Integrating circular economy, digital economy, and social protection policies to drive green business innovation: Insights from Indonesia’s culinary SMEs
-
Received September 11, 2024;Accepted November 15, 2024;Published November 26, 2024
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-6879Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2684-3551Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-3841Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0948-4000Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4083-0810
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.28
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 368-381
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 140 Views
-
31 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Global concern over environmental pollution has sparked the adoption of green business practices, which are essential for the sustainability of SMEs through green economy initiatives and renewable resources. This study aims to analyze the integration of circular and digital economy policies along with social protection policies in supporting green business innovation among culinary SMEs. By emphasizing the significance of government roles and innovation capabilities, the paper proposes that policies promoting environmentally friendly practices and social security can enhance sustainable performance in alignment with SDG principles. The study employs a quantitative approach, surveying 200 culinary SMEs in Surabaya City in Indonesia, a city known for its vibrant SME sector and commitment to sustainable practices. The data analysis, conducted using PLS-SEM through SmartPLS 4, reveals that circular economy policies (t-test = 6.503; p-value = 0.000) and social security (t-test = 3.848; p-value = 0.000) significantly enhance green business innovation, while digital economy policies are not significant (t-test = 0.725; p-value = 0.468). Furthermore, green business innovation positively impacts sustainable performance (t-test = 24.418; p-value = 0.000). However, internal innovation capabilities do not moderate the relationship between integrative policies and green business innovation. The findings indicate that government policies significantly influence green business innovation in MSMEs, particularly through circular economy regulations. Regulatory support and incentives are crucial for driving environmental sustainability and enhancing competitiveness. Strengthening digital economy policies through improved technology access and digital literacy will further support green innovation, while investments in internal innovation and human resources are vital for sustainable growth.
Acknowledgment
This study is funded by the Riset Kolaborasi Indonesia (Grant No. B/43869/UN38.III.1/LK.04.00/2024) by LPPM Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q56, O31, L26
-
References65
-
Tables7
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Proposed research model
- Figure 2. Bootstrapping output
-
- Table 1. Respondent characteristics
- Table 2. Validity, reliability, and multicollinearity testing
- Table 3. Fornell-Larcker test results
- Table 4. HTMT test results
- Table 5. Direct effects and R-square result
- Table 6. Results of checking the moderating hypotheses
- Table A1. Variable-indicator description
-
- Almosova, A., Burda, M. C., & Voigts, S. (2020). Social security contributions and the business cycle. Journal of Macroeconomics, 65, Article 103209.
- AlMulhim, A. F. (2021). The role of internal and external sources of knowledge on frugal innovation: Moderating role of innovation capabilities. International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(3), 341-363.
- Alonso-Martinez, D., De Marchi, V., & Di Maria, E. (2021). The sustainability performances of sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 323, Article 129145.
- Aminah, S. (2022). Implementation of green city Surabaya: Overcoming challenges of local-global and green capitalism development. Global Strategis, 16(2), 329-356.
- Aranda-Usón, A., Moneva, J. M., Portillo-Tarragona, P., & Llena-Macarulla, F. (2018). Measurement of the circular economy in businesses: Impact and implications for regional policies. Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment, 2018(2), 187-205.
- Ardyan, E., Nurtantiono, A., Istiyanto, B., & Rahmawan, G. (2017). Green innovation capability as driver of sustainable competitive advantages and SMES marketing performance. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(8), 1114-1122.
- Auwalin, I., Rumayya, Rahma Sari, F., & Maulida, S. R. (2022). Applying the pro-circular change model to restaurant and retail businesses’ preferences for circular economy: Evidence from Indonesia. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18(1), 97-113.
- Babbitt, L. G., Brown, D., & Mazaheri, N. (2015). Gender, entrepreneurship, and the formal-informal dilemma: Evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 72, 163-174.
- Basl, J., & Benesova, A. (2020). Green industry 4.0 – Analysis of green aspects penetration in business readiness models for industry 4.0. Proceedings of the 28th Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks: Digitalized Economy, Society and Information Management, IDIMT (pp. 125-132). Linz: Trauner Verlag Universität.
- Behrendt, C., Nguyen, Q. A., & Rani, U. (2019). Social protection systems and the future of work: Ensuring social security for digital platform workers. International Social Security Review, 72(3), 17-41.
