080/rvgluz.29.106.11Volume: 29 / Issue: 106 / First page: 623 / Year: 2024Contributors: Isabel Cristina Alzate Rendón, Antonio BoadaJournal title: Social EconomicsArticle title: STRATEGIC PROVISING OF ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SECURITY IN COVID-19 CONDITIONSDOI: 10.26565/2524-2547-2022-64-07Volume: / Issue: 64 / First page: 63 / Year: 2022Contributors: Kateryna Oriekhova, Olena Golovko, Pavel GaydaJournal title: Problems and Perspectives in ManagementArticle title: Assessing the degree of development of dynamic capabilities theory: A systematic literature reviewDOI: 10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.34Volume: 21 / Issue: 3 / First page: 418 / Year: 2023Contributors: Arcadio Gonzalez-Samaniego, Marco A. Valenzo-Jimenez, Jaime Apolinar Martinez-Arroyo, Salvador Antelmo Casanova ValenciaJournal title: Journal of Economics and International RelationsArticle title: Іmprovement financial management of enterprise taking into account technologies for attracting additional financial resourcesDOI: 10.26565/2310-9513-2023-17-09Volume: / Issue: 17 / First page: 94 / Year: 2023Contributors: Kateryna Oriekhova, Оlena Golovko, Оlena Khristoforova, Maksym Babenko
- 643 Views
-
234 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Creating resilient supply chains and more agile and competitive organizations are challenges that companies face today in a highly competitive and changing environment. Therefore, organizations must understand the importance of developing and strengthening their dynamic capabilities (DC) and supply chain dynamic capabilities (SCDC) in order to improve their market performance, participation, and sustainability. This study performs a meta-analysis of the literature related to organizational and supply chain dynamic capabilities, which together constitute an ecosystem of capabilities that every organization should develop to improve performance. After an exhaustive review of 1203 articles aligned with the base theoretical construct of dynamic capabilities, the information was decanted from strict filters. This allowed to evidence the contribution of this construct in literature aligned with organizational performance, as well as to identify the contribution that can be made by other constructs aligned with the dynamic capabilities’ ecosystem. The findings show a theoretical relationship between both constructs, presenting how the supply chain dynamic capabilities constitute a specialization and differentiation of organizational dynamic capabilities. In addition, the study highlights their major contribution to developing competitive advantages and improving organizational performance.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L21, L25, M10, M19
-
References100
-
Tables3
-
Figures7
-
- Figure 1. Organizational DC model
- Figure 2. Methodological process
- Figure 3. Information flow during the phases of meta-analysis
- Figure 4. Cluster of authors in Web of Science
- Figure 5. Cluster of authors in Scopus
- Figure 6. Concepts related to supply chain and DC in Web of Science
- Figure 7. Concepts related to SCDC in Web of Science
-
- Table 1. Conceptual framework DC and SCDC
- Table 2. Definition of main SCDCs
- Table 3. Elements included in the meta-analysis
-
- Acosta Prado, J. C., Longo-Somoza, M., & Fischer, A. L. (2013). Capacidades dinámicas y gestión del conocimiento en nuevas empresas de base tecnológica. Cuadernos de Administracion, 26(47), 35-62. (In Spanish).
- Allred, C. R., Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C., & Magnan, G. M. (2011). A Dynamic Collaboration Capability as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 129-161.
- Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Starategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33-46.
- Aslam, H., Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2020). Determining the antecedents of dynamic supply chain capabilities. Supply Chain Management, 25(4), 427-442.
- Baker, P. (2008). The design and operation of distribution centres within agile supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(1), 27-41.
- Balcik, B., Silvestri, S., Rancourt, M. È., & Laporte, G. (2019). Collaborative Prepositioning Network Design for Regional Disaster Response. Production and Operations Management, 28(10), 2431-2455.
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 30-42.
- Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2010). The construction and contributions of “implications for practice”: What’s in them and what might they offer? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(1), 100-117.
- Bergvall-Forsberg, J., & Towers, N. (2007). Creating agile supply networks in the fashion industry: A pilot study of the European textile and clothing industry. Journal of the Textile Institute, 98(4), 377-386.
- Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 42(4), 372-387.
- Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5375-5393.
- Bititci, U. S., Martinez, V., Albores, P., & Parung, J. (2004). Creating and managing value in collaborative networks. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(3/4), 251-268.
- Blome, D., Schoenherr, T., & Rexhausen, C. (2013). Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1295-1318.
- Boyer, K. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2002). Competitive priorities: Investigating the need for trade-offs in operations strategy. Production and Operations Management, 11(1), 9-20.
- Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of tecnological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902.
- Cao, Y., & Jiang, H. (2020). Dimension construction and test of dynamic capability of enterprise supply chain. Proceedings - 2020 International Conference on E-Commerce and Internet Technology, ECIT 2020 (pp. 310-314).
- Castillo, M. B., Tamayo, T. J., Cabeza, P. D., Roldán, B. M. I., & Ruiz Moreno, A. (2016). Factores Clave Para La Búsqueda Del Aprendizaje Organizacional En La Cadena De Suministro: Una Aproximación Teórica. Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda Época, 1(1), 92-117. (In Spanish).
- Chan, H. K., & Chan, F. T. S. (2010). Comparative study of adaptability and flexibility in distributed manufacturing supply chains. Decision Support Systems, 48(2), 331-341.
- Chang, H. L., Chen, C. H., & Su, C. H. (2008). Developing supply chain dynamic capability to realize the value of inter-organizational systems. PACIS 2008 – 12th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Leveraging ICT for Resilient Organizations and Sustainable Growth in the Asia Pacific Region.
- Chaudhuri, A., Ghadge, A., Gaudenzi, B., & Dani, S. (2020). A conceptual framework for improving effectiveness of risk management in supply networks. International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(1), 77-98.
- Cheng, J. H., Chen, M. C., & Huang, C. M. (2014). Assessing inter-organizational innovation performance through relational governance and dynamic capabilities in supply chains. Supply Chain Management, 19(2), 173-186.
- Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 351-366.
- Christopher, M., Lowson, R., & Peck, H. (2004). Creating agile supply chains in the fashion industry. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 32(8), 367-376.
- Colicchia, C., & Strozzi, F. (2012). Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 17(4), 403-418.
- Collins, D. (1994). Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 143-142.
- Dani, S. (2011). Supply Chain Project Management – a structured collaborative and measurable approach 2nd edition, by J. B. Ayers. International Journal of Production Research, 49(21), 6587-6588.
- De Moura, G. B., & Saroli, L. G. (2021). Sustainable value chain management based on dynamic capabilities in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(1), 168-189.
- Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
- Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105-1121.
- Friday, D., Ryan, S., Sridharan, R., & Collins, D. (2018). Collaborative risk management: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(3), 231-253.
- Garcia-Torres, S., Albareda, L., Rey-Garcia, M., & Seuring, S. (2019). Traceability for sustainability – literature review and conceptual framework. Supply Chain Management, 24(1), 85-106.
- Garzón, M. A. (2015). Modelo de capacidades dinámicas. Revista Dimensión Empresarial, 13(1), 111-131.
- Grant, R. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implication for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
- Grant, R. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
- Griffith, D., & Harvey, M. (2001). A Resource Perspective of Global Dynamic Capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 597-606.
- Hall, R. (1992). The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 135-144.
- Hallikas, J. (2003). Managing Risk in Supplier Networks: Case Studies in Inter-Firm Collaboration. Lappeenranta University of Technology.
- Han, Y., Chong, W. K., & Li, D. (2020). A systematic literature review of the capabilities and performance metrics of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 58(15), 4541-4566.
- Haris, A., & Tashfeen, M. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and performance: A supply chain perspective. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(1), 198-213.
- Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring Competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 63-84.
- Hong, J., Zhang, Y., & Ding, M. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3508-3519.
- Hülsmann, M., Grapp, J., & Li, Y. (2008). Strategic adaptivity in global supply chains-Competitive advantage by autonomous cooperation. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(1), 14-26.
- Isnaini, D. B. Y., Nurhaida, T., & Pratama, I. (2020). Moderating effect of supply chain dynamic capabilities on the relationship of sustainable supply chain management practices and organizational sustainable performance: A study on the restaurant industry in Indonesia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 97-105.
