Sustainable development of the Ukrainian agrarian sector: perspectives and challenges
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.03
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #3, pp. 28-39
- Cited by
- 1373 Views
-
275 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Sustainable development of the Ukrainian economy is rather complicated, extraordinary and controversial task for Ukraine. By fulfilling the obligations assumed by the world community to implement the main provisions of sustainable development, Ukraine undergoes comprehensive structural transformations, which undoubtedly have a significant impact on the development of its agrarian sector. Administrative and territorial reform is one of the major structural changes, which is taking place at the present time and has a direct impact on the agrarian sector development. The research is aimed at deepening the methodological principles for predicting the effectiveness of new institutes and rules caused by agrarian and structural transformations in the national economy, as well as substantiating the cluster model of sustainable development of the agrarian sector.
The provision of the economic theory of “path dependence” is the methodological basis of the research. In the article, based on a combination of theoretical and empirical methods, the transformation of the state of the socio-economic system, which is conditioned by the introduction of a new rule in implementing the reforms, is researched. Under these conditions, the effect of hysteresis may arise – the new rule can fall into the institutional trap and stay in it even when perturbations often disappear.
Given the analysis of the current implementation of the sustainable development model in the agrarian sector, the authors focus on combining the efforts of management bodies, socially responsible business and rural population and substantiate the need to improve the system of functional environment, which should be based on the cluster concept of development. It is precisely the cluster structure that will ensure the effectiveness of production relations between market agents, minimize the emergence of ineffective institutions and reduce the likelihood of institutional traps in the future.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O10, Q10, Q18
-
References21
-
Tables1
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Shaping the institutional environment taking path dependence into account
- Figure 2. Algorithm of a new rule input
- Figure 3. Functional model of the agrarian sector of the economy when compared to the cluster model
- Figure 4. Cluster-based model of the agrarian sector sustainable development
-
- Table 1. Main problems and causes of advisory development inhibition in the agrarian sector of the Ukrainian economy
-
- Arthur, W. B. (1987). Self- Reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics. In P. W. Anderson, K. J. Arrow, & D. Pines (Eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex Systems, A proceedings volume in the Sante Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity (pp. 9-28). New Mexico: Addison-Wesley.
- Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
- Bardhan, P. (1997, September). Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXV, 1320-1346.
- Bihus, M. M. (2017). Кластеризація як перспектива розвитку міжнародного туризму та активізатор економіки в Україні [Klasteryzatsiia yak perspektyva rozvytku mizhnarodnoho turyzmu ta aktyvizator ekonomiky v Ukraini]. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 27(2), 48-52.
- Cvijanović, D., Mihailović, B., Čavlin, M., & Čavlin, G. (2015). Impact of Marketing Consulting on Performances of Agrarian Clusters in Serbia. Sustainability, 7, 1099-1115.
- Ilchuk, V. P. (2008). Формування кластерів як засіб підвищення конкурентоспроможності економіки регіону [Formuvannia klasteriv yak zasib pidvyshchennia konkurentospromozhnosti rehionu].
- Katan, L. I. (2012). Теоретичні засади формування регіонального інноваційно орієнтованого кластера аграрної сфери [Teoretychni zasady formuvannia rehionalnoho innovatsiini oriientovanoho klastera ahrarnoi sfery]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho Ahrarnoho Universytetu, 2, 172-175.
- Kropyvko, M. F. et al. (2008). Особливості формування регіональних агропромислових кластерів [Osoblyvosti formuvannia rehionalnykh ahropromyslovykh klasteriv]. Ekonomika ahropromyslovoho kompleksu, 10, 7-15.
- Lopatynskyi, Y. M. (2006). Трансформація аграрного сектора: інституційні засади [Transformatsiia ahrarnoho sektora: instytutsiini zasady] (343 p.). Chernivtsi: Ruta.
- Maksimova, T. P., & Miliaev, K. V. (2015). Agro-industrial Clusters in the Russian Federation Economy: Features of Investment Attraction Analysis. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER Publishing, 6, 165-172.
- Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- North, D. (1997). Institutes, institutional changes and functioning of the economy. M.: Beginning.
- Polterovich, V. M. (1999). Институциональные ловушки и экономические реформы (ЦЭМИ РАН и РЭШ) [Istitutsionalnyye lovushki i ekonomicheskiye reformy (TSEMI RAN i RESH)] (37 p.). Moscow.
- Porter, M. (2005). Competition (608 p.). M.
- Priviledge Cheteni (2017). Sustainable development: biofuels in agriculture. Environmental Economics, 8(2), 83-91.
- Retius Chifurira, Delson Chikobvu, & Dorah Dubihlela (2016). Rainfall prediction for sustainable economic growth. Environmental Economics, 7(4-1).
- Semenda, D., & Semenda, O. (2018). Assessment of ecological and economic efficiency of agricultural lands preservation. Environmental Economics, 9(1), 47-56.
- Shebanin, V. S. (2012). Інноваційна діяльність: сутність, значення, проблеми розвитку та найважливіші напрямки їх вирішення [Innovatsiina diialnist: sutnist, znachennia, problem rozvytku ta naivazhlyvishi napriamky yikh vyrishennia].
- Sobkevych, O. V. (2014). Стратегічні напрями інституційного забезпечення розвитку аграрного сектору в Україні [Stratehichni napriamy instytutsiiniho zabezpechennia rozvytku ahrarnoho sektoru v Ukraini] (45 p.). Kyiv: NISS.
- Tirole, J. A. (1993). Theory of Collective reputations with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality. Toulouse: Institut d’Economie Industrielle, Paris: MIT and Ceras.
- Vasylieva, L. M. (2011). Теоретико-прикладне трактування ролі кластера як інструменту підвищення конкурентоспроможності аграрного сектора економіки [Teoretyko-prykladne traktuvannia roli klastera yak instrument pidvyshchennia konkurentospromozhnosti ahrarnoho sektora ekonomiky]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, 23, 119-121.