- Benešová, A., Basl, J., Tupa, J., & Steiner, F. (2021). Design of a business readiness model to realise a green industry 4.0 company. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 34(9), 920-932.
- Borah, P. S., Iqbal, S., & Akhtar, S. (2022). Linking social media usage and SME’s sustainable performance: The role of digital leadership and innovation capabilities. Technology in Society, 68.
- Bures, O. (2017). Contributions of private businesses to the provision of security in the EU: beyond public-private partnerships. Crime, Law and Social Change, 67(3), 289-312.
- Camilleri, M. A. (2020). European environment policy for the circular economy: Implications for business and industry stakeholders. Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1804-1812.
- Chen, L.-F. (2019). Green certification, e-commerce, and low-carbon economy for international tourist hotels. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(18), 17965-17973.
- Chibba, M. (2014). Understanding human trafficking: Perspectives from social science, security matters, business and human rights. Contemporary Social Science, 9(3), 311-321.
- Choi, Y. S., & Porananond, P. (2023). Competition law and policy of the ASEAN member states for the digital economy: A proposal for greater harmonization. Asia Pacific Law Review, 31(2), 358-379.
- Dindarian, A. (2021). Overview: The smart sustainable city initiatives and the circular economy. In Circular Economy and Sustainability. Volume 1: Management and Policy (pp. 369-384). Elsevier.
- Elshaer, I. A., Azazz, A. M. S., & Fayyad, S. (2023). Green management and sustainable performance of small- and medium-sized hospitality businesses: Moderating the role of an employee’s pro-environmental behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), Article 2244.
- Fatimah, Y. A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, Article 122263.
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
- Ferreira, J., & Coelho, A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities, innovation and branding capabilities and their impact on competitive advantage and SME’s performance in Portugal: The moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(3), 255-286.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Ge, Y., Xia, Y., & Wang, T. (2024). Digital economy, data resources and enterprise green technology innovation: Evidence from A-listed Chinese Firms. Resources Policy, 92, Article 105035.
- Guo, J., Jia, F., Yan, F., & Chen, L. (2024). E-commerce supply chain finance for SMEs: The role of green innovation. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 27(9), 1596-1615.
- Hair, J. F., Astrachan, C. B., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Sarstedt, M., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), Article 100392.
- Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Jiang, Y., & Deng, F. (2022). Multi-dimensional threshold effects of the digital economy on green economic growth? – New evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(19), Article 12888.
- Kock, N. (2017). Common method bias: A full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (pp. 245-257). Springer International Publishing.
- Kwon, S., & Keo, L. (2019). Social health protection in Cambodia: Challenges of policy design and implementation. International Social Security Review, 72(2), 97-111.
- Li, H. (2022). Green innovation, green dynamic capability, and enterprise performance: Evidence from heavy polluting manufacturing enterprises in China. Complexity.
- Li, J., Zhao, Z., Cong, L. M., & Xu, Y. (2024). Impact of social insurance law on total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese micro and small businesses. Applied Economics, 56(57), 7937-7959.
- Liang, Y., Zhao, C., & Lee, M.-J. (2023). Institutional pressures on sustainability and green performance: The mediating role of digital business model innovation. Sustainability, 15(19).
- Lin, Q., & Zhou, P. (2024). Synergy of digital economy and green economy in sustainable development policy. Journal of Autonomous Intelligence, 7(3).
- Lindgren, P., Knoth, N. S. H., Sureshkumar, S., Friedrich, M. F., & Adomaityte, R. (2021). “Green multi business models” How to measure green business models and green business model innovation? Wireless Personal Communications, 121(2), 1303-1323.
- Lindner, S., Burdick, C., & Meseguer, J. (2017). Characteristics and employment of applicants for social security disability insurance over the business cycle. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 17(1).
- Lund, F. (2012). Work-related social protection for informal workers. International Social Security Review, 65(4), 9-30.
- Ma, Y., Thornton, T. F., Mangalagiu, D., Lan, J., Hestad, D., Cappello, E. A., & Van der Leeuw, S. (2020). Co-creation, co-evolution and co-governance: Understanding green businesses and urban transformations. Climatic Change, 160(4), 621-636.
- Milios, L. (2021). Overarching policy framework for product life extension in a circular economy – A bottom-up business perspective. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(4), 330-346.
