The influence of the perceptions of institutional environment on entrepreneurial plans: exploring the moderating effects of firm age and firm size in Bulgarian enterprises

  • Received November 9, 2016;
    Accepted December 5, 2016;
    Published May 10, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Zhelyu Vladimirov , Tzvetan Davidkov , Desislava Yordanova
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1-1).2017.04
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2017, Issue #1 (cont.), pp. 175-182
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    1 articles
  • 1024 Views
  • 259 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

It was acknowledged that institutional environment plays important role for shaping entrepreneurial behavior in transition economies. The present study investigates the influence of entrepreneurs’ perceptions of institutional environment on their entrepreneurial plans in a large representative sample from a transition economy. The findings reveal that institutional environment has a significant influence on entrepreneurial plans and that firm age and size moderate the effect of institutional environment on entrepreneurial plans. The paper provides recommendations for future research and a discussion of practical implications.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Characteristics of the respondents
    • Table 2. Results from a binary logistic regression (dependent variable = PLANS).
    • Acs, Z. J., Desai, S. and Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions, Small Business Economics, 31 (2-3), 219-234.
    • Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211.
    • Aldrich, H. and Auster, E. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications, Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 165-198.
    • Bhat, S. and Khan, R. (2014). Entrepreneurship and Institutional Environment: Perspectives from the Review of Literature, European Journal of Business and Management, 6 (1), 84-91.
    • Cardon, M. and Stevens, C. (2004). Managing human resources in small organizations: What do we know? Human Resource Management Review, 14, 295-303.
    • Dana, L.P. and Ramadani, V. (2015). Context and Uniqueness of Transition Economies. In Dana, L.P. and Ramadani, V. (eds.) Family Businesses in Transition Economies. Springer International Publishing. 39-69
    • ESTAT Agency. (2009). Index of Business Climate, 2002-2008.
    • Estrin, S., Meyer, K.E. and Bytchkova, M. (2006). Entrepreneurship in transition economies, in Casson, M., Yeung, B., Basu, A. and Wadeson (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 693-725.
    • Gollwitzer, P.M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans, American Psychologist, 54 (7), 493-503.
    • Greene, W. (1997). Econometric analysis. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.
    • Hannan, M. and Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change, American Journal of Sociology, 49 (2), 149-164.
    • Henrekson, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and Institutions, IFN Working Paper No. 707, 2007, Stockholm.
    • Kayne, J. (1999). State Entrepreneurship Policies and Programs, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
    • Kozan, M., Oksoy, D. and Ozsoy, O. (2006). Growth plans of small businesses in Turkey: Individual and environmental influences, Journal of Small Business Management, 44 (1), 114-129.
    • McMillan, J. and Woodruff, C. (2002). The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1693, 153-170.
    • Nawata, K. (1994). Estimation of sample selection bias models by the maximum likelihood estimator and Heckman’s two-step estimator, Economics Letters, 45 (1), 33-40.
    • North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • North, D. (1991). Institutions, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 97-112.
    • Pistrui, D. (2003). Growth intentions and expansion plans of new entrepreneurs in transitioning economies: An investigation into family dynamics, entrepreneurship and enterprise development, Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autonóma de Barcelona.
    • Rodrik, D. (2007). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
    • Scase, R. (1997). The role of small businesses in the economic transformation of Eastern Europe: real but relatively unimportant, International Small Business Journal, 16, 113-121.
    • Simeonova-Ganeva, R., Vladimirov, Z., Ganev, K., Panayotova, N., Dimitrova, T., Yordanova, D., Boeva, M., Kulev, D., Peneva, R. and Todorova, M. (2012). Analysis of the Situation and Factors for Development of SMEs in Bulgaria 2011-2012: Economic Recovery and Competitiveness, Bulgarian Small and Medium Enterprises Promotion Agency, Ministry of Economy, Energy and Tourism, Noema, Sofia.
    • Smallbone, D. and Welter, F. (2001). The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies, Small Business Economics, 16 (4), 249-262.
    • Smallbone, D. and Welter, F. (2006). Conceptualizing entrepreneurship in a transition context, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 3 (2), 190-206.
    • Sokol, M. (2001). Central and Eastern Europe a decade after the fall of state-socialism: Regional dimensions of transition processes, Regional Studies, 35 (7), 645-655.
    • Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations, in J.G. March (ed.) Handbook of organizations, Rand McNally: Chicago, 142-193.
    • Trivić, J. and Petković, S. (2015). Different Features of Transition Economies: Institutions Matter, in Dana and L.P., Ramadani, V. (eds.) Family Businesses in Transition Economies, Springer International Publishing. pp. 71-96
    • Van de Ven, A.H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 211-230.
    • Veciana, J.M. (1999). Creación de empresas como programa de investigación científica, Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 8 (3), 11-36.
    • Vladimirov, Z. (2001). Is there well-functioning market economy in Bulgaria? In: European dimensions in the governance and economy of transition countries. Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. Publishing house “Paradigma”, 176-198, Sofia.
    • Welsh, J. and White, J. (1981). A small business is not a little big business, Harvard Business Review, pp. 18-32.
    • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship-conceptual challenges and ways forward, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35 (1), 165-184.
    • Welter, F., Smallbone, D., Aculai, E., Isakova, N. and Schakirova, N. (2003). Female Entrepreneurship in Post Soviet Countries, in Butler, J. (ed.) New Perspectives on Women Entrepreneurs, Information Age, Greenwich, pp. 243-269.
    • Williams, N. and Vorley, T. (2015). Institutional asymmetry: how formal and informal institutions affect entrepreneurship in Bulgaria. International Small Business Journal, 33 (8), pp. 840-861.
    • World Bank. (2014). Doing Business 2015: Going Beyond Efficiency. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    • World Economic Forum. (2014). Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015. WEF, Switzerland.
Related Articles

