Investigating the effects of public expenditure structure and fiscal discipline on SDGs in EU countries: An empirical analysis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.15(3).2026.06
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2026, Issue #3, pp. 79–92
- 7 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Public finance management has become increasingly important for achieving Sustainable Development Goals in European Union countries, where fiscal constraints, debt sustainability pressures, and development-oriented investment needs coexist. This study examines the effects of public expenditure structure and fiscal discipline on Sustainable Development Goals performance in EU countries. The analysis uses annual panel data for EU countries over the period 2007–2023. The SDG performance index is constructed from SDG 8, SDG 9, SDG 10, SDG 11, SDG 16, and SDG 17 indicators, while the public expenditure structure index is constructed from indicators reflecting collective government spending, total government expenditure, and the government investment share. Difference GMM and System GMM estimations are applied, and Driscoll–Kraay and KRLS estimators are used for robustness checks. The results show that public expenditure structure has a negative and statistically significant effect on SDG performance, with coefficients of –0.284 in the Difference GMM model and –0.048 in the System GMM model. Fiscal discipline has a positive and statistically significant effect, with coefficients of 0.353 and 0.315, respectively. Robustness estimations also support the negative effect of public expenditure structure and the positive effect of fiscal discipline. However, the Driscoll–Kraay coefficient of fiscal discipline is statistically significant only at the 10% level. These findings suggest that fiscal discipline may support SDG performance through macro-fiscal stability, whereas the scale and composition of public expenditure alone may be insufficient unless they are aligned with SDG-oriented priorities.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H61, H50, Q01, C33
-
References64
-
Tables7
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research model of the study
-
- Table 1. Variables used in the study
- Table 2. PCA data
- Table 3. Statistical values of variables
- Table 4. Correlation analysis results
- Table 5. GMM analysis results
- Table 6. Diagnostic test results
- Table 7. Robust estimator results
-
- Afonso, A., & Aubyn, M. St. (2005). Non-parametric approaches to education and health efficiency in OECD countries. Journal of Applied Economics, 8(2), 227-246.
- Afonso, A., Alves, J., Bazah, N., & Sánchez-Fuentes, A. J. (2025). Functional public sector spending and SDGs: An efficiency map for the EU countries (CESifo Working Paper No. 12036). CESifo GmbH.
- Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2005). Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice, 123(3), 321-347.
- Akdemir, T., & İlgün, M. F. (2011). Kamu borçlanması sınırlamalarının kamu harcamalarının bileşimi üzerine etkileri: Avrupa Birliği ülkelerine yönelik ampirik bir değerlendirme [The effects of public debt constraint on public expenditure composition: An empirical evaluation for the European Union countries]. Maliye Dergisi, 160, 177-203. (In Turkish).
- Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1995). Fiscal expansions and fiscal adjustments in OECD countries. Economic Policy, 10(21), 205-248.
- Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2019). Prioritising SDG targets: Assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages. Sustainability Science, 14(2), 421-438.
- Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
- Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
- Awan, A., Sadiq, M., Hassan, S. T., Khan, I., & Khan, N. H. (2022). Combined nonlinear effects of urbanization and economic growth on CO2 emissions in Malaysia. An application of QARDL and KRLS. Urban Climate, 46, Article 101342.
- Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
- Baret, K. (2023). Fiscal rules’compliance and social welfare. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 150, 25-66.
- Bisiriyu, S. O., & Dhar, B. K. (2025). Glodebtization: Implications for sustainable development goals. Research in Globalization, 11, Article 100317.
- Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
- Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (2000). GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321-340.
- Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68-90.
- Cristóbal, J., Ehrenstein, M., Domínguez-Ramos, A., Galán-Martín, Á., Pozo, C., Margallo, M., Aldaco, R., Jiménez, L., Irabien, A., & Guillén-Gosálbez, G. (2021). Unraveling the links between public spending and Sustainable Development Goals: Insights from data envelopment analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 786, Article 147459.
- Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Bisogno, M. (2022). Budget transparency and financial sustainability. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(6), 210-234.
- Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G.A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32-44.
- da Cruz, N. F., Tavares, A. F., Marques, R. C., Jorge, S., & de Sousa, L. (2016). Measuring local government transparency. Public Management Review, 18(6), 866-893.
- Devarajan, S., Swaroop, V., & Zou, H. F. (1996). The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37(2), 313-344.
- Dutu, R., & Sicari, P. (2016). Public spending efficiency in the OECD: Benchmarking health care, education and general administration (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1278). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Elevli, Ö., & Akiş, E. (2025). Birleşmiş Milletler sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları çerçevesinde AB ve Türkiye’nin mukayeseli analizi [A comparative analysis of the EU and Turkey within the framework of the United Nations sustainable development goals]. Finans Ekonomi Ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi – Journal of Finance, Economics and Social Research, 10(1), 1-18. (In Turkish).
- Erdal, E. (2023). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmada 2030 gündeminin kamu istihdam hizmetleri açısından ülke örnekleriyle incelenmesi [An examination of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development in terms of public employment services with country examples] (Thesis). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Labour and Social Security, Turkish Employment Agency General Directorate, Ankara. (In Turkish).
- European Commission (EC). (2023, May 25). Eurostat report shows EU’s progress on Sustainable Development Goals.
- European Commission (EC). (2024, July 2). Report on the state of the Digital Decade 2024. European Commission.
- European Fiscal Board. (2024, October 2). 2024 annual report of the European Fiscal Board. European Commission.
- Eurostat. (2024, March 5). General government expenditure by function in 2022. Eurostat News.
