Testing the fruitfulness of the institutional environment for the development of innovative-entrepreneurial universities in Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.23
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #4, pp. 274-288
- Cited by
-
Funding dataFunder name: Ternopil National Economic UniversityFunder identifier: –Award numbers: –
- 1045 Views
-
146 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Strengthening the integration of higher education, research, and innovation is a crucial requirement of time. The entrepreneurial university today is considered and analyzed as a promising model for their combination. The educational and scientific systems of many countries are faced with the task of converging all vertices of the “knowledge triangle.” The problem of Ukrainian educational and scientific system is a necessity to implement the concept of formation of the innovation and entrepreneurial model of a modern university, which will enable the effective implementation of administrative reforms in this field. The article aims to analyze the impact of innovative environmental factors on the development of entrepreneurial universities in Ukraine, based on correlation and panel regression analysis. The method of quantitative analysis (panel regression) is used to formulate the key results of the article. The results show that the growth of government expenditures by 1% leads to an increase in the Global Innovation Index by 0.375 in 4 years. Also, every additional 1% of people working with new technologies increases the level of Global Innovation Index by 0.75 annually. Despite European trends, Ukrainian educational environment does not contribute to the development of innovation and entrepreneurial universities (the education expenditures are ineffective). The research provides a vector for understanding the implementation of the most effective strategies of promising innovation and investment development of education and science in Ukrainian universities, considering their existing potential and contemporary world trends of development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)A12, I23, I25, O30
-
References32
-
Tables4
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Education and universities development
- Figure 2. Government expenditure on education, 2000–2015
- Figure 3. Histogram of the distribution of the share of education costs to the general budget of the countries
- Figure 4. Dependence between the number of HEIs and the GII in Ukraine
- Figure 5. Dependence between the number of students and the GII in Ukraine
-
- Table 1. Global Innovation Index
- Table 2. Model results – 1
- Table 3. Human Resources in Science and Technology (HRST), % of active population
- Table 4. Model results – 2
-
- Cole, J. R. (2010). The great American university: its rise to pre-eminence, its indispensablenation role, why it must be protected. New York: Public Affairs.
- Curley, M., & Formica, P. (2013). The experimentalnature of new venture creation: Capitalizing on open innovation 2.0. New York: Springer.
- Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: university-industry-government: innovation in action. London: Routledge.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
- European Commission (2003). Green Paper. Entrepreneurship in Europe.
- European Commission (2006). Economic reforms and competitiveness: key messages from the European Competitiveness Report 2006.
- Eurostat, the Statistical Office of the European Communities (2007). European business – Facts and figures (448 p.).
- FICCI (2017). Leapfrogging to Education 4.0: Student at the core (80 p.).
- General Accounting Office (GAO) (1980). Bayh-Dole Act.
- Global Innovation Index (2019). The Global Innovation Index (GII) 2019: Creating Healthy Lives – The Future of Medical Innovation.
- Karpov, A. O. (2017). Sovremennyy universitet kak draivar ekonomicheskogo rosta: modeli i missii [Modern university as an economic growth driver: models & missions]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 3, 58-76. (In Russian).
- Kharlamova, G. O., Stavytskyy, A. V., & Zarotiadis, G. (2018). The impact of technological changes on income inequality: the EU states case study. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 76-94.
- Koziuk, V., Dluhopolskyi, O., Hayda, Y., & Klapkiv, Y. (2019). Does education quality drive ecological performance? Case of high and low developed countries. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 5(S1), 22-32.
- Kutsenko, V. I. (2010). Spivpratsia osvity ta nauky u rozbudovi innovatsiinoi ekonomiky [Collaboration of education and science in the development of innovative economy]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii – Marketing and innovation management, 2, 100-107. (In Ukrainian).
- Lane, J. E., & Johnstone, D. B. (2013). Higher education system 3.0: Harnessing system ness, delivering performance. New York: SUNY Press.
- Laptevа, A. V., & Efimov, V. S. (2016). New Generation of Universities. University 4.0. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 11(9), 2681-2696.
- Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2010). Fertility, Human Capital, and Economic Growth over the Demographic Transition. European Journal of Population, 26(2), 159-182.
- Leutz, W. (2012). Foreign-Born Workers in Long-Term Supportive Services. Public Policy & Aging Report, 22(2), 1-11.
- Makrides, G. A. (2019). The Evolution of Education from Education 1.0 to Education 4.0: Is it an evolution or a revolution?
- Molchanova, E. Yu., & Dluhopolskyi, O. V. (2019). Vid pokolinnia X do pokolinnia Z: vyklyky dlia osvity ta biznesu [From generation X to generation Z: challenges for education and business]. In T. Finikov & Sukharski (Eds.), Innovatsiinyi universytet i liderstvo: proekt i mikroproekty – III [Innovative university and leadership: project and microprojects - III] (pp. 300-315). Warsaw: Wydzial “Artes Liberales” UW. (In Ukrainian).
- Nour, S. M. (2016). Economic Systems of Innovation in the Arab Region (309 p.). Palgrave Macmillan US.
- Osetskyi, V. L. (2017). Yakisnyi osvitnii protses v umovakh universytetskoi avtonomii [Qualitative educational process in the conditions of university autonomy]. Internatsionalizatsiia osvity i nauky: natsionalni osoblyvosti ta svitovi tendetsii: kolektyvna monohrafiia [Intenationalization of education and science: national peculiarities and global tendencies: joint monograph]. (In Ukrainian). Kyiv.
- Osetskyi, V. L. (2018). Strategic priorities of innovative development of institutional architecture of economy of Ukraine and Georgia. Strategic priorities for Developing Ukraine and Georgia: Innovation and Partnership (308 p.). Batumi.
- Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (2009). University governance. Western European Comparative Perspectives. Netherlands: Springer.
- Rai, S. M., Brown, B. D., & Ruwanpura, K. N. (2019). SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth – a gendered analysis. World Development, 113, 368-380.
- Reichert, S., & Tauch, Ch. (2003). Trends 2003: Progress towards the European Higher Education Area.
- Scott, R. (2009). Innovative strategy in the Great Britain. Foresight-Russia, 3(4), 16-21.
- Shevchenko, V. V. (2019). The reform of the higher education of Ukraine in the conditions of the military political crisis. International Journal of Educational Development, 65, 237-253.
- Sotula, O., & Denysenko, V. (2019). Application of fuzzy logic approach for the determination of the integral index of the implicit impact of the higher education system on regional development (on the example of Ukraine). The 8th International Conference on Monitoring, Modeling & Management of Emergent Economy (M3E2 2019), 65.
- Stavytskyy, A. V. (2018). Challenges for Higher Education: The Case of Ukraine. In Sustainable Futures for Higher Education (pp. 109-113).
- Stillman, D. (2018). Lyudi Z [People Z]. Harvard Business Review Rossiya – Harvard Business Review Russia. (In Russian).
- Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and Productive Efficiency of University Intellectual Property Licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109-124.