Small business and entrepreneurial venture in an economic conundrum

  • Received February 9, 2016;
    Accepted January 24, 2017;
    Published May 11, 2017
  • Author(s)
    John Amolo , Stephen O. Migiro
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1-1).2017.14
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2017, Issue #1 (cont.), pp. 271-279
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    1 articles
  • 1304 Views
  • 1963 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Does small business add the same value as entrepreneurial venture to an economy? Entrepreneurial ventures are resilient to economic duress, while providing higher quality and quantity of jobs, products and services. A needed entrepreneurial economic omnipresence pervasively stimulates socio-economic mindset in opportunity, rather than resource pursuit. A managed economy is under challenge by a knowledge economy and the policies of the former have become irrelevant for the latter. The unpredictable economic times call for a flexibility associated with an entrepreneurial economy. In this presentation, a literature review was conducted to highlight this conundrum in an economy. The findings are that entrepreneurial ventures have their distinctive features from simply small business enterprise and are better served in an entrepreneurial economy than a managed economy.

The significance of an entrepreneurial business and economy for individuals and policy makers alike has never needed an emphasis as in the days of our economic volatility.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. (1993). Conclusion. In Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B. (eds.) Small Firms entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    • Acs, Z. J., Fritzoy, F. R. and Smith, I. (2002). High Technology employment and R&D in Cities: heterogeneity vs. specialisation. Annals of regional science, 36, 373-386.
    • Audrestch, D. (2012). Entrepreneurship research. Management Decision, 50(5), 755-764.
    • Audrestch, D. B. and Thurick, A. R. (2001a). What is new about the new economy: sources of growth in the managed economy and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 795-825.
    • Audrestch, D. B. and Thurick, A. R. (2004). A model of the entrepreneurial economy. International journal of entrepreneurship education, 2, 142-166.
    • Audretsch, D. B., Grilo, I. and Thurik, A. R. (2007). The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton. MA: US, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
    • Bennett, R. (2008). SME policy in Britain since the 1990’s: what have we learnt? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 375-397.
    • Bork, R. H. (1978). The Antrust Paradox: A policy at war with self. NewYork, NY: Basic Books.
    • Brook W. A. and Evans, D. S. (1983). Small Business Economics. Small Business Economics, 1, 7-20.
    • Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. F., & Carland, J. C. (1984). Differentiating Entrepreneurs from Small Business owners: a conceptualisation. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354-359.
    • Carlsson, B. (1989). The evolution of Manufacturing technology and its impact on industrial structure: an international study. Small Business economics, 1, 21-38.
    • Caves, R. (1982). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Chandler, A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and Scope: The dynamics of industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Chaston, I. (2008). Small creative Industry firms: a development dilemma? Management Decision, 46(6), 819-831.
    • Coarse, R. H. (1937). The Nature of a firm. Economica, 4, 386-405.
    • Emergent Dictators. The F.S. Pardee RAND Graduate School dissertation series.
    • Erken, H., Donselaar, P., and Thurik, R. (2008). Total Factor productivity and the role of entrepreneurship. Jena Economic papers #2008-019. Jena: Friedrich Schiller University and Max Planck Institute of Economics.
    • Foer, A. A. (2001). Small Business and Antitrust. Small Business Economics, 16, 3-20.
    • Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The New Industrial State. Houghton, Mifflin, Boston, MA.
    • Gorman, G., Hanlon, D., & King, W. (1997). Some Research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education and education for small business management: a ten literature review.
    • Gray, C. (1998). Enterprise Culture. Routledge, London.
    • Herenkson, M., and Sanandaji, T. (2014). Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States (PNAS), 111(5), 1760-1765.
    • Jones, C. I. (1995). R&D based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 759-784.
    • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
    • Lange, T. (2012). Job Satisfaction and Self-employment: Autonomy or Personality? Small Business Economics, 38(2), 165-177.
    • Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of monetary economics, 22, 3-29.
    • McKelvie, A. and Wiklund, J. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: a focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 261-288.
    • Millan, J. M., Hessels, J., Thurik, A. R., Aguado, R. (2011). Determinants of Job Satisfaction across the EU-15: a Comparison of Self-Employed and Paid Employees. Small Business Economics, DOI 10.1007/s11187-011-9380-1.
    • Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary theory of economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. International Small Business Journal, 15(3), 56-78.
    • Nieman, G., Hough, J., and Nieuwenhuizen, C. (eds.). (2008). Entrepreneurship: South African Perspective. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
    • Nieuwenhuizen, C., Machado, R., Jacobs, H., Conradie, W., Fourie, W., Lubaschgne, M., Ferreira, E., Cassim, S., Steyn, J., Le Roux, E. (2004). Basics of Entrepreneurship. Cape Town: Juta&Co Ltd.
    • Pate, L., and Wankel, C. (Eds). (2014). Emerging research directions in social entrepreneurship. USA: Springer Science and Business Media Dordretchet.
    • Reylands, P. L. and Lancester, G. (2007). Predictive Strategic Management decisions in small firms: a possible Bayesian solution. Management Decision, 45(6), 1038-1057.
    • Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technical Change. Journal of Political Change, 98, 71-101.
    • Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
    • Scarpetta, S., Hemmings, Ph., Tressel, T., and Woo, J. (2002). The role of policy and institutions for productivity and firm dynamics: evidence from micro and industry data. OECD Economics working Paper 329, Paris: OECD.
    • Scheepers, M. J., Solomon, G., and De Vries, A. (2009). Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students’ Survey: South African Report 2008-2009. Entrepreneurial Intentions and Behavior Of South African University Students, South Africa, University Of Stellenbosch: Department Of Business Management.
    • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper and Row, New York, NY.
    • Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.
    • Solow, R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of economics and statistics, 39, 312-320.
    • Spiropoulos, R. (2014). Experts breakdown differences between Entrepreneurs and Small Business Owners.
    • Stephens, H. M., Partridge, M. D. and Faggian, A. (2013). Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth In Lagging Regions. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5), 778-812.
    • Stevenson, H. H. and Gumpert, D. E. (1991) The heart of entrepreneurship. In Salmon, W. A., and Stevenson, H. H. (Eds), The entrepreneurial venture. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
    • Tees, D. J. (1993). The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Perspectives on Alfred Chandler’s “Scale and Scope”. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 199-225.
    • Thurick, A. R., and Wennerkers, A. R. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and significance of the GEM project. In Reynolds, P. D., Camp, S. M., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., and Hay, M. (Eds). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Summary report London Business School and Babson College, 109-190.
    • Thurick, R., and Wennerkers, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship, small business and economic growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(1), 140-149.
    • Thurik, A. R., Stam, E. and Audretsch, D. B. (2013). The rise of entrepreneurial economy and the future of dynamic capitalism. Technovation, 33(8-9), 302-310.
    • Varian, H. (2011). Micromultinationals Will Run the World. Foreign Policy, 188, Sept/Oct
    • Venter, H., Urban, B., and Rwigema, R. (2011). Entrepreneurship: Theory in Practice. 2nd ed. South Africa, Oxford University Press.
    • Vernon, K. (1970). Organisation as a scale factor in the growth of firms. In Markham, J. W. and Papanek, F. W. (eds.), Industrial Organisation and economic development. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 47-66.
    • Watson, C. H. (2001). Small Business verses entrepreneurship revisited. In: Brockhause, R. H (Ed.), Entrepreneurship Education: A global view. Burlington: Ashgate.
    • Wennerkers, A. R. M. and Thurick, A. R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13, 27-55.
    • Wickham, P. (2008). Strategic Entrepreneurship. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PrenticeWilliamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.
    • Young, A. (1998). Growth without scale effects, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 41-63.
Related Articles

