The impact of state regulation in a sphere of education on sustainable development of national economy
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.23
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #4, pp. 275-288
- Cited by
- 774 Views
-
130 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Education is a core element of the Sustainable Development Concept. It is not only because of the declaration of SDG 4 within the 2030 Agenda but also its embeddedness in other goals, targets, and indicators. Thus, the study aims to generalize approaches to define the relationship between the efficiency of the strategy of sustainable development of the national economy and state regulation of education. The research is accomplished for 14 Central and Eastern European countries (2006–2016) using the combination of principal components method and parametric method of stochastic frontier analysis in the software package STATA 11 and FRONTIER 4.1. As a result, the empirical proofs of the strong and adequate link between the efficiency of the sustainable development strategy of the national economy and state regulation of education are identified. The technical efficiency indexes were also calculated that allowed forming three clusters for Central and Eastern European countries distributed by the level of state regulation of education and efficiency of sustainable development strategy implementation. It helps to distinguish the main measures to reform the state regulation of education in Ukraine considering the experience of Slovenia, Poland, the Czech Republic, countries that proved to be the leaders in a sphere of sustainable development strategy implementation. The recommendations for further improvements in educational policies were defined. For instance, effective and sustainable state regulation of education should focus on decentralizing education, developing private-public partnerships, stimulating adult education development, etc.
Acknowledgment and funding
This research was funded by the grant from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine “Reforming the lifelong learning system in Ukraine for the prevention of the labor emigration: a coopetition model of institutional partnership” (No. 0120U102001).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)І26, І28, Q01
-
References77
-
Tables5
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. The integral index of SDGs achievements in the sample of Central and Eastern European countries, 2006 and 2016 (based on authors’ calculations)
- Figure 2. The integral index of efficiency of sustainable development strategy implementations in the sample of Central and Eastern European countries, 2006, 2010, and 2016 (based on authors’ calculations)
-
- Table 1. The TOP-15 most influential papers in the field of research, ranked by Google Scholar Ranking (GSR), cites, and cites per year (C/pY)
- Table 2. The results of the maximum likelihood ratio test for Kobb-Douglas function and the translogarithmic function (criteria are formed based on Eling and Luhnen (2008))
- Table 3. Estimation of the translogarithmic function for the identification of a relationship between state regulation of education (HE) and the efficiency of sustainable development strategies implementation (NEI)
- Table 4. Clusters of Central and Eastern countries distributed by the level of state regulation of education and efficiency of sustainable development strategy implementation
- Table 5. Guidelines for reforming the system of state regulation of education, using best practices of Poland, the Czech Republic, and Slovenia
-
- Aigner, D. J., Knox Lovell, C. A., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.
- Anatan, L. (2018). An institutional perspective of knowledge transfer within university and industry alliance. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 11(4), 378-395.
- Andriychuk, V. G. (2005). The efficiency of agrarian enterprises activity: theory, methodology, analysis. Kyiv: KNEU.
- Arbuthnott, K. D. (2009). Education for sustainable development beyond attitude change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(2), 152-163.
- Atkočiūnienė, Z. O., & Miroshnychenko, O. (2019). Towards sustainable development: the role of R&D spillovers in innovation development. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 409-419.
- Battese, G. E., & Coelli, T. J. (1992). Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: with Application to Paddy Farmers In India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-169.
- Bercu, A.-M., Tofan, M., Cigu, E., & Petrisor, M.-B. (2019). The Government Effectiveness Drivers and Growth. Empirical evidence from CEE countries. Transformations in Business & Economics, 18(2A), 553-567.
- Bhandari, M. P., & Shvindina, H. (Eds.) (2019) Introduction: The Problems and Consequences of Sustainable Development Goals. In Reducing Inequalities Towards Sustainable Development Goals: Multilevel Approach (pp. 1-25). Denmark: River Publishers.
- Bhandari, M. P., & Bhattarai, K. (2017). Institutional Architecture for Sustainable Development (SD): A Case Study from Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan. SocioEconomic Challenges, 1(3), 6-21.
- Bondar, A., & Paszkowski, J. (2019). Intellectual capital as a factor of cooperation between the countries of the eastern partnership and the european union Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 78-91.
- Bordean, O. N., & Sonea, A. (2018). Student satisfaction and perceived skills: any link to employability?, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 356-370.
- Breidlid, A. (2009). Culture, indigenous knowledge systems and sustainable development: A critical view of education in an African context. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(2), 140-148.
- Burmeister, M., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I. (2012). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(2), 59-68.
- Coelli, T. (1996). A guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: A computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation (CEPA Working papers, 96/ 07, 33).
- Costanza, R., Daly, L., Fioramonti, L., Giovannini, E., Kubiszewski, I., Mortensen, L. F., ... & Wilkinson, R. (2016). Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Ecological Economics, 130, 350-355.
- Degtjarjova, I., Lapina, I., & Freidenfelds, D. (2018). Student as stakeholder: “voice of customer” in higher education quality development. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 388-398.
- Eling, M., & Luhnen, M. (2010). Frontier Efficiency Methodologies to Measure Performance in the Insurance Industry: Overview, Systematization, and Recent Developments. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract, 35, 217-265.
- Farrell, M. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
- Golovchanskaya, E. E., Strelchenya, E. I., Popkova, E. G., & Leonenko, O. V. (2018). The key role of intellectual resources in the economic growth models in the institutional environment of innovative activity of the Republic of Belarus: theory and practice. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 11(3), 213-227.
- Goncharova, M. L. (2015). Managerial Consulting in Ukraine: Key Problems, Trends and Development Perspectives. Actual Problems in Economics, 164(2), 136-141.
- Gorobets, A. (2011). Corrections to the human development index and alternative indicators of sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 3(2), 107-115.
- Guziejewska, B., & Majdzińska, A. (2018). The model of municipal education expenditures in Poland. Policy, budget and demography. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(3), 523-541.
- Iacobuta, A., Claudiu, M., Mihai, C., Cautisanu, C., & Cismas, L. (2019). Institutions and sustainable development: a cross-country analysis. Transformations in Business and Economics, 18, 628-647.
- Indiyati, D. (2018). The role of organisational culture, intellectual capital and competitive advantage in supporting the government policies in education. International. Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 11(1/2), 68-82.
- ISO 9000:2015. (n.d.). Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary.
- Jikia, G., Vorontsova, A., & Petrushenko, Yu. (2017). Measuring Efficiency of Financial Support in Lifelong Learning System: A Case Study of Ukrainian Regions. Business Ethics and Leadership, 1(4), 84-92.
- Karlaftis, M. G. (2004). A DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(2), 354-364.
- Karnitis, G., & Karnitis, E. (2017). Sustainable growth of EU economies and Baltic context: Characteristics and modelling. Journal of International Studies, 10(1), 209-224.
- Khalili, N. R., Duecker, S., Ashton, W., & Chavez, F. (2015). From cleaner production to sustainable development: the role of academia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 30-43.
- Kohnová, L., Papula, J., & Salajová N. (2019). Internal factors supporting business and technological transformation in the context of Industry 4.0. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 137-145.
- Kostel, M., Leus, D., Cebotarenco, A., & Mokrushina, A. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals for Eastern Partnership Countries: Impact of Institutions. SocioEconomic Challenges, 1(3), 79-90.
- Kowo, Ak. S., Owotutu, S. Ol., & Adewale, Ad. G. (2019). Enhancing the Operational Effectiveness of Savings and Credit Cooperative Societies for Sustainable Growth. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 3(2), 59-68.
- Kryk, B. (2016). Accomplishment of the European Union lifelong learning objectives in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3), 389-404.
- Kuznetsov, N., Akopova, E., Panasenkova, T., Przhedetskaya, N., & Rodionova, N. (2017). Role of clusters and forms of public-private partnership in provision of sustainable growth on the basis of network cooperation within regional innovational system. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 10(2/3), 142-150.
- Lambovska, M., Rajnoha, R., & Dobrovic, J. (2019). From Quality to Quantity and Vice Versa: How to Evaluate Performance in the Budgetary Control Process. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(1), 53-69.
- Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176-187.
- Lo Storto, C., & Goncharuk, A. G. (2017). Efficiency vs Effectiveness: a Benchmarking Study on European Healthcare Systems. Economics and Sociology, 10(3), 102-115.
- Longman Business English Dictionary (2000). Efficiency.
- Łyszczarz, B. (2016). Public-private mix and performance of health care systems in CEE and CIS countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(2), 169-185.
- Malyarets, L., Barannik, I., Sabadash, L., & Grynko, P. (2019). Modeling the Economic Sustainability of the Macro System (for Example Ukraine). Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(3), 23-35.
- Maroy, C. (2009). Convergences and hybridization of educational policies around ‘post-bureaucratic’models of regulation. Compare, 39(1), 71-84.
- Martínez-Alier, J., Pascual, U., Vivien, F. D., & Zaccai, E. (2010). Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1741-1747.
- Maslak, O., Grishko, N., Vorobiova, K., & Hlazunova, O. (2018). The optimization of the management mechanism of the intellectual capital of Ukraine. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 169-183.
- Matošková, J. (2016). Measuring Knowledge. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(4), 5-29.
- Mazurek, J., & Mielcová, E. (2019). On the relationship between selected socio-economic indicators and student performances in the PISA 2015 study. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 22, 22-39.
- Meeusen, W., & Van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions With Composed Error. International Economic Review, 18, 435-444.
- Mohammadalizadehkorde, M., & Weaver, R. (2018). Universities as Models of Sustainable Energy-Consuming Communities? Review of Selected Literature. Sustainability, 10(9), 3250.
