A bibliometric analysis of research on trade remedies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.46
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #1, pp. 578-592
- 347 Views
-
79 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to explore the research landscape and identify the main research directions related to the topic of trade remedies. The research data were collected by accessing the Scopus database with 289 documents and the WoS database with 75 documents published from 1950 to 2023. After processing the data overlap, 290 documents were used as the final sample for the study. The study employed descriptive statistical analysis; bibliometric analysis was conducted using the VOSviewer 1.6.20 software. The results indicate that publications on the topic of trade remedies have been relatively scarce, but diverse research has been conducted in various countries worldwide. The period from 2007 to 2023 has seen significant development in the quantity of both articles and citations related to the topic. Additionally, the study reveals three main research directions related to the development of different aspects of trade remedies. These include research on specific measures of trade remedies (anti-dumping, countervailing measures, safeguard measures, and reactive and preventive trade defense measures), research on the use of tariffs as a tool for implementing trade remedies in the field of renewable energy, and research on resolving international trade disputes in the agricultural sector.
Acknowledgment
This collaborative research involves scholars from the University of Law – Hue University and Duy Tan University. The authors extend their gratitude to both institutions for their support and assistance in facilitating the publication of this research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, M54, D23, L20
-
References45
-
Tables4
-
Figures8
-
- Figure 1. Procedure for conducting research
- Figure 2. Statistics on the number of articles and citations on the topic trade remedies
- Figure 3. Statistics of countries publishing articles about trade remedies
- Figure 4. Network visualization map of citations by countries
- Figure 5. Statistics by type of published documents
- Figure 6. Network visualization map of the co-citation by authors
- Figure 7. Network visualization map of co-occurrence by keywords
- Figure 8. Overlay visualization map of co-occurrence by keywords
-
- Table 1. Statistics of total number of articles and citations over the years
- Table 2. Statistics of the top 10 journal with the most publications on the topic of trade remedies
- Table 3. Statistics of documents with the highest number of co-citations
- Table 4. Statistical co-word analysis
-
- Ahn, D. (2015). Legal development of WTO trade remedy practices in East Asia. In J. Chaisse & T-y. Lin (Eds.), International Economic Law and Governance: Essays in Honour of Mitsuo Matsushita (pp. 515-533). Oxford Academic.
- Asmelash, H. (2022). The turn to safeguard measures in the solar trade war. Journal of World Trade, 56(5), 803-830.
- Barceló III, J. J. (1991). A history of GATT unfair trade remedy law – Confusion of purposes. World Economy, 14(3), 311-333.
- Bown, C. P. (2005). Trade remedies and world trade organization dispute settlement: Why are so few challenged? Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 515-555.
- Bown, C. P. (2021). The US-China trade war and Phase One agreement. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(4), 805-843.
- Bown, C. P., & Crowley, M. A. (2007). Trade deflection and trade depression. Journal of International Economics, 72(1), 176-201.
- Bradford, A., & Büthe, T. (2015). Competition policy and free trade: Antitrust provisions in PTAs. In A. Dür & M. Elsig (Eds.), Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreements (pp. 246-274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bungenberg, M., & Van Vaerenbergh, P. (2020). Countervailing measures and China’s accession protocol to the WTO. Journal of World Trade, 54(5), 749-772.
- Cannistra, D. (2023). Expanding trade remedy scope: Cross-border and public policy subsidies. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 18(10), 372-375.
- Carter, C. A., & Gunning-Trant, C. (2010). U.S. trade remedy law and agriculture: Trade diversion and investigation effects. Canadian Journal of Economics, 43(1), 97-126.
- Chung, J. W. (1998). Effects of U.S. trade remedy law enforcement under uncertainty: The case of steel. Southern Economic Journal, 65(1), 151-159.
- Ehlermann, C. D., & Lockhart, N. (2004). Standard of review in WTO law. Journal of International Economic Law, 7(3), 491-521.
- Espa, I. (2019). New features of green industrial policy and the limits of WTO rules: What options for the twenty-first century? Journal of World Trade, 53(6), 979-1000.
- Fruscione, A. (2021). The free trade agreement between the European Union and Vietnam. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 16(1), 39-42.
- Gagné, G. (2000). North American free trade, Canada, and US trade remedies: An assessment after ten years. The World Economy, 23(1), 77-91.
