Analysis of the enterprise`s readiness to implement modern tools of corporate culture development
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/dm.18(4).2020.01
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #4, pp. 1-9
- 555 Views
-
105 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Corporate culture is a unique attribute of the enterprise that positively affects the socio-economic results of its activity and develops under the influence of external and internal factors. The paper suggests a group of factors influencing corporate culture that determine the effectiveness and speed of its development. This group includes the level of competence of HR managers; the level of influence on staff of formal and informal leaders and their attitude to changes; the presence of cultural bugs, the attitude of the existing culture to changes, the degree of hierarchy, the speed of communication channels, the level of staff satisfaction with the situation, the presence of feedback. An analysis of global trends of enterprises’ corporate culture development allowed formulating the following areas of its improvement for the domestic enterprises: formation of a passionate employee, ensuring a balance between work and personal life, an individual approach to personal development and the effectiveness of staff activities, the organization of a virtual office, diversification as a part of teams, and reduction of hierarchy levels. The assessment of the domestic enterprises readiness to implement measures in the framework of the identified areas indicates that the most enterprises are ready to introduce modern tools for the development of corporate culture. At the same time, the necessity was revealed to introduce the individual approach to identify areas for improving professional skills and ensuring a balance between work and personal life of employees.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D23, J53, M14, M54
-
References37
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Якісна інтерпретація показника готовності підприємства до впровадження інноваційних заходів з розвитку корпоративної культури
- Table 2. Оцінка готовності ПАТ «Харківміськгаз» до впровадження інноваційних заходів з розвитку корпоративної культури
- Table 3. Оцінка готовності підприємств Харківського регіону до реалізації заходів з розвитку корпоративної культури за основними світовими тенденціями
-
- Armstrong, M. (2009). Praktika upravleniya chelovecheskimi resursami [The practice of human resource management] (1040 p.). St. Petersburg: Piter Press. (In Russian).
- Buzko, I. (2002). Strategicheskoye upravleniye investitsiyami i innovatsionnaya deyatelnost predpriyatiya [Strategic investment management and innovative activities of the enterprise] (176 p.). Lugansk: VUNU im. V. Dalya. (In Russian).
- Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework (288 p.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
- Denison, D. (1984). Bringing corporate culture to the bottom line. Organizational Dynamics, 13(2), 5-22.
- Denison, D. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Derhachova, V., & Fedirko, H. (2018). Features of formation of corporate culture at the enterprises of Ukraine. Economic Bulletin of NTUU «KPI», 15, 1-8. (In Ukrainian).
- Elvesson, M. (2005). Organizatsionnaya kultura [Organizational culture] (460 p.). Kharkov: Humanitarian Center. (In Russian).
- Engelen, A., Flatten, T., Thalmann, J., & Brettel, M. (2014). The effect of organizational culture on entrepreneurial orientation: A comparison between Germany and Thailand. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(4), 732-752.
- Fedulova, І. (2009). Obhruntuvannia napriamiv innovatsiinoho rozvytku pidpryiemstv khliborobnoi haluzi [Substantiation of directions of innovative development enterprises of the grain industry] (512 p.). Kyiv: NUHT. (in Russian).
- Gaponenko, A. (2008). Upravleniye znaniyami. Kak prevratit znaniya v kapital [Knowledge management. How to turn knowledge into capital]. Moskva: Eksmo. (In Russian).
- Harrington, E. (1965). The Desirability Function. Industrial Quality Control, 21(10), 494-498.
- Harris, P., & Moran, R. (1996). Managing Cultural Differences. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.
- Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-7.
- Hovorukha, Zh. (2012). Diahnostyka rivnia hotovnosti pidpryiemstva do zdiisnennia innovatsiinoi stratehii [Diagnosis of the level of readiness of the enterprise to implement an innovation strategy]. Agrosvit, 15, 34-39. (In Ukrainian).
- Idris, S., Wahab, R., & Jaapar, A. (2015). Corporate cultures integration and organizational performance: A conceptual model on the performance of acquiring companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 591-595.
- Kottler, J., & Heskett, J. (1992). Corporate culture and Performance (224 p.). New York: Free Press.
- Lane, H., & DiStefano, J. (1988). International Management Behavior (391 p.). Toronto: Nelson.
- Millington, M., & Schultz, J. (2009). The Challenge of Organization Culture in Quality Assurance Implementation. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 33(2), 121-130.
- Musіjovska, O., & Gudz, O. (2017). Innovative susceptibility and innovative ability in the process of formation of innovative policy of enterprise. Black sea economic studies, 18, 83-88. (In Ukrainian).
- Nedobieha, O., & Natalenko, M. (2012). The theoretical basis for determining availability of personnel of enterprises in innovative activity. Time description of economic reforms, 2(6), 131-137. (In Ukrainian).
- Nongo, E., & Ikyanyon, D. (2012). The influence of corporate culture on employee commitment to the organization. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(22), 21-28.
- Otenko, I., & Chepeliuk, M. (2018). Korporatyvna kultura: mizhnarodnyi ta transformatsiinyi aspekty [Corporate Culture: International and Transformational Aspects] (242 p.). Kharkov: KhNEU. (In Ukrainian).
- Ouchi, W. (1982). Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
- Pascale, R., & Athos, A. (1981). The Art of Japanese Management (221 p.). New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Pettigrew, A. (1979). On Studying Organizational Cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 570-581.
- Piters, T., & Uoterman, R. (1986). V poiskah effektivnogo upravleniya (Opyt luchshih kompanij) [In search of effective management (experience of the best companies)]. Moskva: Progress. (In Russian).
- Robbins, S., & Coulter, M. (2002). Menedzhment [Management] (888 p.). Moskva: Vilyams. (In Russian).
