Creating innovative design labs for the public sector: A case for institutional capacity building in the regions of Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.26
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #2, pp. 320-332
- Cited by
- 842 Views
-
324 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Innovative design labs were created by public authorities of the USA, Australia, Singapore, Finland, Canada, the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, China, and other countries to accelerate changes and develop modern public service. This paper provides further insight to establishing external innovation accelerators for strengthening capacity of public institutions. The study aims to define the development opportunities for innovative design labs for the public sector in Ukraine’s regions by the case of the Laboratory of Intellectual Development for Empowering Regions (LIDER). The study was conducted at two stages: (1) exploring the features of innovation implementation in the public sector and outlining the main problems of innovation capacity of public institutions; (2) defining the development opportunities for the LIDER via SWOT-analysis. To substantiate the study results, the correlation analysis between autocratic, bureaucratic, competitive, self-protective, and participative leadership behaviors of CEOs and innovation index based on data from 18 countries was performed, as well as a survey of 195 public servants of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine and an interview of 9 experts were conducted.
The following key development opportunities for the LIDER were detected: promoting the introduction of incremental innovations in public institutions by using design thinking methodology; assisting the development of pro-innovative culture and participative leadership via individual-centric and system-oriented approaches; developing effective tools for performance management and supporting public institutions in project activity; organizing the competitions for regional innovative projects; assisting in creation of radically human systems in public institutions.
Acknowledgment
The paper was prepared within the framework of the joint Ukrainian-Lithuanian R&D project “Competence Development of Lithuanian and Ukrainian Public Sector Employees Using Design-Thinking Methodology”.
The project has received funding from the Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT, agreement № S-LU-20-5) and the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (agreement № М/31-2020).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O31, R58
-
References43
-
Tables2
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Visualization of correlation analysis between leadership behaviors and innovation index
-
- Table 1. SWOT-matrix for analysis of the development opportunities for the LIDER
- Table 2. Possibilities for using the strategic linkages from the SWOT-matrix for developing the LIDER
-
- Afonin, E. A., & Balakireva, O. M. (2015). Functional readiness and competence of civil servants in Ukraine to exercise public administration in the context of democracy Ukrainskyi Sotsium – Ukrainian Society, 1, 7-22. (In Ukrainian).
- Allio, L. (2014). Design thinking for public service excellence. Singapore: GCPSE, UNDP.
- Alon, A., Elron, D., & Jackson, L. (2016). Innovation: clear vision, cloudy execution. 2015 US Innovation Survey. Accenture.
- Apolitical. (2019). Mapped: The innovation labs transforming government – and how to get in touch. Innovation Lab Directory.
- Arundel, A., & Huber, D. (2013). From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sector. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 146-159.
- Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789-798.
- ASH Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation. (2019). Selection criteria. Harvard Kennedy School.
- Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: an event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395-415.
- Bloch, C. (2011). Measuring Public Innovation in the Nordic Countries (MEPIN) (Report).
- Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 310-319.
- Bugge, M. M., & Bloch, C. W. (2016). Between bricolage and breakthroughs – framing the many faces of public sector innovation. Public Money & Management, 36(4), 281-288.
- Burnett, M., & Rongione, C. (2019). New solutions to complex challenges: A public sector citizen-centric, sustainable and fit for the future. European Institute of Public Administration.
- Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performers: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675.
- De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2015). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166.
- Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681-1691.
- Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2018). Conditions for complex innovations: evidence from public organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3), 820-843.
- Dzvinchuk, D. I., Petrenko, V. P., Orliv, M. S., & Molodtsov, O. V. (2020). Three-dimensional model of the institutional matrix as a methodological tool for designing institutional changes. Revista Galega De Economía, 29(1), 1-15..
- European Commission. (2013). European public sector innovation scoreboard 2013 – A pilot exercise.
- European Commission. (2019). European innovation scoreboard 2019.
- Gellen, M. (2017). Bureaucrats as innovators? Statistical analysis on innovative capacity within the Hungarian central civil service. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 12(SI), 38-54.
- GLOBE. (2020). Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness: Overview.
- Harb, B., & Sidani, D. (2019). Transformational leadership for organizational change in the Lebanese public sector. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(2), 205-216.
- Hughes, A., Moore, K., & Kataria, N. (2011). Innovation in public sector organisations: A pilot survey for measuring innovation across the public sector (Report). NESTA.
- Lapuente, V., & Suzuki, K. (2020). Politicization, bureaucratic legalism, and innovative attitudes in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 454-467.
- Lau, A., Yusoff, D., & Faisall, Sh. (2016). Design-led innovation in the Singapore public service. The Human Experience Lab, Public Service Division. Singapore.
- Meijer, A. (2019). Public innovation capacity: Developing and testing a self-assessment survey instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 617-627.
- Moldogaziev, T. T., & Resh, W. G. (2016). A Systems theory approach to innovation implementation: Why organizational location matters. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 677-692.
- National Agency of Ukraine for Civil Service. (2019). Uzahalnena statystychna informatsiia shchodo rezultativ otsiniuvannia sluzhbovoi diialnosti fakhivtsiv z pytan reform za 2018 rik [Generalization of statistical information on the results of performance appraisal of specialists on reforms for 2018] (Statistics). (In Ukrainian).
- OECD & Eurostat. (2018). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). Paris/Eurostat and Luxemburg: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2018). HR and leadership strategies for building innovative public sector organisations.
- OECD. (2019). Observatory of public sector innovation.
- OPM. (2019). Federal employee viewpoint survey: Empowering employees. Inspiring change. Office of Personnel Management.
- Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335-1350.
- Rao, A., Hurley, B., Khan, A., & Bhat, R. (2019). Government trends 2020: A report from the Deloitte Center for Government Insights (Report).
- Sahni, N. R., Wessel, M., & Christensen, C. (2013). Unleashing breakthrough innovation in government. Stanford Social Innovation Review.
- Sandor, S. D. (2018). Measuring Public Sector Innovation. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 14(54), 125-137.
- Suzuki, K., Ha, H., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2020). Direct and non-linear innovation effects of demographic shifts. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(3), 351-369.
- Teodoro, M. P. (2009). Bureaucratic job mobility and the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 175-189.
- Torugsa, N., & Arundel, A. (2016). Complexity of innovation in the public sector: A workgroup-level analysis of related factors and outcomes. Public Management Review, 18(3), 392-416.
- Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and enterpreneurship in public service. In P. Windrum & P. Koch (Eds.), Innovation in Public Sector Services, 1, 3-20. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Witell, L., Snyder, H., Gustafsson, A. Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P. (2016). Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2863-2872.
- World Bank Group. (2018). Improving public sector performance: Through innovation and inter-agency coordination (Report).
- Zidonis, Z., Bilinskyi, D., & Nazyrov, K. (2020). Management innovation practices to public sector organizations. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 392-401.