Ambidexterity: a possible balance to manage complexity
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.02(1).2018.01
-
Article InfoVolume 2 2018, Issue #1, pp. 1-12
- Cited by
- 1948 Views
-
366 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
The present article originates from the effort to answer the following question: is it possible for an organizational structure to steer between organizational routines and Black Swans? (Taleb, 2007). Unexpected, unique and low-frequency events are “unknown variable” that, despite the planning and precautions deployed, catch an organization off-guard, and might have catastrophic consequences. Unexpected events impact organizations, undermining the knowledge and redefining the list of competences that an organization needs in order to be competitive. The main goal of the present article is to shed light on the role and the challenges that firms undertake in their defining moments of adaptation of their organizational assets – the structure –. The rational pattern of adaptation is exemplified by the use of ambidextrous organizational structures, which focus on activities that can be defined as exploration and exploitation. Within the analysis of “the science of complexity”, parallels, paradoxes and metaphors representing a synthesis of a largely shared doctrine will be investigated: firms need to utilize known variables, or sometimes unknown ones, that are inevitably complex, in order to find the right fit, react swiftly to change, successfully compete, and obtain results.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D21, M54, L21
-
References51
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Bonazzi, G. (2008). Storia del pensiero organizzativo. 14th ed., Milano: Franco Angeli.
- Adriaenssen, D., & Johannessen, J-A. (2015). Conceptual generalization: methodological reflections in social science a systemic viewpoint. Kybernetes, 44(4), 588-605.
- Albino, V., Carbonara, N., & Giannoccaro, I. (2005). Organizzazioni e complessità. Muoversi tra ordine e caos per affrontare il cambiamento. Milano: Franco Angeli.
- Baccarani, C. (2010). Complessità e intelligenza manageriale. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 81(10), 97-111.
- Baccarani, C. (1991). Qualità e governo dell’impresa. Singergie Italian Journal of Management, 7, 37-56.
- Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routine: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3), 643-677.
- Benner, M., & Tushman, M. (2003). Exploitation, exploration and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256.
- Costa, G., & Giannecchini, M. (2013). Risorse Umane. Persone, relazioni e valore. Terza Edizione, Milano: McGraw-Hill.
- Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1995). Venti di cambiamento organizzativo: come le idee si trasformano in oggetti e azioni, in Bacharach, S., & Gagliardi P. (1995). Il pensiero organizzativo europeo. Milano: Guerini Editore.
- Daft, R. L. (2010). Organizzazione Aziendale, 4a ed., Milano: Apogeo, Milano.
- De Toni, A. F. (2010). Teoria della complessità e implicazioni manageriali: verso l’auto-organizzazione. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 81(10), 77-96.
- De Toni, A. F., & Bernardi, E. (2009). Il pianeta degli agenti. Teoria e simulazione ad agenti per cogliere l’economia complessa. Torino: Utet Università.
- Depew, D. J., & Weber B. H. (1995). Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Geneaology of Natural Selection. Cambridge: MIT Press, Cambridge.
- Duncan, R. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation, In R. H. Killman, L. R. Pondy, & D. Sleven (Eds.). The management of organization, 1, 167-188.
- Emirbayers, M., & Mishce, A. (1998). What is an agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.
- Faggioni, F., & Simone C. (2009). Le declinazioni della complessità. Ordine, caos e sistemi complessi. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 79(09) 3-45.
- Frigotto, M. L., & Narduzzo, A. (2016). Sbiancare il cigno nero? Strategie e competenze manageriali per riconoscere il nuovo. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 34(99), 345-363.
- Gersick, C. J., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performaning groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes, 47, 65-97.
- Gharajedaghi, J. (1999). Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity. Boston: Butterworth- Heineman.
- Gibson, C. B., & Birnikshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
- Grandori, A. (1995). Organizzazione delle attività economiche. Bologna: Il Mulino.
- Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. R. (1983). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociology Review, 29, 149-164, 1983.
- Kortmann, S. (2012). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational ambidexterity: A comparison between manufacturing and service firms. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Langenmayr, F. (2016). Organizational memory as a function. The construction of past, present and future in organisations. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
- Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1990). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1990.
- Mainzer, K. (1997). Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind and Mankind, 3a ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- 27. Miglietta, A. (2010). Nuove visioni dell’impresa dopo la grande crisi: prime riflessioni. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 81(10), 31-49.
- Nonaka, I. (1988). Creating Organizational Order out of Chaos: Self-Renewal in Japanese Firms. California Management Review, 30(3), 57-73.
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338.
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard business review, 82(4), 74-81.
- Ocasio, W. (1997). Toward and attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 187-206.
- Olik, J. K., Vinitzky-Seroussi, V., & Levy, D. (2011). The collective memory reader. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Pascale, R. T. (1992). Il management di frontiera. Come le aziende più intelligenti usano conflitti e tensioni per diventare leader. Milano: Sperling & Kupfer.
- Pascale, R. T., Millemann, M., & Gioja, L. (2000). Surfing the edge of chaos. The laws of nature and the new laws of business. New York: Three Rivers Press.
- Pennings, J. M. (1992). Structural Contingency Theory: A Reappraisal. Research in Organizazional Behavior, 14, 267-390.
- Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociologican Review, 48(2), 147- 160.
- Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of management, 34(3), 375-409.
- Repur, C. (2009). Attentional triangulation: learning from unexpected rare crises. Organizational Science, 20(5), 876-893.
- Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381-403.
- Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan. The impact of the highly improbable, New York: Random House.
- Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organization in action: social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Turner, B. A, & Pidgeon, N. (1997). Man-Made disasters. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Tushman, M. L., Smith, W. K., & Binns, A. (2011). The ambidextrous CEO. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 74-80.
- Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38(4), 8-30.
- Vicari, S. (1998). La creatività dell’impresa. Tra caso e necessità. Milano: Etas, Milano.
- Vicari, S., & Troilo, G. (2003). Creativitàorganizzativa e generazione di conoscenza: il contributo della teoria dei sistemi cognitivi. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 61-62(03), 189-211.
- Von Bertanffy, L. V. (1969). General theory of systems. N. York, George Braziller. Trad. it. Teoria generale dei sistemi. Milano: ISEDI.
- Wadhwani, R. D., & Bucheli, M. (2014). The Future of the Past in Management and Organization Studies. Organizations in Time: History, Theory, Methods. New York: Oxford.
- Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.
- Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the Unexpected. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Zamarian, M. (200). Le routine organizzative. Percorsi di apprendimento e riproduzione. Torino: Utet Libreria.