Performance evaluation using the CAMELS model: A comparative study of local commercial banks in Qatar and Kuwait
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(3).2021.14
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2021 , Issue #3, pp. 152-165
- Cited by
- 1028 Views
-
438 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Nowadays, the banking system is undergoing significant changes. Digitalization that appears in Industry 4.0 also pioneers in the banking system, so we can also talk about Bank 4.0 as a new development direction. In this shift in the digital age, it becomes even more critical to examine the performance of banks. The case study approach was based on an attempt to diagnose the performance of a sample of local commercial banks in Qatar and Kuwait based on their financial statements for the period 2013–2017, and approve the existing accounting data as sources for the financial analysis process, by using essential financial analysis tools such as financial ratios. The output of the analysis was used to measure performance. All this is applicable when using the CAMELS rating model to evaluate the financial performance of the banking sector. The results show statistically significant differences between countries for four factors (Asset quality, Management efficiency, Earnings quality and Sensitivity) and none for the remaining two (Capital adequacy and Liquidity management) because the significant level is higher than 5%. However, the two factors with no significant differences are vital to the prudent operation of banks, mainly that Qatari banks perform better than Kuwaiti banks.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, G32
-
References27
-
Tables10
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sample of the selected banks
- Table 2. CAMELS factors and measurement ratios
- Table 3. Average ratios of years and rankings in the case of the Capital adequacy factor in selected banks
- Table 4. Average ratios of years and rankings in the case of the Asset quality factor at selected banks
- Table 5. Average ratios of years and rankings in the case of the Management efficiency factor at selected banks
- Table 6. Average ratios of years and rankings in the case of the Earnings quality factor at selected banks
- Table 7. Average ratios of years and rankings in the case of the Liquidity management factor at selected banks
- Table 8. Average ratios of years and rankings in the case of the Sensitivity factor at selected banks
- Table 9. The overall ranking of the selected banks from Qatar and Kuwait for the period 2013–2017
- Table 10. The result of multivariate analysis of variance comparing the banks’ attributes in two countries
-
- Abdmoulah, W., & Laabas, B. (2012). Kuwaiti banks efficiency: An examination of technical and allocative efficiency over the period 1994–2009. International Review of Business Research Papers, 8(5), 123-136.
- Abdul-Wahab, A.-H., & Haron, R. (2017). Efficiency of the Qatari banking industry: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(2), 298-318.
- Altan, M., Yusufazari, H., & Bedük, A. (2014). Performance Analysis of Banks in Turkey Using CAMEL Approach. In Proceedings of International Academic Conferences (No. 0902916). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
- Arab Bankers Association (ABA). (2019). National Bank of Kuwait: a bank for the next generation. Arab Banker, 30, 12-15.
- Baral, K. J. (2005). Health check-up of commercial banks in the framework of CAMEL: A case study of joint venture banks in Nepal. Journal of Nepalese Business Studies, 2(1), 41-55.
- Barker, D., & Holdsworth, D. (1993). The causes of bank failures in the 1980s (Research Paper No. 9325). Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
- Barr, R. S., Killgo, K. A., Siems, T. F., & Zimmel, S. (2002). Evaluating the productive efficiency and performance of US commercial banks. Managerial Finance, 28(8), 3-25.
- Bodla, B. S., & Verma, R. (2006). Evaluating performance of banks through CAMEL Model: A case study of SBI and ICIC. The IUP Journal of Bank Management, 5(3), 49-63.
- Chandani, A., Mehta, M., & Chandrasekaran, K. B. (2014). A Working Paper on the Impact of Gender of Leader on the Financial Performance of the Bank: A Case of ICICI Bank. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 459-471.
- Dincer, H., Gencer, G., Orhan, N., & Sahinbas, K. (2011). A performance evaluation of the Turkish banking sector after the global crisis via CAMELS ratios. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1530-1545.
- Echekoba, F. N., Egbunike, C. F., & Kasie, E. G. (2014). Determinants of Bank Profitability in Nigeria: Using Camel Rating Model (2001–2010). Journal of Business and Management, 16(9), 44-50.
- Gasbarro, D., Sadguna, I. G. M., Zumwalt, J. K. (2002). The changing relationship between CAMEL ratings and bank soundness during the Indonesian banking crisis. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 19(3), 247-260.
- Ghazavi, M., & Bayraktar, S. (2018). Performance Analysis of Banks in Turkey Using Camels Approach Case Study: Six Turkish Banks During 2005 To 2016. İşletme Araştrımaları Dergisi, 10(2), 847-874.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2019). Qatar: 2019 Article IV Consultation-Press Release (Staff Report).
- Joshi, A., & Sharma, L. D. (2015). Seeking the Best Indian Bank: An Implementation to Camel Model. International Journal of Applied Financial Management Perspectives, 3(4), 1349-1358.
- Kumar, S., & Sharma, R. (2014). Performance analysis of top Indian Banks through camel approach. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 3(7), 81-92.
- Nanthini, V., & Shanmugam, N. K. (2020). A Study On Financial Performance of Private Sectors Banks in India – A Camel Model. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 32(2), 1937-1940.
- Nguyen, A. H., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2020). Applying The Camel Model to Assess Performance of Commercial Banks: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(2), 177-186.
- Qatar Central Bank (QCB). (2020). Monetary System in Qatar Historical Background.
- Roman, A., & Şargu, A. C. (2013). Analyzing the financial soundness of the commercial banks in Romania: An approach based on the camels framework. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 703-712.
- Rose, P., & Hudgins, S. (2010). Bank Management and Financial Services (8th ed.). McGraw Hill/Irwin.
- Saikrishna, M. B., & Varghese, A. (2020). A Camel Model Analysis of Selected Public (Sbi) And Private (Hdfc) Sector Banks In India. Studies in Indian Place Names, 40(3), 2145-2152.
- Suresh, C., & Bardastani, M. (2016). Financial Performance of Selected Conventional And Islamic Banks In Kingdom of Bahrain – A CAMEL Ranking Based Approach. European Journal of Contemporary Economics and Management, 1(1), 23-59.
- Thagunna, K., & Poudel, S. (2013). Measuring Bank Performance of Nepali Banks: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Perspective. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(1), 54-65.
- Union of Arab Banks. (2020). Official site.
- Venkatesh, D., & Suresh, C. (2014). Comparative Performance Evaluation of Selected Commercial Banks in Kingdom of Bahrain Using CAMELS Method.
- Yuksel, S., Dincer, H., & Hacioglu, U. (2015). CAMELS-based Determinants for the Credit Rating of Turkish Deposit Banks. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 4(4), 1-17.