Role of behavioral biases in the investment decisions of Pakistan Stock Exchange investors: Moderating role of investment experience
-
Received September 4, 2023;Accepted November 3, 2023;Published February 2, 2024
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-1669Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6696-9971Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3563-2951Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0418-5439
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.12
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2024, Issue #1, pp. 146-156
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by1 articlesJournal title: Cogent Business & ManagementArticle title: Earnings management opportunistic or efficient in Pakistan? The role of corporate governance practicesDOI: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2398716Volume: 11 / Issue: 1 / First page: / Year: 2024Contributors: Syed Farhan Shah, Shahid Mehmood, Muhammad Asif Khan, József Popp
- 586 Views
-
132 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Despite many revolutionary asset pricing models developed over the past decades, traditional finance does not explain investor behavior very well. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of behavioral biases on the investment decisions of investors of Pakistan Stock Exchange. In addition, the moderating influence of investment experience investigated in this study. The findings were reported using a sample of 230 individual investors, who make their own investments, typically through a mutual fund, bank, or internet broker. They make investments to achieve their unique investment objectives, such as saving for retirement, a child’s education, or increasing their overall wealth. The influence of behavioral biases on investment decisions was calculated using regression analysis. Regression results show that beta and t-values are significant and have a significant impact on investment decisions. Regression findings show that Confirmation Bias, Gamblers Fallacy Bias, Negativity Bias, Bandwagon Effect Bias, Loss Aversion Bias, and Overconfidence Bias all have a substantial impact on Investment Decisions. Status quo prejudice and endowment bias have a favorable but minor influence on Investment Decisions. Investment Experience is regarded as an essential component that contributes to successful decision making under risk and uncertainty, however the results of this study show that moderating variables have a minor influence. According to the findings, the moderating variable had no effect on the connection between behavioral biases and investment decisions. And the reason for this is that behavioral biases persist regardless of investing experience.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G41, G23, G11, H54
-
References69
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Theoretical framework
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the investment decision model
- Table 2. Correlational statistics for the investment decision model
- Table 3. Regression analysis (N = 230)
- Table 4. Hypothesis testing results
-
- Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586-612.
- Adielyani, D., & Mawardi, W. (2020). The influence of overconfidence, herding behavior, and risk tolerance on stock investment decisions: The empirical study of millennial investors in Semarang City. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 89-101.
- Ahmad, M., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2020). Overconfidence heuristic-driven bias in investment decision-making and performance: mediating effects of risk perception and moderating effects of financial literacy. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 38(1), 60-90.
- Apicella, C. L., Azevedo, E. M., Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2014). Evolutionary origins of the endowment effect: Evidence from hunter-gatherers. American Economic Review, 104(6), 1793-1805.
- Arshad, I. (2019). Investment intentions model of Pakistani investors.
- Athief, F.H.N., & Ma’ruf, A. (2023). Tracing the asymmetry of religiosity-based loyalty of Islamic bank depositors. Banks and Bank Systems, 18(1), 1-13.
- Baker, H. K., & Nofsinger, J. R. (2002). Psychological biases of investors. Financial Services Review, 11(2), 97-116
- Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., Goyal, N., & Gaur, V. (2019). How financial literacy and demographic variables relate to behavioral biases. Managerial Finance, 45(1), 124-146.
- Banerji, J., Kundu, K., & Alam, P. A. (2022). The Impact of Behavioral Biases on Individuals’ Financial Choices under Uncertainty: An Empirical Approach. Business Perspectives and Research, 22785337221098287.
- Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 1053-1128.
- Bashir, T., Azam, N., Butt, A. A., Javed, A., & Tanvir, A. (2013). Are behavioral biases influenced by demographic characteristics & personality traits? Evidence from Pakistan. European Scientific Journal, 9(29).
- Bashir, T., Javed, A., Usman, A., Meer, U. I., & Naseem, M. M. (2013). Empirical testing of heuristics interrupting the investor’s rational decision making. European Scientific Journal, 9(28).
- Baumann, L., Prokoph, S., Gabriel, C., Freudenberg, U., Werner, C., & Beck-Sickinger, A. G. (2012). A novel, biased-like SDF-1 derivative acts synergistically with starPEG-based heparin hydrogels and improves eEPC migration in vitro. Journal of Controlled Release, 162(1), 68-75.
- Baumann, S. (2012). How to amend biased risk perception in enterprise risk management.
- Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
- Blikhar, M., Ostapenko , O., Khomyshyn , I., Ostapenko , L., & Vinichuk, M. (2023). “Transformation” of hired labor as one of the conditions for reforming labor legislation of ukraine: economic and legal dimension. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(48), 351-361.
- Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), 425-451.
- Danylyshyn, B., Bondarenko, O., Gudz, M., Ptashchеnko, O., Mohylova, A., & Radkevych, L. (2023). Marketing Tools to Increase Regional Investment Attractiveness. Review of Economics and Finance, 21, 1101-1108.
