Commercialization of intellectual property objects in industrial enterprises
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.37
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #3, pp. 465-477
- Cited by
- 374 Views
-
182 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Introducing the results of innovative activity into economic circulation is one of the essential characteristics of an effective industrial enterprise. Commercializing intellectual property objects involves coordinated production and commercial activity, adopting and implementing scientifically based decisions. This is necessary to successfully pass an intellectual product through all stages of its life cycle.
The purpose of this study is to form market processes for commercializing intellectual property objects at industrial enterprises, finding the most effective option for their introduction into economic circulation.
The theoretical investigation of the problem made it possible to identify and analyze various possible conceptual approaches to commercializing intellectual property in an industrial enterprise. Among them are market push, market pull, engineering, and reengineering commercialization models.
Separate stages of forming the market model for commercializing intellectual property in an industrial enterprise are highlighted. First, the methodological principles of the vertical, horizontal, and vertical-horizontal market processes of intellectual property commercialization have been developed. The peculiarities of an intellectual product’s life cycle are determined; based on this, a market model of intellectual property’s life cycle (model of successive changes) is proposed. Finally, for each of the proposed market processes, the main advantages and disadvantages of their practical use are determined, as well as the areas of their most effective usage.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)М31, О32, О33
-
References20
-
Tables3
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Stages of commercialization of intellectual property objects in an industrial enterprise
- Figure 2. Vertical commercialization of intellectual property objects
- Figure 3. Horizontal commercialization of intellectual property objects
- Figure 4. Vertical-horizontal commercialization of intellectual property objects
- Figure 5. Market model of the life cycle of intellectual property (the market process of successive changes)
-
- Table 1. Economic prerequisites for using vertical commercialization of intellectual property objects
- Table 2. Economic prerequisites of horizontal commercialization of intellectual property objects
- Table 3. Economic characteristics of vertical-horizontal commercialization of intellectual property objects
-
- Bozeman, B. (2020). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655.
- Cho, J., & Lee, J. (2013). Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(13), 5314-5330.
- Chukhray, N. I., & Mrykhina, O. B. (2018). Theoretical and methodological basis for technology transfer from universities to the business environment. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 399-416.
- De Prato, G., Nepelski, D., & Piroli, G. (2015). Innovation Radar: Identifying innovations and innovators with high potential in ICT FP7, CIP & H2020 Projects (Science for Policy Report). Joint Research Centre.
- Dereń, A.-M., & Skonieczny, J. (2018). Marketing Intellectual Property. Marketynh i tsyfrovi tekhnolohii – Marketing and Digital Technologies, 2(2), 21-29.
- Lyalyuk, A. (2017). Marketing Strategies in the Intellectual Property Market. Economic Journal of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 9(1), 45-51.
- Maslak, O. I., Maslak, M. V., Grishko, N. Y., Pererva, P. G., Hlazunova, O. O., & Yakovenko, Y. Y. (2021). Artificial Intelligence as a Key Driver of Business Operations Transformation in the Conditions of the Digital Economy. Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy Systems, MEES.
- Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: A new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140-156.
- Morrison, J. (2021). Intellectual Property & National Security. The University of Cincinnati Intellectual Property and Computer Law Journal (IPCLJ), 6(1), 8.
- Novikov, Ye. A. (2019). Pravove rehuliuvannia diialnosti merezh transferu tekhnolohii [Legal Regulations of the Activities of Technology Transfer Networks]. Kharkiv: NDI PZIR NAPrNU. (In Ukrainian).
- Pankevych, V., Bilous, I., Omelyanenko, V., Nagornyi, Y., & Sukhostavets, A. (2019). The world market of intellectual property objects and interests of national security of countries. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(1), 123-137.
- Park, C. (2015). Technology commercialization strategy for R&D institutions [Presentation Slides]. Strategic Business Insights.
- Pererva, P., Kocziszky, G., Szakaly, D., & Veres Somosi, M. (2012). Technology transfer (668 p.). Kharkiv/Miskolc: NTU “KhPI”/ University of Miskolc.
- Pererva, P., Kuchynskyi, V., Kobielieva, T., Kosenko, A., & Maslak, O. (2021a). Economic substantiation of outsourcing the information technologies and logistic services in the intellectual and innovative activities of an enterprise. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(13), 6-14.
- Pererva, P., Usov, M., Chernobrovkina, S., Larka, L., & Rudyka, V. (2021b). Methods for Assessing the Investment Attractiveness of Innovative Projects. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(6).
- Smirnova, N. V. (2015). A generalization of the existing theoretical and methodical approaches concerning the formation mechanism of commercialization of innovations and technology transfer. Ekonomika i Finansy: Naukovyy Zhurnal – Economics and Finance: Scientific Journal, 3, 44-53. (In Ukrainian).
- Soo, C., Tian, A. W., Teo, S. T., & Cordery, J. (2017). Intellectual capital-enhancing HR, absorptive capacity, and innovation. Human Resource Management, 56(3), 431-454.
- Trinci, M. (2018). Technology and audit – a powerful future. KPMG Australia.
- Volpatti, L. R., & Yetisen, A. K. (2014). Commercialization of microfluidic devices. Trends in Biotechnology, 32(7), 347-350.
- Zemlickienė, V., Bublienė, R., & Jakubavičius, A. (2018). A model for assessing the commercial potential of high technologies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(1), 29-54.