Individualized employee engagement or collaborative employee relations: insights on leadership strategies to manage employees in the UK market
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.29
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #3, pp. 366-376
- Cited by
- 1238 Views
-
224 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Leadership can be defined as the ability of an individual to lead or guide other people, teams or organizations. There have been many theories related to this topic including the characteristics of leaders, their situational communication, purpose, performance, authority, vision and mission, charm and presence of mind. The main types of employee engagement discussed in this study are individualized employee engagement and collaborative employee engagement in the context of the UK. This study mainly seeks to investigate the insights of employees and leaders on different leadership strategies to manage employees in the UK-based MNCs. Descriptive and inferential analysis was performed so as to ascertain the influence of two different leadership strategies – Individualized Employee Engagement (IEE) and Collaborative Employee Relations (CER) – on effective employee management. It was validated from findings in this study that employees and leaders both prefer and believe that individualized employee engagement leads to better and effective employee management.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, M19
-
References22
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Descriptive analysis of the demographic background of respondents
- Figure 2. Text frequency analysis
-
- Table 1. Correlation analysis on IEE
- Table 2. Logistic regression analysis on IEE
- Table 3. Correlation analysis on CER
- Table 4. Logistic regression analysis on CER
- Table 5. Frequency analysis on transcripts
- Table 6. Matrix analysis
-
- Aon Hewitt (2015). 2015 Trends in Global Employee Engagement.
- Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2015). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations (Vo. 135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- CEB (2014). The New Power of Collaboration.
- Fletcher, J. (2004). The paradox of postheroic leadership: an essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 647- 661.
- Fletcher, J., & Kaeufer, K. (2003). Shared leadership: paradox and possibility. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
- Guest, D. (2014). Employee engagement: fashionable fad or long term fixture? Abingdon: Routledge.
- Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
- Hofstede, G. (2010). Long- versus short-term orientation: new perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493-504.
- Hong, Y., Liao, H., Hu, J., & Jiang, K. (2013). Missing link in the service profit chain: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 237.
- Ibrar, M., & Khan, O. (2015). The impact of reward on employee performance (a case study of malakand private school). International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 52, 95-103.
- James, K. T. (2011). Leadership in context Lessons from new leadership theory and current leadership development practice. Commission on Leadership and Management in the NHS.
- Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 629-724.
- Kothari, C. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques.
- Lawson, H. (2004). The logic of collaboration in education and the human services. The Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 225-237.
- McFeeters, F. E. (2003). The Effects of Individualism Vs. Collectivism on Learner’s Recall, Transfer and Attitudes Toward Collaboration and Individualized Learning. Virigina Poytechnic Institute and State University.
- Nduru, M. N. (2014). An Investigation into the Effects of Lack of Employee Engagement on Job Performance: A Case Study of UAP Insurance Kenya, Mombasa Branch Office. United States International University – Africa.
- Rebecca, L., & Franke, V. (2013). Culture Matters: Individualism vs. Collectivism in Conflict Decision- Making. Societies, 3, 128-146.
- Salman, W. A., & Hassan, Z. (2015). The impact of teamwork on employee performance. Internatinal Journal of Accounting, Business and Management, 4(1), 77-86.
- Saunders, M., & Tosey, P. (2012). The layers of research design. Rapport (Winter), 58-59.
- Senge, P., & Kaeufer, K. (2001). Communities of leaders or no leadership at all. New York: Prentice Hall.
- Thomas, D. C. (2008). Comparing Cultures: Systematically Describing Cultural Differences. In Cross-cultural Management: Essential Concepts (pp. 47-69). SAGE Publications, Inc: Thousand Oaks.
- Townsend, K., Wilkinson, A., & Burgess, J. (2014). Routes to partial success: collaborative employment relations and employee engagement. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 915- 930.