- Jiang, C., & Li, C. (2011). Study on the Components of Supply Chain’s Dynamic Capabilities. 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science (pp. 1-4).
- Jin, Y. H., Fawcett, S. E., Fawcett, A. D., & Swanson, D. (2019). Collaborative capability and organizational performance: Assessing strategic choice and purity. International Journal of Production Economics, 214, 139-150.
- Ju, K. J., Park, B., & Kim, T. (2016). Causal relationship between supply Chain dynamic capabilities, technological innovation, and operational performance. Management and Production Engineering Review, 7(4), 6-15.
- Kähkönen, A. K., Lintukangas, K., & Hallikas, J. (2018). Sustainable supply management practices: making a difference in a firm’s sustainability performance. Supply Chain Management, 23(6), 518-530.
- Kareem, M. A., & Kummitha, H. V. R. (2020). The Impact of Supply Chain Dynamic Capabilities on Operational Performance. Organizacija, 53(4), 319-331.
- Ketchen, D. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2007). Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 573-580.
- Klassen, R. D., & Vachon, S. (2003). Collaboration and Evaluation in the Supply Chain: the Impact on Plant-Level Environmental Investment. Production and Operations Management, 12(3), 336-352.
- Lane, P. J., Koka, B., & Pathak, S. (2006). The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-863.
- Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102-112.
- León-Bravo, V., Caniato, F., Caridi, M., & Johnsen, T. (2017). Collaboration for Sustainability in the Food Supply Chain: A Multi-Stage Study in Italy. Sustainability, 9(7), 1253.
- Li, G., Lin, Y., Wang, S., & Yan, H. (2006). Enhancing agility by timely sharing of supply information. Supply Chain Management, 11(5), 425-435.
- Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339(1), 57-58.
- Mangla, S. K., & Kumar, P. (2014). Flexible Decision Approach for Analysing Performance of Sustainable Supply Chains Under Risks/Uncertainty. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15, 113-130.
- Masteika, I., & Čepinskis, J. (2015). Dynamic Capabilities in Supply Chain Management. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 830-835.
- Maynez-Guaderrama, A. I., Valles-Monge, L., & Hernández-Gómez, J. A. (2018). Capacidades organizacionales y ventaja competitiva: análisis en empresas mexicanas exportadoras de autopartes. Entreciencias: Diálogos En La Sociedad Del Conocimiento, 6(17), 17-33. (In Spanish).
- Mekhum, W. (2019). The impact of sustainability concept on supply chain dynamic capabilities. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 267-276.
- Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25.
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The Prisma Group. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336-341.
- Monge, L. V., & Guaderrama, A. M. (2015). Capacidades de absorción , innovación y respuesta : su influencia en la agilidad de cadena de suministro Introducción. Culcyt/Ingeniería Industrial, 56(1), 107-121. (In Spanish).
- Olavarrieta, S., & Ellinger, A. E. (1997). Resource-based theory and strategic logistics research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 27(9/10), 559-587.
- Pérez, C. (2012). Las revisiones sistemáticas: declaración PRISMA. Revista Española de Nutrición Comunitaria, 18(1), 57-58. (In Spanish).
- Peteraf, M. (1993). The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantages: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191.
- Philemon, E., Msomba, Z., Samson, M., Ramadhan, & Mlinga, S. (2018). Identification of Enabling Factors for Collaboration in Management of Risk in Construction Projects: A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 7(2), 152-159.
- Polater, A. (2021). Dynamic capabilities in humanitarian supply chain management: a systematic literature review. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 11(1), 46-80.
- Rajaguru, R., & Matanda, M. J. (2019). Role of compatibility and supply chain process integration in facilitating supply chain capabilities and organizational performance. Supply Chain Management, 24(2), 315-330.
- Ramanathan, U., Bentley, Y., & Pang, G. (2014). The role of collaboration in the UK green supply chains: an exploratory study of the perspectives of suppliers, logistics and retailers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 231-241.
