A comprehensive empirical validation of employee engagement antecedents and consequences among Generation Y in Indian public sector banks: A gender-moderated analysis

  • 544 Views
  • 2 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Sustaining employee engagement has become essential for the operational efficiency and service quality of Indian public sector banks, particularly as Generation Y employees increasingly constitute a major share of the workforce. This study aims to empirically validate a gender-moderated structural model of employee engagement among Generation Y employees in Indian public sector banks. Data were collected from 223 Generation Y employees across public-sector banks in India, using a combination of a paper-based questionnaire and an online Google Forms survey. Variance-based structural equation modelling was used to assess the measurement and structural models, while multi-group analysis explored gender-specific differences in the hypothesized paths. Six significant antecedents of employee engagement were identified: Corporate Social Responsibility, Dispositional Characteristics, Psychological Availability, Psychological Safety, Perceived Supervisor Support and Transformational Leadership, and Social and Interpersonal Relationships. Engagement positively affected Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Task Performance, and mediated all antecedent–outcome relationships. Gender-based differences emerged, with Corporate Social Responsibility and Dispositional Characteristics more influential for women, while Fit Perceptions and Distributive Justice showed stronger effects for men. The study contributes to the banking literature by offering a multidimensional, empirically tested engagement model and demonstrating gender’s moderating role.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Conceptual framework
    • Figure 2. Full mediation
    • Figure 3. Partial mediation
    • Table 1. Bank-wise break-up of respondents
    • Table 2. Constructs and their measures
    • Table 3. Measurement model and structural model assessment
    • Table 4. Eight full mediation paths
    • Table 5. Four partial mediation paths
    • Table 6. Measurement invariance of composites (MICOM)
    • Table 7. Multi-group analysis: Male vs female bootstrapping results – Path Coefficients
    • Table 8. Status of hypotheses H1aee
    • Table 9. Status of Hypotheses H2eecn
    • Table A1. Respondents (Section A)
    • Table A2. Sections B, C and D
    • Conceptualization
      S. Srikanth Payal, H. S. Srivatsa
    • Data curation
      S. Srikanth Payal, H. S. Srivatsa
    • Formal Analysis
      S. Srikanth Payal, H. S. Srivatsa
    • Investigation
      S. Srikanth Payal, H. S. Srivatsa
    • Methodology
      S. Srikanth Payal, H. S. Srivatsa
    • Project administration
      S. Srikanth Payal, H. S. Srivatsa
    • Resources
      S. Srikanth Payal
    • Software
      S. Srikanth Payal
    • Validation
      S. Srikanth Payal, H. S. Srivatsa
    • Visualization
      S. Srikanth Payal, H. S. Srivatsa
    • Writing – original draft
      S. Srikanth Payal
    • Supervision
      H. S. Srivatsa
    • Writing – review & editing
      H. S. Srivatsa