Barriers to effective value chain management in developing countries: new insights from the cotton industrial value chain
-
Author(s)Arthur MapangaLink to ORCID Index: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9115-7000ResearcherID: C-2809-2018
,
Collins Ogutu Miruka
,
Nehemiah Mavetera
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.03
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #1, pp. 22-35
- Cited by
- 2542 Views
-
850 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
A rigorous and extensive application of the value chain management (VCM) has become the vogue in modern day business practices and processes. However, due to the complex and multidimensional nature of value chains, achieving efficient and effective value chain management in real value chains remains a major conundrum for practitioners. Many unknown barriers continue to impede effective and efficient value chain management in developing countries’ industrial value chains. The purpose of this study was to find out the common barriers to effective value chain management in a developing country’s industrial value chains using evidence from the cotton industry in Zimbabwe. The analysis was based on survey data sets obtained from 157 purposively sampled experts from the cotton industry value chain in Zimbabwe. Exploratory factor analysis was used to find the barriers to effective value chain management. The results revealed both architectural and governance barriers to effective value chain management. The findings also presented major policy implications for industrial value chains in the developing countries and also indicated areas for further robust research founded on a broader data set from other developing countries’ industrial chains as a way of validating the findings of this study.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L22, M10, M11
-
References44
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Reliability testing on the items measuring the barriers to effective VCM
- Table 2. Results of KMO and Bartlett’s test of sphericity on barriers to effective VCM
- Table 3. Eigenvalues of the barriers in the cotton industry value chain in Zimbabwe
- Table 4. Initial solution on the barriers
- Table 5. Equamax factor rotation on the barriers to effective VCM
- Table 6. Summary of barriers to effective and efficient VCM in the Zimbabwe cotton value chain
-
- Ackah, D. D., & Agboyi, M. R. (2014). Procurement and the value chain. A tool for achieving effective organizational goal.
- Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2012). Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41.
- Arnold, J., Nicoletti, G., & Scarpetta, S. (2008). Regulation, allocative efficiency and productivity in OECD countries: Industry and firm-level evidence. OECD Economic Department Working Papers, 616, 67.
- Balcik, B., Beamon, B. M., Krejci, C. C., Muramatsu, K. M., & Ramirez, M. (2010). Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: Practices, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(1), 22-34.
- Baldwin, R. E. (2012). Global supply chains: why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going.
- Beckert, J. (2009). The social order of markets. Theory and society, 38(3), 245-269.
- Bratianu, C. (2016). Knowledge dynamics. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 4(3), 323.
- Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of operations management, 29(3), 163-180.
- Chen, J., & Imam, P. (2013). Causes of asset shortages in emerging markets. Review of Development Finance, 3(1), 22-40.
- Christ, K. L. (2014). Water management accounting and the wine supply chain: Empirical evidence from Australia. The British Accounting Review, 46(4), 379-396.
- Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson UK.
- Datta, P. P., & Christopher, M. G. (2011). Information sharing and coordination mechanisms for managing uncertainty in supply chains: a simulation study. International Journal of Production Research, 49(3), 765-803.
- Elms, D. K., & Low, P. (Eds.). (2013). Global value chains in a changing world. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
- Gereffi, G. (2014). Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 9-37.
- Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2016). Global value chain analysis: a primer.
- Ghosh, J. (2010). The unnatural coupling: Food and global finance. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(1), 72-86.
- Humphrey, J., & Memedovic, O. (2003). The global automotive industry value chain: What prospects for upgrading by developing countries?
- Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2001). A handbook for value chain research, 113. Ottawa: IDRC.
- Keynes, J. M. (1924). Alfred Marshall, 1842-1924. The Economic Journal, 34(135), 311-372.
- Kline, R. (2013). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. In Applied quantitative analysis in education and the social sciences (p. 171).
- Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard business review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
- Lauridsen, L. S. (2010). Strategic industrial policy and latecomer development: the what, the why and the how. In Forum for Development Studies, 37(1), 7-32. Routledge.
- Lee, J., Gereffi, G., & Beauvais, J. (2012). Global value chains and agrifood standards: Challenges and possibilities for smallholders in developing countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(31), 12326-12331.
- Lorenzen, M., & Mudambi, R. (2012). Clusters, connectivity and catch-up: Bollywood and Bangalore in the global economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(3), 501-534.
- Matheson, M. T. (2011). Taxing financial transactions: Issues and evidence (No. 11-54). International Monetary Fund.
- Mathur, S. S., Mathur, S., & Kenyon, A. (2012). Creating value: successful business strategies. Routledge.
- McDonald, R. P. (2014). Factor analysis and related methods. Psychology Press.
- Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2008). Global value chains and technological capabilities: a framework to study learning and innovation in developing countries. Oxford development studies, 36(1), 39-58.
- Motta, M. (2004). Competition policy: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Ogbo, A. I., & Ukpere, W. I. (2014). The impact of effective inventory control management on organisational performance: A study of 7up bottling company Nile mile Enugu, Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(10), 109.
