The effect of government budget on tax compliance: An empirical mediation analysis

  • 4 Views
  • 0 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of government budget on tax compliance, with tax fairness and public trust as mediating variables. This study used a sample size of 200 respondents, based on the minimum sample size criteria for partial least squares (PLS-SEM), inverse square root, and gamma-exponential methods. To strengthen the robustness of results, a bootstrapping method with a subsample of 5,000 was used in hypothesis testing. The survey was conducted with 200 individual taxpayers. The results show that the government budget has a positive effect on tax compliance with a coefficient of 0.233. Tax fairness has a positive effect on tax compliance, with a coefficient of 0.573. The results show that government budget expenditure positively affects tax fairness and has a positive indirect effect on tax compliance through tax fairness at the 10% level. The results also show that the relationship between budget expenditure and public trust is negative and statistically significant (β = –0.170, p = 0.036). Government budget positively affects tax fairness and has a positive indirect effect on tax compliance through tax fairness, marginally significant at the 10% level. The IPMA analysis results indicate that tax fairness has the highest importance and performance, while the government budget ranks the lowest. The practical value of this research is that the government must implement a fair taxation system, as it is the primary determinant of tax compliance.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Structural model
    • Figure 2. Importance–performance map analysis (IPMA)
    • Table 1. Reliability and validity
    • Table 2. Heterotrait-monotrait analysis
    • Table 3. Fornell-Larcker criterion
    • Table 4. Path coefficients and p-values
    • Table 5. Analysis of the importance–performance matrix (IPMA)
    • Conceptualization
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Agung Juliarto
    • Data curation
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Raviano Althaf Rasyidava
    • Formal Analysis
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Mutiara Tresna Parasetya
    • Funding acquisition
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Mutiara Tresna Parasetya
    • Investigation
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Raviano Althaf Rasyidava
    • Methodology
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Agung Juliarto
    • Project administration
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Mutiara Tresna Parasetya
    • Resources
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Raviano Althaf Rasyidava
    • Software
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Mutiara Tresna Parasetya
    • Supervision
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Mutiara Tresna Parasetya
    • Validation
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Raviano Althaf Rasyidava
    • Visualization
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Raviano Althaf Rasyidava, Mutiara Tresna Parasetya
    • Writing – original draft
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Raviano Althaf Rasyidava, Mutiara Tresna Parasetya, Agung Juliarto
    • Writing – review & editing
      Nur Cahyonowati, Dwi Ratmono, Raviano Althaf Rasyidava, Mutiara Tresna Parasetya, Agung Juliarto