Assessment of the social expenditure impact on the economic growth in OECD countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.31
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #3, pp. 389-405
- Cited by
- 1053 Views
-
135 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Economic growth is exposed to many socio-economic factors that impact both the formation and allocation of resources. The theoretical part of this article discusses studies by various authors on the social expenditure impact on economic growth, the dependence of this influence on selected funding principles and social policy models. In the empirical part, using the Pooled Mean Group (PMG) procedure and the Fixed Effect Model, the impact of social expenditure on the economic growth in OECD countries is determined. An increased focus is put on assessing the long-term impact of the main types of social expenditures (public and private), based on different financing principles (distribution and accumulation), on the economic growth rates both in OECD in general and in the context of countries (based on the Esping-Andersen’s typology) grouped according to social policy models. The following conclusions are drawn: 1) an increase in the share of total social expenditures in the country’s GDP negatively affects economic growth; 2) an increase in the share of private social expenditures in the country’s GDP contributes to economic growth; 3) the obtained indicators of impact assessment are different depending on a social policy model chosen. The analysis is based on OECD panel data for the period 1980–2013.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)С23, G23, Н55
-
References55
-
Tables9
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Analysis of the social protection impact on the factors determining economic growth
- Table 2. Social policy models
- Table 3. Results of the OECD countries analytical grouping according to the correlation between the share of private social expenditures in the total costs and GDP per capita (average for the years from 1980 to 2013)
- Table 4. Pooled Regression for the logarithm of real GDP per capita and the logarithm of socio-economic factors
- Table 5. Fixed Effect Regression for the logarithm of real GDP per capita and the logarithm of socio-economic factors
- Table 6. Random Effect Regression with for the logarithm of the real GDP per capita and the logarithm of socio-economic factors
- Table 7. Assessment of the social expenditure impact (public and private) on the economic growth
- Table 8. Assessment of the social expenditure impact (public and private) on the economic growth
- Table 9. Assessment of the social expenditure impact (public and private) on economic growth according to social policy models
-
- Adascalitei, D. (2012). Welfare State Development in Central and Eastern Europe: A State of the Art Literature Review. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 4(2).
- Aiginger, K. (2008). Typologies of Social Models in Europe. WIFO.
- Alderman, H., & Hoddinott, J. (2010). Growth‐Promoting Social Safety Nets. 2020 Focus Brief on the World’s Poor and Hungry People. Washington DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
- Alderman, H., & Yemtsov, R. (2012). Productive Role of Safety Nets (Social Protection and Labor Discussion Paper No.1203. Background Paper for the World Bank 2012–2022. Social Protection and Labor Strategy). Washington DC, World Bank.
- Andersen, T. G., & Sorensen, B. E. (1996). GMM Estimation of a Stochastic Volatility Model: A Monte Carlo Study. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 14, 328- 352.
- Arjona, R., Ladaique, M., & Pearson, M. (2003). Growth, Inequality and Social Protection. Canadian Public Policy, Supplement: The Linkages between Economic Growth and Inequal¬ity, 29, 119-139.
- Aspalter, C. (2006). The east Asian welfare model. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(4), 290-301.
- Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data.
- Barrientos, A. (2012). Social transfers and growth: What do we know? What do we need to find out? World Development, 40(1), 11-20.
- Barrientos, A., & Scott, D. (2008). Social Transfers and Growth: A Review. Manchester, UK: Brooks World Poverty Institute, University of Manchester.
- Bassanini, A., Scarpetta, S., & Hemmings, P. (2001). Economic growth: the role of policies and institutions – panel data evidence from OECD countries (OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No. 283).
- Bonoli, G., George, V., & Taylor- Gooby, P. (2000). European Welfare Futures: Towards a Theory of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Cichon, M., Scholz, W., van de Meerendonk, A., Hagemejer, K., Bertranou, F., & Plamondon, P. (2004). Financing social protection. Quantitative Methods in Social Protection. Series Geneva, International Labour Office/ International Social Security Association.
- Commander, S. J., Davoodi, H. R., & Lee, U. J. (1997). The Causes of Government and the Consequences for Growth and Well-Being (World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 1785).
- Dafermos, Y., & Papatheodorou, C. (2010). The Impact of Economic Growth and Social Protection on Inequality and Poverty: Empirical Evidence from EU Countries. Paper presented at 1st International Conference in Political Economy, September 10-12, 2010, Rethymno, Crete.
- Damerau, T. M. (2011). Social Protection: A Necessary Condition for Economic Growth? A Guidance for Governance Decisions under Theoretical Uncertainty. Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University.
- Diamond, P., & Lodge, G. (2013). European Welfare States after the Crisis: Changing Public Attitudes. London: Policy Network.
- Ebbinghaus, B. (2012). Comparing Welfare State Regimes: Are Typologies an Ideal or Realistic Strategy? Paper Presented at European Social Policy Analysis Network – ESPAnet Conference, Edinburgh.
