ICT-mediated organizational change in microfinance organizations: a case study

  • Received March 5, 2018;
    Accepted June 8, 2018;
    Published July 6, 2018
  • Author(s)
    Mohammad Badruddozza Mia
    ORCID Researcher ID , Magnus Ramage
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.04
  • Article Info
    Volume 16 2018, Issue #3, pp. 40-47
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    2 articles
  • 1364 Views
  • 197 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

A strong research tradition on the economic and social impacts of microfinance intervention has been going on. But a dearth of studies on microfinance organizational and management perspectives is there, although the social and economic impacts of this development program largely depend on its organizational setup and intervention management. ICT (decipher!!!) has been used in microfinance organizations for quite a long period of time. This study looks into the ICT-mediated material and social changes that happen in this unique type of organization and its management. The study was conducted using exploratory case study in two organizations. A number of semi-structured interviews and focus groups have been conducted at different layers of the organizations. The study found that ICT has profound implications for change in different material and social aspects of microfinance organizations. As a catalyst, ICT causes organizational structure shrank both horizontally and vertically. Because of the use of ICT a loss-of-middle phenomenon emerges in organizational structure and a tendency of centralized decision authority prevails. It helps boosting up the operational performance and transparency and lowering the long-debated interest rate of microfinance. It engenders profound changes in human resources and socio-cultural aspects of microfinance organizations. However, if protective mechanism is not adopted then the use of ICT may have detrimental effects to the social performance of microfinance. This study contributes to the knowledge domain of ICT-mediated organizational change and the microfinance policy makers by exploring the implications of ICT to different organizational aspects. It contributes by unearthing the detrimental effect of ICT to the development outcome of microfinance intervention.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Methods of data collection
    • Ahmad, M. M. (2002). NGO Field Workers in Bangladesh. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    • Amagoh, F. (2008). Perspectives on Organizational Change: Systems and Complexity Theories. Public Sector Innovation Journal, 13(3), 28-42.
    • Anderson, C. L., Locker, L., & Nugent, R. (2002). Microcredit, Social Capital and Common Pool Resources. World Development, Elsevier, 30(1), 95-105.
    • Avgerou, C. (2000). IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective. Information Technology and People, 13(4), 234-262.
    • Avgerou, C. (2001). The Significance of Context in Information Systems and Organizational Change. Information Systems Journal, 11, 43-63.
    • Barrett, M., Grant, D., & Wailes, N. (2006). ICT and Organizational Change: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 42(1), 6-22.
    • Bertalanffy, L. V. (1973). General Systems Theory: Foundation, development, application. London: Penguin (original American publication, 1968).
    • Brynjolfsson, E., & Lorin, M. H. (1998). Information Technology and Organizational Design: Evidence from Micro data. MIT Sloan School.
    • Charitonenko, S., & Campion, A. (2003). Expanding Commercial Microfinance in Rural Areas: Constraints and Opportunities. Case study presented at conference on Paving the Way Forward for Rural Finance. Washington, DC, USA.
    • Fay, D., & Luhrmann, H. (2004). Current themes in organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 113-119.
    • Feigenberg, B., Field, E. M., & Pande, R. (2010). Building Social Capital Through Microfinance (Working Paper 16018). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
    • Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. (2004). Introduction – Organizational discourse: Exploring the field. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & Putnam, L. (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse (pp. 1-36). London: SAGE.
    • Iyengar, K. P., Quadri, N. A., & Singh, V. K. (2010). Information Technology and Microfinance Institutions: Challenges and Lessons Learned. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 8(2), 1-11.
    • Karim, L. (2008). Demystifying Micro-Credit: The Grameen Bank, NGOs, and Newliberalism in Bangladesh. Cultural Dynamics, 20(5), 5-29.
    • Midgley, G. (2003). Towards an Appropriate Social Theory for Applied Systems Thinking: Critical Theory and Soft Systems Methodology, Systems Thinking, 4, London: SAGE.
    • Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.
    • Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63-92.
    • Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organizational Science, 11(4), 404-428.
    • Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145-165.
    • Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2006). ICT and Organizational Change: A Commentary. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 42(1), 127-134.
    • Pettigrew, A. M. (1987). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6), 649-670.
    • Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292.
    • Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R., & Cameron, K. (2001). Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 697-713.
    • Reed, L. (2015). Mapping Pathway Out of Poverty. Microcredit Summit Campaign. Washington DC, USA.
    • Scott, P. M., & Van, V. A. (2004). Handbook of organizational change and innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Skyttner, L. (2005). General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspective, Practice. World Scientific Publishing Company.
    • Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of Wealth of Nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London.
    • Sturdy, A., & Grey, C. (2003). Beneath and beyond organizational change management: Exploring alternatives. Organization, 10(4), 651-662.
    • Volkoff, O., Strong, D. M., & Elmes, M. B. (2007). Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change. Organization Science, 18(5), 832-848.
    • Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
    • Wyner, G. M., & Malone, T. W. (1996). Cowboys or Commanders: Does Information Technology Lead to Decentralization? Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, December 15-18, Columbus, OH.
    • Yunus, M., & Jolis, A. (1998). Banker to the Poor. The University Press Limited, Dhaka.
    • Zachariadis, M., Scott, S., & Barrett, M. (2010). Exploring critical realism as the theoretical foundation of mixed-method research: evidence from the economics of IS innovations (Working Paper Series 3/2010). Judge Business School, Cambridge, UK.
Related Articles

