The impact of e-marketing orientation, technological orientation and learning capacity on online SME performance
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.14
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2021, Issue #3, pp. 168-179
- Cited by
- 1304 Views
-
446 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Currently, Internet penetration is accelerating across the country in Bangladesh, which, in particular, has led to the simultaneous development and growth of online businesses. Due to increased internet availability and accessibility, a number of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) continue to operate using an Internet-driven online platform. This context requires a research effort to investigate the underlying factors that might influence the business performance of online SMEs. Thus, the aim of the study is to examine the impact of e-marketing orientation (EMO), technology orientation (TO), and learning capability (LC) on online SME performance in the context of Bangladesh. In this study, the dependent variable is online SME performance, whereas the independent variables are EMO, TO and LC. To achieve this objective, the study developed a questionnaire based on past literature. Following a non-probability random sampling approach, 320 survey forms were distributed among online SME owners using the online survey system (Google form), and finally 156 responses were realized as fully complete responses. Hence, the study sample size is n = 156. SPSS version no. 26 was used to analyze the correlation among independent and dependent variables and to test the hypotheses. During statistical analysis, the 5% significance level is used as a threshold value to accept hypotheses. The study results show that EMO, TO and LC have a statistical and significant impact on online SME performance. Finally, this paper seeks to outline several important implications for online SME owners, as well as suggest several directions for future research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, M13, M31
-
References45
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research model of the study
- Figure 2. Result analysis of regression coefficient
-
- Table 1. Demographic information about online SME owners
- Table 2. Correlation analysis
- Table 3. Regression analysis
- Table 4. Summary of hypothesis testing
-
- Ainin, S., Parveen, F., Moghavvemi, S., Jaafar, N. I., & Mohd Shuib, N. L. (2015). Factors influencing the use of social media by SMEs and its performance outcomes. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 115(3), 570-588.
- Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315-326.
- Al-Henzab, J., Tarhini, A., & Obeidat, B. Y. (2018). The associations among market orientation, technology orientation, entrepreneurial orientation and organizational performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(8), 3117-3142.
- Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29-49.
- Ardito, L., & Dangelico, R. M. (2018). Firm environmental performance under scrutiny: The role of strategic and organizational orientations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 426-440.
- Ariyachandra, T. R., & Frolick, M. N. (2008). Critical success factors in business performance management – Striving for success. Information Systems Management, 25(2), 113-120.
- Borges, M., Hoppen, N., & Luce, F. B. (2009). Information technology impact on market orientation in e-business. Journal of Business Research, 62(9), 883-890.
- Brodie, R. J., Winklhofer, H., Coviello, N. E., & Johnston, W. J. (2007). Is e-marketing coming of age? An examination of the penetration of e-marketing and firm performance. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(1), 2-21.
- Buli, B. M. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and performance of SMEs in the manufacturing industry: Evidence from Ethiopian enterprises. Management Research Review, 40(3), 292-309.
- Chatterjee, S., Gupta, S. D., & Upadhyay, P. (2020). Technology adoption and entrepreneurial orientation for rural women: Evidence from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120236.
- Chiva, R., Alegre, J., & Lapiedra, R. (2007). Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 224-242.
- Coviello, N. E., Milley, R., & Marcolin. B. (2001). Understanding IT-enabled interactivity in contemporary marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 18-33.
- Drennan, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2003). The relationship between internet use and perceived performance in retail and professional service firms. Journal of Services Marketing, 17(3), 295-311.
- Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1950). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression I. Biometrika, 37(3-4), 409-428.
- Eid, R., & El-Gohary, H. (2013). The impact of E-marketing use on small business enterprises’ marketing success. The Service Industries Journal, 33(1), 31-50.
- Gao, G. Y., Zhou, K. Z., & Bennett-Yim, C. K. (2007). On what should firms focus in transitional economies? A study of the contingent value of strategic orientations in China. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(1), 3-15.
- García-Sánchez, E., García-Morales, V. J., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2018). Influence of technological assets on organizational performance through absorptive capacity, organizational innovation and internal labour flexibility. Sustainability, 10(3), 1-25.
- Hao, S., & Song, M. (2016). Technology-driven strategy and firm performance: Are strategic capabilities missing links? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 751-759.
- Hernández-Linares, R., Kellermanns, F. W., & López-Fernández, M. C. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and SME performance: The moderating effect of market orientation. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(1), 162-195.
