Increasing the productivity of manufacturing firms in Cameroon in a sustainable way: Renewable or non-renewable energy?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.13(1).2022.03
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2022, Issue #1, pp. 28-37
- Cited by
- 392 Views
-
83 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The question of what energy form should guarantee firm productivity in the future is becoming increasingly important, considering the risk that the gradual depletion of the world’s non-renewable energy reserves poses to the continuity of productivity. This study aims to assess the effect of individual energy forms on productivity growth of manufacturing firms in Cameroon. This paper uses a two-stage stochastic frontier method to determine the energy form that is most likely to ensure the continuity of the productivity of manufacturing firms in Cameroon in the next few years. The data for the study came from the Annual Enterprise Surveys (EAE) conducted by the National Institute of Statistics of Cameroon (NIS) from 2012 to 2019. The analysis data constitute a panel of 288 representative firms. Factors that primarily explain firm productivity were value-added, renewable and non-renewable energy, capital, labor, and raw materials. The study analyzed the entire manufacturing industry, agri-food sector, and other manufacturing industries. Despite being a group estimate, individual firms are taken into account. Across the manufacturing industry in Cameroon, the results indicate that renewable energy is the most advantageous form. Indeed, this form would cause a 9.27% increase in productivity for a one percentage point increase. However, as the impact coefficients are insignificant, it is difficult to assess the contribution of non-renewable energy to firm productivity.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to sincerely thank Atanase Yene for his invaluable support in this work, helpful comments, and suggestions on the previous draft of this paper. The usual disclaimer applies, and views are the authors’ sole responsibility.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q32, Q40, Q42, Q47
-
References32
-
Tables3
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Evolution of industrial value-added (% GDP)
- Figure 2. Evolution of manufacturing firms’ average energy consumption in Cameroon (2012 and 2019)
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of explanatory variables of the productivity growth of manufacturing firms in Cameroon
- Table 2. Summary of correlations between the study variables
- Table 3. Estimates of the effect of the form of energy on the productivity of manufacturing firms in Cameroon
-
- Aigner, D., Lovell, C., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.
- Allcot, H., Collard-Wexler, A., & O’Connell, S. S. (2016). How do electricity shortages affect productivity? Evidence from India. American Economic Review, 106(3), 587-624.
- Arlet, J. (2017). Electricity tariffs, power outages and firm performance: a comparative analysis. The World Bank.
- Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, R. S., Ozturk, I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: evidence from top 38 countries. Applied Energy, 162, 733-741.
- Bi, G., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China’s thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66, 537-546.
- Färe, R., & Primont, D. (1995). Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Springer Science-Business Media, LLC.
- Filippini, M., Geissmann, T., Karplus, J. V., & Zhang, D. (2020). The productivity impacts of energy efficiency programs in developing countries: Evidence from iron and steel firms in China. China Economic Review, 59, 101364.
- Güney, T. (2019). Renewable energy, non-renewable energy and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(5), 389-397.
- Haoran, W., Herui, C., & Qiaozhi, Z. (2021). Effect of green technology innovation on green total factor productivity in China: Evidence from spatial Durbin model analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125624.
- Harris, J. M., & Roach, B. (2018). Environmental and natural resource economics: a contemporary approach. New York.
- Hotelling, H. (1931). Economics of exhaustible resource. Journal of Political Economy, 39(2), 137-175.
- King, C. W. (2020). An integrated biophysical and economic modeling framework for long-term sustainability analysis: the HARMONEY model. Ecological Economics, 169, 106464.
- Kumbhakar, S. C., Parmeter, C. F., & Zelenyuk, V. (2020). Stochastic Frontier Analysis: foundations and advances II. In S. C. Ray, R. G. Chambers, & S. C. Kumbhakar (Eds.), Handbook of Production Economics (pp. 1-38). Springer.
- Kumbhakar, S. C., Wang, H.-J., & Horncastle, A. P. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to Stochastic Frontier Analysis using Stata. Cambridge University Press.
- Meeusen, W., & Van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production function with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435-444.
- Melnyk, L., Sommer, H., Kubatko, O., Rabe, M., & Fedyna, S. (2020). The economic and social drivers of renewable energy development in OECD countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 37-48.
- Mensah, J. T. (2016). Bring back our light: power outages and industrial performance in sub-Saharan Africa. Conference paper: AAEA 2016 Annual Meeting.
- Montalbano, P., & Nenci, S. (2019). Energy efficiency, productivity and exporting: firm-level evidence in Latin America. Energy Economics, 79, 97-110.
- Musau, A., Kumbhakar, S. C., Mydland, O., & Lien, G. (2021). Determinants of allocative and technical inefficiency in stochastic frontier models: an analysis of Norwegian electricity distribution firms. European Journal of Operational Research, 288(3), 983-991.
- National Institute of Statistics of Cameroon (NIS). (2019a). Rapports. Institut National de la statistique du Cameroun.
- National Institute of Statistics of Cameroon (NIS). (2019b). Bases De Données. Institut National de la Statistique du Cameroun.
- National Institute of Statistics of Cameroon (NIS). (2020). Catalogue des publications statistiques du système National d’Information Statistique (SNIS).
- Nishimizu, M., & Page, J. J. (1982). Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change: dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia 1965–1978. Economic Journal, 92(368), 920-936.
- Nycz-Wróbel, J. (2021). Activities undertaken by Polish manufacturing companies to reduce air emissions. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 309-320.
- Omri, A. F., & Belaïd, F. (2021). Does renewable energy modulate the negative effect of environmental issues on the socio-economic welfare? Journal of Environmental Management, 278(2), 111483.
- Ostrom, F. E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
- Shui, H., Xiaoning, J., & Jun, N. (2015). Manufacturing productivity and energy efficiency: a stochastic efficiency frontier analysis. International Journal of Energy Research, 39(12), 1649-1663.
- Solow, R. M. (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies, 41(5), 29-45.
- Stiglitz, J. E. (1974). Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth path. The Review of Economic Studies, 41(5), 123-137.
- Tao, F., Zhang, H., Hu, J., & Xia, X. H. (2017). Dynamics of green productivity growth for major Chinese Urban agglomerations. Applied Energy, 196, 170-179.
- Wang, Z., & Feng, C. (2015). Sources of production inefficiency and productivity growth in China: A global data analysis. Energy Economics, 49, 380-389.
- Yevdokimov, Y., Chygryn, O., Pimonenko, T., & Lyulyov, O. (2018). Biogas as an alternative energy resource for Ukrainian companies: EU experience. Innovative Marketing, 14(2), 7-15.