Investment capacity of the economy during the implementation of projects of public-private partnership

  • Received August 8, 2017;
    Accepted September 7, 2017;
    Published November 2, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Oksana N. Berduygina , Andrey I. Vlasov , Evgeny A. Kuzmin
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3-1).2017.03
  • Article Info
    Volume 14 2017, Issue #3, pp. 189-198
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    8 articles
  • 1167 Views
  • 475 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

The article considers the peculiarities of the mechanism of public-private partnership. An important problem of the research is to find an optimal ratio in the investment distribution when the arising positive externalities are maximized. In the critical literature review, the assumption was made that the balance between the market and state methods of regulation allows reaching the sustainable growth from the point of view of the use of resources. This hypothesis is developed in the analysis of the multiplicative effect through the index of GDP investment capacity. The research approach is based upon the study of the regression dependencies: multidimensional optimization is solved by the method of configurations with performing the iteration procedure. The obtained results show that the state contribution into the total investment potential of the projects of public-private partnership is traditionally low. The maximal investment capacity of the economy can be reached when maintaining the structure of investment distribution at the ratio 0.09/0.91 for the public and private sectors, respectively. The practical use of the optimization model allows to introduce the flexible mechanism of coordination of the terms of project financing.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Infrastructural PPP projects for 1990–2017
    • Figure 2. Top-10 countries using the PPP mechanism, number of contracts
    • Table 1. Dynamics of changing of GDP investment capacity and a share of state participation in the financing of the EU investment projects
    • Table 2. Statistical basis of modelling
    • Table 3. Iteration procedure of optimization
    • Akitoby, B., Hemming, R., & Schwartz, G. (2007). Public Investment and Public-Private Partnerships. Economic Issues, 40.
    • Arkhipova, O. V. (2010). Эволюция понятий “функции государства» и «провалы государства” [Evoluciya Poniatiy “Funkcii Gosudarstva” i “Provaly Gosudarstva”]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 6(187), Economica, Issue 26, 57-62.
    • Benito, B., Montesinos, V., & Bastida, F. (2008). An Example of Creative Accounting in Public Sector: The Private Financing of Infrastructures in Spain. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(7), 963-986.
    • Buchanan, J. M. (1997). Works (Trans. from English, Vol. 1). Moscow: Taurus Alfa.
    • Bures, O. (2017). Contributions of Private Businesses to the Provision of Security in the EU: Beyond Public-Private Partnerships. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(3), 289-312.
    • Delmon, J. (2009). Private Sector Investment in Infrastructure: Project Finance, PPP Projects and Risk. The World Bank and Kluwer Law International.
    • Gordeev, A., & Kiselev, K. (2008). Механизм государственно-част¬ного партнерства в сфере науки: в чьей воле его запустить? [Mekhanizm Gosudarstvenno-chastnogo Partnerstva v Sfere Nauki: v Ch’ej Vole Ego Zapustit’?] Uchenyj Sovet, 10, 15-20.
    • Gugkaeva, K. V. В., & Tuaeva, L. A. (2017). Государственно- частное партнерство: стандартные подходы и новые решения [Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe Partnerstvo: Standartnye Podhody Novye Resheniya]. Ekonomika i Predprinimatel’stvo, 2-1(79-1), 364-366.
    • Howard, M. (2001). Public Sector Economics for Developing Countries. University of the West Indies Press.
    • Kapkanschikov, S. G. (2009). Государственное регулирование экономики [Gosudarstvennoe Regulirovanie Ekonomiki]. Moscow: KNORUS.