- Rivera, H. A., & Figueroa, L. S. (2017). Capacidades dinámicas, una fuente de ventaja competitiva. Criterio Libre, 11(19), 245-261. (In Spanish).
- Sandberg, E., Kindström, D., & Haag, L. (2019). Interorganisational Dynamic Capabilities in Supply Chains – a Conceptual Framework. Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Logistics (ISL 2019) Supply Chain Networks vs Platforms: Innovations, Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 112-119).
- Shan, H., Li, Y., & Shi, J. (2020). Influence of supply chain collaborative innovation on sustainable development of supply chain: A study on Chinese enterprises. Sustainability, 12(7), 2978.
- Sharma, R., Shishodia, A., Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Belhadie, A. (2020). Agriculture supply chain risks and COVID-19: mitigation strategies and implications for the practitioners. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications.
- Shin, N., Park, S. H., & Park, S. (2019). Partnership-based supply chain collaboration: Impact on commitment, innovation, and firm performance. Sustainability, 11(2), 449.
- Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756-770.
- Stadler, H., Kilger, C., & Meyr, H. (2015). Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning (5th ed.). Springer.
- Stefanelli, F., Bevilacqua, M., & De Sanctis, I. (2016). Adaptability into Supply Chain Strategy: The adaptable PCSA framework. Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, IEEE IESM 2015 (pp. 378-387).
- Storer, M., & Hyland, P. (2011). Reconfiguration or innovation in supply chains? International Journal of Technology Management, 56(2/3/4), 188-207.
- Sunder, V., & Ganesh, L. S. (2021). Identification of the Dynamic Capabilities Ecosystem – A Systems Thinking Perspective. Group & Organization Management, 46(5), 893-930.
- Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288-297.
- Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
- Teece, D. J. (2014). The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: (Economic) Theory of Firms. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328-352.
- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. M. Y. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
- Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-556.
- Tieman, M. (2017). Halal risk management: combining robustness and resilience. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(3), 461-475.
- Tripathi, G., & Joshi, S. (2019). Creating Competitive Advantage through Sustainable Supply Chains: A Theoretical Framework for the Assessment of Practices, Dynamic Capabilities, and Enterprise Performance of Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4), 7863-7875.
- Tuominen, M., Rajala, A., & Möller, K. (2004). How does adaptability drive firm innovativeness? Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 495-506.
- Um, J., Lyons, A., Lam, H. K. S., Cheng, T. C. E., & Dominguez-Pery, C. (2017). A Supply Chain Performance: a Capability Perspective on Their Relationships and Competitiveness Implications. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 15-26.
- Van Hoek, R. I. (2006). Moving forward with agility – a little faster. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(6).
- Vanpoucke, E., Vereecke, A., & Wetzels, M. (2014). Developing supplier integration capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Operations Management, 32(7-8), 446-461.
- Velásquez, J. D. (2014). Una Guía Corta para Escribir Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. DYNA, 82(189), 9-12. (In Spanish).
- Vilko, J. (2012). Approaches to Supply Chain Risk Management: Identification, Analysis and Control. Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis.
- Ward, P. T., McCreery, J. K., Ritzman, L. P., & Sharma, D. (1998). Competitive priorities in operations management. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 1035-1046.
- Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
- Whitten, G. D., Kenneth, W. G., & Zelbst, P. J. (2012). Triple-A supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 32(1), 28-48.
- Wu, S. J., & Ragatz, G. L. (2010). The role of integrative capabilities in involving suppliers in New Product Development: A knowledge integration perspective. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 19(1-2), 82-101.
- Xia, L. X. X., Ma, B., & Lim, R. (2008). Supplier performance measurement in a supply chain. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) (pp. 877-881).
- Xu, M., Cui, Y., Hu, M., Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Liang, S., & Qu, S. (2019). Supply chain sustainability risk and assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 857-867.
- Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Information System Research, 13(2), 147-150.