- Gathii, J. T. (2011). African regional trade agreements as legal regimes. Cambridge University Press.
- Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193.
- Grimmett, J. J. (2009). Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization (WTO): An overview. Congressional Research Service.
- Hughes, L., & Meckling, J. (2017). The politics of renewable energy trade: The US-China solar dispute. Energy Policy, 105, 256-262.
- Kazeki, J., & Miwata, Y. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for antidumping and countervailing duty measures in Japan and the world. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 17(11/12), 464-467.
- Lambert, W. J., & Mcdaniel, P. (2013). Trade remedies: Antidumping and countervailing duty laws and evasion management. Nova Science Pub Incorporated.
- Leung, X. Y., Sun, J., & Bai, B. (2017). Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, 35-45.
- Martin Rodriguez, P. M. (2007). Safeguards in the World Trade Organization ten years after: A dissociated state of the law? Journal of World Trade, 41(1), 159-190.
- Martin, A., & Vergote, W. (2008). On the role of retaliation in trade agreements. Journal of International Economics, 76(1), 61-77.
- Martin, L., Amanor-Boadu, V., & Stirling, F. (1998). Countervailing and antidumping actions: An evaluation of Canada’s experience with the United States. American Review of Canadian Studies, 28(3), 315-334.
- Meilke, K. D., & Sarker, R. (1997). Four case studies of agri-food CVDs and a proposal for reforming national administered protection agencies. Agricultural Economics, 17(2-3), 147-164.
- Morales-Moreno, I. (2008). Managing the challenges of WTO participation: Case study 28 Mexico’s agricultural trade policies: International commitments and domestic pressure. Análisis Económico, 23(53), 315-328.
- Nakagawa, J. (2007). No more negotiated deals?: Settlement of trade and investment disputes in East Asia. Journal of International Economic Law, 10(4), 837-867.
- Pattnaik, D., Kumar, S., & Vashishtha, A. (2020). Research on trade credit – A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 12(4), 367-390.
- Phan Tan, L., & Wright, L. T. (rev. ed.). (2021). Mapping the social entrepreneurship research: Bibliographic coupling, co-citation and co-word analyses. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1896885.
- Price, D. D. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5), 292-306.
- Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348.
- Puccio, L., & Erbahar, A. (2016). Circumvention of anti-dumping: A law and economics analysis of proportionality in EU rules. Journal of World Trade, 50(3), 391-416.
- Qureshi Asif, H. (2006). Interpreting WTO agreement: Problems and perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
- Savel’ev, O., & Khetagurova, Z. (2016). Anti-dumping measures against Russian exporters: Opportunities for removing. Mirovaya Ekonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 60(11), 25-34.
- Skogstad, G. (1988). The application of Canadian and U.S. trade remedy laws: Irreconcilable expectations? Canadian Public Administration, 31(4), 539-565.
- Stewart, T. P., Dwyer, A. S., Gantz, D. A., & Prusa, T. J. (2009). Antidumping: Overview of the agreement. In K. W. Bagwell, G. A. Bermann, & P. C. Mavroidis (Eds.), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade (pp. 197-263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Tian, X., Geng, Y., Sarkis, J., & Zhong, S. (2018). Trends and features of embodied flows associated with international trade based on bibliometric analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 131, 148-157.
- Van Vaerenbergh, P. (2023). WTO rules for greening trade remedies. In Greening Trade Remedies. European Yearbook of International Economic Law (pp. 25-48). Springer.
- Viet, L. T., & Thanh, H. P. (2023). Mediating effects of risk perception and management attitude toward the intention to implement trade remedies: A case study in Vietnam. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(4), 25-37.
- Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635.
- Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
- Wang, H., Wang, J., & Feng, Z. (2018). The economic effects of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy policies among China, the US and the EU: The photovoltaic industry. The Singapore Economic Review, 63(3), 513-534.
- Wu, M., & Salzman, J. (2013). The next generation of trade and environment conflicts: The rise of green industrial policy. Northwestern University Law Review, 108(2).
- Young, L. M., Wainio, J., & Meilke, K. (2003). Trade remedy actions in NAFTA: Agriculture and agri-food industries. World Economy, 26(7), 1041-1065.