Psychological contract, organizational commitment, and knowledge innovation: A perspective of open innovation
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.33
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #2, pp. 418-432
- Cited by
- 965 Views
-
1108 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper explores the influence of employee perception of psychological contracts on knowledge innovation from the perspective of open innovation. The purpose is to explore internal factors affecting knowledge innovation through the construction of the SEM model and provide enterprise managers with scientific and effective management methods. The survey sample includes 312 technical and scientific research employees from 16 high-tech enterprises in China. This study adopts a quantitative research method and conducts a questionnaire survey through the subjective sampling method of improbability sampling. Through empirical analysis, the results show that a psychological contract has a significant positive effect on knowledge innovation. Among them, the relational psychological contract is more influential than the transactional one. The influence of the relational psychological contract on organizational commitment is extremely significant; the influence is more than 50%. It reflects the importance that employees attach to the employment relationship. However, the transactional psychological contract has no significant effect on organizational commitment, and organizational commitment plays a partial mediating role. Therefore, enterprises should focus on building mutual trust and friendly employment relationships and implement targeted management strategies and incentives for employees to enhance their ability of knowledge innovation.
Acknowledgment
This study is a part of the research project: Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (19YJC630141).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O15, O36
-
References27
-
Tables9
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. The conceptual framework
- Figure 2. Confirmatory factor analysis model
- Figure 3. Structural model of the study
-
- Table 1. Demographics
- Table 2. Descriptive statistical analysis
- Table 3. Reliability analysis
- Table 4. Validity analysis
- Table 5. Confirmatory factor analysis
- Table 6. Discriminant validity analysis
- Table 7. Model fit index
- Table 8. Path coefficient analysis of the structural equation
- Table 9. Mediating effect analysis
-
- Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
- Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
- Battistelli, A., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., Di Napoli, G., & Piccione, L. (2019). Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work-based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(3), 361-381.
- Bo, S., & Tian, W. (2019). Knowledge innovation mechanism: An analysis based on the dynamic process of organizational memory. Management Review, 31(9), 94-104. (In Chinese).
- Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
- Cambra-Fierro, J., Florin, J., Perez, L., & Whitelock, J. (2011). Inter-firm market orientation as antecedent of knowledge transfer, innovation and value creation in networks. Management Decision, 49(3), 444-467.
- Dai, L., & Wang, L. (2016). Psychological contract, reciprocal preference and knowledge sharing willingness. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4(8), 60.
- Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59.
- Freese, C., & Schalk, R. (1996). Implications of differences in psychological contracts for human resource management. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 501-509.
- Flood, P. C., Turner, T., Ramamoorthy, N., & Pearson, J. (2001). Causes and consequences of psychological contracts among knowledge workers in the high technology and financial services industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(7), 1152-1165.
- Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213-221.
- Kickul, J., & Lester, S. W. (2001). Broken promises: Equity sensitivity as a moderator between psychological contract breach and employee attitudes and behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2), 191-217.
- Kiazad, K., Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2014). Psychological contract breach and employee innovation: A conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(3), 535-556.
- Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of applied psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
- Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.
- Nazir, S., Qun, W., Hui, L., & Shafi, A. (2018). Influence of social exchange relationships on affective commitment and innovative behavior: Role of perceived organizational support. Sustainability, 10(12), 4418.
- Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
- Önhon, Ö. (2019). The relationship between organizational climate for innovation and employees’ innovative work behavior: ICT sector in Turkey. Vezetéstudomány-Budapest Management Review, 50(11), 53-64.
- Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142-150.
- Rousseau, D. M. (1998). The ’problem’ of the psychological contract considered. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 665-671.
- Rousseau, D. M., Hansen, S. D., & Tomprou, M. (2018). A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1081-1098.
- Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management, 37(3), 580-607.
- Turnley,W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (1999a). The impact of psychological contract violations on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Human Relations, 52(7), 895-922.
- Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (1999b). A discrepancy model of psychological contract violations. Human Resource Management Review, 9(3), 367-386.
- Turnley, W. H., Bolino, M. C., Lester, S. W., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2003). The impact of psychological contract ful-fillment on the per-formance of in-role and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 29(2), 187-206.
- Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert systems with applications, 39(10), 8899-8908.
- Wong, Y., Ngo, H., & Wong, C. (2002). Affective Organizational Commitment of Workers in Chinese Joint Ventures. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(7), 580-598.