Measuring the commercial potential of new product ideas using fuzzy set theory
-
Author(s)Maksym W. SitnickiLink to ORCID Index: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0452-0404
,
Valeriy BalanLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-0636
,
Inna TymchenkoLink to ORCID Index: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-5309
,
Viktoriia SviatnenkoLink to ORCID Index: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-8959
,
Anastasiia SychovaLink to ORCID Index: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0427-372X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(2).2021.14
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2021, Issue #2, pp. 149-163
- Cited by
- 949 Views
-
285 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The stage of selecting creative ideas that have the prospect of further commercial use and can be used to create new products, services, or startups is one of the most complex and important stages of the innovation process. It is essential to take into account expert opinions and evaluations, often vague and ambiguous. The study aims to develop a methodological approach to measure the commercial potential of new product ideas based on fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic. To this end, three calculation schemes are developed: the first two are based on fuzzy multicriteria analysis using Fuzzy SAW and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods, respectively; the third is based on building a logical-linguistic model with fuzzy expert knowledge bases and applying fuzzy inference using the Mamdani algorithm. Fuzzy numbers in triangular form with triangular membership functions are used to present linguistic estimates of experts and fuzzy data; the CoA (Center of Area) method is used to dephase the obtained values. For practical application of the proposed algorithm, the model is used as an Excel framework containing a general set of input expert information in the form of linguistic estimates and fuzzy data, a set of calculations using three schemes, and a set of defuzzification of the obtained results. The framework allows for simulation modeling depending on the modification of the list of defined evaluation criteria and their partial criteria, and adjustments to expert opinions. The developed methodological approach is suggested for the initial stages of the innovation process to facilitate the assessment of creative ideas and improve their implementation.
Acknowledgment
This scientific paper is published with the support of the International Visegrad Fund.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, O32, C51
-
References30
-
Tables4
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Measuring the commercial potential of creative ideas
- Figure 2. Evaluation terms of membership functions
- Figure 3. The system structure of Mamdani fuzzy inference
- Figure 4. Main blocks of the framework of the developed methodological approach
-
- Table 1. Term set with respective triangular fuzzy numbers
- Table 2. Evaluation sub-crietria weights for fuzzy TOPSIS
- Table 3. Fuzzy matrix of “solutions” for the application of fuzzy TOPSIS
- Table 4. Section of the FKB (C) – fuzzy knowledge base to determine the level of ideas’ commercial potential according to the sub-criteria of criterion C – ‘creativity’
-
- Astebro, T. (2004). Key Success Factors for Technological Entrepreneurs’ R&D Projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(3), 314-321.
- Bandarian, R. (2007). Measuring Commercial Potential of a New Technology at the Early Stage of Development with Fuzzy Logic. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 2(4), 73-85.
- Barsh, J., Capozzi, М. & Mendonca, L. (2007). How companies approach innovation: A McKinsey Global Survey. McKinsey Quarterly.
- Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1-9.
- Drucker, P. F., & Maciariello, J. A. (2008). Management (Revised ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
- Forde, A. N., & Fox, M. S. (2016). A Proposed Approach for Idea Selection in Front End of Innovation Activities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8), 48-55.
- Gors, J. Horton, G., & Kempe, N. (2012). A Collaborative Algorithm for Computer-Supported Idea Selection in the Front End of Innovation. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 217-226.
- Herrmann, T., Laukemann, A., Binz, H., & Rot, D. (2018). The Emoji Method: An Approach for Identifying and Formulating Problem Ideas. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 12(12), 1071-1086.
- Huynh, V., & Nakamori, Y. (2011). A Linguistic Screening Evaluation Model in New Product Development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 165-175.
- Jain, R. K., Martyniuk, A. O., Harris, M. M., Niemann, R. E., & Woldmann, K. (2003). Evaluating the commercial potential of emerging technologie. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 2(1), 32-50.
- Kosko, B. (1993). Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic. Hyperion.
- Malyar, N., Polishchuk, V., Sharkad, M., & Liakh, I. (2016). Model of startups assessment under conditions of information uncertainty. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(4(81), 43-49.
- Mamdani, E. H. (1977). Application of Fuzzy Logic to Approximate ReasoningUsing Linguistic Synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 26(12), 1182-1191.
- Messerle, M., Binz, H., & Roth, D. (2012). Existing problems of idea evaluations and possible areas of improvement. Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference – Design 2021, 1917-1928. Dubrovnik, Croatia.
- Miloud, T., Aspelund, A., & Cabrol, M. (2012). Startup valuation by venture capitalists: an empirical study. Venture Capital, 14(2-3), 151-174.
- Porter, M., & Millar, V. (1985). How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149-160.
- Riel, A., Neumann, M., & Tichkiewitch, S. (2013). Structuring the early fuzzy front-end to manage ideation for new product development. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 62(1), 107-110.
- Rometty, G. (2006). Expanding the Innovation Horizon: The Global CEO Study 2006. IBM Global Business Services.
- Siegel, R. A., Hansén, S. O., & Pellas, L. H. (1995). Accelerating the commercialization of technology: commercialization through co-operation. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 95(1), 18-26.
- Soukhoroukova, А., Spann, М., & Skiera, В. (2010). Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 100-112.
- Stevanović, M., Marjanović, D., & Štorga, M. (2015). A Model of Idea Evaluation and Selection for Product Innovation. Proceedings from 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), 8: Innovation and Creativity, 27-30. Italy.
- Stevanović, M., Marjanović, D., & Štorga, M. (2016). Idea management in product innovation-the empirical research results. Tehnički vjesnik: znanstveno-stručni časopis tehničkih fakulteta Sveučilišta u Osijeku, 23(5), 1285-1294.
- Sutton, R. (2013). Okhota za ideyami: Kak otorvatsia ot konkurentov, narushaya vse pravila [Hunt for ideas. How to have a head start on competitors by breaking all the rules]. Moscow: Alpina Publisher. (In Russian).
- Travessini, R., Rodrigues, T., Braghini, J., Colmenero, J. C., Beinlich, S., & Zocche, L. (2015). Selection of ideas in the furniture industry with the help of the method Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Espacios, 36(9), 2-12.
- Trolle, J., Fagerström, B., & Rosio, C. (2020). Challenges in the Fuzzy Front End of the Production Development Process. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 13, 311-322.
- Van Leekwijck, W., & Kerre, E. E. (1999). Defuzzification: criteria and classification. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 108(2), 159-178.
- Westerski, A., Iglesias, C. A., & Nagle, T. (2011). The road from community ideas to organisational innovation: a life cycle survey of idea management systems. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 7(4), 493-506.
- Wierik, T. M. (2019). Analyzing investment decision criteria for blockchain startups (Bachelor Thesis). University of Twente.
- Zadeh, L. А. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
- Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 89-100.
