How does work engagement mediate the association between human resources management and organizational performance?

  • Received April 24, 2018;
    Accepted June 11, 2018;
    Published July 18, 2018
  • Author(s)
    Gonçalo Pombo
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Jorge Gomes
    ORCID Researcher ID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(3).2018.06
  • Article Info
    Volume 16 2018, Issue #3, pp. 63-79
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    4 articles
  • 1614 Views
  • 451 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

The aim of this paper is to understand how workers’ perceptions and behaviors contribute to understanding the association between human resources management (HRM) and organizational performance (OP). Over the past few decades, theory construction has lagged the intermediate linkages between HRM and OP, and, therefore, there are still many unanswered questions with regards to such an association. To sustain the HRM-OP link, the authors highlight the potential influence of employees’ work engagement (WE), with the aim of exploring some of the intermediating variables, focusing on the perceptions of employees’ attitudes and behaviors. This research emphasizes that line managers have a crucial role to play in stimulating employees’ efforts and in shaping HR-related outcomes. Line managers act as crucial intermediaries in determining how HR policies that lead to OP can be designed and administered. Nevertheless, line managers have the capability to disrupt or stimulate the system, which has a significant impact on employees’ engagement with the organization. The empirical research is based on a sample of 1,609 employees and 40 organizations and was carried out in two settings. Results suggest that line managers and employees’ perceptions of HR policies were positively related to line managers’ perceptions of OP. The results also support a path model, whereby WE strengthens HR systems’ association with enhanced levels of OP. The discussion reviews the implications of these results and suggests future directions for research.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Research framework
    • Table 1. Operationalization of the research variables
    • Table 2. Cronbach’s alpha
    • Table 4. Regression analysis
    • Table 5. Calculation for mediation tests
    • Table 6. Inconsistent mediation
    • Table 7. Effects of mediator in the research model
    • Adeniji, A. A., Osibanjo, A. O., & Abiodun, A. J. (2013). Organisational change and human resource management interventions: An investigation of the Nigerian Banking Industry. Serbian Journal of Management, 8(2), 2-16.
    • Albdour, A. A., & Altarawneh, I. I. (2014). Employee engagement and organisational commitment: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Business, 19(2), 1083-4346.
    • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. London: Cornell University Press.
    • Aroian, L. A. (1944/1947). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265-271.
    • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
    • Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., Pickus, P. S., & Spratt, M. (1997). Human Resource as a source of shareholder value: Research and recommendations. Human Resource Management, 36, 39-47.
    • Besanko, D., Deanove, D., Shanley, M., & Schefer, S. (2013). Economics of strategy (Vol. 6). New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
    • Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(1), 67-94.
    • Bos-Nehles, A. C., Riemsijk, M. J., & Looise, J. K. (2013). Employee perceptions of linemanagement performance: applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers’ HRM implementation. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 861-877.
    • Boudreau, J. W., & Ramstad, P. M. (1998). Human resource metrics: Can measures be strategic? CARHS Working Paper Series, 10, 1-28.
    • Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203-221.
    • Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory in high-performance work systems: progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(1), 3-23.
    • Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2008). Strategy and Human Resource Management (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Brewster, C., & Larsen, H. H. (1992). Human Resource Management in Europe: Evidence from ten countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 3, 409-433.
    • Budhwar, P. S. (2000). Evaluating levels of strategic integration and devolvement of human resources management in the UK. Personnel Review, 29(2), 141-157.
    • Budhwar, P. S., & Sparrow, P. R. (1997). Evaluating levels of strategic integration and devolvement of human resource management in India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(4), 476-494.
    • Chen, Y.-Y., & Fang, W. (2008). The moderating effect of impression management on the organizational politics-performance relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 263-277.
    • Cliff, N., & Earleywine, M. (1994). All predictors are “mediators” unless the other predictor is a “suppressor”. Unpublished manuscript.
    • Colakoglu, S., Lepak, D., & Hong, Y. (2006). Measuring HRM effectiveness: considering multiple stake holders in a global context. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 209-218.
    • Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2002). Reciprocity through the lens of the psychological contract: Employee and Employer perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 11(1), 1-18.
