Brand activism and millennials: an empirical investigation into the perception of millennials towards brand activism
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.14
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #4, pp. 163-175
- Cited by
- 5265 Views
-
2297 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The reckless pursuit of social, environmental, political and cultural issues and brands may alienate the very customer base, whom they try to impress, especially the millennials. Hence, this study intends to study the perceptions of millennials towards brand activism, so that the findings from the study can help the brand managers to steer their brands into the troubled waters of brand activism. The methodology followed is HTAB (Hypothesize, Test, Action, Business), a popular analysis framework given by Ken Black in his book titled “Business Statistics: Contemporary Decision Making (6th ed.)” A sample comprising of 286 respondents was collected. The final data had 286 observations and 45 features across seven categories.
It was found that millennials prefer to buy a brand if it supports a cause or purpose and they stop buying if brand behaves unethically. It was also observed that there is no gender difference amongst the millennials towards their perceptions concerning brand activism. Moreover, millennials across different income categories have similar perceptions of brand activism. It was also substantiated that the emotional tie of the millennials with the brand existing for a cause goes beyond price shifts and brands taking a political stance, cherry-picking of issues and being disruptive prompts and creates profound backlash for the brands.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, M37, M10
-
References36
-
Tables10
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. HTAB (Hypothesize, Test, Action, Business) framework
- Figure 2. Distribution of variables by types
-
- Table 1. A snapshot of data dictionary
- Table 2. KMO and Bartlett’s test
- Table 3. Rotated component matrix
- Table 4. Distribution of brand activism response
- Table 5. Millennials prefer to buy brands that actively invest in manifesting activism
- Table 6. The liking for activism driven brands spans across genders amongst millennials
- Table 7. The liking for activism driven brands spans across different income levels amongst the millennials
- Table 8. Millennials are willing to pay high price for brands associated with activism
- Table 9. Fake and insincere brand activism triggers backlash among the millennials
- Table 10. Millennials feel that the brands should add their business voice to socio-cultural, political and environmental causes
-
- Anuar, M. M., & Mohamad, O. (2012). Effects of Skepticism on Consumer Response toward Cause-related Marketing in Malaysia. International Business Research, 5(9), 98-105.
- Baek, Y. M. (2010). To Buy or Not to Buy: Who are Political Consumers? What do they Think and How do they Participate? Political Studies, 58, 1065-1086.
- Basci, E. (2014). A Revisited Concept of Anti-Consumption for Marketing. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(7), 160-168.
- Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53.
- Bergh, J., & Behrer, M. (2013). How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Branding to Generation Y. Kogan Page, London.
- Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why and How Consumer respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-24.
- Bolton, R. N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, T., Loureiro, Y. K., & Solnet, D. (2013). Understanding Generation Y and Their Use of Social Media: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24(3), 245-267.
- Carr, D. J., Gotlieb, M. R., & Shah, D. V. (2012). Examining overconsumption, competitive consumption, and conscious consumption from 1994 to 2004: Disentangling cohort and period effects.
- Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The Myth of the Ethical Consumers – Do Ethics matter in Purchase Behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18 (7), 560-577.
- Carroll, A. B. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Social Performance (CSP). In R. W. Kolb (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society (pp. 509-517). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE Publications.
- Chang, C. T., & Cheng, Z. H. (2015). Tugging on Heartstrings: Shopping Orientation, Mindset, and Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 337-350.
- Chen, J. (2010). The moral high ground: Perceived moral violation and moral emotions in consumer boycotts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States.
- Chéron, E., Kohlbacher, F., & Kusuma, K. (2012). The effects of brand-cause fit and campaign duration on consumer perception of cause-related marketing in Japan. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 357-368.
- Clemensen, M. (2017). Corporate political activism: When and how should companies take a political stand? Unpublished master’s project, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
- Cone Inc. (2006). The 2006 Cone Millennial Cause Study: The Millennial Generation: Pro-Social and Empowered to Change the World. AMP Agency, Cone Inc,
- Copeland, L. (2014). Conceptualizing Political Consumerism: How Citizenship norms differentiate Boycotting from Buycotting. Political Studies, 62(S1), 172-186.
- Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224-241.
- Edelman Earned Brand Global Report (2018). A Study of How Brands Can Earn, Strengthen and Protect Consumer-Brand Relationships.
- Farah, M. F., & Newman, A. J. (2010). Exploring Consumer Boycott Intelligence using a Socio-Cognitive Approach. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 347-355. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 347-355.
- Fromm, J., & Garton, C. (2013). Marketing to Millennials: Reach the Largest and Most Influential Generation of Consumers Ever. AMACOM, American Management Association.
- Gardberg, N. A., & Newburry, W. (2009). Who Boycotts Whom? Marginalization, Company Knowledge, and Strategic Issues. Business & Society, 52(2), 318-357.
- Garfield, L. (2018). Gun-control activists aren’t backing down on a boycott of Apple, Amazon, and FedEx-here’s how it could affect sales. Business Insider.
- Kam, C. D., & Deichert, M. A. (2017). Boycotting, buycotting, and the Psychology of Political Consumerism (Paper presented at the 2016 Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association). Chicago, IL.
- Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2003). Exploring Motivations for participation in a Consumer Boycott. In S. Broniarczyk & K. Nakamoto (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (pp. 363-369). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
- Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92-109.
- Kotler, P., & Sarkar, C. (2017). Finally Brand Activism! The Marketing Journal.
- Mantovani, D., de Andrade, L. M., & Negrão, A. (2017). How Motivations for CSR and Consumer-Brand Social Distance Influence Consumers to adopt Pro-Social Behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36, 156-163.
- Moosmayer, D. C., & Fuljahn, A. (2010). Consumer Perceptions of Cause Related Marketing Campaigns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(6), 543-549.
- Neilson, L. A. (2010). Boycott or Buycott? Understanding Political Consumerism. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9(3), 214-227.
- Parment, A. (2012). Generation Y in Consumer and Labour Markets: Routledge, New York, NY: Routledge.
- Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How Can Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Create Value for Stakeholders? A Systematic Review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117-135.
- Solomon, M., Bamossy, G., Askegaard, S., & Hogg, M. (2010). Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.
- Steckstor, D. (2012). The Effects of Cause-related Marketing on Customers’ Attitudes and Buying Behavior. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
- Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled – and More Miserable than Ever Before. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational Differences in Psychological Traits and Their Impact on the Workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 862-877.
- Waddock, S. (2008). Corporate Philanthropy. In R. W. Kolb (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society (pp. 487-492): SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.