Enforcement of consumer rights protection laws and intention to reuse digital financial services among Generation Z youth: Empirical evidence from Vietnamese commercial banks
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(4).2024.02
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2024, Issue #4, pp. 17-33
- 65 Views
-
10 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Digital financial services are crucial in boosting the competitive edge of businesses and economies in numerous developing nations. This study aims to explore the factors that affect consumers’ perceptions of the implementation of consumer protection laws and their willingness to continue using digital financial services. Data were collected through interviews with 689 Gen Z consumers (born after 1996) who have used digital financial services in Vietnamese commercial banks. The results of the partial least square – structural equation modeling indicate that six factors influence attitudes toward the enforcement of consumer protection laws, in descending order: perceived benefits, understanding of legal regulations, perceived asymmetry, perceived risk, understanding of technology and digital finance, and understanding of dispute resolution. Additionally, attitudes toward law enforcement, as well as understanding of technology and digital finance, positively impact consumers’ intention to reuse digital financial services, while perceived risk has the opposite effect. Furthermore, all six independent factors impact the intention to reuse digital financial services through the mediating role of attitudes toward the enforcement of consumer protection laws. The study’s findings also lay the groundwork for policy recommendations for legislative authorities and strategic guidance for service providers and consumers in emerging markets in the future.
Acknowledgment
This study is the result of collaboration between researchers from the University of Law, Hue University, and School of Business and Economics, Duy Tan University. The authors would like to thank both institutions for their support and facilitation in the publication of this research. This study was conducted under project code DHH2024-12-85, Decision No. 298/QĐ-ĐHH dated March 27, 2024, issued by the Director of Hue University.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, D18, M10
-
References36
-
Tables8
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Model and hypotheses
- Figure 2. PLS-SEM results
-
- Table 1. Statistics of indicators measuring model reliability
- Table 2. Discriminant reliability
- Table 3. Inner VIF test results
- Table 4. Statistics of the model’s predictive ability
- Table 5. Results of testing hypotheses with direct effects
- Table 6. Results of testing the hypotheses with indirect effects
- Table A1. Descriptive statistics about the samples
- Table B1. Measurement summary
-
- Abu Daqar, M. A., Arqawi, S., & Abu Karsh, S. (2020). Fintech in the eyes of Millennials and Generation Z (the financial behavior and Fintech perception). Banks and Bank Systems, 15(3), 20-28.
- Atkinson, A., & Messy, F.-A. (2012). Measuring Financial Literacy: Results of the OECD / International Network on Financial Education (INFE) Pilot Study (OECD Working Papers No. 15). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Cartwright, P. (2004). Banks, consumers and regulation. Hart Publishing.
- Dinh, V., Le, D. Van, Duong, D., & Pham, D. (2023). Determinants affecting digital financial consumer protection: Evidence from 135 countries. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 27, e00301.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Frolova, E. E., & Ermakova, E. P. (2022). Consumer protection for digital financial services. Advances in Research on Russian Business and Management, 2022, 157-168.
- Graupner, E., Melcher, F., Demers, D., & Maedche, A. (2015). Customers’ intention to use digital services in retail banking-an information processing perspective (ECIS 2015 Completed Research Papers No. 61).
- Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-21.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
- Huston, S. J. (2010). Measuring Financial Literacy. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 296-316.
- Khuong, N. V., Phuong, N. T. T., Liem, N. T., Thuy, C. T. M., & Son, T. H. (2022). Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Financial Technology among Vietnamese Youth: Research in the Time of COVID-19 and Beyond. Economies, 10(3), 57.
- Kornacka, E., & Monkiewicz, M. (2022). Consumer protection in the financial market in the era of digital transformation. In Gąsiorkiewicz, L., & Monkiewicz, J. (Eds.), Digital Finance and the Future of the Global Financial System (pp. 161-179). London: Routledge.
- Lan, H. (2024). Gần 300.000 cuộc gọi khiếu nại của người tiêu dùng đã được giải quyết [Nearly 300,000 consumer complaint calls have been resolved]. (In Vietnamese).