- Moldan, B., Janoušková, S., & Hák, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4-13.
- Mouzas, S. (2006). Efficiency versus effectiveness in business networks. Journal of Business Research, 59(10-11), 1124-1132.
- Nazarko, J., & Šaparauskas, J. (2014). Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 25-44.
- Novikova, I., Stepanova, A., Zhylinska, O., & Bediukh, O. (2020). Knowledge and technology transfer networking platforms in modern research universities. Innovative Marketing, 16(1), 57-65.
- Obeid, H., & Brychko, M. (2017). Stakeholder’s financial relations and bank business management efficiency: evidence from Ukraine. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 1(2), 12-29.
- Palascakova, D., Koľveková, G., & Melas, D. (2019). Analysis of State Investments into Human Capital in Slovak Republic. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 22, 114-128.
- Palienko, M., & Lyulyov, O. (2018). The Impact of Social Factors on Macroeconomic Stability: Empirical Evidence for Ukraine and European Union Countries. SocioEconomic Challenges, 2(1), 103-116.
- Petrunia, Y., Chentsov, V., Życzyński, N., & Petrunia, V. (2019). Marketing environment and marketing management of universities in Ukraine: national and regional dominants. Innovative Marketing, 15(1), 1-12.
- Polyakov, M., Bilozubenko, V., Korneyev, M., & Shevchenko, G. (2019). Selection of parameters for multifactor model in the knowledge economy marketing (country level). Innovative Marketing, 15(1), 89-99.
- Pylypenko, S. M. (2016). Theoretical bases of enterprise efficiency estimation. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problem ekonomiky: elektronne naukove fakhove vydannia – Global and national problems of economy: an electronic scientific professional edition, 10, 452-456. (In Ukrainian).
- Raišienė, A. G., Bilan, S., Smalskys, V., & Gečienė, J. (2019). Emerging changes in attitudes to inter-institutional collaboration: the case of organizations providing social services in communities. Administratiesi Management Public, 33, 34-56.
- Rungsrisawat, S., & Pamornmast, C. (2019). Does the education, health and employment determine the economic growth: a case study. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 701-714.
- Savga, L., Krykliy, O., & Kyrychenko, K. (2018). The Role of Internal and External Stakeholders in Higher Education System in Ukraine. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(1), 32-43.
- Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009). Students’ socio-scientific reasoning on controversies from the viewpoint of education for sustainable development. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 657-687.
- Skliar, I. (2018). Towards the assurance of transparency and quality of higher education in Ukraine: National Qualification Framework. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(1), 96-105.
- Skliar, I. D., & Samoilikova, A. V. (2014). Risk Evaluation at Enterprise Innovation And Investment Activity Financing. Actual Problems of Economics, 11(161), 173-178.
- Smaliukienė, R., Bekešienė, S., Chlivickas, E., & Magyla, M. (2017). Explicating the role of trust in knowledge sharing: a structural equation model test. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(4), 758-778.
- Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., & O’Connell, D. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911-919.
- Steiner, G., & Posch, A. (2006). Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: an innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9), 877-890.
- Tvaronavičienė, M., Tarkhanova, E., & Durglishvili, N. (2018). Sustainable economic growth and innovative development of educational systems. Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 248-256.
- Ulewicz, R., & Blaskova, M. (2018). Sustainable development and knowledge management from the stakeholders’ point of view. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2), 363-374.
- United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York.
- Vaiciukevičiūtė, A., Stankevičienė, J., & Bratčikovienė, N. (2019). Higher education institutions’ impact on the economy. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(3), 507-525.
- Volchik, V., & Maslyukova, E. (2019). Trust and development of education and science. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 1444-1455.
- Vorontsova, A. S., Lieonov, S. V., Vasylieva, T. A., & Artiukhov, A. Y. (2018). Innovations in the financing of lifelong learning system: expenditure optimization model. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 218-231.
- Vorontsova, A., Mayboroda, T., & Lieonov, H. (2020a). Innovation management in education: impact on socio-labour relations in the national economy. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 346-357.
- Vorontsova, A., Vasylieva, T., Bilan, Y., Ostasz, G., & Mayboroda, T. (2020b). The influence of state regulation of education for achieving the sustainable development goals: case study of Central and Eastern European countries. Administratiesi Management Public, 34, 6-26.
- Wierzbicka, W. (2018). Information infrastructure as a pillar of the knowledge-based economy — an analysis of regional differentiation in Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(1), 123-139.
- Yuan, X., & Zuo, J. (2013). A critical assessment of the Higher Education For Sustainable Development from students’ perspectives–a Chinese study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 108-115.
- Zuzeviciute, V., Praneviciene, B., Simanaviciene, Z., & Vasiliauskienė, V. (2017). Competence for Sustainability: Prevention of Dis-Balance in Higher Education: The Case of Cooperation While Educating Future Law Enforcement Officers. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13, 121-130.