Removing the barriers on the way to European high-performance finance functions
-
Received August 23, 2019;Accepted December 20, 2019;Published December 27, 2019
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6442-8642
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.30
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #4, pp. 370-380
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 784 Views
-
139 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
One of the most important staff units in an organization is the finance function, as this function maintains the relations with all parts of the organization and operates at a management team level. Therefore, this function needs to transform itself into a high-performance finance function (HPFF). Unfortunately, finance functions encounter many barriers before they can start this transformation. In this article, the research question “What are the most important barriers which have to be dealt with in order for the finance function to start its transition to a high-performance finance function?’ is addressed. For this, a review of the professional literature (as no academic studies could be found on the topic), a small-scale survey among finance professionals, and Delphi research with 14 highly experienced finance experts were conducted. The results of the research were the following Top 10 of barriers of most important obstacles: 1) inefficient and not integrated business processes; 2) data not (yet) in order; 3) insufficient leadership and insufficient will to change; 4) no culture of change and improvement in the finance function; 5) inadequate ICT systems; 6) lack of buy-in from the business for the transformation; 7) insufficient knowledge in the finance function of the business; 8) not the right capacities/people/skills in the finance function; 9) insufficient/unclear business objectives and priorities; 10) business managers do not sufficiently manage the analyses and insights provided by the finance function.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10
-
References52
-
Tables1
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Schematic overview of the Delphi research process
-
- Table 1. Top 10 of most severe barriers in the transformation into HPFF
-
- ACCA (2016). Professional accountants – the future: generation next. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London.
- ACCA & IMA (2014). Financial insight: challenges and opportunities. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London.
- Accenture (2011). Delivering value in a complex world: the next battleground for the Finance organization. Accenture LLC, Chicago.
- Accenture (2014). The CFO as architect of business value, delivering growth and managing complexity. Accenture 2014 High Performance Finance Study, Accenture LLC, Chicago.
- Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi Method and its application to social policy and public health. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
- CFO Research & SAP (2014). Building High-Performing Finance Functions. CFO Publishing LLC, Boston.
- CFO Signals (2017). What North America’s top finance executives are thinking - and doing. The CFO Program, Deloitte Development LLC.
- Chapman, R. J. (1998). The effectiveness of working group risk identification and assessment techniques. International Journal of Project Management, 16(6), 333-343.
- Dawson, M. D., & Brucker, P. S. (2001). The utility of the Delphi method in MFT research. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 29(2), 125-140.
- De Waal, A., & Bilstra, E. (2016). Hoe bouw je een high performance financiële functie [How to build a high-performance finance function]. Vakmedianet, Deventer.
- De Waal, A., & Goedegebuure, R. (2017). Investigating the causal link between a management improvement technique and organizational performance: The case of the HPO framework. Management Research Review, 40(4), 429-450.
- Delbeq, A., Van de Ven, A., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott Foresman, Glenview.
- Deloitte (2013). Finance business partnering, making the right move. Deloitte & Touche, Dublin.
- Deloitte (2015). The Deloitte Finance benchmark, getting back to growth. Deloitte Development LLC.
- Ehrenhalt, S., Koudal, P., Chaudhuri, A., & Rao, A. (2008). Finance masters: How Finance is Quietly Emerging as a Key to Business Transformation. Deloitte Review, 3, 35-45.
- Ernst & Young (2010). The DNA of a CFO: a study of what makes a Chief Financial Officer. Ernst & Young, New York.
- EY (2016). Is the future of finance new technology or new people? Preparing for the future finance function. EYG, London.
- Favaro, P. (2001). Beyond bean counting: the CFO’s expanding role. Strategy & Leadership, 29(5), 4-8.
- Guiterrez, O. (1989). Experimental techniques for information requirements analysis. Information and Management, 16(1), 31-43.
- Hoe, S. L. (2009). Transforming finance for the future. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 6(1), 65-77.
- Hsihui, C., Ittner, C. D., & Paz, M. T. (2014). The Multiple Roles of the Finance Organization: Determinants, Effectiveness, and the Moderating Influence of Information System Integration. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 1-32.
- Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.
- IBM (2010). The new value integrator: insights from the Global Chief Financial Officer study. IBM Global Business Services, New York.
- KPMG (2008). Finance of the Future: looking forward to 2020. KPMG LLP, London.
- Kraan, D. (2017). Enhancing the finance function in line ministries. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 16(2), 75-92.
- Laick, S. (2012). Using Delphi methodology in information system research. International Journal of Management Cases, 14(4), 261-268.
- Lawson, R. (2013). Rising to the challenge, achieving real-time visibility across the organization, IMA® the association of accountants and financial professionals in business.
- Linstone, H., & Turloff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co, London.
- Loo, R. (2002). The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(4), 762-769.
- Lyon, J., & Kops, D. (2012). Finance transformation: experts insights on shared services and outsourcing. Accountants in Business, ACCA.
- Mahlendorf, M. D. (2014). Discussion of: The Multiple Roles of the Finance Organization: Determinants, Effectiveness, and the Moderating Influence of Information System Integration. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 33-42.
- McKinsey & Company (2016). Are today’s CFOs ready for tomorrow’s demands on finance? McKinsey & Company, New York.