- Dervishaj, B. (2021). Psychological Biases, Main Factors of Financial Behaviour-A Literature Review. European Journal of Medicine and Natural Sciences, 4(1), 27-44.
- Elliott, W. B., Hodge, F. D., & Jackson, K. E. (2008). The association between nonprofessional investors’ information choices and their portfolio returns: The importance of investing experience. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 473-498.
- Fiol, C. M., & O’Connor, E. J. (2003). Waking up! Mindfulness in the face of bandwagons. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 54-70.
- Gholizadeh, M. H., Shakerinia, I., & Sabet, S. Z. (2013). The role of behavioral biases on Investment Decisions Case studies: Tehran stock. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(4), 819-824.
- Govender, K., & David, E. (2023). Experience and satisfaction: Exploring students’ perceptions of private and public higher education services. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2), 371-382.
- Haigh, M. S., & List, J. A. (2005). Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. The Journal of Finance, 60(1), 523-534.
- Hasan, A., Riaz, Z., & Nakpodia, F. (2023). Explicating the contextuality of corporate governance through ownership structure and family management: evidence from an emerging economy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
- Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297-307.
- Horák, M., Kukučková, S., & Dobeš, K. (2022). Exploring behavioral barriers and interventions in retirement savings: Findings from online focus groups among university students. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(2), 154-166.
- Hung, A., Parker, A. M., & Yoong, J. (2009). Defining and measuring financial literacy.
- Jabes, K. (2011). The Effect of Investors Psychology on Investment Decision Making: The Case of Nairobi Securities Exchange.
- Jarrar, A. (2021). The association between cognitive biases and the quality of strategic decision making: Evidence from Jordanian banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(2), 1-11.
- Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 557.
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky A.(1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk (pp. 263-292).
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979a). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen.
- Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.
- Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.
- Kida, T., Moreno, K. K., & Smith, J. F. (2010). Investment decision making: do experienced decision makers fall prey to the paradox of choice? The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 11(1), 21-30.
- Korniotis, G. M., & Kumar, A. (2009). Do behavioral biases adversely affect the macro-economy? SSRN, 1330147.
- Korniotis, G. M., & Kumar, A. (2011a). Do behavioral biases adversely affect the macro-economy? The Review of Financial Studies, 24(5), 1513-1559.
- Korniotis, G. M., & Kumar, A. (2011b). Do older investors make better investment decisions? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 244-265.
- Kotieno, J. G. O. (2012). The effect of investor psychology on investment decision making: the case of Nairobi Securities Exchange.
- Lovric, M. (2011). Behavioral finance and agent-based artificial markets.
- Madaan, G., & Singh, S. (2019). An analysis of behavioral biases in investment decision-making. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(4), 55-67.
- McGuire, E. (2004). Investment Decisions: A Study of the Role Played by Past Experiences
- Mokhtar, A. I. (2014). Behavioral finance: investor psychology perspective. Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, 3(2), 41-60.
- Morewedge, C. K. (2009). Negativity bias in attribution of external agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(4), 535.
- Nguyen, M. T. N. (2023). Examining contagion effects between global crude oil prices and the Southeast Asian stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(1), 77-87.
- Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
- Park, J., Konana, P., Gu, B., Kumar, A., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). Confirmation bias, overconfidence, and investment performance: Evidence from stock message boards (McCombs research paper series no. IROM-07-10).
- Parveen, S., Satti, Z. W., Subhan, Q. A., & Jamil, S. (2020). Exploring market overreaction, investors’ sentiments and investment decisions in an emerging stock market. Borsa Istanbul Review, 20(3), 224-235.
- Reb, J., & Connolly, T. (2007). Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 107-114.
- Rongyu, H. (2023). Validity verification of Mental Accounting in Public Goods Payment
- Sadiq, M. (2015). The Effects of Influential Behavioural Factors on Investors Decision Making in Stock Market of Pakistan.
- Sahi, S. K., Arora, A. P., & Dhameja, N. (2013). An exploratory inquiry into the psychological biases in financial investment behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14(2), 94-103.
- Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
- Serpeninova, Y., Lehenchuk, S., Mateášová, M., Ostapchuk, T., & Polishchuk, I. (2022). Impact of intellectual capital on profitability: Evidence from software development companies in the Slovak Republic. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 411-425.
- Sha, N., & Ismail, M. Y. (2021). Behavioral investor types and financial market players in Oman. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 285-294.
- Shavit, T., Giorgetta, C., Shani, Y., & Ferlazzo, F. (2010). Using an eye tracker to examine behavioral biases in investment tasks: An experimental study. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 11(4), 185-194.
- Singh, S. (2012). Investor irrationality and self-defeating behavior: Insights from behavioral finance. Journal of Global Business Management, 8(1), 116.
- Subash, R. (2012). Role of behavioral finance in portfolio investment decisions: Evidence from India.
- Taylor, R. N. (1975). Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision making performance. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 74-81.
