Relationships between tax burden, incomes, and poverty in rural areas of Kazakhstan: Regional evidence
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.15(3).2026.01
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2026, Issue #3, pp. 1-13
- 9 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between tax burden, income, and the level of poverty in rural areas of Kazakhstan. Panel regional data are analyzed for the period 2010–2024, obtained from the Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan and the State Revenue Committee. The methodological framework includes regression analysis and econometric modeling. Five models were constructed showing that the growth of the gross regional product has a positive association with the incomes of the rural population (β = 0.927, p < 0.001). On the contrary, the relationship with the tax burden is statistically insignificant (β = 0.001). The study showed that before the 2018 tax reform, the fictitious indicator was β = –0.014; after that, β = 0.251, indicating a structural shift in household incomes of about 25–29%. The regional resource-based model shows that in non-oil regions, the tax burden is positive (β = 0.014), whereas in oil regions, it is statistically significant but negative (–0.021). The results suggest that higher GRP levels are not statistically associated with corresponding improvements in rural income indicators and poverty rates. In these cases, it is necessary to undertake comprehensive actions to improve the social well-being of the rural population, including strengthening the institutional environment, promoting regional economic development, and ensuring equitable distribution of benefits from economic growth.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H20, I32, R11
-
References54
-
Tables5
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Interregional differences in income and depth of poverty in rural areas of Kazakhstan (regions = 14, year = 2024)
- Figure 2. Dynamics of the tax burden for 2010–2024
-
- Table 1. Main variables of econometric analysis
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics (n = 210, 14 regions, 2010–2024)
- Table 3. Diagnostic test results
- Table 4. Regional differences in income, tax burden, poverty, and estimated fixed effects
- Table 5. Results of panel regression with fixed effects
-
- Abdulla, K. (2021). Regional convergence and structural transformation in a resource-dependent country. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 548-557.
- Adekunle, A. O. (2025). The relationship between tax revenue, economic growth, and trade openness in developing countries. Reviews of Management Sciences, 7(2), 23-37.
- Adilet. (2017). On the enactment of the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Taxes and Other Mandatory Payments to the Budget" (Tax Code), the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated December 25, 2017, No. 121-VI SAM. (In Russian).
- Adilet. (2021). Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated October 12, 2021, No. 729 on the approval of the national project "Strong Regions – A driver of the country's development". (In Russian).
- Afida, C. N., & Widodo, C. (2023). The location-based tax incentives in Indonesia: Special economic zones. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia, 7(2), 11-17.
- Afonso, A., & Jalles, J. T. (2016). Economic performance, government size, and institutional quality. Empirica, 43, 83-109.
- Alhamdany, S. N., Alhamdany, M. N., Mohammed, A. Q., & Alhamdany, S. N. (2025). The impact of fiscal policy on economic and social development in Iraq. Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics, 22, 788-803.
- Arellano, M. (1987). Computing robust standard errors for within-group estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49(4), 431-434.
- Arnold, J. M. (2008). Do tax structures affect aggregate economic growth? Empirical evidence from a panel of OECD countries (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 643). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Auerbach, A. J., & Hassett, K. A. (1992). Tax policy and business fixed investment in the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 47(2), 141-170.
- Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97-111.
- Bozatlı, O., & Albayrak, M. (2026). Corporate tax and economic growth: A Fourier-based analysis in the context of Türkiye. Uluslararası Sosyal Siyasal ve Mali Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 108-118.
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNS). (2024a). Statistics of standard of living.
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNS). (2024b). Expenses and incomes of the population.
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNS). (2024c). GRP statistics.
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (BNS). (2024d). Employment and unemployment.
- Buss, T. F. (2001). The effect of state tax incentives on economic growth and firm location decisions: An overview of the literature. Economic Development Quarterly, 15, 105-90.
- Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner's guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317-372.
- Chaisse, J., & Ji, X. (2020). The pervasive problem of special economic zones for international economic law: Tax, investment, and trade issues. World Trade Review, 19, 567-588.
- El Husseiny, I. A. (2023). The relative effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policies in promoting Egypt’s output growth: An empirical investigation using an ARDL approach. Journal of Economic Structures, 12, Article 4.
- Gnangnon, S. K., & Brun, J. (2019). Trade openness, tax reform and tax revenue in developing countries. The World Economy, 42(12), 3515-3536.
- Götze, R., & Rothgang, H. (2014). Fiscal and social policy: Financing long-term care in Germany. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Griffith, R. (2022). Obesity, poverty and public policy. The Economic Journal, 132(644), 1235-1258.
- Hart, N. A. (2005). The role and effectiveness of fiscal policy. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 16(1), 17-41.