    • Cunningham, I., & Hyman, J. (1999). Devolving human resources responsibilities to the line. Personnel Review, 28(1/2), 9-27.
    • Currie, G., & Procter, S. (2005). The antecedents of middle managers’ strategic contribution: The case of a professional bureaucracy. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1325- 1356.
    • Dany, F., Guedri, Z., & Hatt, F. (2008). New Insights into the Link between HRM Integration and Organizational Performance: The Moderating Role of Influence Distribution Between HRM Specialists and Line Managers. The International Journal of Human Resources Management, 19(11), 2095-2112.
    • Davis, J. A. (1985). The logic of causal order (Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    • Delmotte, J. (2008). Evaluating the HR function: Empirical studies on HRM architecture and HRM system strength. Doct. K.U. Leuven, 101-142.
    • Dufour, J. M., & Dagenais, M. G. (1985). Durbin-Watson tests for serial correlation in regressions with missing observations. Journal of Econometrics, 27(3), 371-381.
    • Edwards, J. R. (2001). Ten Difference Score Myths. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 265-287.
    • Fairchild, A. J., & Mackinnon, D. P. (2009). A General Model for Testing Mediation and Moderation Effects. Society for Prevention Research, 10(2), 87-99.
    • Gardner, T. M., Moynihan, L. M., Park, H. J., & Wright, P. M. (2001). Beginning to unlock the black box in the HR firm performance relationship: The impact of HR practices on employee attitudes and employee outcomes. CARHS Working Paper Series, 1-43.
    • Gerhart, B. (2005). Human resources and business performance: Findings, unanswered questions, and an alternative approach. Management Revue, 16, 174-185.
    • Gilbert, C., De Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2010). The Influence of line managers and HR department on employees’ affective commitment (Catholic University of Leuven (KUL) MO Working Paper (No. 1004)).
    • Gonçalves, P. S., & Neves, J. (2012). The Link between perceptions of Human Resources Management practices and employee well-being at work. Advances in Psychology Study, 1(1), 31-39.
    • Gooderham, P., Parry, E., & Ringdal, K. (2008). The impact of bundles of strategic human resource management practices on the performance of European firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(11), 2041-2056.
    • Gould-Williams, J. (2007). HR practices, organizational climate and employee outcomes: evaluating social exchange relationships in local government. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(9), 1627- 1647.
    • Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123-136.
    • Guest, D. E. (1997). Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(3), 263-276.
    • Harney, B. (2014). Managerial roles. In P. Flood & Y. Freeney (Eds.), Wiley Encyclopedia of Management (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
    • Harney, B., & Jordan, C. (2008). Unlocking the black box: line managers and HRM-performance in a call centre context. International Journal of productivity and performance management, 57(4), 275-296.
    • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relation. New York: Wiley.
    • Hope Hailey, V., Farndale, E., & Truss, C. (2005). The HR department’s role in organisational performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 49-66.
    • Hutchinson, S. (2013). Performance management theory and practice. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development.
    • Hutchinson, S., & Purcell, J. (2003). Bringing policies to life: The vital role of line managers in people management Chartered Institute of Personnel Development (CIPD).
    • Hutchinson, S., Kinnie, N., & Purcell, J. (2002). Bringing Policies to Life: Discretionary Behaviour and the Impact on Business Performance. Bath Conference. University of Bath School of Management.
    • Jyoti, J., & Sharma, P. (2017). Empirical investigation of a moderating and mediating variable in between mentoring and job performance: A structural model. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33(1), 55-67.
    • Kehoe, R. R., & Wright, P. M. (2013). The impact of High-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviours. Journal of management, 39(2), 366-391.
    • Kelley, H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
    • Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501.
    • Kulik, C. T., & Bainbridge, H. T. (2006). HR and the line: The distribution of HR activities in Australian organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44(4), 240-256.
    • Larsen, H. H., & Brewster, C. (2003). Line management responsibility for HRM: what is happening in Europe? Employee Relations, 25(3), 228-244.
    • Latham, G., & Ernst, C. (2006). Keys to motivating tomorrow’s workforce. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2), 181-198.
    • Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D. P., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 371-391.
    • MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial Relations and Labor Review, 48(2), 197-221.
    • MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144-158.
    • MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.
    • MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.
    • Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2007). The relationship between “high-performance work practices” and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction Setting the Scene: HRM and Performance effects. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(4), 537-567.