    • Kolesnikova, K. I. (2008). Государственно-частное партнерство: опыт зарубежных стран и перспективы для России [Chastno-gosudarstvennoe Partnerstvo: Opyt Zarubezhnykh Stran i Perspektivy dlja Rossii]. Nauchnyj vestnik UrAGS, 3(4), 2008.
    • Kushlin, V. N. (2005). Государственное регулирование рыночной экономики [Gosudarstvennoe Regulirovanie Rynochnoy Ekonomiki] (pp. 53-54). Moscow: RACS.
    • Kuzmin, E. A. (2012). Нормальные рецертативные транзакционные издержки в оценках вязкости экономической среды [Normal’nye Retsertativnye Transaktsionnye Izderzhki v Otsenkakh Viazkosti Economicheskoy Sredy]. Regional’naja Ekonomika: Teorija i Praktika, 36(267), 51-60.
    • Lavlinskii, S. M., Panin, A. A., & Plyasunov, A. V. (2016). Comparison of Models of Planning Public-Private Partnership. Journal of Applied and Industrial Mathematics, 10(3), 356-369.
    • Makhortov, E. A., & Semchenkov, A. S. (2007). Государственно-частное партнерство как форма отношений власти и бизнеса в России [Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe Partnerstvo kak Forma Otnosheniy Vlasti i Biznesa v Rossii]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser. 12, Politicheskie nauki, 6, 41-51.
    • Merzlov, I. Yu. (2015). Содержание эконометрической модели оценки эффективности решений применимости государственно-частного партнерства во взаимосвязи с конкурентоспособностью региона [Soderzhanie Ekono-metricheskoy Modeli Otsenki Effektivnosti Resheniy Primeni¬mosti Gosudarstvenno-chastnogo Partnerstva vo Vzaimosviazi s Konkurentosposobnost’yu Regiona]. Sovremennye Problemy Naukii Obrazovanija, 2, 341.
    • Moroney, R. M., & Krysik, J. (1998). Social Policy and Social Work: Critical Essays on the Welfare State. Transaction Publishers.
    • Pankratov, A. A. (2010). Государственно-частное партнерство в современной практике: основные теоретические и практические проблемы [Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe Partnerstvo v Sovremennoy Praktike: Osnovnye Teoreticheskie i Prakticheskie Problemy]. Moscow: ANKIL.
    • Platonov, A. N., Shumaev, V. A., & Bushueva, I. V. (2008). Государственное регулирование национальной экономики [Gosudarstvennoe Regulirovanie Natsional’noy Ekonomiki] (pp. 56- 61). Moscow: Alfa-M Infra-M.
    • Postnikova, A. A. (2017). Государственно-частное партнерство как механизм привлечения инвестиций [Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe Partnerstvo kak Mekhanizm Privlecheniya Investicij]. Ekonomika i Biznes: Teorija i Praktika, 1, 87-91.
    • Rajan, T. A., Sharad, S., & Sinha, S. (2009). PPP in Greenfield Airport Development: A Case Study of Cochin International Airport Limited. In A. Akintoye, & M. Beck (Eds.), Policy, Management and Finance of Public-Private Partnerships (pp. 97-122). John Wiley & Sons.
    • Rybasova, M. V., & Krasova, E. A. (2016). Эффективность проектов государственно- частного партнерства [Effektivnost Proektov Gosudarstvenno-chastnogo Partnerstva]. Nauchnyj Vestnik Volgogradskogo Filiala RANHiGS. Ser.: Economika, 2, 13-17.
    • Seeletse, S. M. (2016). Performance of South African private-public partnerships. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(2).
    • Turovsky, A. A. (2017). Государственно-частное партнерство как объект публичной политики [Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe Partnerstvo kak Ob’ekt Publichnoy Politiki]. NovaInfo. Ru, 1(59), 505-514.
    • Varnavsky, V. (2004). Государственно-частное партнерство в России: проблемы становления [Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe Partnerstvo v Rossii: Problemy Stanovleniya]. Otechestvennye Zapiski, 6(20), 172-180.
    • Vries, P. (2013). The Modern Public-Private Demarcation: History and Trends in PPP. In P. Vries, & E. B. Yehoue (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Public-Private Partnerships (pp. 9-28).
    • World Bank (n.d.). World Bank Open Data.
    • Yakobson, L. I. (1996). Экономика общественного сектора: основы теории государственных финансов [Ekonomika Obschestvennogo Sektora: Osnovy Teorii Gosudarstvennykh Finansov]. Moscow: Aspekt-Press.
Related Articles

