Insights on electric vehicle adoption: Does attitude play a mediating role?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(1).2022.09
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2022, Issue #1, pp. 104-116
- Cited by
- 1147 Views
-
631 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Vehicles are classified as a mobile source of pollution worldwide. This problem is compounded in countries like India, where the population is enormous, and the number of automobiles increases quickly. To overcome this issue, governments and individuals must adopt electric vehicles and maximize the use of eco-friendly vehicles. However, the adoption of electric vehicles in India is gradual. One of the reasons is the attitude towards traditional and electric vehicles. This study’s primary objective is to determine how attitude influences the adoption of electric vehicles. The topic is vital since the attitude provided by numerous studies influences the intention to buy anything. This study considered one dependent variable (electric vehicle adoption) and one mediating variable (attitude) along with five independent variables. The data collection method was straightforward, and the sample size was 366 respondents. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA), structural equation modeling (SEM), and mediation analysis were used to analyze the data. All adopted constructs were trustworthy, with average variance extracted exceeding 0.55, composite reliability exceeding 0.75, and factor loadings exceeding 0.70 for most. The model fit indices were also found to be significant on several parameters. Among all other variables, only financial incentives affect electric vehicle adoption. In other circumstances, opinions did not influence customer uptake of electric vehicles.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D11, L62, Q56
-
References54
-
Tables7
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Proposed research model
- Figure 2. Model fit
- Figure 3. Structural model
-
- Table 1. Demographic profile
- Table 2. KMO and Bartlett’s test
- Table 3. Reliability and validity
- Table 4. Discriminant validity (Fornell-Larcker criterion)
- Table 5. CFA results indicators
- Table 6. Regression path coefficients results
- Table 7. Mediation analysis
-
- Adepetu, A., Keshav, S., & Arya, V. (2016). An agent-based electric vehicle ecosystem model: San Francisco case study. Transport Policy, 46, 109-122.
- Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., Rahman, I., & Amini, M. H. (2017). A market modeling review study on predicting Malaysian consumer behavior towards widespread adoption of PHEV/EV. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(22), 17955-17975.
- Ali, I., & Naushad, M. (2021). Determinants of customer satisfaction in online grocery shopping. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(3), 383-390.
- Ali, I., & Naushad, M. (2022). A Study to Investigate What Tempts Consumers to Adopt Electric Vehicles. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 13(2), 26.
- Ali, I., Naushad, M., & Sulphey, M. M. (2020). Do trust and corporate social responsibility activities affect purchase intentions? An examination using structural equation modeling. Innovative Marketing, 16(4), 62-73.
- Axsen, J., Orlebar, C., & Skippon, S. (2013). Social influence and consumer preference formation for pro-environmental technology: The case of a UK workplace electric-vehicle study. Ecological Economics, 95, 96-107.
- Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2018). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
- Bjerkan, K. Y., Nørbech, T. E., & Nordtømme, M. E. (2016). Incentives for promoting battery electric vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 43, 169-180.
- Chen, M.-F., & Tung, P.-J. (2014). Developing an extended theory of planned behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36, 221-230.
- Chu, W., Im, M., Song, M. R., & Park, J. (2019). Psychological and behavioral factors affecting electric vehicle adoption and satisfaction: A comparative study of early adopters in China and Korea. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 1-18.
- Dash, A. (2021). Determinants of EVs adoption: A study on green behavior of consumers. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10(1), 125-137.
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582-602.
- Egnér, F., & Trosvik, L. (2018). Electric vehicle adoption in Sweden and the impact of local policy instruments. Energy Policy, 121, 584-596.
- Ertz, M., Karakas, F., & Sarigöllü, E. (2016). Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3971-3980.
- Fenger, J. (1999). Urban air quality. Atmospheric Environment, 33(29), 4877-4900.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Funke, S. Á., Sprei, F., Gnann, T., & Plötz, P. (2019). How much charging infrastructure do electric vehicles need? A review of the evidence and international comparison. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 77, 224-242.
- Gallagher, K. S., & Muehlegger, E. (2011). Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(1), 1-15.