- Lan, H., & Dung, C. (2023). Gia cố “tấm khiên” bảo vệ quyền lợi người tiêu dùng tài chính [Strengthen the “shield” to protect the rights of financial consumers]. (In Vietnamese).
- Le, Q. V., & Tran, T. T. (2024). E-Commerce and Digital Financial Services During COVID-19 and Potential for Expansion in Post-pandemic: Insights from Vietnamese Consumer Behaviors. In Thuan, N. H., Dang-Pham, D., Le, H. S., Phan, T.Q. (Eds.), Information Systems Research in Vietnam (Volume 2). Springer, Singapore.
- Lobozynska, S., Skomorovych, I., & Vladychyn, U. (2020). State Policy of Consumer Protection in the Digital Financial Services Market in Ukraine. Journal of Finance and Financial Law, 2(26), 51-62.
- Lusoli, W., & Miltgen, C. L. (2009). Young People and Emerging Digital Services: An Exploratory Survey on Motivations, Perceptions and Acceptance of Risks. European Commission’s Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
- Micklitz, H., Stuyck, J., & Terryn, E. (2010). Cases, materials and text on consumer law. Hart Publishing.
- Musau, S. M., Muathe, S., & Mwangi, L. W. (2022). Financial literacy and consumer protection: A road map to digital financial access by SMEs in Kenya. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance (JEF), 24(2), 1-25.
- Ngo, H. T., & Nguyen, L. T. H. (2024). Consumer adoption intention toward FinTech services in a bank-based financial system in Vietnam. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 32(2), 153-167.
- Normawati, R., Rahayu, S., & Worokinasih, S. (2021). Financial knowledge, digital financial knowledge, financial attitude, financial behaviour and financial satisfaction on millennials. In ICLSSEE 2021: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2021. Jakarta, Indonesia.
- OECD. (2017). Ensuring financial education and consumer protection for all in the digital age (G20/OECD INFE Report).
- OECD. (2022). Recommendation of the Council on High-Level Principles on Financial Consumer Protection.
- Rana, N. P., Luthra, S., & Rao, H. R. (2020). Key challenges to digital financial services in emerging economies: the Indian context. Information Technology and People, 33(1), 198-229.
- Riefa, C. (2021). Consumer law enforcement as a tool to bolster competition in digital markets: a case study on personalized pricing. Competition and Consumer Protection Policies for Inclusive Development in the Digital Era. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (pp. 15-29).
- Schneider, S., & Kokshagina, O. (2021). Digital transformation: What we have learned (thus far) and what is next. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(2), 384-411.
- Thuong, D. T., Chi, N. M., Duc, V. D., Trung, D. Q., Hieu, D. T., & Vinh, D. T. (2023). Factors affecting students’ intention to use digital banking services. Banking Review. (In Vietnamese).
- Vietnam Ministry of Finance. (2020). Decision No. 149/QD-TTg dated January 22, 2020 on introducing national financial inclusion strategy by 2025 with orientations towards 2030. (In Vietnamese).
- Vietnam National Assembly. (2023). Khoản 1 Điều 54 Luật Bảo vệ quyền lợi người tiêu dùng năm 2023 [Clause 1, Article 54 of the Law on Consumer Protection 2023]. (In Vietnamese).
- Wardhani, N. E. (2023). A Legal Perspective on the Antecedents of Consumer Protection in Digital Financial Services. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 9(1), 17-32.
- Wei, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Li, Y., & Jiang, Z. (2019). Predicting population age structures of China, India, and Vietnam by 2030 based on compositional data. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0212772.
- Wibella, N., Fahmi, I., & Saptono, I. T. (2018). Factors Affecting Consumer Acceptance of Digital Financial Inclusion; An Anecdotal Evidence from Bogor City. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 9(4), 1338-1353.
- World Bank Group. (2017). Good practices for financial consumer protection: 2017 edition.