  • Project finance risk management for public-private partnership

    Oleh KolodizievORCID Researcher ID, Viktoriia TyschenkoORCID , Kateryna AzizovaORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(4).2017.14
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 14, 2017         Issue #4         pp. 171-180 Views: 1438 Downloads: 233 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The development of public-private partnership in Ukraine in recent years has become very important as an instrument of anti-crisis orientation. The real economic situation objectively creates the preconditions for more effective use of this mechanism and institutes of public-private partnerships in order to ensure sustainable economic development, obtain new ones and improve the quality of public services provided to the population.
    The objective of the research is to identify the components of project finance risk management and to provide justification of effective and balanced sharing of risks between public and private partners as the prerequisite and the main principle of effective implementation of public-private partnership.
    The authors used the following research methods: systemic approach, theoretical and empirical methods of scientific knowledge.
    This paper examines types of investment project financing by banks based on public-private partnership. It defines the structure of public-private partnership according to sources of capital investment in the project vehicle. The paper identifies components of the risk management process in project finance. It proves that a balanced distribution of risks between the private and public partners is the key requirement and the primary principle of effective public-private partnership. In this way, the need for mobilization of additional financial resources for implementation of investment projects calls for extended cooperation of state agencies and banks as a part of the effort of economic crisis management.

  • SDG 3 and financing instruments in Austria and Ukraine: Challenges and perspectives

    Mario SitumORCID Researcher ID, Alex PlastunORCID Researcher ID, Inna MakarenkoORCID Researcher ID, Yuliіa SerpeninovaORCID Researcher ID, Giuseppe SorrentinoORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.11
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021         Issue #3         pp. 118-135 Views: 1214 Downloads: 300 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the SDG in healthcare achievement in Austria and Ukraine and to determine possible lessons for Ukraine based on best EU and world experiences. To identify existing challenges and perspectives a comparative analysis of key indicators of healthcare expenditures and health financing systems in Austria and Ukraine was carried out. Results indicate that in Ukraine there is a substantial lack of public funding for healthcare (only 682 US dollars per capita in 2018), a poor share of voluntary health insurance (less than 1%), significant amounts (on average 50%) of expenditures of the population in general spending on health. On the contrary, in Austria, there is sufficient public funding for healthcare (5,879 US dollars per capita in 2018), more than 5% share of voluntary health insurance, moderate amounts (on average 25%) of expenditures of the population in general spending on health. Austria’s experience as an EU-member country with a successful example of a financing strategy for the healthcare system is a sound example for Ukraine. The alternative financing tools (e.g. result-based financing, impact investment, public-private partnership) can be used as an additional financing mechanism of healthcare funding in Ukraine. The use of these instruments along with the improvement of the fiscal policy, social security, and governance based on Austrian experience can cut the existing financing gap to achieve SDG targets in healthcare in Ukraine.

    Acknowledgment
    This study is financed equally by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education and Science and the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine.

  • Public-private partnership as an effective mechanism for attracting private investment in achieving the aims the socio-economic development of Ukraine

    Yuliia KomarynskaORCID , Olha KryshevychORCID , Nataliya LinnykORCID , Vladyslav KarelinORCID , Olena KofanovaORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.38
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #4         pp. 469-479 Views: 1175 Downloads: 180 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The article analyzes public-private partnership (PPP) as a form of interaction between state and business in the context of optimizing the Ukrainian economy. According to the results of SWOT analysis of the implementation of PPP projects in the infrastructure of Ukraine (2017–2019), the main criteria that determine the necessary model of public-private partnership were substaintiated, namely the distribution of investments, risks, obligations between the state and the private sector, the term and object of the agreement.
    The study analyzed the impact of economic, political, legislative and criminal processes on public-private partnerships in Ukraine. It was proved that the formation of specific allocation relations based on the interaction between public and private property is the most important feature of public-private partnership, which distinguishes it from other forms of interaction between the state and business. Advantages of PPP are as follows: the increase of management efficiency of state and municipal property objects, the reduction of tax burden on the state budget and optimization of budget expenditures on public services provision, the maintenance of budget-funded institutions, etc. It has been established that the PPP is the best alternative to privatization in order to attract private investment in strategic infrastructure facilities.

Download Preview
Close
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations