Factors influencing the multinational banks’ decisions to curtail operations in russia: Does ESG matter?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(1).2024.12
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2024, Issue #1, pp. 135-147
- Cited by
- 435 Views
-
117 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The paper is devoted to an under-researched topic of the international business community’s reaction to russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine. It aims to evaluate how G7 and EU financial sanctions, institutional pressure, ESG ratings, and asset value of multinational banks in russia influence their decisions to reduce activities in the invading country. The study used the Yale CELI database of companies leaving and staying in Russia for the classification tree method. The results show that none of the banks headquartered in G7 and EU member states that had no or relatively little assets in russia before the invasion are doing business there on a pre-war scale. Unlike banks headquartered in other countries, most either curtailed their presence in that market or exited the market. This indicates that financial sanctions imposed by G7 and EU member states and institutional pressure on banks in these countries to withdraw from the russian market have proven effective to a certain extent. However, these factors do not meaningfully influence the business of multinational banks with significant assets in russia. The study has not confirmed the hypothesis that a bank with higher ESG ratings is more likely to curtail its operations in the market of an aggressor country and withdraw. However, nearly all banks that scaled back significant activities or even pulled out of russia have better ESG indicators than the industry average. The results suggest the feasibility of improving the methodologies of ESG rating providers for accurately measuring business reactions to aggression and war crimes.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G24, G41
-
References49
-
Tables1
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. The classification tree built on two classification features
- Figure 2. The classification tree after analyzing the influence of ESG and SDG ratings
-
- Table 1. Classification tree structure (the S&P Global ESG Score variable is added)
-
- Ahmed, D., Demers, E., Hendrikse, J., Joos, P., & Lev, B. (2023). Are ESG ratings informative about companies’ socially responsible behaviors abroad? Evidence from the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Accountability in a Sustainable World Quarterly.
- Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794-816.
- Basnet, A., Blomkvist, M., & Galariotis, E. (2022). The role of ESG in the decision to stay or leave the market of an invading country: The case of Russia. Economics Letters, 216, 110636.
- Batoudaki, T., & Pizza, A. (2022, May 19). Banks’ ESG risks related to the Russia-Ukraine conflict on investors’ radars. Sustainalytics.
- Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.
- Comfort, N. (2023, June 27). ECB urges banks to speed up plans to exit or shrink Russia units. Bloomberg.
- CSRHUB. (n.d.). Consensus ESG ratings.
- Damodaran, A. (2023, October 23). ESG is beyond redemption: May it RIP. Financial Times.
- Dincă, M. S., Vezeteu, C-D., & Dincă, D. (2023). Does withdrawal from/remaining in an aggressor country affect companies’ ESG ratings? Case study of the Russia-Ukraine war. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11.
- European Commission (EC). (2023). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the transparency and integrity of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities. COM (2023) 314 final 2023/0177(COD).
- Evenett, S., & Pisani, N. (2022). Less than nine percent of western firms have divested from Russia. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Fojcik, B. (2022, November 21). Russia exit still possible if foreign banks willing to stomach losses. S&P Global Market Intelligence.
- Girardone, C. (2022). Russian sanctions and the banking sector. British Journal of Management, 33(4), 1683-1688.
- Glambosky, M., & Peterburgsky, S. (2022). Corporate activism during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Economics Letters, 217, 110650.
- Guénette, J. D., Kenworthy, P., & Wheeler, C. (2022). Implications of the war in Ukraine for the global economy (EFI Policy Note 3). The World Bank Group.
- Hood, A., Tauwhare, R., & Smith, C. (2024). UK, EU and US sanctions on Russia. Fieldfisher.
- ISS. (n.d.). Access a range of high-level ISS ESG corporate ratings, scores, and fund ratings.
- Kauffman, C., & Robinson, M. (2022, October 31). ESGs. Invest with caution. George Gibbs Center for Economic Prosperity.
- Keeley, T. (2022). Sustainable: Moving beyond ESG to impact investing. New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.
- Kerber, R., & Wilkes, T. (2022, July 1). Insight: How Russia’s war blindsided the world of ESG investing. Reuters.
