Sustainability reporting in the light of corporate social responsibility development: economic and legal issues
-
Author(s)Victor SukhonosLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-0227
,
Inna MakarenkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7326-5374
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1-1).2017.03
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2017, Issue #1 (cont.), pp. 166-174
- Cited by
- 1712 Views
-
726 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Independent audit assurance of sustainability reporting is the basis for increasing the credibility of the stakeholders, its transparency and reliability; it is a means of implementing legal liability of the company and the evidence of achievement of its legitimacy to the public. The bases for providing such assurance are the standards of implementation of audit tasks in the sphere of sustainable development. Comparative analysis of international practice as for assurance regarding the SR with local realities, based on the reporting database of Ukrainian GRI companies for the 2005-2014 years, witnessed the initial phase of such practices among Ukrainian companies, and the need to strengthen regulatory efforts to determine the legal status of SR auditing standards in Ukraine, ensuring a legal environment and the development of corporate social responsibility initiatives.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G02, G14, M41
-
References20
-
Tables1
-
Figures3
-
- Fig. 1. State of publishing CSR reporting and their assurance in the world in 2011-2015 according Corporateregister.com
- Fig. 2. State of publishing CSR reporting and their assurance in Ukraine in 2011-2015 according Corporateregister.com
- Fig. 3. Share of corporate reports with independent assurance of the biggest companies in the world in 2005-2015, composed from materials of KPMG (Currents of change The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015)
-
- Table 1. The main parameters of verified reports of Ukrainian companies
-
- Adams, C.A., & Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 97-115.
- Adams, C.A. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting – performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17 (5), 731-757.
- Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumpti on of social responsibilities. Academy of Managementlournal, 16, pp. 312-322.
- Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation, Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, 15 (3), 282-311.
- Deegan, C., Cooper, B.J., & Shelly, M. (2006). An investingation of TBL report assurance statements: UK and European evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21 (4), 329-371.
- Dzomira S. (2015). Corporate governance appraisal: annual reports disclosure by commercial banks in Zimbabwe. Banks and Bank Systems, 4 (10), 32-40.
- Faisal Tower, Greg; and Rusmin, Rusmin. (2012). Legitimising Corporate Sustainability Reporting Throughout the World, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 6 (2), 19-34.
- Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the Adoption of Sustainability Assurance Statements: An International Investigation, Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 182-198
- Mohamed A. Omran Theoretical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Critical Review. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, ISSN 2162-30822015, 5(2).
- Morimoto, Risako and Ash, Johnand Hope, Christopher. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: From The oryto Practice. University of Cambridge, Judge Institute of Management Working Paper No. 14/2004.
- O’Dwyer, Brendan and Owen, David and Uneman, Jeffrey, Seeking Legitimacy for New Assurance Forms: Th Case of Assurance on Sustainability Reporting (January 18, 2011). Accounting, Organizations and Society, Forthcoming.
- Perego, P.M. (2009). Causes and consequences of choosing different assurance providers: An international study of sustainability reporting, International Journalof Management, 26(3), 412-425.
- Perego, P., & Kolk, A. (2012). Multinationals’ Accountability on Sustainability: The Evolution of Third-party Assurance of Sustainability Reports, Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 173-190.
- Preston, L.E., & Post, J.E. (1975). Private management and public policy: The principle of public responsibility. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Savitri, E. (2016). Coorporate governance mechanism and the moderating effect of independency on the integrity of financial reporting. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 4 (13), 68-74.
- Simnett, R. (2012). Assurance of sustainability reports. Revision of ISAE 3000 and associated research opportunities, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 3(1), 89-98.
- Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W.F. (2009). Assurance on sustain ability reports: An international comparison, Accounting Review, 84 (3), 937-967.
- Smit, A. M., Zyl, J. (2016). Investigating the extent of sustainability reporting in the banking industry. Banks and Bank Systems, 11 (4), 71-81.
- Wood, D.J. Corporate Social Performance Revisited Donna J. Wood. The Academy of Management Review, 16 (4). (Oct., 1991), 691-718.
- Zorio, A., García-Benau, M.A., & Sierra, L. (2013). Sustainability Development and the Quality of Assurance Reports: Empirical Evidence, Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 484-500.
-
The role of accounting in sustainable development
Inna Makarenko ,
Alex Plastun
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(2).2017.01
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 4-12 Views: 7675 Downloads: 4738 TO CITEIdeology of Sustainable Development and Sustainable Development Goals influence the transformation of business processes in the companies. Professional accountants are important part of this transformation. In this paper the role of accounting in Sustainable Development Goals achievement is discussed. Different approaches to structuring the role of professional accountants in Sustainable Development are investigated. Among them are types of roles that perform accountants, their professional functions, skills and competencies in the corporate environment. As the result a holistic vision of the role of accounting in sustainable development in the new economic conditions is provided.
-
The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: accounting for endogeneity
Hyunjung Choi , Byungchul Choi ,
Jungyoon Byun
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.06
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 69-84 Views: 4623 Downloads: 546 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and earnings management after controlling for endogeneity of CSR. Using a sample of non-financial firms listed on Korean Securities Market between 2002 and 2010, this study finds that ignoring endogeneity biases the estimated relation between CSR and earnings management. Specifically, the results show that the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and discretionary accruals reported in the previous studies becomes insignificant. However, the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and real activities manipulation remains significant even when the endogeneity of CSR commitment is taken into account. Therefore, this study provides evidence that proactive CSR engagement significantly affects firm’s practice of real activities manipulation, while it does not affect its practice of discretionary accruals. These results indicate that CSR commitment leads managers to be more responsible in management of operational activities than in accruals management.
-
Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
Patrick Velte
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.02
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 19-35 Views: 4476 Downloads: 1720 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯCorporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.
