South Africa University students’ perceptions of key education service quality determinants
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.30
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #3, pp. 377-388
- 1240 Views
-
294 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Understanding higher education (HE) service quality is critical for success in a highly competitive environment, since through a better understanding of the determinants of HE service quality, HE managers and leaders could better manage HE service quality better. A survey was conducted among a purposive judgmental sample of 400 students, from two HE institution campuses in SA, to identify their perceptions of key service quality determinants (KSQDs), and the importance of the KSQDs, by using a semi-structured questionnaire. It was ascertained that students ranked KSQDs as follows: Responsiveness, Assurance, Reliability, Tangibles, and Empathy (RARTE), and in terms of their importance, the KSQDs were ranked as follows: Responsiveness, Reliability, Assurance, Empathy and Tangibles (RRAET). Higher education leadership should take note of the KSQDs and focus their resources on these in order to create an organization that is student-centric.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, C12
-
References33
-
Tables10
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Measurement model for service quality
- Figure 2. Importance of service quality dimensions
- Figure 3. Mean importance ratings of service quality variables
- Figure 4. Comparing service quality importance ratings with actual ratings for each service quality dimension
-
- Table 1. Reliability scores of the research constructs
- Table 2. Convergent and discriminant validity indices
- Table 3. Total variance explained for the service quality measurements
- Table 4. Rotated factor matrix service quality
- Table 5. Model fit indices for SERVPERF dimensions
- Table 6. Correlation between service quality dimensions and measurements
- Table 7. Service quality dimensions and demographic factors
- Table 8. Relationship between the importance of the service quality dimension and their related measurement
- Table 9. Actual and importance rating for each service quality dimension
- Table 10. Cluster analysis results
-
- Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: three instruments compared. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(1), 71-89.
- Abouchedid, K., & Nasser, R. (2002). Assuring quality service in higher education: registration and advising attitudes in a private university in Lebanon. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(4), 198-206.
- Al-Mushasha, N. F., & Nassuora, A. B. (2012). Factors determining e-learning service quality in Jordanian higher education environment. Journal of Applied Sciences (Faisalabad), 12(14), 1474-1480.
- Alnaser, A., & Almsafir, M. (2014). Service quality dimensions and students satisfaction. Journal of Advanced Social Research, 4(6), 1-17.
- Bisschoff, C. (2001). Customer service factors of a Telematic Learning BBA degree. South African Journal of Education, 21(4), 228-233.
- Calvo-Porral, C., Lévy-Mangin, J. P., & Novo-Corti, I. (2013). Perceived quality in higher education: an empirical study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 31(6), 601-619.
- Cheng, Y., & Tam, W. (1997). Multi-models of quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 5(1), 22-31.
- Christiansen, B., Turkina, E., & Williams, N. (2013). Cultural and technological influences on global business. Hershey PA: Business Science Reference.
- Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance-based and perceptions minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125-131.
- Diedericks, R. (2012). Students’ perceptions of service quality at two South African higher education institutions (Doctoral dissertation). North-West University: Potchefstroom.
- Esposito, V. V. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.
- Gbadamosi, G., & De Jager, J. (2008). Measuring service quality in South Africa higher education: developing a multidimensional scale (pp. 8-12). Spain: Global Business and Technology Association.
- Green, P. (2014). Measuring service quality in higher education: A South African case Study. Journal of International Education Research, 10(2), 131- 142.
- Hinterhuber, A., & Liozu, S. (2013). Innovation in Pricing: Contemporary Theories and Best Practices. Oxon: Routledge.
- Kajan, E., Dorloff, F.-D., & Bedini, I. (2012). Handbook of research on e-business standards and protocols: Documents, data, and advanced web technologies. Hershey PA: Business Science Reference.
- Khodayari, F., & Khodayari, B. (2011). Service quality in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(9), 38-46.
- Kontic, L. (2014). Measuring Service Quality in Higher Education: The Case of Serbia. In Human Capital without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for Quality of Life; Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2014 (pp. 645-654). To Know Press.
- McClean, R. (2012). Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Research Methods: University of Bolton, UK, June 28-29, 2012.
- Mertova, P., & Nair, C. S. (2011). Student feedback: the cornerstone to an effective quality Assurance system in higher education. Oxford, England: Chandos Publishing.
- Naidoo, V. (2014). Service quality perceptions of students at a South African university. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(27), 199.
- Nair, C. S. (2010). Leadership and management of quality in higher education. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
- Radder, L., & Han, X. (2009). Service quality of on-campus student housing: a South African experience. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 8(11), 107-120.
- Rauterberg, M. (2003). Human-computer interaction INTERACT’03. Processing IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
- Russell, M. (2005). Marketing Education – A review of service quality perceptions among International students. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 65-77.
- Samervel, R. (2012, August 9). Forum rejects plea, says student is not “consumer”.
- Sultan, P., & Wong, H. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context: a qualitative research approach. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 70-95.
- Van Schalkwyk, R. D., & Steenkamp, R. J. (2014). The exploration of service quality and its measurement for private higher education institutions. Southern African Business Review, 18(2), 83-107.
- Veerasamy, D., Govender, J. P., & Noel, D. T. (2012). International students’ expectations and perceptions of service quality: the case of a higher education institution in South Africa. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 4(10), 588-594.
- Wang, J. (2012). Advancing the service sector with evolving technologies: Techniques and principles. Hershey, PA: Business Science Reference.
- Webber, J. (2011, July 11). Students are not consumers.
- Wood, R. & Brotherton, B., 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Hospitality Management. California: Sage.
- Yousapronpaiboon, K. (2014). SERVQUAL: Measuring higher education service quality in Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1088- 1095.
- Zabadi, A. M. (2013). Implementing Total Quality Management (TQM) on the Higher Education Institutions – A Conceptual Model. Journal of Finance and Economics, 1(1), 42-60.