Consumer sentiment toward international activist advertising
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(2).2023.20
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2023, Issue #2, pp. 250-260
- 497 Views
-
186 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Companies have been increasingly conveying activist advertising messages to international audiences in response to persisting social ills and unsustainable business practices. Given the ambiguity surrounding the effects of international advertising, this study aims to compare the response of local consumers to a multinational brand’s standardized activist advertising strategy with creative executions adapted to the national contexts of Greece and the USA. The selected brand originates from the USA. The paper used a systematic qualitative approach and sentiment analysis using Microsoft Excel and Azure Machine Learning add-in. Analysis conducted on 1,051 user comments in January 2023 regarding two publicly accessible social media posts of a multinational haircare brand showed both similarities and differences in consumer responses. 662 comments were in English and 389 comments were in Greek. The study’s dataset was anonymized entirely and de-identified. The results indicate that consumer sentiment was largely negative in both countries. Although the relative share of negative comments was significantly higher in the USA (96.7%) than in Greece (59.4%), both groups of consumers placed their emphasis on the same themes (e.g., children and products). Therefore, they have perceived the main message similarly, irrespective of the execution differences. Overall, the findings can be attributed to strategic and tactical issues of the activist advertising campaign, as well as to sociocultural particularities of the national context. In the case of international advertising, attempts to incorporate the brand’s stance on a controversial sociopolitical issue into its advertising strategy pose significant risks to business organizations.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M16, M31, M37
-
References41
-
Tables3
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Negative and positive word cloud for the campaign launched in Greece
- Figure 2. Negative and positive word cloud for the campaign launched in the USA
-
- Table 1. Activism campaign and type of sentiment
- Table 2. Bivariate correlations (Spearman’s Rho)
- Table 3. Independent samples t-tests
-
- Aaker, D. A., & Myers, J. G. (1975). Advertising management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Caillat, Z., & Mueller, B. (1996). The influence of culture on American and British advertising: An exploratory comparison of beer advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(3), 79-89.
- De Mooij, M. (2003). Convergence and divergence in consumer behaviour: Implications for global advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 22(2), 183-202.
- De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83-91.
- Douglas, S. P., & Wind, Y. (1987). The myth of globalization. Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(4), 19-29.
- Duncan, T., & Ramaprasad, J. (1995). Standardized multinational advertising: The influencing factors. Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 55-68.
- Elinder, E. (1965). How international can European advertising be? Journal of Marketing, 29(2), 7-11.
- Finne, Å., & Grönroos, C. (2009). Rethinking marketing communication: From integrated marketing communication to relationship communication. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2-3), 179-195.
- Harris, G. (1994). International advertising standardization: What do the multinationals actually standardize? Journal of International Marketing, 2(4), 13-30.
- Hatzithomas, L., Fotiadis, T. A., & Coudounaris, D. N. (2016). Standardization, adaptation, and personalization of international corporate social media communications. Psychology & Marketing, 33(12), 1098-1105.
- Holbrook, M. B. (1987). Mirror, mirror, on the wall, what’s unfair in the reflections on advertising? Journal of Marketing, 51(3), 95-103.
- James, W. L., & Hill, J. S. (1991). International advertising messages: To adapt or not to adapt. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(3), 65-71.
- Kale, S. H. (1991). Culture-specific marketing communications: an analytical approach. International Marketing Review, 8(2), 18-30.
- Kanso, A., & Nelson, R. A. (2002). Advertising localization overshadows standardization. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(1), 79-89.
- Kennedy, A. M., & Parsons, A. (2012). Macro-social marketing and social engineering: A systems approach. Journal of Social Marketing, 2(1), 37-51.
- Levitt, T. (1983). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 92-102.
- Livas, C. (2021). The powers and perils of societal advertising. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(3), 454-470.
- Miracle, G. E., Yeol Chang, K., & Taylor, C. R. (1992). Culture and advertising executions: A comparison of selected characteristics of Korean and US television commercials. International Marketing Review, 9(4), 5-17.
- Moorman, C. (2020). Commentary: Brand activism in a political world. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 388-392.
- Moriarty, S. E., & Duncan, T. R. (1991). Global advertising: Issues and practices. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 13(1-2), 313-341.
- Mueller, B. (1986). Reflections of culture: An analysis of Japanese and American advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising Research, 27, 51-59.
- Ogilvy, D. (1985). Ogilvy on advertising. New York: Vintage Books.
- Okazaki, S., Taylor, C. R., & Doh, J. P. (2007). Market convergence and advertising standardization in the European Union. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 384-400.
- Onkvisit, S., & Shaw, J. J. (1999). Standardized international advertising: Some research issues and implications. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(6), 19-24.
- Pagani, M., Goldsmith, R., & Perracchio, A. (2015). Standardization vs. adaptation: Consumer reaction to TV ads containing subtitled or English dubbed ads. International Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 702-714.
- Papavassiliou, N., & Stathakopoulos, V. (1997). Standardization versus adaptation of international advertising strategies: Towards a framework. European Journal of Marketing, 31(7), 504-527.
- Penz, E., & Stöttinger, B. (2015). Consuming ‘European’: Capturing homogeneity and heterogeneity in consumer culture of five European countries. European Journal of International Management, 9(3), 326-341.
- Petit, T. A., & Zakon, A. (1962). Advertising and social values. Journal of Marketing, 26(4), 15-17.
- Pollay, R. W. (1983). Measuring the cultural values manifest in advertising. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 6(1), 71-92.
- Pollay, R. W. (1986). The distorted mirror: Reflections on the unintended consequences of advertising. Journal of Marketing, 50(2), 18-36.
- Pollay, R. W., & Gallagher, K. (1990). Advertising and cultural values: Reflections in the distorted mirror. International Journal of Advertising, 9(4), 359-372.
- Rajabi, M., Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., & Goos, P. (2017). Consumer responses to different degrees of advertising adaptation: The moderating role of national openness to foreign markets. International Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 293-313.
- Rodman, H. (1967). Marital power in France, Greece, Yugoslavia, and the United States: A cross-national discussion. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29(2), 320-324.
- Schmid, S., & Kotulla, T. (2011). 50 years of research on international standardization and adaptation – From a systematic literature analysis to a theoretical framework. International Business Review, 20(5), 491-507.
- Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (2021). Sustainable marketing: Market-driving, not market-driven. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(1), 150-165.
- Sriram, V., & Gopalakrishna, P. (1991). Can advertising be standardized among similar countries? A cluster-based analysis. International Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 137-149.
- Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Wang, S., Koutsouvanou, E., & Albright, M. (2002). Childrearing values in Greece, Taiwan, and the United States. Parenting: Science and Practice, 2(3), 185-208.
- Taylor, C. R., & Johnson, C. (2002). Standardized vs. specialized international advertising campaigns: What we have learned from academic research in the 1990s. In C. R. Taylor (Ed.), Advances in International Marketing, 12 (pp. 45-66). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Theodosiou, M., & Leonidou, L. C. (2003). Standardization versus adaptation of international marketing strategy: An integrative assessment of the empirical research. International Business Review, 12(2), 141-171.
- Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2007). Adaptation vs. standardization in international marketing – The country-of-origin effect. Innovative Marketing, 3(4), 7-20.
- Zandpour, F., & Harich, K. R. (1996). Think and feel country clusters: A new approach to international advertising standardization. International Journal of Advertising, 15(4), 325-344.