- Eyraud, L., Debrun, X., Hodge, A., Lledó, V., & Pattillo, C. (2018). Second-generation fiscal rules: Balancing simplicity, flexibility, and enforceability (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. SDN/18/04). Internatıonal Monetary Fund.
- Gaspar, V., Amaglobeli, D., Garcia-Escribano, M., Prady, D., & Soto, M. (2019). Fiscal policy and development: Human, social, and physical investments for the SDGs (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. SDN/19/03). Internatıonal Monetary Fund.
- González-Pier, E., Barraza-Lloréns, M., Beyeler, N., Jamison, D., Knaul, F., Lozano, R., Yamey, G., & Sepúlveda, J. (2016). Mexico’s path towards the Sustainable Development Goal for health: An assessment of the feasibility of reducing premature mortality by 40% by 2030. The Lancet Global Health, 4(10), e714-e725.
- Guillamón, M. D., Ríos, A. M., & Benito, B. (2025). Understanding the factors influencing SDG achievement across nations: A comprehensive study. Sustainable Development, 33(4), 5336-5350.
- Gupta, S., & Verhoeven, M. (2001). The efficiency of government expenditure: Experiences from Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23(4), 433-467.
- Haberal, Z., & Işık, A. (2024). Birleşmiş Milletler sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları çerçevesinde Türkiye’deki büyükşehir belediyelerinin faaliyetlerinin değerlendirilmesi [An evaluation of the activities of metropolitan municipalities in Turkey within the framework of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals]. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(3), 1193-1222. (In Turkish).
- Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573.
- Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(4), 1029-1054.
- Herrera, S., & Pang, G. (2005). Efficiency of public spending in developing countries: an efficiency frontier approach (Working Papers No.WPS3645). World Bank Publications.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). Fiscal monitor: Putting a lid on public debt. IMF.
- Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J. (1999). Data clustering: A review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 31(3), 264-323.
- Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. Springer-Verlag, NewYork.
- Joumard, I., André, C., & Nicq, C. (2010). Health care systems: Efficiency and institutions (OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 769). OECD Publishing.
- Källqvist, T. (2021). The sustainable development goals in the EU budget. Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs, Directorate-General for Internal Policies.
- Kroll, C., Warchold, A., & Pradhan, P. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 5, Article 140.
- Lnenicka, M., Nikiforova, A., Luterek, M., Milic, P., Rudmark, D., Neumaier, S., Santoro, C., Casiano Flores, C., Janssen, M., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2024). Identifying patterns and recommendations of and for sustainable open data initiatives: A benchmarking-driven analysis of open government data initiatives among European countries. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), Article 101898.
- Lobonț, O.-R., Șelaru, D.-A., Criste, C., Crăciun, A. F., Vătavu, S., & Ștefea, P. M. (2025). The sustainability dilemma: Fiscal rules, institutional quality, and economic outcomes in the EU. Systems, 13(12), Article 1055.
- Maddala, G. S. (1988). Introduction to econometrics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
- Malak, M., & Demir, I. C. (2023). Human development by fiscal instrument dimension: Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Ekonomska Misao i Praksa.
- Malinvaud, E. (1997). Statistical methods in econometrics (2nd ed.). North-Holland, Amsterdam.
- Marti, L., & Cervelló-Royo, R. (2023). Disparities in sustainable development goals compliance and their association with country risk. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 3038-3051.
- McGowan, P. J., Stewart, G. B., Long, G., & Grainger, M. J. (2019). An imperfect vision of indivisibility in the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(1), 43-45.
- Mungiu-Pippidi, A., & Dadašov, R. (2016). Measuring control of corruption by a new index of public integrity. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(3), 415-438.
- Negri, C., & Dincă, G. (2023). Public sector’s efficiency as a reflection of governance quality, a European Union study. Plos One, 18(9), Article e0291048.
- Nerini, F. F., Sovacool, B., Hughes, N., Cozzi, L., Cosgrave, E., Howells, M., Tavoni, M., Tomei, J., Zerriffi, H., & Milligan, B. (2019). Connecting climate action with other Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(8), 674-680.
- Ocolișanu, A., Dobrotă, G., & Dobrotă, D. (2022). The effects of public investment on sustainable economic growth: Empirical evidence from emerging countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Sustainability, 14(14), 8721.
- OECD. (2023). Government at a glance 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Porciello, J., Ivanina, M., Islam, M., Einarson, S., & Hirsh, H. (2020). Accelerating evidence-informed decision-making for the Sustainable Development Goals using machine learning. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(10), 559-565.
- Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J.P. (2017). A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future, 5, 1169-1179.
- Schick, A. (1998). A contemporary approach to public expenditure management. World Bank.
- Sobczak, E., Bartniczak, B., & Raszkowski, A. (2021). Implementation of the no poverty sustainable development goal (SDG) in Visegrad Group (V4). Sustainability, 13(3), Article 1030.
- Sultana, M., & Rahman, M. H. (2024). Investigating the impact of GDP, energy mix, energy intensity, and the service sector on environmental pollution in MENA countries: An application of Driscoll–Kraay standard error approach. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 101087.
- Trabelsi, N., & Boujelbene, Y. (2024). Public sector efficiency and economic growth in developing countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 596-615.
- Truger, A. (2016). The golden rule of public investment: A necessary and sufficient reform of the EU fiscal framework? (IMK Working Paper No. 168). IMK Working Paper.
- United Nations. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goals.
- World Bank. (n.d). Worldwide Governance Indicators. World Bank.
- Yılmaz, H., & Yücel, T. (2022). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın sağlanmasında uluslararası çalışmalar ve eleştirileri [International studies and critiques on achieving sustainable development]. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi – International Academy of Management Journal, 5(3), 691-702. (In Turkish).


