The impact of strategic orientations on service innovation: The moderating effect of technological capabilities
-
Received May 25, 2024;Accepted September 2, 2024;Published October 22, 2024
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3096-1963Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9995-9873
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.07
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 83-94
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 69 Views
-
6 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study investigates the relationship between strategic orientations and innovation within the Sudanese service sector: hospitality, postal, bank, education, communication, and insurance spheres. Drawing upon the resource-based view, the paper examines the influence of market, service, and learning orientations on both incremental and radical innovation. Moreover, the study explores the moderating role of technological capabilities in this relationship. A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing a convenience sample of 160 managers from various service sub-sectors in Sudan. Empirical findings reveal that market orientation, service orientation, and learning orientation have a significant effect on incremental innovation (estimates = 0.164, p = 0.00; estimates = .177, p = .014). In addition, market and service orientations demonstrate a significant relationship with technological capabilities (estimates = 0.612, p = 0.00; estimates = –.376, p = .018). Further, incremental innovation and radical innovation significantly correlated with technological capabilities (estimates = .131, p = 0.00; estimates = .365, p = 0.00), while service orientation and learning orientation do not have a significant correlation with radical innovation (estimates = .153, p =.129; estimates = .061, p = .491). Learning orientation does not have a significant correlation with technological capabilities (estimates = .168, p > .228). Furthermore, results indicate that technological capabilities do not moderate the relationship between strategic orientation and service innovation.
Acknowledgment
The author would like to thank Deanship of Scientific Research at Majmaah University for supporting this work under Project No. R-2024-1367.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M12, M19
-
References46
-
Tables4
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
- Figure 2. CFA results
- Figure 3. Path analysis
-
- Table 1. Items of study variables
- Table 2. Exploratory factor analysis
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Reliability and correlation
-
- Agustia, D., Haryanto, S. D., Permatasari, Y., & Midiantari, P. N. (2022). Product innovation, firm performance and moderating role of technology capabilities. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3), 252-265.
- Ahn, S., Kim, K.-S., & Lee, K.-H. (2022). Technological capabilities, entrepreneurship and innovation of technology-based start-ups: The resource-based view. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), Article 156.
- Anwar, J., & Hasnu, S. A. F. (2017). Strategic patterns and firm performance: Comparing consistent, flexible and reactor strategies. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30, 1015-1029.
- Atuahene-Gima, K., & Ko, A. (2001). An empirical investigation of the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurship orientation alignment on product innovation. Organization Science, 12, 54-74.
- Cheng, C. C. &, Krumwiede, D. (2012). The role of service innovation in the market orientation – New service performance linkage. Technovation, 32(7-8), 487-497.
- Cheng, C. J. C., & Sheu, C. (2017). When are strategic orientations beneficial for collaborative service innovation? The Service Industries Journal, 37(7-8), 466-493.
- Ejdys, J. (2015). Innovativeness of residential care services in poland in the context of strategic orientation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 746-752.
- Engen, M., Fuglsang, L., Tuominen, T., Sundbo, J., Møller, J. K., Scupola, A., & Sørensen, F. (2021). Conceptualising employee involvement in service innovation: An integrative review. Journal of Service Management, 32(5), 702-751.
- Fayolle, A., Basso, O., & Bouchard, V. (2013). Understanding the impact of culture on a firm’s entrepreneurial orientation and behaviour: A conceptual framework (Working Paper # 2008-02). London: European Entrepreneurship in the Globalizing Economy.
- García, F., Avella, L., & Fernández, E. (2012). Learning from exporting: The moderating effect of technological capabilities. International Business Review, 21(6), 1099-1111.
- Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2012). Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 998-1022.
- Garg, S., & Dhar, R. (2017). Employee service innovative behavior: The roles of leader-member exchange (LMX), work engagement, and job autonomy. International Journal of Manpower, 38(2), 242-258.
- Haeussler, C., Patzelt, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2012). Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 217-233.
- Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tath, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall Inc.
- Heredia, J., Castillo-Vergara, M., Geldes, C., Carbajal Gamarra, F. M., Flores, A., & Heredia, W. (2022). How do digital capabilities affect firm performance? The mediating role of technological capabilities in the “new normal. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), Article 100171.
- Horng, J. S., Liu, C. H. S., Chou, S. F., Tsai, C. Y., & Hu, D. C. (2018). Developing a sustainable service innovation framework for the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 455-474.
- Huhtala, J.-P., Sihvonen, A., Frösén, J., Jaakkola, M., & Tikkanen, H. (2014). Market orientation, innovation capability and business performance. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(2), 134-152.