- Ostrom, E. (2014). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 6(4), 235-252.
- Pearson, S. (2016). Building brands directly: creating business value from customer relationships. Springer.
- Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2010). Upgrading to compete global value chains, clusters, and SMEs in Latin America.
- Ponte, S., & Sturgeon, T. (2014). Explaining governance in global value chains: A modular theory-building effort. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 195-223.
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 2.
- Prajogo, D., & Olhager, J. (2012). Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 514-522.
- Quarshie, A. M., Salmi, A., & Leuschner, R. (2016). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics journals. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(2), 82-97.
- Ross, D. F. (2013). Competing through supply chain management: creating market-winning strategies through supply chain partnerships. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Sass, D. A., & Schmitt, T. A. (2010). A comparative investigation of rotation criteria within exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(1), 73-103.
- Soosay, C., Fearne, A., & Dent, B. (2012). Sustainable value chain analysis – a case study of Oxford Landing from “vine to dine”. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(1), 68-77.
- Speier, C., Whipple, J. M., Closs, D. J., & Voss, M. D. (2011). Global supply chain design considerations: Mitigating product safety and security risks. Journal of Operations Management, 29(7), 721-736.
- Stadtler, H. (2015). Supply chain management: An overview. In Supply chain management and advanced planning (pp. 3-28). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Taglioni, D., & Winkler, D. (2016). Making global value chains work for development. World Bank Publications.
- Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of management, 37(4), 1019-1042.
-
Challenges of improving effectiveness and efficiency of the higher educational system in developing countries
Saheer Al-Jaghoub ,
Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan 
,
Hussein Al-Yaseen ,
Anas Al-Soud ,
Ahmad Areiqat
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 19-31 Views: 1861 Downloads: 468 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯDue to the country’s lack of natural resources and its dependence on human resources, Jordanian universities have started to implement quality assurance system aiming to improve effectiveness and efficiency of the higher educational system. This paper presents the results of a research that aims to identify the main issues and challenges facing these universities in implementing quality assurance system. Data for this research were collected using a survey mailed to all public and private universities to investigate the main issues affecting the implementation of quality assurance system in Jordanian universities. The results of this research showed that the most important challenges faced by Jordanian universities are: human and lack of awareness, resistance to change and cultural among others. The research findings hoped to be useful for both universities and policy makers in the government in order to realize the full benefits of implementing quality assurance system. Hence, this and other research on implementing quality assurance in higher educational institutions might be of assistance.
-
Institutional support for the organic farming development – a conceptual framework
Olena Dobrovolska ,
José Manuel Recio Espejo
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.09(4).2018.05
Environmental Economics Volume 9, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 50-59 Views: 1775 Downloads: 219 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯRealization of agricultural production complying with the sustainable development principles has resulted in a separate direction – organic farming. Its big difference from all other economy sectors is in its dependence on the natural and climatic conditions. Therefore, agricultural production has a dual nature, namely it depends on the environment health on the one hand, and, on the other hand, directly affects this health through the use of technologies that can both improve and substantially worsen the environmental situation. The institutional support for the organic farming is of great importance. This issue is relevant for scientists from countries, where organic farming is actively developing. In Ukraine, this is also a topical issue. The paper presents a conceptual framework of institutional support for the organic farming development, which includes elements such as state regulation, self-regulation, objects and subjects of organic farming, as well as an organic product market. Legal, informational, infrastructure and financial directions of ensuring the development of organic farming are also defined. The essence of each element is revealed. The main indicators of the organic farming development in Ukraine are analyzed, i.e. the organic farming areas, their proportion in agricultural lands, the number of producers, the volume of the organic market, the volume of organic consumption per capita, as well as the share of domestic organic land in the world's territory. A correlation analysis based on data from the largest world market of the USA made it possible to determine the factors that have the greatest impact on the development of the organic agricultural sector. The number of organic producers is statistically significant, and the share of land in the organic farming does not have a significant impact on the organic product consumption. At the same time, this can be seen from the point of view that the more producers will offer their products, the more saturated the market will be, and therefore the level of the organic products coverage can be greater.
-
Financial system development progress in Western Balkans
Emira Kozarević ,
Nedžad Polić ,
Amela Perić
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(2).2017.01
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 12, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 7-19 Views: 1693 Downloads: 538 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯFinancial system supports economic growth, while its regulatory framework provides stability for investors. Develo-ping countries with bank-oriented financial systems are not attractive to investors, so prolonged status quo leads to economic deterioration. This is particularly the case with some of the most underdeveloped areas in Europe: Western Balkans. It is essential the developing countries in this region consider steps towards financial liberalization, which will help open the borders for capital flows and attract new investments. The main goal of this paper is to review and present the available information related to the banking system development in Western Balkans in terms of ownership structure, capital adequacy, loan and asset performance, return on investment and liquidity. These indicators should provide a clearer picture of the current financial systems in Western Balkans economies and their development progress – useful for comparison with other developing regions and financial transformation and liberalization efforts.
