Complexity of reference consultations for undergraduate and graduate students in an academic library
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.08(2).2024.07
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2024, Issue #2, pp. 76-90
- 61 Views
-
10 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Effective resource allocation is critical for academic libraries that offer reference consultations and information literacy instruction to support student success. The study aims to examine the time spent and the intensity and variation in information resource use across 671 reference consultations provided to undergraduate and graduate students at the Czech National Library of Technology, categorized by complexity levels. A case study methodology with quantitative analysis, including descriptive statistics and correlation tests, was applied. The results indicate that simple consultations require more extensive involvement of information resources with an emphasis on basic information literacy, while higher grades of consultations involve fewer resources but more frequent use of full-text databases. It is also shown that information resources are used consistently, with usage patterns reflecting the complexity of users’ assignments and questions. The analysis shows that there is a significant relationship between consultation complexity and both the time spent providing a consultation (correlation coefficient 0.276) and the time spent preparing for the consultation (correlation coefficient 0.262). The results suggest the need for strategic planning of human resources based on service complexity to increase the efficiency of consultations, as well as more conscious decision making regarding the use of information resources in consultation services.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful for the invaluable support provided by the Czech National Library of Technology during the research process. The research data offered were extremely helpful and have been essential to complete this research successfully.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H41, L32, L86
-
References31
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Number of consultations with different complexities per year
- Figure 2. Number of consultations with different complexities per level of study
-
- Table 1. READ Scale and NTK reference service complexity
- Table 2. Descriptive analysis of the consultation by complexity
- Table 3. Time variables descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Test results for correlation between complexity and time variables
- Table A1. Definitions of consultation characteristics used in the study
- Table A2. Absolute and relative frequencies of “Discipline of Assignment”
-
- Belanger, J., Collins, K., Deutschler, A., Greer, R., Huling, N., Maxwell, C., Papadopoulou, E., Ray, L., & Roemer, R. C. (2016). University of Washington Libraries Chat Reference Transcript Assessment. University of Washington.
- Bradley, D. R., Oehrli, A., Rieh, S. Y., Hanley, E., & Matzke, B. S. (2020). Advancing the reference narrative: Assessing student learning in research consultations. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 15(1), 4-19.
- Bungaro, F., Muzzupapa, M. V., & Tomatis, M. S. (2017). Extending the Live Chat Reference Service at the University of Turin – A Case Study. Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences. IATUL Conference 2017, Italy.
- Chodounská, A., & Ryzhkov, A. (2019, April 9). Beyond Academic Support. Using a CRM System to Enhance the Value of Academic Services and Improve Internal Training.
- Dennison, R. F. (1999). Usage-Based Staffing of the Reference Desk: A Statistical Approach. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 39(2), 158-165.
- Faix, A. (2014). Peer reference revisited Evolution of a peer-reference model. Reference Services Review, 42(2), 305-319.
- Flynn, D. (2021). Evaluating a recorded appointment service for individual research consultations between librarians and allied health students. Reference Services Review, 49(3-4), 231-249.
- Fournier, K., & Sikora, L. (2015). Individualized Research Consultations in Academic Libraries: A Scoping Review of Practice and Evaluation Methods. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(4), 247-267.
- Fournier, K., & Sikora, L. (2017). How Canadian librarians practice and assess individualized research consultations in academic libraries: A nationwide survey. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(2), 148-157.
- Gerlich, B. K., & Berard, G. L. (2007). Introducing the READ Scale: Qualitative Statistics for Academic Reference Services. Georgia Library Quarterly, 43(4), 7-13.
- Gerlich, B., & Berard, G. (2010). Testing the Viability of the READ Scale (Reference Effort Assessment Data): Qualitative Statistics for Academic Reference Services. College & Research Libraries, 71(2), 116-136.
- Henry, D. B., & Neville, T. M. (2008). Testing Classification Systems for Reference Questions. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 47(4), 364-373.
- Jastram, I., & Zawistoski, A. G. (2008). Personalizing the library via research consultations. In Steiner, S. K. & Madden, L. M. (Eds.), The Desk and Beyond: Next Generation Reference Services (pp. 14-24). Association of College and Research Libraries.
- Katz, B. (2002). Introduction to reference work. vol. 1: Basic information services (8. ed). McGraw-Hill.
- Lambaria, K., & Clark, J. C. (2023). Reference Services. Notes, 80(1), 58-65.
- Maloney, K., & Kemp, J. H. (2015). Changes in Reference Question Complexity Following the Implementation of a Proactive Chat System: Implications for Practice. College & Research Libraries, 76(7), 959-974.
- McLaughlin, J. (2011). Reference transaction assessment Survey of a multiple perspectives approach, 2001 to 2010. Reference Services Review, 39(4).
- Merkley, C. (2009). Staffing an Academic Reference Desk with Librarians is not Cost-effective. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 4(2), 143-147.
- Meserve, H. C., Belanger, S. E., Bowlby, J., & Rosenblum, L. (2009). Developing a Model for Reference Research Statistics: Applying the “Warner Model” of Reference Question Classification to Streamline Research Services. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48(3), 247-258.
- NTK. (2023, September 30). About NTK. Nationa Library of Technology.
- Quinn, B. (1994). Beyond Efficacy: The Exemplar Librarian As a New Approach to Reference Evaluation. Illinois Libraries, 76, 163-173.
- Reference and User Services Association (RUSA). (2021). Definitions of Reference.
- Rogers, E., & Carrier, H. S. (2017). A qualitative investigation of patrons’ experiences with academic library research consultations. Reference Services Review, 45(1), 18-37.
- Ryan, S. M. (2008). Reference Transactions Analysis: The Cost-Effectiveness of Staffing a Traditional Academic Reference Desk. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(5), 389-399.
- Skenderija, S., Stehlík, M., & Houdek, T. (2017). Before and Beyond Embedding: A Reference Fable from the National Library of Technology in Prague. IFLA WLIC 2017. Wroclaw.
- Stapleton, J., Carter, C., & Bredahl, L. (2020). Research consultations in the academic library: A scoping review on current themes in instruction, assessment and technology. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(4), 102156.
- Vassady, L., Archer, A., & Ackermann, E. (2015). READ-ing Our Way to Success: Using the READ Scale to Successfully Train Reference Student Assistants in the Referral Model. Journal of Library Administration, 55(7), 535-548.
- Ward, D., & Jacoby, J. A. (2018). A rubric and methodology for benchmarking referral goals. Reference Services Review, 46(1), 110-127.
- Warner, D. G. (2001). A New Classification for Reference Statistics. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 41(1), 51-55.
- Watts, J., & Mahfood, S. (2015). Collaborating with Faculty to Assess Research Consultations for Graduate Students. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 34(2), 70-87.
- Zaugg, H. (2021). Development and Validation of Subject Librarian Consultation Competencies. Online Conference (pp. 105-115). Oxford, England.