Examining the integrity behavior challenges of enforcement officers in Malaysian local government
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.23
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #1, pp. 263-277
- Cited by
- 1083 Views
-
747 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
There is a call from society to examine the integrity behavior challenges of local government (LG) enforcement officers who work directly with citizens due to the nature of this job. One of the job requirements of enforcement officers is to investigate law enforcement directly to their customers, such as petty traders, hawkers, business owners, developers and contractors, and others. In executing their duties, particularly on law enforcement, high integrity behavior and professionalism of enforcement officers in LG administrative areas of responsibility are necessary. Based on the framework, the study aims to examine the integrity behavior challenges of enforcement officers from the citizens’ and staff’ perspectives, in particular, on to what extent the officers face the difficulties and challenges in executing their enforcement tasks. Thus, during the study, 30 respondents, namely the citizens and LG staff in Kedah, were surveyed. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to gain specific dimensions related to integrity behavior. From the citizens’ perspective on LG enforcement teams’ integrity behavior, challenges were related to main aspects such as biasness, political intervention, and bureaucracy matters. Meanwhile, LG staff consider integrity behavior challenges to be affected by opportunistic attitudes among staff, workforce, and financial issues. The study suggests that enforcement officers should develop soft skills, employability skills, and upgrade academic levels to understand the current situation and develop negotiation skills to deal with grassroots society.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O15
-
References50
-
Tables2
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Integrity and enforcement frameworks from the citizens’ perspective
- Figure 2. Integrity and enforcement frameworks from LG regulator’s perspective REFERENCES
-
- Table 1. The list of respondents’ profile among citizens
- Table 2. List of respondents’ profiles among LG staff
-
- Ahmad Sarji Bin Abdul Hamid (1996). Circulars on Administrative Reform in The Civil Service of Malaysia (1991–1996). Kerajaan Malaysia.
- Alam, M. M., Johari, R. J., & Said, J. (2018). An empirical assessment of employee integrity in the public sector of Malaysia. International Journal of Ethics and System, 34(4), 458-471.
- Ali, N., & Abdullah, M. A. (2012). The food consumption and eating behaviour of Malaysian urbanites: Issues and concerns. Geografia Malaysia Journal of Society and Space, 8(6), 157-165.
- Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Regulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Baker, S. E., & Edwards, R. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and ceases in qualitative research. National Centre for Research Methods.
- Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Beaglehole, J. H. (1976). The District: A Study in Decentralization in West Malaysia (Issue 6 of Hull monographs on South-East Asia). University of Hull.
- Binh, P. D. (2014). Provincial Monitoring and Control System in Vietnam: Case Study of Hai Duong Province. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(4), 220-227.
- Black, J., & Baldwin, R. (2010). Really responsive risk-based regulation. Law and Policy, 32(2), 181-213.
- Boyd-Swan, C. H., & Molina, A. D. (2019). Public Service Integrity and the Quality of Governance: Examining the Role of Citizen-Administrator Value Congruence. Public Integrity, 21(3), 229-247.
- Chua, Y. P. (2012). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan: Asas Statistik Penyelidikan (Buku 2). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Colquitt, J. A., & Salam, S. C. (2009). Foster Trust through Ability, Benevolence and Integrity. In E. A Locke (Ed.), Handbook of Principles of Organization Behavior: Indispensable Knowledge for Evidence-based Management (pp. 389-404). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Cresswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research (2nd ed.). SAGE; Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
- Danziger, J. N. (2007). Understanding the Political World: A Comparative Introduction to Political Science (8th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
- Erakovich, R., & Kolthoff, E. (2016). Analysis of Ethical Leadership and Integrity Development in Local Government: The United States. The Netherlands, Montenegro, and Serbia. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(11), 872-882.
- Friese, S. (2019). ATLAS.ti 8 Windows – User Manual – updated for program version 8.4. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. Berlin: Germany.
- Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. London: UK.
- Guest, G., Namey, E. E., & Mitchell, M. L. (2012). Collecting Quantitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
- Houston, D., & Harding, L. H. (2013). Public trust in government administrators: Explaining citizen perceptions of trustworthiness and competence. Public Integrity, 16(1), 53-75.
- Huberts, L. (2014). The integrity of governance: What it is, what we know, what is done, and where to go. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Javier, F. (2007). Assessing corruption – An analytical review of corruption measurement and its problems: Perception, error and utility.