- Kiesel, F., & Kolaric, S. (2023). Should I stay or should I go? Stock market reactions to companies’ decisions in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 89, 101862.
- Kolodiziev, O., & Gontar, D. (2014). Scenario modeling of the bank’s market value strategic management. Ekonomicnij Casopis-XXI – Economic Annals-ХХI, 9-10(2), 19-23. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolodiziev, O., Tyschenko, V., Ostapenko, V., & Kolodizieva, T. (2018). Assessment of the development level of information and communication infrastructure in the regions of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 134-144.
- KSE Institute. (n.d.). Stop Doing Business with Russia. Public Database.
- Kulikov, V., Simanovskyy, M., Eichenberg, A., & Braese, K. A. (2023). Navigating wartime communications: Multinational corporations in the Russia-Ukraine war. Society and Economy, 46(1), 1-23.
- LSEG Data & Analytics. (n.d.). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Data: LSEG ESG Scores.
- Lumivero. (n.d.). XLSTAT statistical and data analysis solution for Microsoft Excel.
- Martins, A. M., Correia, P., & Gouveia, R. (2023). Russia-Ukraine conflict: The effect on European banks’ stock market returns. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 67, 100786.
- Moody’s Methodology. (2021, October 19). Cross-Sector Rating Methodology. General Principles for Assessing Environmental, Social and Governance Risks Methodology.
- Moody’s. (2023). ESG Scores.
- MSCI. (2024). MSCI SDG Alignment Methodology. MSCI ESG Research LLC.
- MSCI. (n.d.). ESG Ratings & Climate Search Tool.
- NAZK. (n.d.). International Sponsors of War.
- Onopriienko, A., Hrybanovskyi, O., & Shapoval, N. (2023a). How the income of foreign businesses in the Russian Federation has changed in 2022 and why so many companies still do not leave. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Onopriienko, A., Shapoval, N., Ribakova, E., Hrybanovskyi, O., Rybalko, N., Hilgenstock, B., Pavytska, Y., & Bilousova, O. (2023b). Analysis of foreign business exits from Russia. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Pajuste, A., & Toniolo, A. (2022). Corporate response to the war in Ukraine: Stakeholder governance or stakeholder pressure? (Finance Working Paper No. 839/2022). European Corporate Governance Institute.
- Pucker, K. P., & King, A. (2022). ESG investing isn’t designed to save the planet. Harvard Business Review.
- Rogov, G. (2009). Mekhanizm formuvannia finansovykh rezultativ korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti [Mechanism of formation of financial results of corporate social responsibility]. Ukrainskyi Zhurnal Ekonomist - Ukrainian Journal Ekonomist, 6, 49-53. (In Ukrainian).
- Rydzak, J. (2023). ESG data needs a human rights upgrade. Ranking Digital Rights. Ranking Digital Rights.
- S&P Global. (2023, February 7). Environmental, Social, and Governance Evaluation. Societe Generale S.A.
- S&P Global. (n.d.). Essential intelligence to accelerate your sustainability journey.
- Societe Generale. (2022, May 18). Societe Generale has closed the sale of Rosbank and its russian insurance subsidiaries.
- Sonnenfeld, J., Mylovanov, T., Shapoval, N., Tian, S., Onopriienko, A., Hirsty, G., & Wyrebkowski, M. (2023). The Russian business retreat – How the ratings measured up one year later. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Sonnenfeld, J., Tian, S., Zaslavsky, S., Bhansali, Y., & Vakil, R. (2022). It pays for companies to leave Russia. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Sustainalytics. (n.d.). Company ESG Risk Ratings: See ESG Risk Ratings for every company in our portfolio, right here.
- Tosun, O. K., & Eshraghi, A. (2022). Corporate decisions in times of war: Evidence from the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Finance Research Letters, 48, 102920.
- United Nations. (2022). Resolution ES-11/1 adopted by the General Assembly on 2 March 2022.
- Vnukova, N., Kavun, S., Kolodiziev, O., Achkasova, S., & Hontar, D. (2019). Determining the level of bank connectivity for combating money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Banks and Bank Systems, 14(4), 42-54.
- Yale CELI. (2023). Yale CELI list of companies leaving and staying in Russia.