- Toma, F.-M., Cepoi, C.-O., Kubinschi, M. N., & Miyakoshi, M. (2023). Gazing through the bubble: an experimental investigation into financial risk-taking using eye-tracking. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 1-27.
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105.
- Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. J. P. B. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: the negativity bias in social-emotional development.
- Volosovych, S., Sholoiko, A., & Shevchenko, L. (2023). Cryptocurrency market transformation during pandemic COVID-19. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(48), 114-126.
- Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129-140.
- Xue, G., He, Q., Lei, X., Chen, C., Liu, Y., Chen, C., Lu, Zh.L., Dong, Q., & Bechara, A. (2012). The gambler’s fallacy is associated with weak affective decision making but strong cognitive ability.
- Yasmin, F., & Ferdaous, J. (2023). Behavioral biases affecting investment decisions of capital market investors in Bangladesh: A behavioral finance approach. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(2), 149-159.
- Yevdokimov, Y., Melnyk, V., Melnyk, L., Dehtyarova, I. (2022). Socio-economic innovations in systems analysis: environmental and economic aspects. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 25(1-2), 134-153.
- Yuan, X., Qin, M., Zhong, Y., & Nicoleta-Claudia, M. (2023). Financial roles in green investment based on the quantile connectedness. Energy Economics, 117, 106481.
-
-
Conceptualization
Saima Aziz, Shahid Mehmood, Anita Tangl
-
Data curation
Saima Aziz, Shahid Mehmood
-
Writing – original draft
Saima Aziz, Shahid Mehmood, Muhammad Asif Khan, Anita Tangl
-
Writing – review & editing
Saima Aziz, Muhammad Asif Khan, Anita Tangl
-
Formal Analysis
Muhammad Asif Khan
-
Software
Muhammad Asif Khan
-
Supervision
Muhammad Asif Khan, Anita Tangl
-
Validation
Muhammad Asif Khan
-
Funding acquisition
Anita Tangl
-
Investigation
Anita Tangl
-
Conceptualization
-
Empirical evidence on the impact of recent Korean tax reforms
Namryoung Lee , Charles Swenson doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.03Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 35-47 Views: 1813 Downloads: 224 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn 2011, Korea required all firms to report all value added tax (VAT) invoices electronically to tax authorities. This unique law provided a natural experiment to examine the effects of this disclosure on income taxes and firms’ related responses. The authors find that this additional required disclosure caused firms to become less aggressive on their income taxes, and that they were unable to pass increased tax burdens forward to consumers or backward to suppliers and labor. To maintain, profitability firms cut research and development (R&D) costs, and this cost cutting was larger for tax aggressive firms. Policy implications of this unintended result are discussed.
-
Dynamics in futures and spot markets: A panel study of advanced and emerging economies of Asia
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 19, 2022 Issue #1 pp. 64-76 Views: 738 Downloads: 290 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe study explores the underpinning interlinkages in the spot and futures markets across nine Asian advanced and emerging economies, and examines whether development status has any impact on the nature and speed of adjustments in the information transmission. By applying Panel VECM to the data set from the very day futures trading was initiated on the respective exchange till February 2020, the results highlight that in the long run, over the entire period, the futures market adjusts 69.7% more than the spot market and there is a bidirectional causality in the short run. Even in the sub-periods, the same phenomena were observed, and in the short run, there was a unidirectional causality from futures to spot during the crisis period. An identical trend was observed for country groups in three sub-periods. However, in the short run, during the crisis period, a unidirectional causality from futures to spot was found in advanced economies, while the opposite pattern was found in emerging economies. The paper establishes that the spot market dominates the information dissemination process. The results also demonstrate that traders prefer liquidity over leverage as their trading venue, the existence of potential index arbitrage opportunities, and validate that development status has no impact on the information transmission pattern amongst the markets, except during turbulent times. The study offers insights to market participants to develop their specific trading strategies in these markets at various economic stages, thereby increasing their expected returns.
-
Does behavioral biases matter in SMEs' borrowing decisions? Insights from Morocco
Khalid Ayad , Anass Touil , Nabil El Hamidi , Khaoula Dobli Bennani doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(1).2024.15Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 170-182 Views: 318 Downloads: 103 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯBank financing decisions by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are crucial to their growth and survival, particularly in emerging economies such as Morocco. This study aims to assess the impact of behavioral biases on these decisions, an area little explored in the existing financial literature. The main objective is to analyze how behavioral biases such as overconfidence, risk aversion, confirmation bias, anchoring, and managerial myopia biases influence bank financing decisions of Moroccan SMEs. The approach adopted is quantitative and uses robust least squares regression to analyze data collected from 167 Moroccan SMEs. The results reveal that overconfidence and anchoring have a significant positive impact on the propensity to take out bank loans, while risk aversion and confirmation bias have a negative effect. Managerial myopia had no significant influence. Control variables such as past financial performance, the length of the banking relationship, and lower risk also positively influence the financing decision.