Optimizing the performance of mean-variance portfolios in various markets: an “old-school” approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.17
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2018, Issue #1, pp. 190-207
- 1611 Views
-
494 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The authors study the performance of mean-variance optimized (MVO) equity portfolios for retail investors in various markets in the U.S. and around the world. Actively managed equity mutual funds have relatively high fees and tend to underperform their benchmark. Index funds such as exchange traded funds still charge appreciable fees, and only deliver the performance of the benchmark. The authors find that MVO portfolios are relatively easy to manage by a retail investor, and that they tend to outperform their benchmark or, at worst, equal its performance, even after adjusting for risk. Moreover, they show that the performance of these funds is not particularly sensitive to the frequency at which they are rebalanced so that, in the limit, an investor might have to rebalance his/her portfolio only once a year. This last finding translates into very low trading costs, even for retail investors. Thus, the authors conclude that MVOs offer an easy, cheap alternative to invest in the world’s equity markets.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G11, G15, G17, G23
-
References18
-
Tables9
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Excess return of mean-variance optimized portfolios
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of country indexes
- Table 2. Performance of mean-variance optimized portfolios
- Table 3. Statistical tests of performance of mean-variance optimized portfolios
- Table 4. Number of assets in portfolios
- Table 5. Portfolio weights of mean-variance portfolios
- Table 6. Performance of restricted mean-variance optimized portfolios
- Table 7. Performance of mean-variance optimized portfolios, excess returns
- Table 8. Performance of restricted mean-variance optimized portfolios, excess returns
- Table 9. Comparison with performance of EW portfolios
-
- Agrawal, D. (2011). Measuring performance of Indian mutual funds. Finance India, June.
- Avramov, D., & Wermers, R. (2006). Investing in mutual funds when returns are predictable. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 339-377.
- Białkowski, J., & Otten, R. (2011). Emerging market mutual fund performance: Evidence for Poland. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 22(2), 118-130.
- Contreras-Pacheco, O. E., Stein, R., & Vecino, C. E. (2015). Evidencia en el mercado accionario colombiano. Estudios Gerenciales, 31(137), 383-392.
- Cuthbertson, K., Nitzsche, D., & O’Sullivan, N. (2008). UK mutual fund performance: Skill or luck? Journal of Empirical Finance, 15(4), 613-634.
- Cai, J., Chan, K. C., & Yamada, T. (1997). The performance of Japanese mutual funds. Review of Financial Studies, 10(2), 237- 274.
- DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1915-1953.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2010). Luck versus Skill in the Cross‐Section of Mutual Fund Returns. The Journal of Finance, 65(5), 1915-1947.
- Gallagher, D. R., & Jarnecic, E. (2004). International equity funds, performance, and investor flows: Australian evidence. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 14(1), 81-95.
- Green, R. C., & Hollifield, B. (1992). When Will Mean‐Variance Efficient Portfolios Be Well Diversified? The Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1785-1809.
- Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389-416.
- Konno, H., & Yamazaki, H. (1991). Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market. Management Science, 37(5), 519-531.
- Kosowski, R., Timmermann, A., Wermers, R., White, H. (2006). Can Mutual Fund Stars Really Pick Stocks? New Evidence from a Bootstrap Analysis. Journal of Finance, LXI(6).
- Malkiel, B. G. (1995). Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971 to 1991. The Journal of Finance, 50(2), 549-572.
- Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
- Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of risk, 2, 21-42.
- Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 119-138.
- Uryasev, S., Zabarankin, M., & Chekhlov, A. (2004). Portfolio optimization with drawdown constraints. Asset and Liability Management Tools, 263-278.