  • Tourism destination competitiveness models

    Mariya Stankova , Ivanka Vasenska doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/tt.1(1).2017.06
    Tourism and Travelling Volume 1, 2017         Issue #1         pp. 58-64 Views: 1226 Downloads: 439 TO CITE

    Nowadays tourism is one of the few branches which creates jobs in the big Bulgarian cities and big tourist centers as in the rural and mountain areas, providing variety of opportunities for over fifty kinds of specialists from different ages. In those frames, the aim of this paper is to unveil, analyze and evaluate the possibilities for enhancing its competitiveness at destination level trough a sustainable planning model. The object of study is the competitiveness of tourism destination Bulgaria according to The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index. We have combined the expert method and the method of observation, applicable for the analysis of competitiveness, as well as the adopted Index methodology. Moreover, together with its comprehension, the paper suggests a model for sustainable planning and development for the surveyed tourism destination.

  • Applied aspects of time series models for predicting residential property prices in Bulgaria

    Svetoslav IliychovskiORCID , Teodora FilipovaORCID , Mariana PetrovaORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.46
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 20, 2022         Issue #3         pp. 588-603 Views: 541 Downloads: 215 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Accurate housing price forecasts play a critical role in balancing supply and demand in the residential real estate market, as well as in achieving the goals of various stakeholders – buyers, investors, construction contractors, public administration, real estate agencies, special investment purpose companies, etc. The present study aims to investigate the relationship between specific predictors and build a suitable model for forecasting housing prices in Bulgaria. In this regard, a study was conducted on transactions with residential real estate in the city of Sofia for the period from the first quarter of 2016 to the fourth quarter of 2021. The ARIMA model is used in the development to predict the values of the variables. Eight models are tested for the researched factors (24 in total). On this basis, the price per square meter of residential property was predicted, including estimated values from the ARIMA model for the parameters involved in the regression equation. The result showed that there is a strong relationship between the analyzed predictors and the studied variable – price per square meter of housing. The tested models are adequate and the statistical requirements for forecasting the prices of residential properties in Bulgaria are complied.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management