- Rynkevich, N. (2019). Organizational culture of enterprises: challenges, threats and trends. Economic Herald of the Donbas, 3(57), 123-136. (In Ukrainian).
- Selznick, Ph. (1992). The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Sheyn, E. (2007). Organizatsionnaya kultura i liderstvo [Organizational culture and leadership]. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russian).
- Simon, H. (2011). Administrative Behavior. New York: Basic Books.
- Simoneaux, S., & Stroud, C. (2014). A strong corporate culture is key to success. Journal of Pension Benefits, 22(1), 51-53.
- Smolinska, N. (2011). Methodical approaches to assessing the level of innovation capacity of the enterpriselinskaya. Marketing and management of innovations, 4(1), 215-221. (In Ukrainian).
- Spivak, V. (2001). Korporativnaya kultura [Corporate culture] (352 p.). (In Russian).
- Vihanskij, O., & Naumov, A. (2001). Menedzhment [Management]. Moskva: Ekonomist. (In Russian).
- Yastremska, O., & Blyzniuk, T. (2008). Otsinka innovatsiinoi spryiniatlyvosti pidpryiemstva [Evaluation of innovative susceptibility of an enterprise]. Ekonomika: problemy teorii ta praktyky - Economics: problems of theory and practice, 241(4), 748-755. (In Ukrainian).
- Zankovskij, A. (2002). Organizacionnaya psihologiya [Organizational psychology] (648 p.). Moskva: Flinta. (In Russian).
-
Non-financial factors affecting the operational performance of hospitality companies: Evidence from Vietnam
Trung Kien Phan
,
Thi Hong Thuy Nguyen ,
Thu Ha Dang ,
Van Thuan Tran ,
Kim Ngoc Le
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.05
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021 Issue #4 pp. 48-62 Views: 9058 Downloads: 1408 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯNon-financial factors including quality of services, the flexibility of a company, utilization of resources, and market orientation are regarded as significant determinants that enhance the profitability-based performance of a service company or a hotel. The study investigated the interaction between these factors and hotel operating performance measured by the hospitality performance and results indicators. Data on 346 executives of Vietnam’s hospitality companies were collected. A structural equation modeling (SEM) method was utilized to examine the positive-direct and moderating effects of non-financial factors on hotel performance in terms of occupancy rate (OCR), average daily rate (ADR), and the revenue per available room (RevPAR). The findings showed that service quality ( = 0.118, p < 0.05), flexibility ( = 0.173, p < 0.05) and resource utilization (= 0.172, p < 0.05) positively affected the performance of Vietnam’s hospitality companies. Meanwhile, innovation showed no direct influence (p = 0.068) but an indirect impact on the performance through service quality ( = 0.311, p < 0.05). Market orientation did not impact the performance (p = 0.076) but it positively affected both innovation ( = 0.322, p < 0.05) and service quality ( = 0.146, p < 0.05). The study contributed to a theoretical enhancement of the current level of knowledge on the factors that affect the performance and developed a reliable scale for measuring the performance of hotels in Vietnam.
-
Exploring fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) small, medium and micro enterprises manufacturers’ need for innovation to achieve growth
Lawrence Mpele Lekhanya ,
Nze Grace Olajumoke ,
Dorasamy Nirmala
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(2).2017.01
Environmental Economics Volume 8, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 8-16 Views: 5442 Downloads: 1158 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the problems of the sustainable development, to explore the level of innovation in the fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) manufacturing SMMEs sectors, which most affects on the state of the environment, to identify the causes of low innovation in the industry and to examine these factors influence on the effectiveness of SMMEs manufacturers innovation strategies, as well as to invent a new innovation strategic approach to overcome innovation problems in the economic growth of fast moving consumer goods SMMEs manufacturers. The study is aimed to determine the level of innovation and factors contributing to low innovation in fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) SMMEs manufacturers, which hinder their economic performance. Mixed approach of quantitative and qualitative questionnaire is used for primary data collection. Sample consists of 120 SMMEs. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (23.0) was employed for data analysis. The study results are presented with figures and diagrams. This study will be a useful tool for general public and relevant stakeholders in this sector.
-
The resource-based view: a tool of key competency for competitive advantage
Akwesi Assensoh-Kodua
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.12
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #3 pp. 143-152 Views: 4586 Downloads: 1052 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe increasing turmoil in the external organizational setting or business environment has focused attention on capabilities and resources as the primary source of competitive advantage. Obviously, this statement points to the application of the resource-based view (RBV) of organizational management. Nevertheless, what constitutes RBV remains an illusion in many quarters of organizational management, as scholars have managed to put up their personal ideas, and managed to converge on phenomenon-driven theories, in addition to RBV. This paper reviews the concepts of RBV in light of knowledge management to highlight some critical pitfalls that might have eluded the research community on the subject matter of RBV. To this end, this paper’s educational value lies in the fact that it simplifies the concept of RBV to the new researcher in a fashion that is capable of appealing to his or her level. A cross-sectional qualitative research approach was employed in an effort aimed at understanding the role of RBV in creating a sustainable competitive advantage and key competencies. A total of 20 relevant articles were searched from different databases and search engines, including Scopus, EBSCO, ABI Inform, IEEE, PubMed, Science Direct, SABINET, IEEE, Bing, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The findings indicate that RBV plays an important role and assists organizations not only create, nurture, and maintain competitive advantage, but also understand the collective resources needed to compete favorably in a globalized and highly competitive market. With expert knowledge workers at its core to provide support for knowledge creation, sharing, and utilization, the RBV principles discussed in this paper promise to guarantee a methodological step geared towards the achievement of competitive advantage. It, therefore, makes an incremental contribution to the RBV to attain modest improvement in organizational settings.