- Mojtaba, R.-B., Hamidreza, S., & Rohollah, Z. (2015). The challenges of implementing business process reengineering in social security organization: The impact of structural features and human resource management. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, 12, 85-93.
- Mole, K., North, D., & Baldock, R. (2017). Which SMEs seek external support? Business characteristics, management behaviour and external influences in a contingency approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35(3), 476-499.
- Mubeen, A., Nisar, Q. A., Patwary, A. K., Rehman, S., & Ahmad, W. (2024). Greening your business: Nexus of green dynamic capabilities, green innovation and sustainable performance. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 22747-22773.
- O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673-690.
- Ogutu, M. O., Akor, J., Mulindwa, M. S., Heshima, O., & Nsengimana, C. (2023). Implementing circular economy and sustainability policies in Rwanda: Experiences of Rwandan manufacturers with the plastic ban policy. Frontiers in Sustainability, 4.
- Purwandani, J. A., & Michaud, G. (2021). What are the drivers and barriers for green business practice adoption for SMEs? Environment Systems and Decisions, 41(4), 577-593.
- Roemer, E., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2021). HTMT2 – An improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(12), 2637-2650.
- Rustiarini, N. W., Bhegawati, D. A. S., & Mendra, N. P. Y. (2022). Does green innovation improve SME performance? Economies, 10(12), Article 316.
- Sarkar, A., Qian, L., & Peau, A. K. (2020). Overview of green business practices within the Bangladeshi RMG industry: Competitiveness and sustainable development perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(18), 22888-22901.
- Schwanholz, J., & Leipold, S. (2020). Sharing for a circular economy? An analysis of digital sharing platforms’ principles and business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269.
- Simonov, S. G., Khamatkhanova, M. A., Lysenko, I. V., & Yamova, O. V. (2016). Social orientation of security of small and medium-sized enterprises in the countries of the customs union (Russia-Kazakhstan-Belarus). International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 14(9), 5921-5934.
- Streukens, S., & Leroi-Werelds, S. (2016). Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results. European Management Journal, 34(6), 618-632.
- Sun, G., Fang, J., Li, J., & Wang, X. (2024). Research on the impact of the integration of digital economy and real economy on enterprise green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200.
- Sutono, S., Harsono, I., Nasruddin, N., & Judijanto, L. (2023). The influence of regulatory policy, technology infrastructure, and human resource quality on economic growth in Surabaya city. West Science Journal Economic and Entrepreneurship, 1(11), 547-556.
- Tian, X., Zhang, Y., & Qu, G. (2022). The impact of digital economy on the efficiency of green financial investment in China’s provinces. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), Article 8884.
- Tohanean, D., & Weiss, P. (2019). Digital entrepreneurship and green business model innovation: Lean startup approaches. Quality – Access to Success, 20(S2), 630-634.
- Torm, N. (2020). To what extent is social security spending associated with enhanced firm-level performance? A case study of SMEs in Indonesia. International Labour Review, 159(3), 339-366.
- Upadhyay, A., Kumar, A., & Akter, S. (2022). An analysis of UK retailers’ initiatives towards circular economy transition and policy-driven directions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24(4), 1209-1217.
- Williams, C. C., & Shahid, M. S. (2016). Informal entrepreneurship and institutional theory: Explaining the varying degrees of (in)formalization of entrepreneurs in Pakistan. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 28(1-2), 1-25.
- Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of Business Research, 101, 697-706.
- Zhang, Z., & Li, W. (2024). Driving effects of digital economy on green efficiency of resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin. Resources Science, 46(3), 475-487.
- Zhao, X., Xu, S., Jiang, T., & Liu, B. (2024). Digital economy’s impact on green innovation efficiency: Bottom-up or top-down? Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.
- Zheng, L. J., Wang, Y. A., Lin, H.-Y., & Liu, W. (2023). Understanding circular economy adoption by SMEs: A case study on organizational legitimacy and Industry 4.0. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(4), 1157-1177.
