Unveiling the link of country compliance, risks, and cost of capital in socially responsible investing
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(1).2025.05
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #1, pp. 52-67
- 47 Views
-
7 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The study provides empirical evidence on the cost implications of socially responsible investing (SRI) in relation to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) preferences. Specifically, it examines whether socially responsible investors incur higher costs to meet non-pecuniary goals and how government involvement can offer rewards to socially responsible investors in supporting the realization of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Using panel data regression, this study analyzes ESG scores and financial and return data of 1,450 firm-year observations in ASEAN-5 countries over the period 2015–2022. The findings reveal that firms implementing ESG practices experience an increase in their cost of capital (CoC), supporting the notion that ESG investment requires a sacrificial cost. Even firms with low operational risks face rising CoC when implementing ESG principles. However, the study also finds that firms located in countries with better government effectiveness and stronger control of corruption benefit from a reduction in CoC, despite ESG implementation. Conversely, country risks, particularly those related to environmental pollution, exacerbate the CoC for firms adhering to ESG criteria. Overall, the results suggest that while country-level governance can reward socially responsible investors by mitigating CoC, country risks such as pollution pose additional burdens, highlighting the need for government intervention to incentivize SRI and align it with global sustainability goals.
Acknowledgment
This research was funded by the Indonesian Ministry of Education, Research, and Technology (DRTPM), Fundamental Research Grant in 2024 [0609.10/LL5-INT/AL.04/2024,359/D.01/LPPM/2024].
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G31, G32, Q50
-
References50
-
Tables13
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
- Figure 2. Country characteristics across ASEAN-5 countries
-
- Table 1. Sample of firms with ESG scores
- Table 2. Descriptions of all research variables
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics of all research variables
- Table 4. Descriptive statistics for the full sample (2015–2022)
- Table 5. Regression results for Model 1
- Table 6. Model specification test of Model 1
- Table 7. Regression results of operational risk proxied by earnings persistence as a moderating variable
- Table 8. Regression results of country compliance as a moderating variable
- Table 9. Model specification test (Government Effectiveness)
- Table 10. Model specification test (Control of Corruption)
- Table 11. Regression results of country risks as a moderating variable
- Table 12. Model specification test (Pollution)
- Table 13. Model specification test (Unemployment)
-
- Acemoglu, D., & Verdier, T. (2000). The choice between market failures and corruption. American Economic Review, 91(1), 194-211.
- Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M. (2013). The value of local political connections in a low-corruption environment. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2), 387-402.
- Angelo, L., Leogrande, D., & Alberto, C. (2023). The Role of Unemployment in the ESG Model at World Level.
- Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
- Baker, M., Egan, M. L., & Sarkar, S. K. (2022). How do investors value ESG? (No. w30708). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021). Impact investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(1), 162-185.
- Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71-86.
- Bialkowski, J., Starks, L. T., & Wagner, M. (2022). Cultural values and cross-country differences in responsible investing sectors (Working paper). University of Canterbury.
- Bose, S., Burns, N., Minnick, K., & Shams, S. (2023). Climate‐linked compensation, societal values, and climate change impact: International evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 31(5), 759-785.
- Cai, Y., Pan, C. H., & Statman, M. (2016). Why do countries matter so much in corporate social performance? Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 591-609.
- Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176-1248.
- Climate Watch. (2023). Historical GHG Emissions.
- Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
- Du, X., Weng, J., Zeng, Q., Chang, Y., & Pei, H. (2017). Do lenders applaud corporate environmental performance? Evidence from Chinese private-owned firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 179-207.
- Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693-714.
- El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
- Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097.
- Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., & Kim, Y. (2017). Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 360-385.
- Huang, J., Duan, Z., & Zhu, G. (2017). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of bank loans? Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(7), 1589-1602.
- Husted, B. W. (1999). Wealth, culture, and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 339-359.
- Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 834-864.
- Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 351-382.
- Kristianthy, L. T., & Ekawati, E. (2024). The effect of company growth on sustainable performance: A moderating perspective of stock mispricing in Indonesia and Japan. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(2), 323-335.
- Khojastehpour, M. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility avoid the incidence of corruption in international expansion? European Business Review, 27(3), 334-342.
- Kwok, C. C., & Tadesse, S. (2006). The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 767-785.
- Leddy, T. K., & Ekawati, E. (2024). The effect of company growth on sustainable performance: A moderating perspective of stock mispricing in Indonesia and Japan. Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 21(2), 323-335.
- Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853-910.
- Lipe, R. (1990). The relation between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information. Accounting Review, 49-71.
- Maghdid, R. S., Kareem, S. M., Salih Hama, Y., Waris, M., & Naveed, R. T. (2024). Moderating role of political stability and economic policy uncertainty between country governance practice and stock market performance. A comparative analysis of Pakistan and Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Plos one, 19(4), e0301698.
- Magnanelli, B. S., & Izzo, M. F. (2017). Corporate social performance and cost of debt: The relationship. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(2), 250-265.
- Mansell, R., & Tremblay, G. (2013). Renewing the knowledge societies vision for peace and sustainable development. Unesco.
- Mariani, L., Trivellato, B., Martini, M., & Marafioti, E. (2022). Achieving sustainable development goals through collaborative innovation: Evidence from four European initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(4), 1075-1095.
- Marsat, S., & Williams, B. (2014). Does the market value social pillar?
- Menz, K.-M. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility: Is it Rewarded by the Corporate Bond Market? A Critical Note. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 117-134.
- Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Valente Gonçalves, L. M. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574.
- Moldan, B., Janoušková, S., & Hák, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4-13.
- Nathania, R., & Ekawati, E. (2024). Banking on ESG: How ownership influences financial outcomes in 5-ASEAN countries. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(3), 121-132.
- Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2014). The effects of corporate social performance on the cost of corporate debt and credit ratings. Financial Review, 49(1), 49-75.
- Pham, L., Hao, W., Truong, H., & Trinh, H. H. (2023). The impact of climate policy on US environmentally friendly firms: A firm-level examination of stock return, volatility, volume, and connectedness. Energy Economics, 119, 106564.
- Rahmaniati, N. P. G., & Ekawati, E. (2024). The role of Indonesian regulators on the effectiveness of ESG implementation in improving firms’ non-financial performance. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).
- Ramiah, V., Martin, B., & Moosa, I. (2013). How does the stock market react to the announcement of green policies? Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(5), 1747-1758.
- Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599-617.
- Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? Accounting Review, 289-315.
- Starks, L. T. (2023). Presidential address: Sustainable finance and ESG issues – value versus values. The Journal of Finance, 78(4), 1837-1872.
- Tarkom, A., & Ujah, N. U. (2023). Global policy uncertainty and working capital management: Does national culture matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122869.
- Taylor, M. (2008). Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: Lessons from California's solar policy. Energy Economics, 30(6), 2829-2854.
- The World Bank (2023). Environment Social and Governance (ESG) Data.
- Wu, J. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28, 999-1023.
- Zhang, J. F., & So, J. Y. C. (2024). The effect of corruption exposure on the ESG performance of multinational firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 86, 102433.
- Zhao, B., Yang, W., Wen, J., & Zhang, W. (2022). The financial market in China under the COVID-19. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(13), 3726-3738.