    • Martins, L. P. (2007). A holistic framework for the strategic management of first tier managers. Management Decision, 45(3), 616-641.
    • McCarthy, A., Darcy, C., & Grady, G. (2010). Work-life balance policy and practice: understanding line manager attitudes and behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 158-167.
    • Nehles, A. C., Riemsdijk, M., Kok, I., & Looise, J. K. (2006). Implementing human resource management successfully: A first-line management challenge. Management Review, 17(3), 256-273.
    • Nehles, A. C., Terhalle, A. M., van Riemsdijk, M., & Looise, J. C. (2010). Line managers as implementers of HRM: are they effective? Manuscript under review.
    • Nishii, L. H., & Wright, P. M. (2008). Variability within organizations: implications for strategic human resources management. In D. B. Smith (Ed.), The People Make the Place: Dynamic Linkages between Individuals and Organizations (pp. 225-48). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Nishii, L. H., Lepak, D. P., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: Their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61, 503-545.
    • Ogbuanya, T. C., & Chukwu, S. O. (2017). Job crafting-satisfaction relationship in electrical/ electronic technology education programme: Do work engagement and commitment matter? Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33, 165-173.
    • Ostroff, C., & Bowen, D. E. (2016). Reflections on the 2014 decade award: is there strength in the construct of HR system strength? Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 196-214.
    • Paauwe, J. (2009). HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 129-142.
    • Paauwe, J., & Richardson, R. (1997). Introduction special issue on HRM and Performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8, 257-262.
    • Piening, E. P., Baluch, A. M., & Ridder, H. G. (2014). Mind the Intended-Implemented Gap: Understanding Employees’ Perceptions of HRM. Human Resource Management, 53(4).
    • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
    • Purcell, & Hutchinson. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource Management Journal, 17, 3-20.
    • Purcell, J. (2002). Sustaining the HR and Performance Link in Difficult Times. CIPD Conference. Harrogate.
    • Purcell, J., & Kinnie, N. (2007). Human resource management and business performance. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell & P. Wright (Eds.), The oxford handbook of human resource management.
    • Purcell, J., Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Rayton, B., & Swart, J. (2003). Understanding the people and performance link: unlocking the black box. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
    • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
    • Sanders, K., Dorenbosch, L., & Reuver, R. (2008). The impact of individual and shared employee perceptions of HRM on affective commitment. Considering climate strength. Personnel Review, 37(4), 412-425.
    • Sanders, K., Shipton, H., & Gomes, J. (2014). Guest editors’ introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current and future challenges. Human Resource Management, 53, 489- 503.
    • Savaneviciene, A., & Stankeviciute, Z. (2012a). Human Resource Management and Performance: From Practices Towards Sustainable Competitive Advantage. In Dr. Hector Cuadra- Montiel (Ed.), Globalization – Education and Management Agendas. InTech.
    • Savaneviciene, A., & Stankeviciute, Z. (2012b). HRM and performance linkage: the role of line managers. Economics and Management, 17(1), 390-396.
    • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, 1-58.
    • Schuler, R. S. (1992). Strategic human resource management: Linking the people with the strategic needs of the business. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 18-32.
    • Smith, C. S., & Tisak, J. (1993). Discrepancy measures of role stress revisited: New perspectives on old issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 285-307.
    • Smith, D. A., Plowman, A. D., & Duchon, D. (2010). Everyday Sensegiving: A Closer Look at Successful Plant Managers. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 46(2), 220-244.
    • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    • Tzafrir, S. S. (2005). The relationship between trust, HRM practices and firm performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(9), 1600-1622.
    • Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (1991). Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 524-536.
    • Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing (Vol. 2). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    • Whittaker, S., & Marchington, M. (2003). Devolving HR responsibility to the line: Threat, opportunity or partnership? Employee Relations, 25(3), 245-261.
    • Wright, P. M., & Nishii, L. H. (2006). Strategic HRM and organizational behaviour: integrating multiple levels of analysis (CARHS Working Paper Series).
    • Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994). Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective. International Journal Of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 301-326.
    • Wright, P., & Nishii, L. H. (2004). Strategic HRM and organizational behaviour: integrating multiple levels of analysis. Paper presented at the Erasmus University Conference “HRM: What’s Next?”.
    • Wright, R. M., McCormick, B., Sherman, W. S., & McMahon, G. C. (1999). The role of human resource practices in petrochemical refinery performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10, 551-571.
Related Articles