- Hooper, V., Huff, S., & Thirkell, P. C. (2007). IS-marketing alignment: Its impacts on marketing performance and on business performance. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2007).
- Idrus, S., Abdussakir, A., & Djakfar, M. (2020). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation and technology orientation on market orientation with education as moderation variable. Management Science Letters, 10(10), 2351-2360.
- Jehangir, M., Dominic, P. D. D., Langove, N., & Khan, A. (2012). Managerial expertise, top management support and learning capacity impact on e-commerce capability and business performance. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 6(4), 379-390.
- Keh, H., Nguyen, T., & Ping, N. H. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 592-611.
- Kocak, A., Carsrud, A., & Oflazoglu, S. (2017). Market, entrepreneurial, and technology orientations: impact on innovation and firm performance. Management Decision, 55(2), 248-270.
- Kutner, M. H., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C., & Neter, J. (2004). Student solutions manual for use with applied linear regression models. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
- Laukkanen, T., Nagy, G., Hirvonen, S., Reijonen, H., & Pasanen, M. (2013). The effect of strategic orientations on business performance in SMEs. International Marketing Review, 30(6), 510-535.
- Lee, D. H., Dedahanov, A. T., & Rhee, J. (2015). Moderating role of external networks and mediating effect of innovation performance on the relationship between technology orientation and firm performance. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 23(3), 321-334.
- Lee, D., & Ng, P. M. (2021). The role of organizational culture, capabilities, and adoption of e-marketing on non-profits’ organizational performance. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 26(2), 1-12.
- Mallén, F., Chiva, R., Alegre, J., & Guinot, J. (2016). Organicity and performance in excellent HRM organizations: the importance of organizational learning capability. Review of Managerial Science, 10(3), 463-485.
- Mandal, S. (2017). The influence of organizational culture on healthcare supply chain resilience: moderating role of technology orientation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(8), 1021-1037.
- Mutlu, H. M., & Sürer, A. (2016). Effects of market, e-marketing, and technology orientations on innovativeness and performance in Turkish health organizations. Health Marketing Quarterly, 33(2), 95-111.
- Raihan, S., Quoreshi, S., & Rahim, A. (2016). Trade Winds of Change – Women Entrepreneurs On The Rise In South Asia Background country study – Bangladesh. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific Bangkok Regional Hub.
- Rajapathirana, R. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44-55.
- Real, J. C., Roldán, J. L., & Leal, A. (2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: Analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 186-208.
- Saqib, M., Zarine, R., & Udin, Z. M. (2018). Exploring the technology orientation influence on the innovativeness-performance relationship of manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 24(3), 277-300.
- Shaltoni, A. M., & West, D. C. (2010). The measurement of e-marketing orientation (EMO) in business-to-business markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1097-1102.
- Shaltoni, A. M., West, D., Alnawas, I., & Shatnawi, T. (2018). Electronic marketing orientation in the Small and Medium-sized Enterprises context. European Business Review, 30(3), 272-284.
- Sheth, J. N., & Sharma, A. (2005). International e-marketing: opportunities and issues. International Marketing Review, 22(6), 611-622.
- Siahaan, D. T., & Tan, C. S. L. (2020). Antecedents of Innovation Capability and Firm Performance of Indonesian ICT SMEs. Asian Journal of Business Research, 10(2), 45-71.
- Tsiotsou, R. H., & Vlachopoulou, M. (2011). Understanding the effects of market orientation and e-marketing on service performance. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 29(2), 141-155.
- Watson, R. P., Leyland, F. P., Berthon, P., & Zinkham, G. (2002). U-commerce: expanding the universe of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 333-47.
- Yousaf, S., Anser, M. K., Tariq, M., Jawad, S. U. R. S., Naushad, S., & Yousaf, Z. (2020). Does technology orientation predict firm performance through firm innovativeness? World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(1), 140-151.
- Yousaf, Z. & Majid, A. (2016). Strategic performance through inter-firm networks: strategic alignment and moderating role of environmental dynamism. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(4), 282-298.
- Yousaf, Z., Sahar, N., Majid, A., & Rafiq, A. (2018). The effects of e-marketing orientation on strategic business performance: Mediating role of e-trust. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 14(3), 309-320.
- Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.