-
-
Conceptualization
Suci Megawati, Herdis Herdiansyah
-
Data curation
Suci Megawati, Herdis Herdiansyah, Amir Machmud
-
Formal Analysis
Suci Megawati, Amir Machmud
-
Funding acquisition
Suci Megawati
-
Investigation
Suci Megawati, Ernoiz Antriyandarti
-
Methodology
Suci Megawati, Herdis Herdiansyah
-
Project administration
Suci Megawati, Sud Sudirman
-
Software
Suci Megawati, Herdis Herdiansyah
-
Supervision
Suci Megawati, Herdis Herdiansyah, Sud Sudirman
-
Writing – original draft
Suci Megawati, Herdis Herdiansyah, Amir Machmud, Ernoiz Antriyandarti, Sud Sudirman
-
Writing – review & editing
Suci Megawati, Amir Machmud, Ernoiz Antriyandarti
-
Resources
Amir Machmud, Ernoiz Antriyandarti
-
Visualization
Amir Machmud, Ernoiz Antriyandarti
-
Validation
Sud Sudirman
-
Conceptualization
-
Non-financial factors affecting the operational performance of hospitality companies: Evidence from Vietnam
Trung Kien Phan , Thi Hong Thuy Nguyen , Thu Ha Dang , Van Thuan Tran , Kim Ngoc Le doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.05Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021 Issue #4 pp. 48-62 Views: 9178 Downloads: 1421 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯNon-financial factors including quality of services, the flexibility of a company, utilization of resources, and market orientation are regarded as significant determinants that enhance the profitability-based performance of a service company or a hotel. The study investigated the interaction between these factors and hotel operating performance measured by the hospitality performance and results indicators. Data on 346 executives of Vietnam’s hospitality companies were collected. A structural equation modeling (SEM) method was utilized to examine the positive-direct and moderating effects of non-financial factors on hotel performance in terms of occupancy rate (OCR), average daily rate (ADR), and the revenue per available room (RevPAR). The findings showed that service quality ( = 0.118, p < 0.05), flexibility ( = 0.173, p < 0.05) and resource utilization (= 0.172, p < 0.05) positively affected the performance of Vietnam’s hospitality companies. Meanwhile, innovation showed no direct influence (p = 0.068) but an indirect impact on the performance through service quality ( = 0.311, p < 0.05). Market orientation did not impact the performance (p = 0.076) but it positively affected both innovation ( = 0.322, p < 0.05) and service quality ( = 0.146, p < 0.05). The study contributed to a theoretical enhancement of the current level of knowledge on the factors that affect the performance and developed a reliable scale for measuring the performance of hotels in Vietnam.
-
Factors affecting service quality at Vietnamese retail banks
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 39-48 Views: 6514 Downloads: 1396 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯSustainable growth and development can be the most important lesson that banks have learned in recent decades. Banks would gain many benefits, win the competition and develop sustainably if there have been more and more loyal customers. Customer satisfaction will help build customer loyalty. In order to have loyal customers, service quality must be good. Quality customer service of the bank is to ensure customer satisfaction and take their needs into consideration to improve service quality. High customer service quality will generate value not only to meet customer needs but also the expectations of customers and make banks more prominent than their competitors. This study identifies factors that affect customer satisfaction with the service quality at Vietnamese retail banks. The results are obtained by qualitative and quantitative method. The research model with a questionnaire consisting of 22 variables, 5 scales for a survey of 554 customers, is identified and developed through interviews with experts and group discussions. The findings show that customer satisfaction with the service quality at retail banks is influenced by “reliability”, “responsiveness”, “empathy”, “security”, and “tangibles”. Based on the findings, solutions for improving service quality are proposed for Vietnamese retail banks.
-
Exploring fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) small, medium and micro enterprises manufacturers’ need for innovation to achieve growth
Lawrence Mpele Lekhanya , Nze Grace Olajumoke , Dorasamy Nirmala doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(2).2017.01Environmental Economics Volume 8, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 8-16 Views: 5575 Downloads: 1172 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the problems of the sustainable development, to explore the level of innovation in the fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) manufacturing SMMEs sectors, which most affects on the state of the environment, to identify the causes of low innovation in the industry and to examine these factors influence on the effectiveness of SMMEs manufacturers innovation strategies, as well as to invent a new innovation strategic approach to overcome innovation problems in the economic growth of fast moving consumer goods SMMEs manufacturers. The study is aimed to determine the level of innovation and factors contributing to low innovation in fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) SMMEs manufacturers, which hinder their economic performance. Mixed approach of quantitative and qualitative questionnaire is used for primary data collection. Sample consists of 120 SMMEs. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (23.0) was employed for data analysis. The study results are presented with figures and diagrams. This study will be a useful tool for general public and relevant stakeholders in this sector.