- Egger, P., Radulescu, D., & Strecker, N. (2016). On the Spread of Social Protection Systems (UNU-WIDER Working Paper 2016/99). Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.
- Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Feld, L. P., & Schneider, F. (2010). Survey on the Shadow Economy and Undeclared Earnings in OECD Countries. German Economic Review, 11/2, 109-149.
- Ferrera, M. (1996) The ‘Southern Model’ of Welfare in Social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17-37.
- Furceri, D. (2010). Stabilization effects of social spending: Empirical evidence from a panel of OECD countries. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 21(1), 34-48.
- Furceri, D., & Zdzienicka, A. (2012). The Effects of Social Spending on Economic Activity: Empirical Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries.
- Gebregziabher, F., & Niño-Zarazúa, M. (2014). Social Spending and Aggregate Welfare in Developing and Transition Economies (UNU-WIDER Working Paper 2014/082). Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.
- Grodsky, V. S. (2015). Well-estab¬lished and new ideas of the theory of economic growth and development. Regional development: an electronic scientific and practical journal, 4(8).
- Gwartney, J. D., Lawson, R., & Holcombe, R. G. (1998). The size and functions of government and economic growth. Joint Economic Committee.
- Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029-1054.
- Hansson, P., & Henrekson, М. (1994). A New Framework for Testing the Effect of Government Spending on Growth and Productivity. Public Choice, 8, 381-401.
- Kerem, K., & Põder, K. (2009). Possible Dilemma – Nordic Welfare State versus Anglo-American Liberal Regime: ‘Estonian Social Model’ in a Comparative Context. In J. Sepp, D. Frear & W. Taylor (Eds.), The Key-factors of Business and Socio-Economic Development during the Global Crisis (pp. 89- 105). USA: COPE International.
- Kostadinova, P. (2014). Social Policy Arrangements across Europe: Continuing Disparities between Social Models in the EU? L’Europe en Formation, 2014/2(n 372), 33-50.
- Levy, S. (2007). Can Social Programs Reduce Productivity and Growth? A Hypothesis for Mexico (International Policy Center Working Paper Series Number 37, January). Ann Arbor: Univesity of Michigan.
- Li, J., & O’Donoghue, C. (2012). A Methodological Survey of Dynamic Microsimulation Models (Working Paper Series 2012-002). Maastricht, UNU-MERIT.
- Li, Y., Wang, X., & Westlund, H. (2015). Physical capital, human capital, and social capital: the changing roles in China’s economic growth. Growth and Change, 46(1), 133-149.
- Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic devel¬opment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
- Magnus, Ya. R., Katyshev, P. K., & Peresetskiy A. A. (2004). Econometrics (6th ed.). Мoscow: Delo (in Russian).
- Mankiw, G. N., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992, May). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407-437.
- Manow, P. (2010). Trajectories of Fiscal Adjustment in Bismarckian Welfare Systems. In B. Palier (Ed.), A long goodbye to Bismarck? Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
- Miyamoto, T. (2003). Dynamics of the Japanese Welfare State in Comparative Perspective: Between Three Worlds and the Developmental State. The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy, 2(2), 12-24.
- Morel, N., & Palme, J. (2013). Financing the welfare state and the politics of taxation. In B. Greve (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state. Routledge, London.
- Murshed, S. Mansoob, Badiuzzaman, M., & Pulok, M. Habibullah (2017). Fiscal capacity and social protection expenditure in developing nations (WIDER Working Paper 2017/60). Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.
- Newey, W. (1985). Generalized Method of Moments Specification Testing. Journal of Econometrics, 29, 229-256.
- OECD (2017). Pension Markets in Focus 2017.
- OECD (2018). Stat.
- Palier, B. (2006). The politics of reforms in Bismarckian welfare systems. Revue Française des Affaires Sociales, 1, 47-72.
- Piachaud, D. (2011). Social Protection, Redistribution and Economic Growth. London School of Economics.
- Püss, T., Viies, M., & Maldre, R. (2010). EU-12 Countries in The Context of European Social Model Types. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(12), 37-48.
- Ratnikova, T. A. (2004). Analysis of panel data in the “Stata” packet. Methodical recommendations to “Economic analysis of panel data” computer practical course. Мoscow: Higher School of Economics (in Russian).
- Romer, P. M. (1986, October). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
- Sahn, D., & Alderman, H. (1996). The Effect of Food Subsidies on Labor Supply in Sri Lanka. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(1), 125‐145.
- Sinanoglu, S. (2013). The Road not Taken: A Typologyof the Welfare Regimes in the Middle East and North Africa. Student Essay, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Solow, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.
- Stephen, Kidd (2016). Fiscal Space for Social Protection: Harmonization of Contributory and Non-Contributory programmes.
- Swan, T. (1956). Economic Growth and Capital Accuxb mulation. The Economic Record, 32, 334-361.
- Tridico, P., & Meloni, W. (2018, February). Economic growth, welfare models and inequality in the context of globalisation. The Economic and Labour Relations Review.