-
-
Conceptualization
Isabel Alzate, Eva Manotas, Antonio Boada, Camilo Burbano
-
Formal Analysis
Isabel Alzate, Eva Manotas, Camilo Burbano
-
Investigation
Isabel Alzate, Eva Manotas, Antonio Boada
-
Methodology
Isabel Alzate, Eva Manotas, Camilo Burbano
-
Project administration
Isabel Alzate, Antonio Boada
-
Resources
Isabel Alzate, Eva Manotas, Antonio Boada
-
Validation
Isabel Alzate, Camilo Burbano
-
Writing – original draft
Isabel Alzate, Eva Manotas, Antonio Boada, Camilo Burbano
-
Writing – review & editing
Isabel Alzate
-
Supervision
Eva Manotas, Antonio Boada
-
Data curation
Antonio Boada
-
Software
Camilo Burbano
-
Conceptualization
-
The impact of social distancing policy on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia
Muhtar Lutfi , Pricylia Chintya Dewi Buntuang , Yoberth Kornelius , Erdiyansyah , Bakri Hasanuddin doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.40Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 492-503 Views: 3858 Downloads: 1386 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study aims to investigate the impact of social distancing policies on SMEs in Indonesia. It used a quantitative method with a survey design. Respondents were all SMEs in Indonesia that are affected by social distancing policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. It involved a total of 587 SME samples selected randomly. The data were collected through observations, questionnaires, and literature studies. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with SPSS software to determine the mean value. The result showed that social distancing policies affect SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is indicated by the decreasing income and demand for SMEs products, and even some have no income (mean values of 2.40) due to the social distancing policies. Besides, the policy’s impact is also shown in the increasing cost of raw materials and production costs due to supply chain problems (mean values of 4.79). The policy’s impact raises anxiety for SMEs to survive so that business actors change their plans by utilizing information technology (mean values of 4.81). This change is a strategy to survive due to the impact of the applied policies. Although social distancing policies affect SMEs’ survival during the pandemic, research findings show that SMEs in Indonesia did not terminate employment (mean values of 4.37) due to the presence of economic stimulus policies that helped SMEs survive and grow during the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
The impact of strategic human resources planning on the organizational performance of public shareholding companies in Jordan
Shaker Al-Qudah , Abdallah Mishael Obeidat , Hosam Shrouf , Mohammed A. Abusweilem doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.19Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 219-230 Views: 3302 Downloads: 3327 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯPerformance management (PM) is a common practice used by organizations to assess and manage employees’ work. Much of PM research is closely related to management practices. Corporations in the public and nonprofit sector continuously develop PM programs to ensure the sustainability of their organizations.
The study aims to analyze the impact of strategic human resources planning on the organizational performance of Jordanian public shareholding companies for senior management and functional unit managers (human resources, marketing, finance, and accounting). The researchers surveyed all the public shareholding companies registered with the Jordan Securities Commission (JSC) in 2019, wherein they found that only 60 companies applied strategic planning and human resources planning (HRP) together. Two hundred and twenty questionnaires were distributed in 52 companies surveyed, and 203 were adopted for statistical analysis. Several statistical methods were used, most notably the multiple regression analysis. The researchers found out a statistically significant impact of the strategic human resources planning (integration of HRP and strategic planning; strategic participation) on organizational performance. The results showed that adopting the strategic HRP dimensions leads to an increase in an organization’s overall productivity, employee satisfaction and reputation, as well as reduced operating costs. HR managers must understand the effectiveness of strategically designed HR practices across functions. -
The role of knowledge management in organizational performance: case study of University of Malang, Indonesia
Andi Nu Graha , Achmad Sudiro , Armanu , Kusuma Ratnawati doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.20Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 230-243 Views: 2379 Downloads: 356 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe present study puts forward a model that examines variables of human resources management practices, organizational culture, knowledge management and organizational performance. By this model, it intends to explore the effects of human resources management practices and organizational culture on organizational performance. Particularly, it intends to find out their relationship with knowledge management as a mediator. The research applies SmartPLS for data analysis, with 163 respondents by means of saturation sampling technique. The results display several facts. First, both HRD practices and organizational culture have significant effects on knowledge management. Second, while knowledge management and organizational culture have a significant effect on organizational performance, HRD practices do not significantly affect organizational performance. It makes knowledge management only serve a partial mediation between human resources management practices and organizational performance, and serve a full mediation between organizational culture and organizational performance.