A literacy of the relevance of Asian value sustainability reporting in Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.07
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2024, Issue #1, pp. 76-87
- Cited by
- 357 Views
-
100 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
An independent institution gives appreciation to companies in Indonesia that have published their sustainability reports by ranking their sustainability reports in the Asia Sustainability Reporting Rating. This institution plays a role in facilitating and encouraging companies, organizations and other entities in Indonesia to adopt good sustainability reporting practices. This ranking factor is predicted to influence the movement of abnormal returns so that it can influence value relevance through the earnings response coefficient. The aim of this study is to reveal the relevance of value in order to obtain empirical evidence regarding the influence of sustainability reports, sustainable report ratings and earnings persistence on the earnings response coefficient. The research sample was 130 companies in Indonesia that were included in the Asia Sustainability Reporting Ranking for the period 2019 to 2022. This paper uses a quantitative multiple linear regression method to test the hypothesis. The research results show that consistent profits can be predicted from the past and make a positive contribution to future earnings response. A company transparently discloses its performance in the sustainability aspect, thereby making the profit response more positive. Companies with high sustainability ratings tend to get a more positive profit response from the market and stakeholders. This study suggests that management and company owners in Indonesia are aware of the need to pay attention to long-term sustainability through the publication of sustainability reports to become a company’s commitment to implementing sustainability and minimizing risks arising from the company’s economic, social and environmental activities.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Directorate of Research, Community Service and Publications (DPPMP) of Stikubank University for supporting the funding of this research. Thanks also to fellow FEB lecturers who have helped provide the facilities needed for this research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G53, M40, M41
-
References35
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of variables tested
- Table 2. Hypothesis testing
-
- Agustina, K., Noviarita, H., Anggraini, E., & Surono. (2021). Sukuk Rating and Financial Ratio of Islamic Banks. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 7(1), 1-9.
- Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
- Ali, A., & Zarowin, P. (1992). Permanent vs transitory components of annual earnings and estimation error in earning response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 249-264.
- Anggraini, D., & Tanjung, P. R. S. (2019). The influence of sustainability report disclosure and implementation of good corporate governance on earning response coefficient. European Journal of Business and Management, 11(34), 35-45.
- Anonim. (2022). Environmental, social and governance scores from LSEG. LESG Data & Analytics.
- Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467-498.
- Beredugo, S. B. (2023). The moderating effect of earnings persistence on the relationship between international financial reporting standards implementation and earnings response coefficient of listed companies in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 3(1), 22-38.
- Biddle, G. C., & Seow, G. S. (1991). The estimation and determinants of associations between returns and eranings: Evidence from cross-industry comparisons. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 6(2), 183-232.
- Collins, D. W., & Kothari, S. P. (1989). An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2-3), 143-181.
- Collins, D. W., Kothari, S. P., Shanken, J., & Sloan, R. G. (1994). Lack of timeliness and noise as explanations for the low contemporaneuos return-earnings association. Journal Accounting and Economics, 18(3), 289-324.
- Donnelly, R. (2002). Earning presistence, losses and the estimation of earning response coefficiens. A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, 38(1), 121-133.
- Easton, P., Shroff, P., & Taylor, G. (2000). Permanent and transitory earnings, accounting recording lag, and the earnings coefficient. Review of Accounting Studies, 5(4), 281-300.
- Easton, P. D., & Zmijweski, M. E. (1989). Cross-sectional variation in the stock market response to accounting earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2-3),117-141.
- Elsakit, O. M., & Wortthington, A. C. (2014). The impact of corporate characteristics and corporate governance on corporate cosial and enviromental disclosure: A literatur review. Interntional Journal of Business and Management, 9(9).
- Felita, A., & Faisal. (2021). The effect of sustainability reporting on company performance. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 10(4), 1-9.
- Ghosh, A., Gu, Z., & Jain, P. (2005). Sustained earnings and revenue growth, earnings quality, and earnings response coefficients. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(1), 33-57.
- Hakim, M. Z., Aulia, V., Hamdani, Hidayat, I., Abbas, D. S., & Pambudi, J. E. (2022). The effect of earning persistence, company size, and capital structure on the earning response coefficient. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 1(1), 1-14.
- Hasanzade, M., Darabil, Mahfoozi, Gholamreza. (2013). Factors affecting the earnings response coefficient: An empirical study for Iran. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3).
- Holbrook, M. B. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and earnings response coefficients. Journal of Finance and Accountancy, 14(11).
- Homan, H. S. (2018). The effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure to earning response coefficient. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 16(1), 1-8.
- Istianingsih., Trireksani, T., & Manurung, D. T. H. (2020). The impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on the future earnings response coefficient (Asean banking analysis). Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22), 1-16.
- Kusuma, K. I., & Subowo. (2018). The Analysis of Factors Affecting the Profit Response Coefficient. Accounting Analysis Journal, 7(2), 95-102.
- Lipe, R. (1990). The relation between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 49-71.
- Mahjoubi, M. N., & Abaoub, E. (2015). Earnings response coefficient as a measure of market expectations: Evidence from Tunis Stock Exchange. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 377-389.
- Mashayekhi, B., & Aghel, Z. L. (2016). A study on the determinants of earnings response coefficients in an emerging market. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 10(7), 2479-2482.
- Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2018). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128-149.
- Penman, S. H., & Penman, S. H. (2003). Financial statement analysis and security valuation, 3. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X. J. (2002). Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 237-264.
- Pham, D. C., Do, T. N. A., Doan, T. N., Nguyen, T. X. H., & Pham, T. K. Y. (2021). The impact of sustainability practices on financial performance: empirical evidence from Sweden. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1), 1-19.
- Scott, W. R., 2015. Financial Accounting Theory (2nd ed.). PrenticeHall Canada.
- Subramaniam, R. K., & Shaiban, M. S. (2011). Investment opportunity set and dividend policy in Malaysia: Some evidence on the role of ethnicity and family control. International Journal Economics, Business and Management, 22(4), 170-177.
- Suwarno. (2019). The effect of earnings management and earnings persistence on earnings response coefficient: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(1), 59-67.
- Wijaya, H., Adhitya, S., Cahyadi, H., & Salim, S. (2020). Factors affecting earning response coefficient with profitability as moderating variable in manufacturing ompanies. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (ICEBM 2019) UNTAR.
- Yusuf, M., Pagalung, G., & Rasyid, S. (2019). The effect of size, liquidity, profit persistence, supply method, sales growth of earnings response coefficient. Global Scientific Journals, 7(5), 259-274.
- Zakaria, N. B., Isa, M. A. M., & Abidin, R. A. Z. (2013). Sukuk Rating, Default Risk and Earnings Response Coefficient. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 131-137.