  • Environmental Performance Index: relation between social and economic welfare of the countries

    Tetyana PimonenkoORCID Researcher ID, Oleksii LyulyovORCID Researcher ID, Olena ChygrynORCID Researcher ID, Maksim Palienko doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.09(3).2018.01
    Environmental Economics Volume 9, 2018         Issue #3         pp. 1-11 Views: 3141 Downloads: 421 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The paper deals with the analysis of methodology of Environmental Performance Index. The authors analyzed and systematized the main existing integrated indices, which were used for evaluation of environmental, social and economic situation in the countries. The authors allocated the environmental performance index as a basis for analyzing the environmental policy of the country. In this direction, the authors analysed the main features, structure and indicators of environmental performance index. The authors allocated the world-leader countries with huge level of CO2 emissions. According to the results, the authors aproved that these countries should improve their environmental policy. Accordingly, they occupied less position in environmental performance index. For the purpose to analyze the relation between ecological, social and economic welfare, the authors analyzed score of sustainable development goal index, social progress index and gross domestic product per capita. The comparison analysis of findings showed that countries with good position on environmental performance index have the strong position on sustainable development goal index and social progress index. The authors suggested that Ukraine should orient to the EU countries with purpose to improve the environmental policy.

  • Industrial Revolutions and their impact on managerial practice: Learning from the past

    Lucia KohnováORCID , Nikola SalajováORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.36
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #2         pp. 462-478 Views: 3083 Downloads: 1336 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Technological changes that come with industrial revolution have largely affected businesses, as well as society. With the current technological shift and Fourth Industrial Revolution, many questions arise regarding the impacts and effects on current ways businesses operate. This study presents a retrospective analysis and overview of previous industrial revolutions. The aim of the retrospective analysis is to identify common characteristics that may lead to lessons learned for the forthcoming Fourth Industrial Revolution and thus complement the current debate on technological change. All previous industrial revolutions have led to change in business environments and new challenges for managers and owners. The findings show that all previous revolutions have led to increase in the number of service jobs created. The key approach of successful countries during the times of industrial revolution has included education as the source of new skills and knowledge necessary for adaption. Countries that were able to produce high skilled people could not only invent, but also adapt to new technologies sooner than others. Similarly, these approaches included introduction of new managerial practices in order to be able to utilize new technologies and new skilled workers effectively. The research article processes secondary data together with literature review on this topic.

  • Industrial development in Saudi Arabia: disparity in growth and development

    Anis AliORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.03
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020         Issue #2         pp. 23-35 Views: 2527 Downloads: 870 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Industrial development in any nation plays a vital role in the strengthening of the economy and employs human resources as per specifications and directly towards the mainstream of the nation. In Saudi Arabia, there was rapid industrialization for four decades. Some manufacturing industries performed well, while some internal and external business environment factors influenced the others’ performance. The study focuses on historical development, as well as recent trends of well-performing and poor-performing industries of Saudi Arabia. Small manufacturing industries in Saudi Arabia are underdeveloped and need more attention to attain sustainable and progressive growth rate in the form of the number of establishments to enjoy the potential. Manufacture of tobacco, computer, electronics and optics, pharmaceuticals and transport equipment are the deprived and underdeveloped industries of the manufacturing sector. There should be some easy credit schemes for the development of deprived or underdeveloped manufacturing industries. To attain sustainable growth and development of the manufacturing sector, a positive attitude of the government towards underdeveloped manufacturing industries, favorable labor laws, and entrepreneurial awareness, technical and financial assistance are necessary. The growth and development of the manufacturing sector of Saudi Arabia will be helpful in the attainment of goals of Vision 2030.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management