- Green, E. H., Skerlos, S. J., & Winebrake, J. J. (2014). Increasing electric vehicle policy efficiency and effectiveness by reducing mainstream market bias. Energy Policy, 65, 562-566.
- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M., (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-151.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
- Hertzke, P., Müller, N., Schenk, S., & Wu, T. (2018, May 4). The global electric-vehicle market is amped up and on the rise. McKinsey Center for Future Mobility.
- Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
- Javid, R. J., & Nejat, A. (2017). A comprehensive model of regional electric vehicle adoption and penetration. Transport Policy, 54, 30-42.
- Jin, L., Searle, S., & Lutsey, N. (2014, October 31). Evaluation of state-level US electric vehicle incentives. The International Council on Clean Transportation.
- Khan, M. S., Saengon, P., Alganad, A. M. N., Chongcharoen, D., & Farrukh, M. (2020). Consumer green behaviour: An approach towards environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1168-1180.
- Khurana, A., Kumar, V. R., & Sidhpuria, M. (2020). A Study on the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: The Mediating Role of Attitude. Vision, 24(1), 23-34.
- Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes: Application to intended purchase of electric cars. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 71-85.
- Kley, F., Lerch, C., & Dallinger, D. (2011). New business models for electric cars – A holistic approach. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3392-3403.
- Kline, R. B. (2006). Principles and Practice of Structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
- Kumar, R. R., & Alok, K. (2020). Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119911.
- Lane, B., & Potter, S. (2007). The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: exploring the consumer attitude-action gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11-12), 1085-1092.
- Lebeau, K., Van Mierlo, J., Lebeau, P., Mairesse, O., & Macharis, C. (2013). Consumer attitudes towards battery electric vehicles: A large-scale survey. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, 5(1), 28-41.
- Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318-328.
- Lieven, T., Mühlmeier, S., Henkel, S., & Waller, J. F. (2011). Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(3), 236-243.
- Melliger, M. A., van Vliet, O. P., & Liimatainen, H. (2018). Anxiety vs Reality-Sufficiency of battery electric vehicle range in Switzerland and Finland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 101-115.
- Mersky, A. C., Sprei, F., Samaras, C., & Qian, Z. S. (2016). Effectiveness of incentives on electric vehicle adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46, 56-68.
- Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3-4), 195-237.
- Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
- Naushad, M. (2018). A study on the antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions among Saudi students. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 600-617.
- Naushad, M., & Malik, S. A. (2018). The mediating effect of entrepreneurial self-efficacy in entrepreneurial intention-a study in Saudi Arabian context. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 267-275.
- Peters, A., & Dütschke, E. (2014). How do consumers perceive electric vehicles? A comparison of German consumer groups. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(3), 359-377.
- Qian, L., & Yin, J. (2017). Linking Chinese cultural values and the adoption of electric vehicles: The mediating role of ethical evaluation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 56, 175-188.
- Quak, H., Nesterova, N., & van Rooijen, T. (2016). Possibilities and barriers for using electric-powered vehicles in city logistics practice. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 157-169.
- Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2016). Influence of social networks on latent choice of electric cars: A mixed logit specification using experimental design data. Networks and Spatial Economics, 16(1), 99-130.
- Sarstedt, M., Hair Jr, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 27(3), 197-211.
- Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39-49.
- Sourkounis, C., & Einwächter, F. (2011). Smart charge management of electric vehicles in decentralized power supply systems. 11th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation. Lisbon, Portugal.
- Turrentine, T. S., & Kurani, K. S. (2007). Car buyers and fuel economy? Energy Policy, 35(2), 1213-1223.
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 169-332.
- Wang, S., Li, J., & Zhao, D. (2017). The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 105, 14-26.
- Werther, B., & Hoch, N. (2012). E-mobility as a challenge for new ICT solutions in the car industry. In R. Bruni, & V. Sassone (Eds.), Trustworthy Global Computing. TGC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7173 (pp. 46-57). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Weston, R., & Gore Jr, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719-751.