- José, M. J. O. (2010). Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities’ moderating roles. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1273-1281.
- Klein, S. P., Spieth, P., & Heidenreich, S. (2021). Facilitating business model innovation: The influence of sustainability and the mediating role of strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(2), 271-288.
- Kyläheiko, K., Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Tuppura, A. (2011). Innovation and internationalization as growth strategies: The role of technological capabilities and appropriability. International Business Review, 20(5), 508-520.
- Lemy, D., Goh, E., & Ferry, J. (2019). Moving out of the silo: How service quality innovations can develop customer loyalty in Indonesia’s hotels. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 25(4), 462-479.
- Lin, F-J., & Lai, C-F. (2021). Key factors affecting technological capabilities in small and medium-sized Enterprises in Taiwan. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(1), 131-143.
- Luo, X., Rindfleisch, A., & Tse, D. K. (2007). Working with rivals: The impact of competitor alliances on financial performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 73-83.
- Malhotra, A., Mathur, A., Diddi, S., & Sagar, A. D. (2022). Building institutional capacity for addressing climate and sustainable development goals: Achieving energy efficiency in India. Climate Policy, 22(5), 652-670.
- Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Njuguna, E. W., Kabata, D., & Wambugu, H. (2022). Strategic orientation and the performance of insurance companies in Kenya. Journal of Business and Management, 24(1).
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Obeidat, B. Y. (2016). The effect of strategic orientation on organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 9(11).
- Oliveira, P., & Roth, A. V. (2012). Service orientation: The derivation of underlying constructs and measures. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(2), 156-190.
- Otache, I. (2019). The mediating effect of teamwork on the relationship between strategic orientation and performance of Nigerian banks. European Business Review, 31(5), 744-760.
- Qiu, S., Alizadeh, A., Dooley, L. M., & Zhang, R. (2019). The effects of authentic leadership on trust in leaders, organizational citizenship behavior, and service quality in the Chinese hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 40, 77-87.
- Ringberg, T., Reihlen, M., & Rydén, P. (2019). The technology-mindset interactions: Leading to incremental, radical or revolutionary innovations. Industrial Marketing Management, 79, 102-113.
- Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy – When is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307-324.
- Ruan, W-Q., Zhang, S-N., Liu, C-H., & Li, Y-Q. (2020). A new path for building hotel brand equity: the impacts of technological competence and service innovation implementation through perceived value and trust. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(8), 911-933.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students. Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.
- Srivastava, M. K., Gnyawali, D. R., & Hatfield, D. E. (2015). Behavioral implications of absorptive capacity: The role of technological effort and technological capability in leveraging alliance network technological resources. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 92, 346-358.
- Stoffels, M., & Leker, J. (2018). The impact of IT assets on innovation performance: The mediating role of developmental culture and absorptive capacity. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(8).
- Tajeddini, K., Martin, E., & Altinay, L. (2020). The importance of human-related factors on service innovation and performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, Article 102431.
- Tsou, H. T., Chen, J. S., & Liao, W. H. (2014). Market and technology orientations for service delivery innovation: The link of innovative competence. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(6), 499-513.
- Tutar, H., Nart, S., & Bingöl, D. (2015). The effects of strategic orientations on innovation capabilities and market performance: The case of ASEM. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 709-719.
- Witell, L., Snyder, H., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P. (2016). Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2863-2872.
- Yang, M., Luu, T. T., & Qian, D. (2022). Nurturing service innovation through developmental culture: A multilevel model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 50, 93-107.
- Yu, Y., Li, M., Li, X., Zhao, J. L., & Zhao, D. T. (2018). Effects of entrepreneurship and IT fashion on SMEs’ transformation toward cloud service through mediation of trust. Information & Management, 55(2), 245-257.
- Zang, J., & Li, Y. (2017). Technology capabilities, marketing capabilities and innovation ambidexterity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(1), 23-37.
- Zhang, J., & Duan, Y. (2010). Empirical study on the impact of market orientation and innovation orientation on new product performance of Chinese manufacturers. Nankai Business Review International, 1(2), 214-231.
- Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). Facilitating servitization in manufacturing firms: The influence of strategic orientation. Sustainability, 13(24), Article 13541.