- O’Connor, J. Schneider, L., & Willman, T. (2014). The world-class performance advantage: how leading finance organizations outperform their peers. Finance Executive Insight, The Hackett Group.
- Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29.
- Oracle & Accenture (2013). The CFO as catalyst for change. Oracle and Accenture, Redwood Shores.
- Owens, D. W. (2016). The Finance Function’s Readiness for Change. CFO Research and WNS, CFO Publishing, Boston.
- Payne, R. (2014). Finance business partnering: a guide. ICAEW, London.
- PWC (2012). Putting your business on the front foot: Finance effectiveness benchmark study 2012. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
- PWC (2014). Finance matters, Finance Function of the future. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
- PWC (2017). Stepping up: How finance functions are transforming to drive business results. Finance Effectiveness Benchmark Report 2017, PricewaterhouseCoopers, USA.
- Robert Half (2013). The growing importance of finance teams. Robert Half Netherlands, Amsterdam.
- Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1-21.
- Stitt-Gohdes, W. L., & Crews, T. B. (2004). The Delphi technique: A research strategy for career and technical education. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 20(2), 55-67.
- Turoff, M. (1970). The Design of a Policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2(2), 149-171.
- Van de Ven, A., & Delbecq, A. L. (1974). The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes. Academy of Management Journal, 17(4), 605-621.
- Van Wensveen, M., & Lepeak, S. (2013). Being the best: Inside the intelligent finance function. Insights from our latest global CFO research. KPMG International Cooperative.
- Wang, J. C., Wang, Y. C., & Tai, Y. F. (2016). Systematic review of the elements and service standards of delightful service. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(7), 1310-1337.
- Watson, T. (2008). Public relations research priorities: a Delphi study. Journal of Communication Management, 12(2), 104-123.
- Wilkinson, M., Boyle, M., Haughey, J., Fisher, S., Haupt, M., Alston, R., Mackey, C., & Wanbon, C. (2012). Finance Business Partnering, changing the focus. Deloitte LLP., London.
- Winklbauer, W. T. (2014). Identifying Technical Competencies: A Delphi Approach. Asian Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(2), 83-97.
- Wunder, T., & Mueller, M. (2008). In search of finance excellence. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 19(3), 41-49.
- Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi method and its contribution to decision-making. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio, Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi Method and its application to social policy and public health (pp 3-33). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
-
Industrial Revolutions and their impact on managerial practice: Learning from the past
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #2 pp. 462-478 Views: 4221 Downloads: 1790 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯTechnological changes that come with industrial revolution have largely affected businesses, as well as society. With the current technological shift and Fourth Industrial Revolution, many questions arise regarding the impacts and effects on current ways businesses operate. This study presents a retrospective analysis and overview of previous industrial revolutions. The aim of the retrospective analysis is to identify common characteristics that may lead to lessons learned for the forthcoming Fourth Industrial Revolution and thus complement the current debate on technological change. All previous industrial revolutions have led to change in business environments and new challenges for managers and owners. The findings show that all previous revolutions have led to increase in the number of service jobs created. The key approach of successful countries during the times of industrial revolution has included education as the source of new skills and knowledge necessary for adaption. Countries that were able to produce high skilled people could not only invent, but also adapt to new technologies sooner than others. Similarly, these approaches included introduction of new managerial practices in order to be able to utilize new technologies and new skilled workers effectively. The research article processes secondary data together with literature review on this topic.
-
Barriers to effective value chain management in developing countries: new insights from the cotton industrial value chain
Arthur Mapanga , Collins Ogutu Miruka , Nehemiah Mavetera doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.03Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 22-35 Views: 2570 Downloads: 852 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯA rigorous and extensive application of the value chain management (VCM) has become the vogue in modern day business practices and processes. However, due to the complex and multidimensional nature of value chains, achieving efficient and effective value chain management in real value chains remains a major conundrum for practitioners. Many unknown barriers continue to impede effective and efficient value chain management in developing countries’ industrial value chains. The purpose of this study was to find out the common barriers to effective value chain management in a developing country’s industrial value chains using evidence from the cotton industry in Zimbabwe. The analysis was based on survey data sets obtained from 157 purposively sampled experts from the cotton industry value chain in Zimbabwe. Exploratory factor analysis was used to find the barriers to effective value chain management. The results revealed both architectural and governance barriers to effective value chain management. The findings also presented major policy implications for industrial value chains in the developing countries and also indicated areas for further robust research founded on a broader data set from other developing countries’ industrial chains as a way of validating the findings of this study.
-
Problem aspects of transformation in financial reporting of business entities in Ukraine
Geopolitics under Globalization Volume 1, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 36-44 Views: 1839 Downloads: 753 TO CITEIn many countries International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) have become part of the domestic law or common practice. Ukraine has also taken the first steps to the use of IFRS taking into account its national peculiarities. However, problems occur in the adaptation of international standards, which need to be solved. The proposed article is devoted to the research of specific problems arising during the implementation of IFRS in Ukraine. The author substantiates the expediency of implementing International Financial Reporting Standards in Ukraine, studies the prospects of using international standards in the national accounting practices and defines the principle of transformation as a priority. It determines the stages of IFRS implementation in Ukraine and the problems that arise on each of these stages. As a result, the study highlights the shortcomings of the national accounting system’s reform and ways of optimizing the process of IFRS implementation in Ukraine.