- Jiménez, F., García-Quesada, M., & Villoria, M. (2014). Integrity Systems, Values, and Expectations: Explaining Differences in the Extent of Corruption in Three Spanish Local Governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 67-82.
- Keane, A., Jones, J. P. G., Edwards-Jones, G., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2008). The Sleeping Policeman: Understanding Issues of Enforcement and Compliance in Conservation. Animal Conservation, 11(2), 75-82.
- Kolthoff, E., Erakovich, R., & Lasthuizen, K. (2010). Comparative analysis of ethical leadership and ethical culture in local government: US, Netherlands, Montenegro and Serbia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(7), 596-612.
- KPKT Policy and Inspectorate Department. (2014). The Star Rating System.
- Laporan Pembahruan dan Kemajuan dalam Perkhidmatan Awam (2000). Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia: Memperkukuh Agenda Pembaharuan. Malaysia: Unit Pemodenan Tadbiran dan Perancangan Pengurusan Malaysia (MAMPU).
- Macrory, R. (2006). Regulatory Justice: Making Sanctions Effective. Bloomsbury: London.
- Manaf, H. A., Armstrong, S. J., Lawton, A., & Harvey, W. S. (2018). Managerial tacit knowledge, individual performance, and the moderating role of employee personality. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(15), 1258-1270.
- Manaf, H. A., Mohamed, A. M., & Lawton, A. (2016). Assessing public participation initiatives in local government decision-making in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(11), 812-820.
- McLeod, R., & Harun, H. (2014, May). Public Sector Accounting Reform at Local Government Level in Indonesia. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(2), 238-258.
- Menzel, D. C. (2015). Research on Ethics and Integrity in Public Administration: Moving Forward, Looking Back. Public Integrity, 17(4), 343-370.
- Ministry of Housing and Local Government. (2008). Circular from the Head of Secretary.
- Mohamad, M. H., Daud, Z., & Yahya, K. K. (2014). Prediction of transformational leadership on employees’ good governance in Malaysian local government authorities: A pilot study. International Journal of Management Research and Review, 4(2), 163-171.
- Mohamad, M. H., Daud, Z., & Yahya, K. K. (2016). The influence of leadership styles on subordinates’ integrity in Malaysia local authorities: The mediating role of trust. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 24, 119-131.
- Nabatchi, T. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 699-708.
- Ngah, K., Zakaria, Z., Mustaffa, J., & Sawal, M. Z. H. M. (2011). The future challenges of local authorities in Malaysia: A case study in Seberang Perai. African Journal of Business Management, 5(26), 108-141.
- Noon, M. (2010). The shackled runner: Time to rethink positive discrimination? Work, Employment and Society, 24(4), 728-739.
- Oakley, A., Hood, S., Mayall, B., & Oliver, S. (Eds.). (1999). People’s Way of Knowing, Gender and Methodology: Critital Issues in Social Research. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Pekeliling Kemajuan Pentadbiran Awam Bil.1 Tahun (2001). Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Penandaarasan Dalam Perkhidmatan Awam. Malaysia: Unit Pemodenan Tadbiran dan Perancangan Pengurusan Malaysia (MAMPU).
- Phang, S. N. (1989). Sistem Kerajaan Tempatan di Malaysia. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur.
- Phang, S. N. (2008). Decentralisation or recentralisation? Trend in local government in Malaysia. Commonwealth Journal of Local Government, 1, 126-132.
- Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Clerkin, R. M. (2014). Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics and Law in the Public Sector (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Rosli, M. H., Abd Aziz, M. A., Mohd, F., & Said, J. (2015). Integrity system in Malaysian public sector: An empirical finding. Procedia Economic and Finance, 28, 260-265.
- Said, J., Alam, M. M., & Khalid, M. A. (2016). Relationship between good governance and integrity system: Empirical study on public sector of Malaysia. Humanomics, 32(2), 151-171.
- Tracey, S. J. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Wahani, R. J. V., Hakim, A., Soeaidy, S., & Noor, I. (2014). The Implementation of Corruption Prevention Policies: A Study on Municipal Government of Surakarta. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 6(5), 9-17.
- Yulk, G. (2009). Leading Organizational Learning: Reflections on Theory and Research. Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 49-53.
- Zukmund, W. G., Babin, B, J., Carr, J. C., & Grifin, M. (2013). Business Research Methods. South-Western: Cengage Learning.