-
-
Conceptualization
Adam Yagoub Abker, Arafa Gebreil Musa
-
Data curation
Adam Yagoub Abker, Arafa Gebreil Musa
-
Formal Analysis
Adam Yagoub Abker
-
Investigation
Adam Yagoub Abker, Arafa Gebreil Musa
-
Methodology
Adam Yagoub Abker, Arafa Gebreil Musa
-
Resources
Adam Yagoub Abker, Arafa Gebreil Musa
-
Writing – original draft
Adam Yagoub Abker, Arafa Gebreil Musa
-
Writing – review & editing
Adam Yagoub Abker, Arafa Gebreil Musa
-
Validation
Arafa Gebreil Musa
-
Conceptualization
-
Non-financial factors affecting the operational performance of hospitality companies: Evidence from Vietnam
Trung Kien Phan , Thi Hong Thuy Nguyen , Thu Ha Dang , Van Thuan Tran , Kim Ngoc Le doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.05Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021 Issue #4 pp. 48-62 Views: 9101 Downloads: 1415 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯNon-financial factors including quality of services, the flexibility of a company, utilization of resources, and market orientation are regarded as significant determinants that enhance the profitability-based performance of a service company or a hotel. The study investigated the interaction between these factors and hotel operating performance measured by the hospitality performance and results indicators. Data on 346 executives of Vietnam’s hospitality companies were collected. A structural equation modeling (SEM) method was utilized to examine the positive-direct and moderating effects of non-financial factors on hotel performance in terms of occupancy rate (OCR), average daily rate (ADR), and the revenue per available room (RevPAR). The findings showed that service quality ( = 0.118, p < 0.05), flexibility ( = 0.173, p < 0.05) and resource utilization (= 0.172, p < 0.05) positively affected the performance of Vietnam’s hospitality companies. Meanwhile, innovation showed no direct influence (p = 0.068) but an indirect impact on the performance through service quality ( = 0.311, p < 0.05). Market orientation did not impact the performance (p = 0.076) but it positively affected both innovation ( = 0.322, p < 0.05) and service quality ( = 0.146, p < 0.05). The study contributed to a theoretical enhancement of the current level of knowledge on the factors that affect the performance and developed a reliable scale for measuring the performance of hotels in Vietnam.
-
Market orientation and corporate performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in Saudi Arabia
The goal of this paper is to examine the effect of business orientation on the success of small and medium-sized enterprises in Saudi Arabia. Corporate performance is a dependent variable, whereas business orientation, competitor orientation and inter-functional orientation are used as independent variables. This cross-section analysis was based on a quantitative survey design. The target population consisted of 72 SMEs (industrial, commercial and service) identified by the Saudi Chamber of Commerce in Riyadh. The companies were selected from Riyadh, Jeddah, Abha, Dammam and Bisha, which were founded before March 1, 2005 with less than 100 employees in Saudi Arabia. The findings showed that consumer orientation, competitor orientation and inter-functional cooperation had a substantial positive influence on the success of SMEs in Saudi Arabia during the study period. Market orientation dimensions, in particular, demonstrated a modest relationship to company efficiency. It was concluded that the greater the orientation of the business, the higher the output and the income of the enterprises. SME owners/managers are advised to understand the consumer orientation dimensions that have a positive effect on the success of their firms. Involved parties also need to establish more consistent business-oriented strategies that assess corporate success in order to boost the output of Saudi companies.
-
Key competitiveness of Indonesian small wooden furniture business
Jusni Jusni , Andi Aswan , Muhammad Hakimi Mohd Shafiai , Gunawan Baharuddin , Riandha Ridho Hafizh Thaha doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(1).2023.06Small wooden furniture businesses in East Indonesia feel pressure from the furniture businesses of the West Indonesia, in particular from Jepara, due to a fierce international rivalry. The study is intended to analyze the effect of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on competitiveness with innovation as an intervening variable. The study distributed 189 questionnaires to the small wooden furniture producers in the South and West Sulawesi Provinces. The collected data were analyzed by structural equation modeling using maximum likelihood approach. The study found that market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, and innovation contributed to leveraging the competitiveness of small furniture producers. With this model, market orientation is found to have a positive and significant effect on innovation and competitiveness, both with a small-medium effect. Interestingly, the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and innovativeness shows a positive, significant, and the most dominant of all structural causal relationships in the model, with a small-high effect. In contrast, the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and competitiveness has a positive and significant effect with a smaller path coefficient. The study also found that innovation shows a positive and significant effect on competitiveness with a relatively small impact.
Acknowledgment
The case of small wooden furniture businesses of Indonesia is part of collaborative research between the research teams from Hasanudd in University and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. In carrying out this study, the involvement of a number of agencies cannot be ignored: the Cooperative and Small and Medium Size Regional Office of South and West Sulawesi Province and Cooperatives and the Small and Medium Size Regional Office of Makassar City.