Bridging governance and technology for fraud detection: Evidence from regional development banks in Indonesia

  • 18 Views
  • 1 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Fraud remains a pervasive challenge undermining financial integrity and stability in the banking sector, particularly in developing economies. This study investigates the determinants of fraud detection effectiveness in Indonesian Regional Development Banks (RDBs), focusing on auditor competency, internal control effectiveness, risk-based internal audit, risk management processes, and information technology utilization. The study population consisted of internal auditors, managers, and audit committee members at Indonesian Regional Development Banks. Using a quantitative approach with 204 survey responses analyzed through Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), the results show that all five factors have a significant positive effect on fraud detection (R2 = 0.554). Risk-based internal audit demonstrates the strongest influence (sig 0.000 < 0.05), followed by risk management processes (sig 0.003 < 0.05), information technology (sig 0.002 < 0.05), internal control effectiveness (sig 0.001 < 0.05), and auditor competency (sig 0.017 < 0.05). The results reveal that all five factors significantly enhance auditors’ ability to detect fraud. These findings indicate that governance mechanisms and digital capabilities jointly enhance fraud detection effectiveness in RDBs.

Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank the Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia, especially the Research Institute, for its support and the Ministry of Education and Research through the Directorate of Research, Technology, and Community Service program for providing intellectual assistance and funding for this project in the PMDSU grant (number: 83/UN5.4.10.K/PT.01.03/KP-DRTPM/2025).

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Conceptual framework
    • Figure 2. Measurement model assessment (loading factor)
    • Table 1. Descriptive statistics variables
    • Table 2. Correlation matrix between latent variable scores
    • Table 3. Path coefficients hypothesis
    • Conceptualization
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap, Erlina
    • Data curation
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap, Erlina
    • Formal Analysis
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap, Erlina
    • Funding acquisition
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap
    • Investigation
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap, Erlina
    • Methodology
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap, Erlina
    • Resources
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap
    • Supervision
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap, Erlina
    • Validation
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap, Erlina
    • Writing – original draft
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap, Erlina
    • Writing – review & editing
      Angginun Juwita Sari Harahap, Erlina
    • Project administration
      Erlina
    • Software
      Erlina