- Hicks, M. J., & LaFaive, M. D. (2011). The influence of targeted economic development tax incentives on county economic growth: Evidence from Michigan’s MEGA credits. Economic Development Quarterly, 25(2), 193-205.
- Howie, P., & Atakhanova, Z. (2014). Resource boom and inequality: Kazakhstan as a case study. Resources Policy, 39(1), 71-79.
- Hussen, M. S. (2020). Institutional quality and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A panel data approach. Journal of Economics and Development, 25(4), 332-348.
- Kalaš, B., Mirović, V., & Andrašić, J. (2017). Estimating the impact of taxes on the economic growth in the United States. Economic Themes, 55(4), 481-499.
- Kangalakova, D. M., & Rakhmetova, D. (2021). Structural features of the intellectual potential of the regions and its impact on the development of the country. Economics: The Strategy and Practice, 16(3), 22-34. (In Kazakh).
- Khajieva, G., & Aida, O. (2020). Problems of socio-economic development of Kazakhstan’s regions in the context of adaptation to the sustainable development. The Economy: Strategy and Practice, 2(15), 167-178. (In Russian).
- Kirkby, R., Vu, H. N., & Yao, Y. (2026). Macroeconomic effects of income and consumption tax reforms in New Zealand. Journal of Macroeconomics, 88, Article 103757.
- Kostarakos, I., & Varthalitis, P. (2024). Growth effects of fiscal policy: An application of the unobserved common factor model. Oxford Economic Papers, 77(3), 675-702.
- Kutasi, G., & Marton, Á. (2024). The optimal tax structure from GDP-growth perspective. Revista Finanzas y Política Económica, 16(1), 121-143.
- Lee, Y., & Gordon, R.H. (2005). Tax structure and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 1027-1043.
- Lerche, A. (2025). Direct and indirect effects of investment tax incentives. American Economic Review, 115(8), 2781-2818.
- Moyo, S. (2005). Land policy, poverty reduction and public action in Zimbabwe. In A.H. Akram-Lodhi, S.M. Borras Jr., & C. Kay (Eds.), Land, Poverty and Livelihoods in an Era of Globalization: Perspectives from Developing and Transition Countries (1st ed.). Routledge.
- Mukayev, A., Satpayeva, Z. T., Kangalakova, D. M., Doskeyeva, G. Z., & de Matos Pedro, E. (2023). Assessment of the population’s quality of life in Kazakhstan during COVID-19: The effectiveness of public policy. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 69-83.
- Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: a study in public economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Ohrn, E. (2019). The effect of tax incentives on U.S. manufacturing: Evidence from state accelerated depreciation policies. Journal of Public Economics, 180, Article 104084.
- Özer, M., & Karagöl, V. (2018). Relative effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policies on output growth in Turkey: An ARDL bounds test approach. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(3), 391-409.
- Pattayat, D. S., Parida, J. K., & Awasthi, I. C. (2022). Reducing rural poverty through non-farm job creation in India. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 65, 137-160.
- Pei, P., Zhang, S., & Zhou, G. (2024). Digital inclusive finance, spatial spillover effects and relative rural poverty alleviation: Evidence from China. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 17, 1129-1160.
- Rachevski, I., & Shami, L. (2024). Twice as effective: Business environment, SME owners’ satisfaction, and local government revenue performance. Local Government Studies, 51, 524-546.
- Rodríguez-Pose, A., Bartalucci, F., & Rau, G. (2025). One Kazakhstan, multiple nations: On a growing regional divide amidst economic dynamism. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 9, 629-651.
- Schumpeter, J. A., & Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 31(196), 791-795.
- Sermagambet, U., Satpayeva, Z. T., Smagulova, G. S., Urban, W., & Yessenzhigitova, R. (2022). Socio-economic inequality in Kazakhstani regions: Assessment and impact on regional development management. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(3), 487-500.
- Smeeding, T. (2005). Public policy, economic inequality, and poverty: The United States in comparative perspective. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 955-983.
- State Revenue Committee of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2024). Dynamics of tax burden and payments to the state budget.
- Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1441-1478.
- Tarawalie, A. B., & Kargbo, N. (2020). Efficacy of fiscal and monetary policy in Sierra Leone: An ARDL bound testing approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 10(3), 217-224.
- Tolosa-Iscala, P. A., Niño-Mejías, X. I., Contreras-Durán, M. A., & Eslava-Zapata, R. (2025). Income tax and employment: Benefits of the special economic and social zone regime. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología – Serie de Conferencias, 4(637), 1-12.
- World Bank. (2024). Kazakhstan poverty and equity assessment 2024. World Bank Group.
- Xia, Y. D., Hu, W., & Su, Z. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty, social financing scale and local fiscal sustainability: Evidence from local governments in China. Sustainability, 14(12), Article 7343.


