Classification and prioritization of stakeholders’ information requests according to Sustainable Development Goals: case of cross-sector partnership in Ukrainian food production industry
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(4).2018.12
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #4, pp. 126-140
- Cited by
- 1330 Views
-
243 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Tracking progress in Sustainable Development Goals (especially Goal 2, Goal 17) substantiates the classification of stakeholders information requests in different sectors of the economy, as well as development of algorithms for selecting the most priority and relevant requests in the context of stakeholder cross-sector partnership. Capital concept and multi-stakeholder approach were recognized as the most appropriate for solving these tasks. This research of existing categories and groups of stakeholders in the real (food production) sector describes the proposed methodology for classifying their information requests and algorithm for their prioritization in relation to a certain type of capital, sustainability dimensions and material topics for stakeholders, SDG, targets, Global Reporting Initiative indicators. The developed methodology is universal both from the point of view of the investigated sectors, the number of alternative stakeholders requests, and the number of experts, as well as from the considerable world experience in prioritizing these requests.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q01, Q16, O13, L66, M14, M40
-
References37
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. GRI reporting of food and beverage products on CSER mechanism and SDG’s progress in world in the period 2000–2017, reports
- Figure 2. External and internal stakeholders engagement in SDG’ progress in the period 2016–2017 in 46 Ukrainian companies, person
-
- Table 1. Key stakeholder groups in accordance with the concept of capital and multi-stakeholder approach
- Table 2. Classification of stakeholders’ information requests relevant to SDG, their targets and indicators economy (based on the example of food production sector)
- Table 3. Categories of stakeholders and their information requests by the MHP company
- Table 4. Information requests of MHP stakeholders, adjusted for the sustainability context
- Table 5. Interpretation of ranked and prioritized stakeholder information requests in the food production sector
- Table 6. Interpretation of the ranking of information requests of the MHP in 2016
-
- AccountAbility (2015). AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard 2015.
- Ali, S., Hussain, T., Zhang, G., Nurunnabi, M., & Li, B. (2018) The implementation of sustainable development goals in “BRICS” countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7), 2513.
- Anzilago, M., Panhoca, L., Bezerra, C. A., Beuren, I. M., & Kassai, J. R. (2018). Values or hypocrisy: the global reporting initiative mapping in agricultural cooperatives in Paraná, Brazil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(8).
- Astarta (2016). Report on the progress 2016. Astarta-Kyiv.
- СSR Case Contest (2018). Цілі сталого розвитку: внесок бізнесу [Tsili staloho rozvytku]. СSR Case Contest Results in 2016-2017. Centre “CSR Development”.
- Czyżewski, A., & Smędzik- Ambroży, K. (2015) Specialization and diversification of agricultural production in the light of sustainable development. Journal of International Studies, 8(2), 63-73.
- Ernst & Young, GreenBiz Group (2013). Six Growing Trends in Corporate Sustainability.
- Freeman, R. (1984). Edward Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Boston. Pitman.
- Friedman, A., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Stud¬ies, 39(1), 1-21.
- Garvare, R., & Johansson, P. (2010). Management for sustainability – A stakeholder theory. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(7), 737-744.
- Gleckman, Н. (2016). Multi-stakeholder governance: a corporate push for a new form of global governance.
- Global Reporting Initiative (2013a). G3.1 Guidelines.
- Global Reporting Initiative (2013b). Sustainability Topics for Sectors: What do stakeholders want to know?
- Global Reporting Initiative (2014). Top 10 GRI Sustainability Aspects for the Agriculture Sector.
- Global Reporting Initiative (2018). GRI Standards.
- Gonzalez, R. A. (2017). Going back to go forwards? From multi-stakeholder cooperatives to Open Cooperatives in food and farming. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 278- 290.
- Govindan, K. (2018). Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 419-431.
- Hemmati et. al. (2002). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: beyond deadlock and conflict in Jan McHarry Paperback. Routledge.
- International Integrated Reporting Council (2012). Towards Integrated Reporting. Communicating Value in the 21st Century.
- ISO 26000 – Social responsibility (n.d.).
- Karwat-Woźniak, B. (2009). Highly commercial family farms in the light of the sustainable development of agriculture and rural areas in Poland. Economy & Sociology, 2(1a).
- KPMG (2011). The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting.
- Kuribayashi, M., Hayashi, K., & Akaike, S. (2018). A proposal of a new foresight platform considering of sustainable development goals. European Journal of Futures Research, 6(1).
- Masud, M. A. K., Hossain, M. S., & Kim, J. D. (2018). Is green regulation effective or a failure: Comparative analysis between Bangladesh Bank (BB) green guidelines and global reporting initiative guideline. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(4).
- MHP (2016). MHP non-financial report.
- MHP (2017). CSR Policy of PJSC “Myronivsky Hliboproduct”.
- Monaco, F., et al. (2017). Food Production and Consumption: City Regions between Localism, Agricultural Land Displacement, and Economic Competitiveness. Sustainability, 9(1), 1-20.
- Podnar, K., & Jancic, Z. (2009). Towards a Categorization of Stakeholder Groups: An Empirical Verification of a Three‐Level Model. Journal of Marketing Communications, 12(4), 297-308.
- Post, D., & Preston, L. (2002). Redefining the Corporation: Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford Business Books.
- Rockström, J., Williams, J., Daily, G., et al. (2017). Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio, 46(1), 4-17.
- SAFA (2013). Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems guidelines. Version 3.0. FAO.
- SDD Database (2018). Sustainability disclosure database.
- SDG (2017). Sustainable Development Goals in Ukraine.
- Sen, S. K., Ongsakul, V. (2018). Clusters of sustainable development goals: A metric for grassroots implementation. Sustainability (United States), 11(3), 118-126.
- Tarquinio, L., Raucci, D., & Benedetti, R. (2018). An investigation of Global Reporting Initiative performance indicators in corporate Sustainability Reports: Greek, Italian and Spanish evidence. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(4).
- UNCTAD (2016). Enhancing the role of reporting in attaining the Sustainable Development Goals: Integration of environmental, social and governance information into company reporting: Note by the UNCTAD secretariat. Geneva, October 4-6, 2016.
- Wheeler, D., & Sillanpa, M. (1997). The stakeholder corporation: A blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value. London: Pitman.