Heritage tourism in India: a stakeholder’s perspective
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/tt.1(1).2017.03
-
Article InfoVolume 1 2017, Issue #1, pp. 20-33
- Cited by
- 1960 Views
-
1000 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Incredible tangible and intangible heritage of India play a vital role towards the nation’s overall growth and development. Ancient literature posse’s sufficient references about the travelers, scholars and philosophers those preserved and portrayed the heritage for future generation which is apparently visible from various travelers’ diaries, traditions and exhibitions. Despite a difficulty in finding out the right sentiment for expressing the true meaning of heritage, the concept of heritage has been explored to its core for an acceptable definition in this research study. This study suggests that heritage can act as an important holistic development tool for the overall community development. The opinion of stakeholders was recorded with the help of a questionnaire administered on local community nearby places of historic significance. The study provides ample scope and opportunities towards heritage tourism development in India as per stakes of local community. According to Mahatma Gandhi “A nation’s culture resides in the hearts and in the soul of its people”. Therefore local community has been considered as the ultimate ambassador for heritage and cultural tourism in this research paper.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Z30, Z32, Z38, Z39
-
References41
-
Tables7
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Stakeholder map for studying heritage tourism in Himachal Pradesh
- Figure 2. Scree plot for the statements related to heritage tourism site attributes in Himachal Pradesh
-
- Table 1. Definitions of cultural heritage tourism
- Table 2. Statements of factors, measuring opinions of stakeholders towards impact of tourists on destination attributes in Himachal Pradesh
- Table 3. KMO and Bartlett’s Test for the statements related to impact of tourists on destination attributes in Himachal Pradesh
- Table 4. Principal Component Analysis with Varimax Rotation for the statements related to impact of tourists on destination attributes in Himachal Pradesh
- Table 5. Post-Hoc contrasts for district wise opinions of stakeholders on economic effects of tourism on tourism destination attributes
- Table 6. ANOVA results for role of government in tourism development in Himachal Pradesh
- Table 7. Post Hoc contrasts for role of government in tourism development in Himachal Pradesh
-
- Agarwal, S., Bhatt, A., Kapoor, N., Moutinho, T., Van Herwarde, G., & Walker, K. (2013). Promoting Ecotourism in Himachal Pradesh.
- Ashworth, G. J. (2000). Heritage, tourism and places: a review. Tourism Recreation Research, 25(1), 19-29.
- Baker, M. J., & Cameron, E. (2008). Critical success factors in destination marketing. Tourism and hospitality research, 8(2), 79-97.
- Bansal, S. P., & Kumar, J. (2013). Ecotourism for Community Development: A Stakeholder’s Perspective in Creating a Sustainable Social Ecology Using Technology-driven Solutions. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 31-40.
- Batta, R. N. (2003). Tourism’s Potential for Financing Conservation Areas: A Study of KufriChail-Naldehra Area of Himachal Pradesh, India. Tourism Recreation Research, 28(1), 57-65.
- Bryant, Fred B., & Paul, R. Yarnold. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. APA.
- Campanella, M. (2013). Establishing tourist places: between social constructivism and phenomenology. Doctoral dissertation, Tartu Ülikool.
- Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 1, 245-276.
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
- Fyall, A., & Garrod, B. (1998). Heritage tourism: at what price? Managing Leisure, 3(4), 213-228.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., &Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Himachal Pradesh Economic Survey 2014-2015.
- Hollinshead, K. (1999). Surveillance of the worlds of tourism: Foucault and the eye-of-power. Tourism Management, 20(1), 7-23.
- Yale, P. (1991). From tourist attractions to heritage tourism. Huntingdon: ELM Publications.
- Jamal, T., & Kim, H. (2005). Bridging the interdisciplinary divide Towards an integrated framework for heritage tourism research. Tourist Studies, 5(1), 55-83.
- Kreag, G. (2001). The impacts of tourism: Minnesota Sea Grant Program.
- Mathieson, A. (2006). Tourism, economic, physical and social impacts. Longman.
- McCain, G., & Ray, N. M. (2003). Legacy tourism: The search for personal meaning in heritage travel. Tourism Management, 24(6), 713-717.
- Morgan, N., & Pritchard, A. (2003). Tourism, promotion and power. London: Wiley.
- Mowforth, M., & Munt, I. (2015). Tourism and sustainability: Development, globalisation and new tourism in the third world. Routledge.
- Poria, Y., Butler, R., & Airey, D. (2003).The core of heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), 238-254.
- Prentice, R. (2001). Experiential cultural tourism: Museums & the marketing of the new romanticism of evoked authenticity. Museum Management and Curatorship, 19(1), 5-26.
- Richards, G. (2000). Tourism and the world of culture and heritage. Tourism recreation research, 25(1), 9-17.
- Schumacher, H. J. (2007). Let’s Talk Europe: Ecotourism. Business World, p. S, 1.
- Shah, K., & Gupta, V. (2000). Tourism, the poor and other stakeholders: Experience in Asia. C. Boyd (Ed.). London: Overseas Development Institute.
- Silberberg, T. (1995).Cultural tourism and business opportunities for museums and heritage sites. Tourism Management, 16(5), 361-365.
- Singh, S. (2008). Destination development dilemma – Case of Manali in Himachal Himalaya. Tourism Management, 29(6), 1152- 1156.
- Stevens, B. F. (1996). Price value perceptions of travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 31(2), 44-48.
- Timothy, D. J., & Boyd, S. W. (2003). Heritage tourism. Harlow, England: Pearson.
- Timur, S., & Getz, D. (2008). A network perspective on managing stakeholders for sustainable urban tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(4), 445-461.
- Tsai, C. H., Wu, T. C., Wall, G., & Linliu, S. C. (2016). Perceptions of tourism impacts and community resilience to natural disasters. Tourism Geographies, 18(2), 152-173.
- Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant heritage: the management of the past as a resource in conflict. John Wiley & Sons.
- UNESCO, W. CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS. (2015). UNWTO/UNESCO World Conference on Tourism & Culture.
- UNESCO. (2005). World Heritage.
- UNESCO/World Commission on Culture and Development. (1995). Our creative diversity. Report of the World Commission on Culture and Development.
- Vasudevan, Smitha. (2008). The role of internal stakeholders in destination branding: Observations from Kerala Tourism. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 4(4), 331-335.
- Walton, J., & Cooper, C. (2011). Tourism and history. Good fellow Publishers.
- Yale. P. (1991). From Tourist Attractions to Heritage Tourism ELM Publications, Huntingdon.
- Youell, R. (1998). Tourism: an introduction. Addison Wesley Longman Ltd. 41. Zeppel, H., & Hall, C. M. (1992). Arts and heritage tourism. Arts and heritage tourism, 47-68.
- Zeppel, H., & Hall, C. M. (1992). Arts and heritage tourism. Arts and heritage tourism, 47-68.