  • Industrial Revolutions and their impact on managerial practice: Learning from the past

    Lucia KohnováORCID , Nikola SalajováORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.36
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #2         pp. 462-478 Views: 4222 Downloads: 1791 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Technological changes that come with industrial revolution have largely affected businesses, as well as society. With the current technological shift and Fourth Industrial Revolution, many questions arise regarding the impacts and effects on current ways businesses operate. This study presents a retrospective analysis and overview of previous industrial revolutions. The aim of the retrospective analysis is to identify common characteristics that may lead to lessons learned for the forthcoming Fourth Industrial Revolution and thus complement the current debate on technological change. All previous industrial revolutions have led to change in business environments and new challenges for managers and owners. The findings show that all previous revolutions have led to increase in the number of service jobs created. The key approach of successful countries during the times of industrial revolution has included education as the source of new skills and knowledge necessary for adaption. Countries that were able to produce high skilled people could not only invent, but also adapt to new technologies sooner than others. Similarly, these approaches included introduction of new managerial practices in order to be able to utilize new technologies and new skilled workers effectively. The research article processes secondary data together with literature review on this topic.

  • Transformational leadership for organizational change in the Lebanese public sector

    Bissane HarbORCID , Dina SidaniORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.15
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019         Issue #2         pp. 205-216 Views: 2673 Downloads: 1242 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The public sector is facing multiple changes. In a constantly changing environment, that is more and more demanding in terms of innovation and performance, the concept of leadership is of particular importance, as it is one of the few tools available to public managers.
    Based on the transformational leadership theory, the aim of this study is to explore how transformational leadership characteristics influence organizational change within the public sector in Lebanon. To serve this purpose, a qualitative approach is adopted based on a series of semi-focused interviews conducted with ten public managers running 10 public administrations. These administrations have undergone significant changes over the past five years.
    The results point out the importance of transformational behaviors adopted by public managers in leading change within the public sector in Lebanon, despite the multiple obstacles. They confirmed the role of two transformational dimensions related to idealized influence and inspirational motivation in the successful implementation of organizational change. This study contributes to better understanding of the role of transformational leadership in promoting change in the public sector.

  • Role of leaders in building organizational readiness to change – case study at public health centers in Indonesia

    Ratna Dwi WulandariORCID , Stefanus Supriyanto , Mochammad Bagus Qomaruddin , Nyoman Anita Damayanti , Agung Dwi Laksono doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.01
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020         Issue #3         pp. 1-10 Views: 2026 Downloads: 687 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Leaders play a strategic role in the process of organizational change. Various studies were conducted to show the role of leaders in succeeding change. One famous concept of leaders’ role was the Mintzberg managerial role, which divides the role of the leader into three main roles: interpersonal, informational, and decisional. This research was conducted to explore the leaders’ role in creating organizational readiness to change. The study was conducted at 40 government-owned public health centers in Indonesia, involving 190 midwives as respondents. The study results show that all three leader’s roles were well implemented by the head of the public health center with the best score in the informational role. However, organizational readiness to change at public health centers is not on the same level. The linear regression test indicates that the decisional role has the largest contribution in building the organizational readiness to change. The successfully implemented role of entrepreneurs, disturbance handlers, resource allocators, and negotiators was the key to the successful implementation of changes. Therefore, the advice given was the need for leaders to improve their decision abilities so that the organizational readiness to change becomes better.

    Acknowledgment
    The researcher thanked the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia, for funding this research.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management