  • The impact of inclusive leadership behaviors on innovative workplace behavior with an emphasis on the mediating role of work engagement

    Dheyaa Falih BannayORCID Researcher ID, Mohammed Jabbar HadiORCID , Ahmed Abdullah AmanahORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.39
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020         Issue #3         pp. 479-491 Views: 2409 Downloads: 1009 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Work creativity manifested in innovative workplace behavior (IWB) and employee work engagement is fundamental to maintaining firm’s sustainability and competitiveness. In this regard, this study investigates the supporting effect of innovative leadership on IWB and employee engagement by maximizing employee vigor, dedication, and absorption. The study data were collected using a questionnaire-based technique, and the questionnaires were administered to 150 respondents working in mobile phone companies in Southern and Central Iraq. The results were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and SmartPLS software. The study results revealed that inclusive leadership and work engagement were significantly related to IWB, and work engagement played a mediating role between inclusive leadership and IWB. The findings further indicated that inclusive leadership behaviors such as openness, accessibility, and availability motivated the subordinates to be engaged in IWB. To promote IWB, company leaders need to effectively engage their followers by taking pride and satisfaction in employee output, which might help employee work engagement and IWB.

  • Fostering innovative behavior in the aviation industry: The role of perceived supervisor support and work group diversity

    Long Nguyen Le HoangORCID , Huong Nguyen Thi ThuORCID , Viet-Anh HoORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.14
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021         Issue #1         pp. 163-176 Views: 1478 Downloads: 695 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The research primarily seeks to understand how supervisor support can directly and indirectly enhance the service innovative behavior (SIB) of flight attendants via work engagement. Moreover, although there has been some research on the effect of group diversity on organizational performance, the results have not been consistent. Thus, this study addresses this gap by investigating how work group diversity can make variance in the relationship between work engagement and innovative behavior of flight attendants. The sample size of 242 flight attendants working at the central airport in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, has been taken for the study. To test hypotheses, structural equation modeling and bootstrapping were employed. This study provided an evidence for the positive nexus between perceived supervisor support and SIB. Additionally, the results shed light on a mediation mechanism of work engagement for the association between flight attendants’ perception of their supervisor and innovative behavior. Furthermore, tenure diversity and job position diversity in a work group were proved to play a moderating role in the relationship between work engagement and service innovative behavior. Specifically, flight attendants are more willing to exhibit innovative behaviors when working in a homogeneous group in terms of tenure and job position rather than in a heterogeneous group. The empirical results contributed to the diversity management literature and broadened the understanding of how to activate the service innovative behavior of employees. From a managerial perspective, managers should pay attention to the characteristics of employees when organizing teamwork.

    Acknowledgment
    The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees of the journal for their extremely useful suggestions for improving the quality of this paper.

  • Transformational behaviors: Increasing work engagement in multinational environments

    Marc ValldeneuORCID , Xavier FerràsORCID , Elisenda Tarrats-PonsORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.41
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021         Issue #2         pp. 519-527 Views: 1226 Downloads: 351 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The role of a leader is fundamental to increase organizational culture and facilitate employee engagement. However, organizations are not providing clear guidance on how to do it. This study aims to determine the relationship between leadership styles and employee engagement as well as to understand whether there is a correlation between an engaged employee and extra effort. The study uses a Multi-Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5x Rater Form) to measure employee perception of the leader styles and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-17) to determine employee engagement. The scope of the study is limited to a sample of 167 employees from 7 different multinational companies and 31 different nationalities.
    Results show that all the transformational behaviors and, concretely the idealized behavior, are significantly positively related to work engagement in multinational environments. Results also reveal a strong correlation between employee engagement and extra effort. The study concludes that leaders or managers should use transformational behaviors if they want to increase engagement and extra effort with their teams. They should increase transformational behaviors like being transparent, consistent, and having a strong sense of purpose to catalyze a collective engagement. These results expand previous studies of transformational leadership and work engagement in multinational environments.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management